SP330025Q0098 - EKC at DLA-D Cherry Point - QA (002).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 39 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SP330025Q0098
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) document for Solicitation SP330025Q0098, related to a software and security system upgrade for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Distribution at Cherry Point, NC. The solicitation involves software installation for the Global Facility Management System (GFMS) and reactivation of two Security Asset Manager (SAM) boxes in Buildings 147 and 159. Key clarifications include confirmation that only two specific SAM boxes (serial numbers 13588 and 13740) are in scope, integration with the basewide AMAG system is not applicable, and the contractor is expected to provide software and license upgrades while DLA will provide virtual server and network infrastructure. The Q&A document also confirms that no baseline versions of deliverables are available, and the project focuses on specific equipment locations with minimal hardware requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation Q&A
| Document Name | Page # | Paragraph, Section # or context | Question/Comment | Response by DLA | |
| 1 | Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement | 7 | Section 3.2.2 | The PWS identifies two SAM boxes with serial numbers 13740 and 13588. However, the manufacturer has two other SAM boxes registered to this account (serial numbers 13488 and 13589). Can the government confirm that only two SAM boxes are covered under this solicitation? | DLA confirms only SN# 13588 and 13740 are within scope of work. |
| 2 | Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement | 1, 6, 19 | Section 2.0, 3.2.1, 4.0 | The PWS references integration with the "existing Lenel OnGuard system". Since DLA Cherry Point is using the basewide AMAG system, can the government confirm that integration with Lenel is not applicable? | DLA confirms N/A |
| 3 | Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement | 1, 7 | Section 2.0 and 3.3 | The PWS references "daily operations" support and testing. Can the government confirm that this is intended to reference the oncall support for Corrective Maintenance, instead of regular scheduled activities that the contractor is required to perform on a daily basis? | The PWS will be updated to remove "daily operations." |
| 4 | Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement | 6 | Section 3.2.1 | Can the government confirm that no equipment/hardware is expected for the upgrade of the GFMS to the DLA Operational Technology Network? Per the PWS, the virtual server and network infrastructure will be provided by DLA. The contractor is only anticipated to provide the software and license upgrade for GFMS. | DLA confirms. |
| 5 | Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement | 25 | Section 8.0, Table 1 Deliverables | Will any baseline versions of the deliverables listed in Table 1 be turned over to the contract after award, or will each of these need to be freshly created? | No baseline versions are available. |
| 6 | Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement | 35 | Section 19.0 | The PWS references an "Equipment List" that provides the location of all equipment under the EKC system. Can the government confirm that the two Security Asset Managers (Buildings 147 and 159) identified in Section 2.0 are the only two equipment items that are covered under this contract? | Confirmed; only those two items. |
| 7 | Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement | 7 | Section 3.2.2 | The PWS states that power is not available to the SAM box in Building 147. Is the contractor expected to connect this box to local power, and if so how far is the closest power source? | Power outlet available within 2 feet of EKC box at Bldg. 147 |
| 8 | Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement | 7 | Section 3.2.2 | The PWS states that communication is not available to either SAM box. Is the contractor expected to connect this box to the network, and if so how far is the closest network connection point? | Yes; distance is unclear at the moment. |
| 9 | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| 11 | |||||
| 12 | |||||
| 13 | |||||
| 14 | |||||
| 15 | |||||
| 16 | |||||
| 17 | |||||
| 18 | |||||
| 19 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| 21 | |||||
| 22 | |||||
| 23 | |||||
| 24 | |||||
| 25 | |||||
| 26 | |||||
| 27 | |||||
| 28 | |||||
| 29 | |||||
| 30 | |||||
| 31 |
https://www.linkedin.com/in/steve-meredith-64597aa1/
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .