Amendment 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

May 26, 2009

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

Environmental Services, Alaska

6. ISSUED BY CODE SP0600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE SP0600

DEFENSE ENERGY SUPPORT CENTER

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN RD., SUITE 4950

FT. BELVOIR, VA 22060-6222

BUYER/SYMBOL – Amy V. Loar/DESC-BXA

PHONE - (703) 767-9329 FAX - (703) 767- 9338

Email –amy.loar@dla.mil 6.1

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., street,city,county,State,and ZIP Code)

X

9a. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

SP0600-09-R-0515

9b. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

April 1, 2009

10a. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10b. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[ X ] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ ] is extended, [ X ] is not extended

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning ___1___ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [ ] is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

1. Clause K7 COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NOTICES AND CERTIFICATION (OCT 2008) is deleted.

2. Solicitation SP0600-09-R-0515 is amended to incorporate the following information.

a. Questions and answers.

b. Sign-in sheets from preproposal conference and site visits.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C.DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C.DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Previous edition unusable Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0002

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

a. Page Limit:

1. For the sample scenario – Does the one page limit apply to only the text response in item 1? Or does it apply to the tabular breakdown of level of effort as well?

Answer: The one page limit applies to the text response only.

2. I have a question regarding the 20 p. limit for the technical proposal. Is it 20 pg. front and back for a total of 40 actual pages, or is it 20 p. in total?

Answer: The technical portion of the proposal is limited to twenty pages in total.

b. Electronic Deliverables:

1. Task 8 in the PWS says, “In addition to providing “hard copies” of all analytical results, electronic deliverables of results must also be included in the price.” Does “electronic deliverables” mean simply a copy of the data package in pdf format?

Answer: Electronic deliverables are to be provided in CD-R media.

2. What level of data package are your looking for? Results only; results + Quality Control; or results, Quality Control, and raw data?

Answer: The data package will be a key part of any report that includes sampling and analysis data (for example--site characterization and monitoring reports, etc.) The report package must include results, quality control, and raw data. The offeror's package shall include the level of QA/QC they are proposing, i.e., Level I, II, or III. The offeror must further explain what is involved in the level they propose using including percentages of data validation and specialty labor categories that are involved for that level. The level they propose shall adhere to current ADEC technical guidance.

3. As part of the “electronic deliverable” do you want an electronic data deliverable, and if so in what format (e.g., Excel, SEDD, COELT, etc.).

Answer: Excel format.

c. Sample Scenario:

1. For completing the Sample Scenario Part 1 portion of the Technical Proposal, are we limited in our assessment or remediation approach by the list of services in Section B – Supplies/Services and Prices/Cost, or can we select a technology that is not on the list?

Answer: There is a one page limit but no limitations to the offeror's technical approach in addressing the Sample Scenario Part 1.

2. Are we limited to, or required to include, five(5) 4” monitoring wells in our assessment approach, or is the Breakdown of the Level of Effort request in Sample Scenario Part 2 independent of our response to the Sample Scenario Part 1?

Answer: Part 2 is independent of the response to P 1 to the Sample Scenario.

d. Ground Water Monitoring:

1. The site descriptions states that there are long term ground water monitoring programs in place for several sites.

Ground water monitoring is not listed as a stand alone task. Is the ground water monitoring included in this scope of work?

Answer: Correct. Groundwater monitoring is not listed in the statement of work because the number of monitoring wells and frequencies for monitoring are different for each location. Each site has a distinct State Approved Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP). The groundwater monitoring tasks will be accomplish using a combination of appropriate line items from the contract that will coincide with the requirements of each LTMP.

e. Testing:

1. What certifications/accreditations are the labs required to hold?

Answer: State of Alaska certified labs must be used.

2. Are project-specific target analyte lists and quality control criteria currently established for the test methods outlined in the Offeror Submission Package and Performance Work Statement, and if so, can they be provided? If project-specific lists and limits are not available, what analytical program guidance do samples collected from the four sites fall under (e.g., Department of Defense Quality Systems Manual, Contract Laboratory Program, ADEC Contaminated Sites, etc.)?

Answer: The project-specific target analyte lists and quality control criteria currently established for the test methods are not outlined in the Offeror Submission Package and Performance Work Statement. The analytical program for samples collected from the four sites fall under the ADEC Contaminated Sites Program guidance.

f. ADEC Contaminated Sites Program:

1. Is this contract to follow the guidelines found in the contaminated sites program, which requires completing the ADEC checklists for each data package and a CDQR?

Answer: Yes. The contract must follow the provisions of the ADEC Contaminated Sites Program

g. Solicitation:

1. A question came up today with regard to Section K- Representations and Certifications. Under K7 there is note that says that this section does not apply to small businesses and foreign governments. Since we are a small business, as are all the offerors, does this mean we do not need to complete any of the three parts (I, II, III) in Section K7?

Answer: The clause is deleted.

Section K99 on page 19 of the OSP – Certification of Toxic Chemical Release Reporting. Are we correct in assuming that the facilities are exempt from form R filing for the following reason - “IV” Facility does not fall within SIC Code major groups 20 to 39 or NIACS sectors 31 to 33.

Answer: The contractor should certify that its company facilities used to perform under the contract will comply with the Toxic Release Reporting requirements, and should check the blocks in K99 that are appropriate. The certification is not for the facilities the contractor will be supporting under the contract. DESC performs the required Toxic Release Reporting requirements for the DFSPs.

Page 4 of6

Preproposal Conference - SP0600-09-R-0515 & Site Visit to DFSP Anchorage, AK - May 12, 2009

Name Office Svmbol Commercial Phone # I Email Address

Amy V. Loar DESC-BXA 703-767-9329 amy.1oaruudla.mil

Laura Curtis DESC-WE 703-767-8312 laura.curtisuudla.mil

'&r: St-o

]>-''1- 1 .<\ '-"'">-' - 1 "=" ''-'I 1 , , _ . I'="J ~-' Mf>'~ - "-__ '.) 1f~ !'t' 1·c. ~1'S"

Ka..t

-'2 ~i- - 5'-1 8 8 - , it ('~J9'\.

-J-7cJ- -t o/Ol

5Pr-1Y-~~ /

~I " I' \ Af. ':) qD'1 -5 b( :rt 0 ')

Of.. f C - PI1 c 'tt.:>~- '17:3 '1 :J I> g'

Qo 7", t,cfbiz

\, , I )/

'RAN0 e5C A-k ~<;Z,- ~777 M~Toe... JDI-IN tU~rJ D&'SC Ak ~s2 -31 rt '1

AitrtlA f'J DfJE ilL F (.:.. OAS ,'<; "} o~)Z5B - Lf f '8'O

$-I{).\A F!o..~e I HCG '101-S~~ -'21 'f q . c..::._

Page 5 of6

Site Visit - SP0600-09-R-0515 DFSP Whittier, AK & Indian Creek Pump Station - May 13, 2009

Name Office Symbol Commercial Phone # I Email Address

AmyV. Loar DESC-BXA 703-767-9329 I amy.1oar@dla.mil

Laura Curtis DESC-WE

1<'Q.,i f{, Gy et' l-ru f £..) U c trt, /L IJ,;,v l\I! \ 66:'> (Ive

¥-'I SW\

t:C>;:-r-,EL5ItJt7JlliIv

5-f~", F {~~e.. 1 He G

703-767-8312

I'rD 7 - /7 7V5>2

I 5Gz J 81S~ I

.-')4 2-3",) 4-0 j..B' ?if3/ g(o'.3 -~I'-( 9

I laura.curtis@dla.mil

I ~~+cd£ lIe Ci o;-..., &Mw/l,1( Q OL(,c,()!\i',(. (F I

:J~~ ~ r @ d eo-\ vJ ~\' e.~ ,'\R..\

?$,tt2xJVIJ t ~/!V'5 ~"~Lt S~I Q3e-(6)haV?Ster~ e-f . (0 WI

~j\j 6, k'n-:; \V L~'l'"' ~L;r,1k. v'\ r---S

J, z :J"7""7

- 54 Z5 8

- ~ c.( 8' g' u: \cu·.-]6~ no y"'rh w)",.I(- I/"'( ( ifV'---..

b\fl.l f~ 6" (i: v\-o ..."*,w ltA-li!- rf'-C , c. i:r/A...

Q~\\t'-'L~(Y\<Jrn I AS-rs!s \v u\'""\\ q ,S( ~ 4--Co6 c.s i-v.J h'6..Yl G::::, S' i V \; h \ q,.In 4- , ~

M mAN 0r5Et2.u>t

ISJ~~JbI~6 ~ "Jc--\t Lee+y

WI L u AJ\1 /Yl A. ~ TI /J

01\5 ,<:. r;t.J-.J :eo , ~o--, ~Lv,'~

I OA'S) $ i{)v .

I D cJ ( - f . .l.. ~ z58- '--1 8&,0

5(P(- ;) (J O t-J CB6rL LEG. €; Q,fl.. <; IS e'N,h fu L l)M s:5&£6J.~v-,' 1 - c~

264- C.jLlb4 oJfi:i:<rl..J, \ e e~'{@'> 06t5' S e"v,"V'v J «i'\j

'?'-'f' '-t-J'J yJG f Lv I C. ( f I'l l" , )n r11- 7' t-' tL-' P~4 rl1l l.

I ~~ ~J ~-Yf 1(8bg')1 Jll-1~j/ 1 ~M1-tU .~i@/d~ J?v/ (

\5 IV~

'£\\)"\'1) \~~\.\ \'\~* \-<.A\~

~A (VI , L

SP0600-09-R-0515

Amendment 0002

Page 60f6

Site Visit - SP0600-09-R-0515 Eielson Pipeline Sites - May 14, 2009

Name

AmyV. Loar

Laura Curtis

Office Symbol Commercial Phone # I Email Address

DESC-BXA 703-767-9329 I amy.loar{@,dla.mil

DESC-WE 703-767 -8312 I laura.curtis{@,dla.mil

-ruf~ LLC 9'07- 272 -golt) Ke{:.f~ tt{flt 1!C. IC Ohor

907-.2 7J- tOJt:J CrYf f.J}p luli

I ' - . -l V! # .,= F . ~ - 1 1 - - -, -'--, • --~ \. I JJP.diN.-f:

(' d-..,.

I k l ,n ( ' ''Illle y t V, •.,JL) I v. ,0D - D C( I......, 1' .+ldlt:Q.. ! \ j (,M;>Deovl qo· (.01V)

~Str{LlAbG'S' Vu,., I