Amendment 0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0004 10/29/2025

6. ISSUED BY CODE SP3300 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

DLA DISTRIBUTION

ACQUISITION OPERATIONS (J7)

430 MIFFLIN AVE, SUITE 3102A

NEW CUMBERLAND, PA 17070-5008

POC: Julie Leasure Julie.kemper2@dla.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and Zip Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

X

SP3300-25-R-5002

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

October 7, 2025

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

CODE FACILITY CODE 10B. DATED

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

_X_ The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copy of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (Such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor__ _is not, _X_ is required to sign this document and return _1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See Continuation Pages.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15a. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 15a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY_________________________________________ BY_________________________________________

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.24 mailto:Julie.kemper2@dla.mil

SP3300-25-R-5002

Amendment 0004

1. The purpose of this amendment is to answer submitted offeror questions and revise solicitation documents.

2. Offeror submitted questions received through October 28, 2025, and the Government’s responses follow on pages 3 – 12 of this amendment.

3. A revised version of the solicitation is being posted with this amendment.

4. Addenda to Attachments 20 and 25 are included to add Vertical Lift Modules to the list of Government Furnished Equipment (Attachment 20) and Preventative Maintenance Schedule (Attachment 25).

5. The following Attachments are being revised and posted with this amendment:

Solicitation SP3300-25-R-5002 Attachment 1 – Performance Work Statement Attachment 2 – Site Specific Work Statement Attachment 7 – Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template Attachment 11 – Contract Data Requirement List Addendum to Attachment 20 - TE 3.5.1 VLM Equipment Listing Addendum to Attachment 25 - TE 4.5.1 Task List VLM PM Schedule Attachment 27 – TE 5.0 Acceptable Performance Levels

6. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Questions shall be submitted by electronic mail to the Acquisition Specialist, Julie Leasure via email at julie.kemper2@dla.mil with the appropriate subject: SP3300-25-R-5002 Solicitation Question; and must be received by 2:00 P.M. Eastern Local Time on November 20, 2025. Questions received after this date and time may not receive a response. No questions may be submitted during the Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit. Answers to questions will be posted to the PIEE and SAM.Gov websites via an amendment to the solicitation.

Question RFP Page OR Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response

The solicitation package includes a second Attachment 1, “Attachment_1___Additional_Information_Form” that is not mentioned in the RFP nor PWS. Please provide information on the requirements of this Att 1, if any.

Attachment 1 Additional Info This form was uploaded in error. Please disregard.

The solicitation package includes a second Attachment 2, “Attachment_2___Past_Performance_Information_Form” that is not mentioned in the RFP nor PWS, but has similar information requests as the Past Performance Contract Data Table required in RFP Section 1 – Evaluation Factor 3: Performance Confidence Assessment. Please provide information on the requirements of this Att 2, if any.

Attachment 2; RFP pg 56 Past Performance Contract Data

This form was uploaded in error. Please disregard.

The RFP says to reference Attachment 11 – Contract Data Requirements List multiple times, but it was not included in the solicitation. Will the Government please provide Attachment 11 or direct us to the source information?

RFP pg 40 List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments (a)

Attachment 11 is the Contract Data Requirements List and the associated required reports. Amendment 0004 incorporates the list and the current version of the reports.

The RFP and PWS say Attachment 21 Technical Exhibit 3.6 is Government Office Equipment, but there’s nothing in the file except a blank table titled ‘VEHICLES’ (and the file is titled ‘Vehicles’). Is the table supposed to be blank (there is no Gov Office Equipment)?

Is this file supposed to be titled Office Equip and say Office Equipment above the table?

RFP pg 40 List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments (a)

TE 3.6 should have been labeled Government Vehicles. The TE has been revised. See questions 27 and 28.

The solicitation package included the following attachments, but they are not listed in the PWS 6.7 TE table:

• Attachment 26 TE 4.6 Contractor Equipment List

PWS pg 138 Attachments 26, 33, 34; 6.7 Technical Exhibits

The Site Specific PWS (Attachment 2) has been revised to show these Technical Exhibits.

Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response

• Attachment_33_TE_6_2N__Delivery_Schedule_Greater_1 0_miles

Attachment_34_TE_6_3N__MPC_Home_Ported_Ships

PWS 4.4.2.A cites “TE 4.4 AMHS Equipment PM Tasks” but the solicitation package did not include this file. Will the Government please provide the TE 4.4 file or direct us to the source information?

PWS 4.4.2.A pg 57 Scheduled Req

/PM

4.4.2.A discusses TE 4.4 but states (if applicable). TE 4.4 is not applicable for this solicitation.

The RFP states “Acceptable Performance Levels are contained in Technical Exhibit 5.0 (Attachment 27-APLs). Each Acceptable Performance Level is identified with a priority level.” Technical Exhibit 5.0 does not identify the priority levels (PR1, PR2, PR3). Will the Government identify the priority levels for each APL in Technical Exhibit 5.0?

RFP Page 30

Tech Exhibit 5.0

Tiered Acceptable Performance Levels

A revised Attachment 27, TE 5.0 Acceptable Performance Levels is attached.

The RFP requires us to send Attachment 35 - Past Performance Questionnaire to our contract references, but it was not included in the solicitation. Will the Government please provide Attachment 35 or direct us to the source information?

RFP pg 57 Past Performance Questionnaire

Attachment 35, Past Performance Questionnaire was inadvertently omitted. It was incorporated by Amendment 0002.

If CDRL A032 is listed as reserved PWS page 137, should we ignore the two different A032 files included in the solicitation package?

If not, what’s the difference between the files which have similar file names?

PWS pg 136 6.6 Mandatory Reports; A032.pdf

The duplicative CDRL A032 has been removed. Attachment 11 contains the correct version.

Please confirm that the following are outside of page limitations: E- File/Volume I, Covers, Index/TOCs, and Glossaries of Acronyms.

RFP pg 48 b. Page Limitations

Page limitations do not apply to E- File/Volume I, Covers, Index/TOCs, and Glossaries of Acronyms.

Under Section 4 – Defense Counterintelligence And Security Agency Facility Clearance, what will the Government accept for “verification” of our facility clearance?

RFP pg 51 Section 4 - DCSA DCSA issues Facility Clearance Letters. That is what the Government expects to be uploaded.

In Factor 3, please explain what the “TAB” references mean in this sentence, “Each contract reference shall be a separate, tabbed section of the Offeror’s past performance proposal (e.g. TAB 1 – Contract Reference 1, address sections 1-5; TAB 2 – Contract Reference 2, address sections 1-5; and TAB 3 – Contract Reference 3, address sections 1-5).”

RFP pg 56 Section 1 – Evaluation Factor 3: Performance Confidence Assessment

The reference to TABs means that each contract reference should be a distinct file containing all of the data requested. You may title them as Tab 1, Contractor X, Tab 2, Contractor Y, etc. Think of the E-Files as

Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response volumes containing different sections of the over-arching E-File.

In E-File III – Performance Confidence Assessment, it states the Offeror shall send the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment

35) to previous customers. Attachment 35 was not provided in the solicitation on PIEE. Will the USG provide Attachment 35 for Offerors to maintain compliance with the solicitation?

RFP Page 57 E-File III, Section 1, para 3

Attachment 35, Past Performance Questionnaire was inadvertently omitted. It was incorporated by Amendment 0002.

For small businesses submitting offers, what are the instructions for submitting E-File IV? The instructions are only tailored to “other than small businesses”.

57 E-File IV Small Business Proposal

Reference Page 69 of the solicitation, If your company is registered as a small business under NAICS 493110 in the System for Award Management (SAM), a SBPCD is not required and will be given a rating of “Acceptable”.

Please clarify estimated ceiling value for this solicitation as the RFP lists it as $137,272,449.92 on page 9 and $164,726,940.00 on page 27.

RFP pg 9 and pg 27 SF 1449 and IDIQ Minimum and Maximum Quantities

The maximum ceiling value for this solicitation is $137,272,449.92. Page 27 has been corrected.

CLINs 0006, 1006, 2006, 3006, and 4006 of the RFP references PWS Section 5.8 for Special Projects/Surge & Sustainment.

However, the PWS identifies Section 5.8 as Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point (TCSP) and Section 5.19 as Special Projects/Surge & Sustainment. Please confirm the RFP Schedule for accuracy.

RFP pgs 2-7; PWS pgs 128 CLINs X006 The schedule pages (2 – 7) have been revised to show the correct section of the

PWS.

Beginning on Page 42 of 81, Solicitation Provisions, the RFP contains fill-in clauses normally contained in Section K. Where does the Gov’t want offerors to include these fill-in clauses in the Vol I submission? Also, if the offeror maintains updated Reps & Certs in their SAM.gov registration, are the fill-in clauses required, or can offerors submit a copy of the current Reps & Certs maintained in SAM.gov?

RFP pgs 42-46 Solicitation Provisions

IAW FAR 52.252-1 (page 46), states in part, “The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the

Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response appropriate information with its quotation or offer.” If the provisions in question are part of your SAM.Gov representations, you may state that in lieu of including the provision with your proposal.

RFP Instructions to Offerors, Item 3 says, “The Proposals shall be submitted as five (5) separate E-Files," but the RFP also requires us to submit two (2) Excel files (Attachment_6_CLIN_X006_Labor_Rate_Table.xlsx and Attachment_8_Staffing_Matrix.xlsx). Please confirm that we should submit at least seven (7) separate E-Files.

RFP pg 48 Instructions to Offerors

Instructions to Offerors, page 59, states that Attachment 6 should be in E-File V, Price Proposal. Page 53 states that Attachment 8 should be included in E-File II, Technical Proposal. Think of the E-Files as volumes containing different sections of the over-arching E-File.

RFP Item #2 under Transition says “POAM is not included in the technical proposal page limitation” and the subsection under that, #2.c, says to “provide a Transition Plan narrative.” Please confirm that the Transition Plan narrative is therefore ‘not included in the technical proposal page limitation.”

RFP pg 55 Transition The POAM is not included in the technical proposal page limitation. The Transition Plan narrative is included in the page limitation.

PPQ instructions say the customer should complete the PPQ and return it to the Acquisition Specialist no later than the proposal due date and time. With the government shutdown and personnel potentially not available to complete this task, please provide an appropriate extension for PPQs to be completed and returned.

RFP pg 57 Evaluation 3 The PPQs are an integral part of the proposal package which must be complete on December 2, 2025. If the shut down interferes with the complete submission of proposals, the Government may consider extending the solicitation closing date.

Many of the CDRL Block Bs and Block 5s refer to documents not included in this solicitation such as Attachments J.1, J.2, J.11, and J.28. Please confirm CDRL reference accuracy.

CDRLs CDRLs – Block B and Block 5

The CDRL items have been revised to remove the incorrect attachment numbers.

Please confirm that the text under “Total Dollar Value of All Subcontracts,” which says “(Reminder: total dollars to small business plus total dollars to large business = total contract value),” is intended to include the Prime Offeror in the total, either as a SB

Att 7, pg 1 Attachment 7- Small Business

Concur that the reminder is confusing.

Attachment 7 has been revised to remove the reminder.

Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response including their self-performance or as a OTSB (LB) including their self-performed work in the LB total dollars. (Otherwise, 100% of the total contract value will show as being subcontracted.)

Subcontracting Plan

On the MPC tab in column A (Activity) there is a reference to Djibouti for MPC In-Check and MPC Delivery. However, Djibouti is not discussed in the RFP and PWSs. Will the Government clarify how this APL is applied?

Attachment 27; Tech Exhibit 5.0

MPC (Tab) Column F of the MPC Tab lists applicability to the contract. For the Djibouti APLs, this is a no.

RFP page 26 states “offerors must pay at least the direct wage and benefits identified in the attached Collective Bargaining Agreement or, if applicable, Wage Determination” – However, Attachment 8 Staffing Matrix, Instructions tab states “Only LCATs contained in an approved CBA may be utilized (excluding Exempt positions). Please confirm whether Offerors are permitted to propose SCA labor for this contract?

Attachment 8 Staffing Matrix

Attachment 8 Offerors must propose the CBA rates for the non-exempt positions discussed in the CBA.

If an offeror proposes a labor category not covered by the CBA, the Wage Determination applies.

The Government provides tables to complete as part of E-File V – Price Proposal but no Excel file template is provided. Can the Government confirm that the setup and organization of requested tables is at the offeror’s discretion, as long as the provided formats are followed?

60 2 Please create your own files using the format provided in the solicitation.

Can Offeror’s include required tables specified in RFP E-File V – Price Proposal section within RFP Attachment 6, thus creating one Excel file for submittal along with one PDF file for the written narrative?

60 2 Yes. Attachment 6 must be included in the Excel file for E-File V, Price Proposal.

Offerors may incorporate the tables into the spreadsheets for the price proposal. PDF file for the written narrative is also acceptable as part of E-File V.

The paragraph states that vehicles listed in TE 3.6 will be provided for Contractor use. When reviewing TE 3.6_Government Equipment

– Vehicles, the document is a blank spreadsheet. Can the government confirm that this spreadsheet was intentionally left blank? Does the Offeror need to address TE 4.6_Contractor

PWS pg 54 4.2.4 Vehicles, Sect A

The TE is blank because the Government does not currently provide vehicles. TE 4.6 lists vehicles that the incumbent contractor leases to fulfill delivery requirements.

Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response

Equipment List to attain the vehicle list that would otherwise be in

TE 3.6?

Are the vehicles in TE 4.6_Contractor Equipment List intended for the local delivery schedule as annotated in TE 5.6N_Local Delivery and Pickup Points and TE 6.2N_Delivery Schedule Greater 10 Miles?

--- --- Yes. See the response to Question 27.

Will the Government confirm that Tables of Contents, Glossaries, and Commitment Letters are not included in page count?

RFP p. 50 a. Organization/ Page Limits, #3.

The Government confirms that Tables of Content, Glossaries, and Commitment Letters are not included in the page count.

Can the Government confirm that items 1-10 referred to in Instructions to Offerors on p. 56 is the same list that appears as a-j in the evaluation criteria on p. 67?

RFP p. 56 & p. 67 E-File III, #2.

Evaluation Factor

The Government confirms that the items noted as 1-10 are the same as the list that appears as a – j on page 67. The solicitation has been revised to incorporate this change.

Can the Government confirm that the narrative required to accompany the Transition Plan of Actions and Milestones (POAM) is not included in the page count?

RFP p. 55 Sect 2, Transition

- 2,c

The POAM is not included in the page count.

However, the Transition Plan is included in the page count.

Regarding potential Acceptable Performance Level (APL) deductions defined under Additional Contract Administration Requirements, the requirement states that “each APL will be subject to the applicable monthly deduction.” However, per TE 27, some of the APLs are measured on an annual basis. For those APLs assessed annually, can offerors assume that potential deductions will be made on a once/year basis?

RFP p. 31; Attch 27, TE 5.0 RFP Additional Contract Admin Requirements, APL Deductions

All APLs are monitored monthly. Any deductions for those measured on an annual basis will be assessed on an annual basis.

The Past Performance Contract Data table and 3. Past Performance Questionnaire both require much the same information regarding PPQ POCs. Would the Government consider deleting the requirement for POC information in the table and leaving the

RFP p. 56 & p. 57 1. Past Performance Contract Data (Table) and 3.

Past Performance

The information requested in the table on page 56 must be submitted as noted.

Because not all past performance is covered in CPARS, the PPQ should also be utilized.

Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response requirement under 3. Past Performance Questionnaire since it requires additional information?

Questionnaire (Attachment 35)

Would the Government consider allowing offerors to submit completed CPARs in lieu of a PPQ for referenced contracts?

RFP p. 57 3. Past Performance Questionnaire

See the answer to question 33.

Will the Government allow for the use of 11x17 size paper for tables, charts, figures and graphics? If so, will you allow for each 11x17 fold-out to count as one page?

RFP p. 48 3. Proposal Preparation Requirements

No. 8 ½ /x 11 pages only.

Should Offerors submit the completed provisions of FAR 52.212-3 included in the RFP as part of Volume I?

RFP p. 70 FAR 52.212-3 IAW FAR 52.252-1 (page 46), states in part, “The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer.” If the provisions in question are part of your SAM.Gov representations, you may state that in lieu of including the provision with your proposal.

In reference to 1.3.1 Key Personnel Requirements & 1.3.2 Non-Key Personnel Requirements; the Transportation Manager (see #6 on page 14-15) is listed as requiring a SECRET level security clearance. Please identify any other positions at DLA San Diego that will require security clearances.

Attachment 1, p.12 & p. 16 6. Transportation Manager

The Transportation Manager is the only designated Key Position where a SECRET clearance is required. The Government anticipates that supervisory positions proposed that oversee the processing of classified items will have the required clearance level. Likewise any non-exempt (CBA) positions known to have access to

Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response classified supplies must have the appropriate security clearance.

APL deductions are identified for PR 1 through PR 3 on page 31.

However, in the TE 5.0 there are no corresponding PR (1-3) associated with any of the APLs, will the government issue a list of the PR associated with each APL?

RFP p. 31 5. Priority associated with each APL (PR1-

PR3)

Attachment 27, TE 5.0, Acceptable Performance Levels has been revised to include the Priority Ratings.

For purposes of uniformity among bidders, given that the CBA ends in December 2025, please confirm that bidders are to submit pricing based on the last year of the CBA and not escalate CBA pricing for all contract years.

p. 19 Attachment 3 – CBA Article 23 – Ware Rate Schedule

Offerors must propose the CBA rates for the non-exempt positions discussed in the CBA.

If an offeror proposes a labor category not covered by the CBA, the Wage Determination applies. When the CBA is revised, an amendment will be issued and your pricing may have to be updated.

Please confirm that subcontractor pricing data is required at the same level of detail as the prime contractor for only major subcontractors (defined as those providing twenty percent (20%) of total dollar threshold AND/OR twenty-five percent (25%) of total man-hour effort).

p. 59,61,63 E-File V Price Proposal Subcontracting Pricing

Confirming that subcontractor pricing data is required at the same level of detail as the prime contractor for only major subcontractors as defined in the solicitation.

CDRL A021 references an Attachment 1 that cannot be located within the CDRL would the government issue the Attachment 1 that the CDRL is referencing?

CDRL A021 Attachment 1 The referenced attachment is imbedded in the PDF file for CDRL A021.

In the projected workload TE5.2 there is no workload associated with the daily ship delivery can the government publish a daily estimate of how many ship deliveries are conducted daily?

TE5.2 TE5.2 The estimated ship deliveries are indicated on Attachment 31, TE 5.6N.

Are there any constraints to when ships take daily ship deliveries or are they accessible 24hrs/day?

TE 5.2 TE5.2 Ships are not generally available for deliveries 24hrs/day. Established schedules can vary dependent upon the ship.

Pre-Proposal

Conference OR Site Visit

RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the

RFP)

Response

Reference RFP CLINs 0006 – 4006; The Labor Hour – Special Projects/Surge & Sustainment CLINS reference PWS Section 5.8 however this PWS section is titled “5.8 Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point (TCSP)”. Respectfully request DLA address this discrepancy and identify the applicable PWS and/or RFP section which describes the Gov’t expectation for how offerors would operate/execute CLINs 0006-4006 during contract performance.

PWS page 128 Paragraph 5.8

See the response to Question 16.

Reference RFP CLINs 0006 – 4006 The Labor Hour –Special Projects/Surge & Sustainment CLINS. Please clarify are these CLINS Cost-Plus, Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Time and Material (T&M), or a mix?

PWS page 128 paragraph 5.8

CLINs X006 are structured as Labor Hour CLINs. FAR 16.602 Labor-hour Contracts, defines a labor-hour contract as a variation of the time-and-materials contract, differing only in that materials are not supplied by the contractor.

Reference RFP CLINs 0006 – 4006 The Labor Hour – Special Projects/Surge & Sustainment CLINS. How will the Government task/assign work to the contractor under this CLIN? Will the Government submit a Request for Proposal (RFP)?

Will the Government prescribe the Level of Effort (LOE) requirements in the RFP (and/or accompanying PWS) or will the offeror propose the LOE in response to the requirement described in the RFP?

PWS page 128 paragraph 5.8

Task orders for CLIN X006 work are generally issued with a statement of work and an estimated cost based upon the Government’s estimated labor hours and the service provider’s Labor Rates from Attachment 6. There may be instances where the Government will request a proposal for the effort required but those actions would be the exception.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT