Amendment_0003_-_SP060016R0423.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

K PAGE 1 OF 5

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0003 22 Aug 16 N/A

6.

ISSUED BY CODE

DLA ENERGY-FEABB

SP0600

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

SP0600

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN RD STE 4950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

BUYER/SYMBOL: JACOB H. VIGIL/DLA ENERGY-FEABB

PHONE: (703) 767-8554; FAX (703) 767-2382

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., street,city,county,State,and ZIP Code)

X 9a. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

Notice of Opportunity/ SP0600-16-R-0423

9b. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) 25 Jul 2016

10a. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO

DUNS: CAGE:

10b. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[x]The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers] is extended, [ x ] is not extended Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment;(b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [] is not, [ ] is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

This amendment to the subject Notice of Opportunity (NOO) is issued to reorder the important of the three Evaluation Factors.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C.DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

SP0600-16-R-0423

Amendment 0003

The subject amendment modifies the following sections of the Notice of Opportunity (NOO):

FIRST: Paragraph 4.a.(6) Response Requirements is modified as follows:

FROM:

(6) Response Requirements

The ESCOs are responsible for verifying the completeness and accuracy of all information furnished to them by the Government. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation and may result in an offer being ineligible for consideration. Responses to this Notice of Opportunity should be received no later than 02 September 2016, 3:00 p.m. Ft. Belvoir VA time. All interested ESCOs should submit the following in order to be considered:

Factor 1 – ESCO Approach: (15 single sided pages maximum)

The ESCO response to this factor should include sufficient information to identify and describe the possible energy conservation measures that it would propose for this project while addressing facilities and infrastructure improvements toward achieving a 25% reduction in energy and water consumption.

A site visit shall not be conducted.

The Government is not seeking a response similar to a Preliminary Assessment. The Government is only looking for a reasonable illustrated approach for how the ESCO would pursue energy conservation efforts meeting JBSA’s needs. The response shall present the following:

a) ESCO’s best industry practices for investigation and development of the ECMs identified and the ESCO’s recommended energy conservation measures culminating in the scope of work for this project. The ESCO shall draw upon and reference information provided in Attachment 1 for this development.

b) ESCO’s rationale for the ECM selected and the determining factors for that ECM selection. The response should provide clear and convincing evidence why and how the selected ECM will meet the needs of JBSA as described herein.

c) ESCO shall include a discussion of resources they intend to utilize as well as any subcontracting or teaming arrangements to be established should they be selected.

It is not a requirement that the ESCO have past performance history in the execution of their selected ECM for this project. The basic IDIQ has already determined each ESCO responsible for the sound implementation capability of the each of 20 technical categories.

To be clear, in the event of resultant task order award, the award shall only be awarded to one of the 16 DOE IDIQ basic contract holders as the prime contractor.

Factor 2 - Price Factors: (Five single sided pages maximum) ESCOs shall discuss and define any cost benefit or other financial advantage their company can bring to the Government that would reduce the amount of principal borrowed for a subsequent project. The discussion of each benefit or advantage must identify, at a minimum, a percentage discount to the implementation costs that are recommended. Be advised that the ESCO will not be held to this exact percentage if selected, however, will be held to the fulfillment of the concept. It is expected and accepted that during the development of the project scope and finalization of all attributes of the project during the Investment Grade Audit that further definitization will occur.

The Government is not looking for a cost breakdown of the project visualized in response to Factor

1. The Government seeks to understand the ESCOs practices and ardent pursuant of any financial benefits that will assist in bringing the implementation cost of the final project down while at the same time not eroding or insulting the success of the project.

Factor 3 – Past Performance: (No additional information is being requested). The Government will use its discretion to determine the sources of past information used in the Past Performance evaluation, and the information may be obtained from agency’s knowledge of contractor performance, other government agencies or commercial entities, or past performance databases.

TO:

(6) Response Requirements

The ESCOs are responsible for verifying the completeness and accuracy of all information furnished to them by the Government. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation and may result in an offer being ineligible for consideration. Responses to this Notice of Opportunity should be received no later than 02 September 2016, 3:00 p.m. Ft. Belvoir VA time. All interested ESCOs should submit the following in order to be considered:

Factor 1 – ESCO Approach: (15 single sided pages maximum)

The ESCO response to this factor should include sufficient information to identify and describe the possible energy conservation measures that it would propose for this project while addressing facilities and infrastructure improvements toward achieving a 25% reduction in energy and water consumption.

A site visit shall not be conducted.

The Government is not seeking a response similar to a Preliminary Assessment. The Government is only looking for a reasonable illustrated approach for how the ESCO would pursue energy conservation efforts meeting JBSA’s needs. The response shall present the following:

a) ESCO’s best industry practices for investigation and development of the ECMs identified and the ESCO’s recommended energy conservation measures culminating in the scope of work for this project. The ESCO shall draw upon and reference information provided in Attachment 1 for this development.

b) ESCO’s rationale for the ECM selected and the determining factors for that ECM selection. The response should provide clear and convincing evidence why and how the selected ECM will meet the needs of JBSA as described herein.

c) ESCO shall include a discussion of resources they intend to utilize as well as any subcontracting or teaming arrangements to be established should they be selected.

It is not a requirement that the ESCO have past performance history in the execution of their selected ECM for this project. The basic IDIQ has already determined each ESCO responsible for the sound implementation capability of the each of 20 technical categories.

To be clear, in the event of resultant task order award, the award shall only be awarded to one of the 16 DOE IDIQ basic contract holders as the prime contractor.

Factor 2 – Past Performance: (No additional information is being requested). The Government will use its discretion to determine the sources of past information used in the Past Performance evaluation, and the information may be obtained from agency’s knowledge of contractor performance, other government agencies or commercial entities, or past performance databases.

Factor 3 - Price Factors: (Five single sided pages maximum) ESCOs shall discuss and define any cost benefit or other financial advantage their company can bring to the Government that would reduce the amount of principal borrowed for a subsequent project. The discussion of each benefit or advantage must identify, at a minimum, a percentage discount to the implementation costs that are recommended. Be advised that the ESCO will not be held to this exact percentage if selected, however, will be held to the fulfillment of the concept. It is expected and accepted that during the development of the project scope and finalization of all attributes of the project during the Investment Grade Audit that further definitization will occur.

The Government is not looking for a cost breakdown of the project visualized in response to Factor

1. The Government seeks to understand the ESCOs practices and ardent pursuant of any financial benefits that will assist in bringing the implementation cost of the final project down while at the same time not eroding or insulting the success of the project.

SECOND: Paragraph 5. Evaluation Methodology of the subject NOO is modified as follows:

FROM:

5. Evaluation Methodology

a. Basis for Selection:

Proposal will be evaluated using the following three factors:

1) ESCO Approach;

2) Price Factor;

3) Past Performance.

Factor 1, ESCO Approach, is more important than Factor 2, Price. When combined, Factor 1 and Factor 2 are more important than Factor 3, Past Performance. The Past Performance factor considers the ESCO’s past performance as the prime contractor.

The resultant Task Order may be awarded to the responsible ESCO that provides the best fit in achieving energy conservation and renewable efforts for JBSA. Best fit means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in satisfying the requirement and represents the best value to the Government considering the ESCO’s approach, price, and past performance.

TO:

5. Evaluation Methodology

a. Basis for Selection:

Proposal will be evaluated using the following three factors:

1) ESCO Approach;

2) Past Performance; and,

3) Price Factor

Factor 1, ESCO Approach, is more important than Factor 2, Past Performance. When combined, Factor 1 and Factor 2 are more important than Factor 3, Price Factor. The Past Performance factor considers the ESCO’s past performance as the prime contractor.

The resultant Task Order may be awarded to the responsible ESCO that provides the best fit in achieving energy conservation and renewable efforts for JBSA. Best fit means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in satisfying the requirement and represents the best value to the Government considering the ESCO’s approach, past performance, and price.

THIRD: All other terms and conditions remain as previously stated.