Att 14 PP Survey.pdf
PDF 10 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR SPAIN Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SP4520-10-R-0001
About this file
Attachment 14
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Cover Letter.doc | DOC document | |
| Att 13 FGS Spain 2008.PDF | ||
| Att 11b Moron AB - Spill Plan.pdf | ||
| Bid Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Att 11a ROTA - Spill Plan.pdf | ||
| Att 1 DD1155.pdf | ||
| Att 4b Transporter Profile Sheet.pdf | ||
| Att 8 Monthly and Annual Status Report.pdf | ||
| Att 7 RESERVED.pdf | ||
| Att 9 Special Equipment.pdf | ||
| Att 6 PP History.pdf | ||
| Spain RFP SP4520-10-R-0001_Latest 16 Dec 09.pdf | ||
| Att 5 HWPS.pdf | ||
| Att 2 1348-1A.pdf | ||
| Att 15 APLs.pdf | ||
| Att 3 1683E.pdf | ||
| Att 4a Facility Profile Sheet.pdf | ||
| Att 10 Sample Label.pdf | ||
| Att 12 Country Clearance Insurance.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SP4520-10-R-0001, SPAIN 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT 14
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
QUESTIONNAIRE
OFFEROR NAME:____________________________________________________
REEFERENCE COMPANY _____________________________________________
CONTRACT (S)#_________________________________ VALUE: $____________
_________________________________ VALUE: $____________
Quality of Product/Service
1. What type of waste was removed/disposed?
2. About how much waste was removed during a twelve month period?
3. How often were they required to remove this waste (daily/weekly/monthly, etc?)
4. Were there performance deficiencies? If yes, were they corrected, and if so, what action did the contractor take to correct these deficiencies?
Please answer the following questions regarding the performance of _________________ by circling the appropriate number with 5 being the highest rating or EXCEPTIONAL, 4 being VERY GOOD, 3 being SATISFACTORY, 2 being MARGINAL and 1 being the lowest rating of UNSATISFACTORY:
5. How well has the contractor demonstrated his ability to comply with the basic requirements of your contract?
5 4 3 2 1
6. Is the contractor timely in submitting quality/error free documents?
5 4 3 2 1
Key Personnel
7. How successful has the contractor demonstrated his ability to manage subcontractors?
5 4 3 2 1
8. Did the contractor provide sufficient personnel to perform the work?
5 4 3 2 1
9. Did the contractor have the right equipment to perform the work?
SP4520-10-R-0001, SPAIN 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 14
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
QUESTIONNAIRE
OFFEROR NAME:____________________________________________________
REEFERENCE COMPANY _____________________________________________
Schedule/Timeliness
10. Did the contractor always perform in a timely manner?
5 4 3 2 1
Business Relations
11. Did the contractor exhibit cooperative behavior?
5 4 3 2 1
12. Did the contractor exhibit a business-like concern for your needs/interest?
5 4 3 2 1
13. Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?
5 4 3 2 1
Basel Notifications
14. When required, did the contractor meet all requirements for waste import, export and transboundary movements, e.g. Basel notifications and local country environmental laws and regulations?
5 4 3 2 1
General
15. Would you award another contract to this company?
Name _______________________________ Company ________________________________
Signature_____________________________ Date ___________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .