Amendment_0002-dtd_25SEP2017.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

K PAGE 1 OF 5

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0002 25 SEP 2017 N/A

6.

ISSUED BY CODE

DLA ENERGY-FEA

SP0600

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

SP0600

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN RD STE 3950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

BUYER/SYMBOL: KEITH A. CARVALHO/DLA ENERGY-FEABB

PHONE: (703) 767-9418; FAX (703) 767-2382

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., street,city,county,State,and ZIP Code)

X 9a. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

Notice of Opportunity/ SP0600-17-R-0427 9b. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09/06/2017

10a. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO

DUNS: CAGE:

10b. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[ X ]The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [] is extended, [ X ] is not extended Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment;(b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [] is not, [ ] is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

JBLE & NASA, Langley, VA SOLICITATION-SP0600-17-R-0427

The intention of this amendment is to address additional RFI questions about solicitation SP0600-17-R-0427.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

Cynthia J. Obermeyer

15B. NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C.DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

SP0600-17-R-0427

Amendment 0002

FIRST: The following RFIs have been received from industry for solicitation SP0600-17-R-0427 and are addressed by the Government:

1. Q: “Regarding project references. If there are exclusive teaming agreements in place, can we also use project reverences from those team members?.”

A: The past performance the Government is seeking in response to Factor 2 is past performance for work performed by one of the 21 ESCOs awarded the DOE Third Generation IDIQ contract.

2. Q: “In Factor 1, the RFP states “The DOE Third-Generation ESPC IDIQ has already determined each

ESCO responsible for the sound implementation of the each of 20 technical categories. To be clear, in the event of resultant Task Order award, the award shall only be awarded to one of the 21 DOE Third- Generation ESPC IDIQ contract holders as the prime contractor.”

A: Yes, the Government will only award one Task Order award to one of the 21 DOE Third Generation ESPC IDIQ contract holders.

3. Q: “In Amendment 001, response to question 8, the DLA clarified that “The government will only consider work performed under UESC or ESPC authority.” It is our intention to use past performance project references drawn from State regulated ESPC projects. Can the DLA please confirm DLA’s acceptance of this proposed approach?”

A: There is not a restriction on the reference’s type of organization where ESPC or UESC work was performed. DLA Energy confirms acceptance of this proposed approach.

4. Q: “Factor 2- Past Performance: Shall the respondent interpret the “1 page single sided maximum” to mean 1 page per past performance reference or 1 page for the requested (4) references?”

A: The NOO allows only one single sided page for the entire Factor 2 response. All four required references must be provided on this one single sided page.

5. Q: “There is no kWh/building data for Eustis, is it available?”

A: Reference Attachment 1 and 3 for the added column with kWH/building data.

6. Q: “The NOO states that transformer upgrades are desired. Are they primary or secondary transformers or both?”

A: Below is the information for each site.

JB-Langley Response: Secondary pad-mounted transformers, approximately half are connected to secondary 22 kVA lines, but some are connected to secondary 4 kVA and 2 kVA loops. Removal of the 4 & 2 kVA loops and integrating all transformers into the 22 kVA secondary line is desired.

Replacement transformers are desired to be the high-efficiency TP-1 standard. Approximately 70 transformers as follows:

1 - 3750 kVA 2 - 1500 kVA 5 - 1000 kVA

Amendment 0002

6 - 750 kVA 15 - 500 kVA 9 - 300 kVA 9 - 225 kVA 11 - 150 kVA 4 - 112.5 kVA 1 - 100 kVA 5 -75 kVA 1 - 50 kVA 1 - 25 kVA

JB-Eustis Response: The transformers on Fort Eustis converts the 13.2 kv primary voltage to one of several secondary voltages. Presently there is no list of transformers that need to be changed for efficiency. We do not have any transformers that are obsolete.

NASA Response: Secondary pad-mounted transformers. Removal of the 2.4 kVA loops and integrating all transformers into the 22 kVA secondary line is desired. Replacement transformers are required to be the high-efficiency TP-1 standard. Targeted transformers are approximately 225 to 1000 kVA.

7. Q: “What is the percentage of lighting at each site that has been converted to LED?”

JB-Langley Response: Only approximately 10% of total base lighting has been converted to LEDs.

JB-Eustis Response: The percentage of lighting that has been converted to LEDs is 89%.

NASA Response: Approximately 5%. Remaining lighting is mostly T-8s, except for a few high bay areas, which are HID.

8. Q: “No electric demand data was listed in the NOO package. Is total demand data per site available?”

JB-Langley Response: The on peak electricity demand rate charge is $ 0.055 per kW-hr and the sum of all other miscellaneous charges sum to approximately $0.065.

JB-Eustis Response: JB-Eustis has five demand charges: distribution demand (1st 5K), distribution demand (anything over 5k), RKVA, off peak demand, and on peak demand. The five demand charges were averaged together for a blended rate of $12.10645.

NASA Response: Reference Attachment 5 for NASA rate charge structure.

Amendment 0002

9. Q: “Regarding RFI#3 on Amendment 0001, can you please confirm that 12,512,300 kWh is the correct amount for 3,205 sq. ft. (building 267)? If the 12,512,300 kWh is accurate, can you help us understand high EUI? Also, the annual electric cost provided in the response to RFI#3 ($1,096,000) does not match the electric cost provided in the revised Attachments 1 and 2 ($817,053.19). Please confirm the electric cost for Building 267?”

A: The revised estimate for Building 267 is 48,700 annual kW-hours for an approximate annual cost of $3,170. The energy intensity of this building is not high. The highest energy intensity buildings are 10, 23,25,351,1302 and (255, 256, and 257 base hospital).

10. Q: “Please provide electrical and natural gas consumption data for Fort Eustis. Currently, only the total energy use is shown.”

A: On page 1 of the NOO, outlines Fort Eustis electricity and natural gas consumption data for calendar year 2016.

11. Q: “Page 2 of the NOO shows NASA’s baseline steam usage as 161,587,200 Mbtu at a cost of $4,950,200(i.e., unit cost $0.0306/Mbtu). Attachment 1 shows NASA steam usage of 69,295 Mbtu”.

a. Please confirm that the units in Attachment 1 are MMBTU (i.e., 69,295,000 Mbtu).

b. Please confirm that the baseline cost of steam for the in-scope NASA buildings is $2,120,427

(product of $0.0306/Mbtu * 69,295,000 Mbtu) and not the $4,950,200 identified on page two of the NOO which would include buildings not in scope.”

A: In regards to part (a) of question 11 the answer is as follows: The units in Attachment 1 are indeed

MMBTU.

In regards to part (b) of question 11 the answer is as follows: The 69,295 MMbtu is just for the buildings that have metered steam. This is not the total NASA usage and that the Center has a district steam system.

There are only a few buildings that do not receive this central steam, primarily the 600 series buildings (these are the buildings on the Air Force side, which are served by a separate small district system); the 2100 series buildings; and some of the smaller buildings/warehouses. NASA's total FY16 steam usage was 383,822 MMBTU. In FY16, NASA used 240,270,000 cubic feet of natural gas to produce 222,234 MMBTU steam. The remaining 161,587 MMBTU steam was produced at the Waste to Energy (WTE) plant.

SECOND: As a result of the questions above, the Attachments 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the solicitation SP0600-17-R-0427 is hereby deleted in its entirety. Attached is the revised Attachment 1 2, 3, and 4 that shall be used in response to the solicitation.

Amendment 0002

THIRD: The following change is hereby made to the NOO, issued 14 September 2017 for SP0600-17-R-0427, as follows:

FROM:

NASA:

Electricity: 120,817,000 Kwh – $8,228,700.00 Natural Gas: 248,957.80 Kcf – $1,070,100.00 Water: 108.3 Mgal – $690,600.00 Fuel Oil: 12 Kgal – $16,100.00 Purchased Steam Renewable: 161,587,200 Mbtu – $4,950,200.00

TO:

NASA:

Electricity: 120,817,000 Kwh – $8,228,700.00 Natural Gas: 248,957.80 Kcf – $1,070,100.00 Water: 108.3 Mgal – $690,600.00 Fuel Oil: 12 Kgal – $16,100.00 Purchased Steam Renewable: 161,587 MMBTU – $4,950,200.00

FOURTH: The following change is hereby made to Amendment 1, block 3 “Effective Date” issued 14 September 2017 for SP0600-17-R-0427, as follows:

FROM: “See Block 16B” TO: 14 SEP 2017

FIFTH: As a reminder to all ESCOs and as stated in the NOO: “The Government is not seeking a response similar to a PA. The Government is only looking for a reasonable illustrated approach for how the ESCO would pursue energy conservation efforts…”.

SIXTH: All other terms and conditions remain as previously stated.