SOM Camp Grayling Building 536Q ACM LCP Survey Report.pdf

PRE-RENOVATION ASBESTOS AND LIMITED LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SURVEY

CAMP GRAYLING: BUILDING 536Q

Camp Grayling Grayling, Michigan Project #188BS26106

PREPARED FOR:

Michigan Department of Military and Veteran Affairs

PREPARED BY:

Atlas Technical Consultants LLC 46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Novi, Michigan 48377 March 20, 2026

Page | 1

46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Novi, Michigan 48377

(248) 669-5147 | oneatlas.com

March 20, 2026

Jon Jorgensen NCARB Design Manager Michigan Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Construction & Facilities Management Office (CFMO) Reserve Forces Support Center 3423 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. #321K Lansing, MI 48906

Subject: Pre-Renovation Asbestos and Limited Lead-Containing Paint Survey Camp Grayling: Building 536Q 12950 E. Grand River Ave Brighton, MI 48116

Dear Mr. Jorgensen:

Atlas is pleased to present this report detailing the findings of the pre-renovation asbestos and limited lead-containing paint survey performed at the above referenced site. The purpose of this sampling was to identify and collect samples of suspect asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-containing paint (LCP) prior to renovation activities.

The pre-demolition asbestos and limited lead-containing paint sampling was conducted on February 25, 2026, by Industrial Hygienist, Mr. Andrew DeLodder, State of Michigan certified asbestos inspector. The sampling was conducted in accordance with sampling criteria specified in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Asbestos Construction Industry Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101), and the Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act of 1987

(AHERA).

If you have any questions, please call us at 248.669.5140.

Respectfully submitted, Kandy Rauser Project Manager Atlas Technical Consultants LLC

Page | i

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Pre-Renovation Asbestos Survey

2. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 General Property and Building Information

2.2 Exterior Finish Descriptions

2.3 Interior Building Descriptions

3. PRE-RENOVATION ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

3.4 Sampling Results

4. LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SAMPLING

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

5.2 Lead-Containing Paint

6. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

TABLES

Table 3-1 ACM Sampling Results

Table 4-1 Lead-Containing Paint Sampling Results

APPENDICES

Appendix A Sample Location Drawing and Photolog Appendix B Asbestos Laboratory Report Appendix C Lead-Containing Paint Laboratory Report

Page | 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder, completed the pre-renovation asbestos and limited lead-containing paint survey of building 536Q, located at Camp Grayling, in Grayling, Michigan, on February 25, 2026.

Eighty-seven (87) asbestos bulk samples, taken from twenty-nine (29) homogenous areas, were collected and submitted for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Of the eighty-seven samples submitted, one hundred-four (104) sample layers were analysed. The results of laboratory testing indicated that one

(1) of the suspect materials contained greater than 1 percent asbestos. The results of laboratory testing indicated that three (3) of the suspect materials contained less than 1 percent asbestos.

Four (4) representative sample of paint, taken from interior of the building, was collected and submitted for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing of the paint chip sample indicated that four (4) samples contained levels of lead greater than the laboratory reporting limits.

If any additional materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

Page | 3

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of this project was to conduct a pre-renovation asbestos and limited lead-containing paint survey of building 536 Q, located at Camp Grayling in Grayling, Michigan.

1.2 Pre-Renovation Asbestos Survey

The scope of the pre-renovation asbestos survey included the following:

• Review of existing asbestos reports for the building(s), if available;

• Survey of the property building(s);

• Identification of accessible suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs);

• Collection and analysis of bulk samples of suspect friable and non-friable materials.

2. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 General Property and Building Information

General property and building information is presented in the following table:

General Property and Building Information

Date of Inspection: February 25,2026

Inspectors Andrew DeLodder Inspector # A48677

Property Address: Camp Grayling, Grayling Michigan

Property Owner Michigan Department of Military and Veteran Affairs

Building Description: Barracks

2.2 Exterior Finish Descriptions

The exterior of the building includes CMU block walls, concrete slab foundation, and a pitched asphalt shingled roof.

2.3 Interior Building Descriptions

The interior finishes of the building included CMU block walls, wall board system ceilings and concrete floors.

3. PRE-RENOVATION ASBESTOS SURVEY

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder conducted the pre-renovation asbestos inspection of the building

Camp Grayling on February 25,2026. Mr. DeLodder is a State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Inspector’s

(Certification No. A48677). The areas identified for renovation were visually inspected for the presence of building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected and placed into individual containers for transport to a National Voluntary Lab Accreditation Program

(NVLAP)-accredited laboratory for analysis. Materials typically known as non-asbestos items (i.e. fibrous glass, foam rubber, wood, etc.) were not sampled. The asbestos inspection consisted of the following three basic procedures:

> Conducting a visual inspection of the structures;

> Identifying homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials; and

Page | 4

> Sampling accessible, friable and non-friable suspect materials.

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

Prior to collecting any samples, homogenous areas (HAs) were identified. A homogeneous sampling area can be described as one or more areas of material that are similar in appearance and texture and that have the same apparent installation date, appearance and function. Actual number of samples collected from each homogeneous sampling area may vary, based on the type of material and professional opinion of the inspector.

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

From the list of suspect homogeneous areas, a physical assessment was performed for each material on the list. A physical assessment includes evaluating the condition, assessing the potential for disturbance, and determining the friability of each material. By definition, "friable" materials are those that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Each material identified was further classified into one of three categories: surfacing materials, thermal systems insulation (TSI) and miscellaneous materials. Each of the three categories have specific sampling requirements, outlined below.

• Surfacing Materials: Refers to spray-applied or troweled surfaces such as plaster ceilings and walls, fireproofing, textured paints, textured plasters, and spray-applied acoustical surfaces.

• Thermal System Insulation: Refers to insulation used to inhibit heat gain or loss on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other building components.

• Miscellaneous Materials: Refers to friable and non-friable products and materials that do not fit in any of the above two categories such as resilient floor covering, baseboards, mastics, adhesives, roofing material, caulking, glazing, and siding. This category also contains wallboard and ceiling tile.

All materials were assessed related to their condition in one of the three categories: good (intact), fair

(damaged) or poor (significantly damaged) per Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 763. Material with localized, significant damage was also assessed as poor.

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

Bulk samples were analyzed by Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc. (ETL) using polarized-light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining (Method Reference: 40 CFR Part 763, Volume 47, No. 103, May

27, 1982 pg. 23376). This laboratory participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP #201028-0), a quality assurance program for PLM analysis, and is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as well as accreditation requirements under 15 CFR Part 25.

Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in

Appendix A. Positive sample results are reported in percent asbestos by volume of the sample and the type of asbestos material within the sample. Other common non-asbestos components may also be noted on the analytical reports. Inspector and laboratory accreditations are provided in Appendix C.

3.4 Sampling Results

Bulk samples were collected from the cabin and analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), EPA Method

600/R-93/116.

The following table provides a summary of accessible suspect and confirmed ACMs from the site structure:

Table 3-1 ACM Sampling Results

Sample ID/Material

Location of Materials

Material Estimated Quantity

Asbestos Content

1-CC-ABC EA 1,2,3,4 Exterior concrete - walkways 1,965 SF ND

Page | 5

Sample ID/Material

Location of Materials

Material Estimated Quantity

Asbestos Content

2-BM-ABC

EA 1,2,3,4

FS 1-9

Brick mortar - CMU block walls

13,845

SF

ND

3-EJ-ABC EA 2,4

Expansion joint - grey, in CMU block walls

80 LF ND

4-EC-ABC EA 1,2,3,4

Exterior caulk - grey, soft, around aluminum window frames(3'x4' window) and door frames

530 LF ND

5-WG-ABC EA 1,2,3,4

Window glaze - white, crumbly, aluminum windows (3'x4' window)

704 LF ND

6-EC-ABC EA 2 & FS 9

Exterior caulk - black, hard, perimeter of mechanical room door frame

20 LF ND

7-EC-ABC EA 2

Exterior caulk - grey, crumbly, natural gas penetration into wall

1 LF ND

8-EC-ABC EA 2

Exterior caulk - white, crumbly, perimeter of steel window frame

10 LF

.25% Chrysotile

(PC)

9-WG-ABC EA 2

Window glaze - light grey, on steel window

12 LF

.25% Chrysotile

(PC)

10-WG-ABC EA 1

Window glaze - white, on entry door window

12 LF ND

11-RM-ABC EA 5

Roofing materials, brownish red asphalt roof

8,625 SF ND

12-EC-ABC EA 5

Exterior caulk - grey, on exhaust fan

1 LF ND

13-CC-ABC FS 1-9

Concrete chip - poured concrete slab foundation

7,730 SF ND

14-EJ-ABC FS 1,3,4,6,8

Expansion joint - black, fibrous, perimeter of concrete slab foundation

580 LF ND

15-EJ-ABC FS 1,3,4,6,8

Expansion joint - grey, soft, seams of concrete slab foundation

290 LF ND

16-IC-ABC FS 1,2,3,4,6,8

Interior caulk - grey, soft, perimeter of door and window frames

1,115 LF ND

17-EC-ABC EA 3

Exterior caulk - grey, perimeter of electrical penetration

1 LF ND

18-VD-ABC FS 2,7

Vibration dampener - white, canvas, on air handling unit

40 SF (4

Each)

40% Chrysotile

19-EJ-ABC FS 4

Expansion joint - grey, hard, in

CMU block wall

20 LF ND

20-IC-ABC FS 4

Interior caulk - grey, hard, perimeter of door frame

60 LF ND

21-IC-ABC FS 5

Interior caulk - white, hard, between shower "step-up" and concrete floor

10 LF ND

Page | 6

Sample ID/Material

Location of Materials

Material Estimated Quantity

Asbestos Content

22-WG-ABC FS 4

Window glaze - grey, on 3 pane door window

50 LF (2

Doors)

0.25% Chrysotile (PC)

23-WBS-

ABC

FS 5

Wallboard system - bathroom ceiling

1,040 SF ND

24-BM-ABC FS 5

Pipe fitting - fiberglass fitting with plastic cover and brown adhesive

525 SF ND

25-IC-ABC FS 5

Interior caulk - white, on ceiling/wall wood trim in shower area

155 LF ND

26-IC-ABC FS 1,3,4,6,8

Interior caulk - white, aligator cracking texture, on ground over expansion joint (FS-14) in front of doorways

30 LF ND

27-BM-ABC FS 9 Brick mortar - chimney stack 60 SF ND

28-TC-ABC FS 9 Terracotta - chimney liner 20 SF ND

29-SC-ABC FS 9

Stack cement - steel penetration

5 SF ND

EA=Exterior Area FS Functional Space NA=Not Applicable UNQ=Unquantified ND= None Detected

In the event additional suspect material is discovered during demolition activities, this material should be treated as presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) in accordance with regulations 29 CFR

1926.1101 and 1910.1001 and other applicable state and local regulations and either sampled to confirm or nullify asbestos content or be treated as ACM and handled accordingly.

4. LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SAMPLING

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder conducted the lead-containing paint (LCP) sampling of the property building on February 25, 2026. The sampling included physical sampling of paint coatings that were deemed representative of the predominant paint coatings observed.

Five (5) paint chip sample was collected and submitted to Accurate Analytical Testing Laboratory, 30105

Beverly Road, Romulus, Michigan for lead analysis. Bulk samples were analyzed using the Environmental

Protection Agency's Test Method SW 846-7420 and 3050B using Flame AAS to determine lead concentration in percent (%) by weight. Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix B. Laboratory accreditations are provided in Appendix C.

The following table provides a summary of the LCP sampling:

Table 4-1 Lead-Containing Paint Sampling Results

Sample ID Sample Location Color Lead

Content

Reporting Limit

1-LBP-Beige Exterior Paint on CMU block wall Beige 0.00159 0.000548

2-LBP-White Exterior paint on steel doors White 0.00483 0.000588

3-LBP-Grey Interior paint on mechanical room floor Grey 0.901 0.000508

Page | 7

Sample ID Sample Location Color Lead

Content

Reporting Limit

4-LBP-White Interior paint from shower ceiling White 0.00297 0.000611

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

The results of laboratory testing during the pre-renovation asbestos survey conducted at the property indicate that one (1) of the materials sampled were found to contain greater than 1% asbestos. The results of laboratory testing during the pre-renovation asbestos survey conducted at the property indicate that three

(3) of the materials sampled were found to contain less than 1% asbestos.

If any additional materials are discovered during demolition/renovation activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

5.2 Lead-Containing Paint

Four (4) representative sample of paint, taken from the exterior and interior of the building, were collected and submitted for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing during the limited lead-containing paint sampling conducted at the property indicate that four samples contained levels of lead greater than the laboratory reporting limits.

The presence of lead-containing paint requires, under OSHA 1926.62 requirements, that the contractor performing renovation, surface preparation, and other activities that impact or potentially impact the lead-coated components, evaluate potential worker exposures to airborne lead. This evaluation can be based, for the specific activities denoted in 1926.62, on objective data obtained by the contractor on other, similar, worksites within the prior calendar year. In addition, lead-containing paint and lead-coated waste and construction debris must be evaluated and, on a case-by-case basis depending on this evaluation, quantitative analysis be performed on these waste steams to ensure compliance with EPA waste disposal regulations.

The presence of Lead-Containing Paint (LCP) and/or Lead-Based Paint (LBP) does not, in itself, trigger regulatory compliance actions. However, when these materials are disturbed, the requirements of OSHA

(1926.1101) and EPA may become operative. Appropriate actions in terms of removal methods, emissions control, worker protection, and waste disposal should be considered by the general contractor and applicable subcontractors while completing renovation activities.

6. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during the NESHAP inspections conducted on February 25, 2026, performed by

Atlas. Selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling were based on EPA Guidance documents, Atlas’s observations, and the assumption that building vintage and renovation history information presented to Atlas allowed the proper designation of homogenous materials for each building.

This document does not contain the elements necessary for an Abatement Work plan, and this document does not contain, nor should it take the place of technical specifications for ACM removal.

Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against changes to material from future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions against present ACM material in locations not investigated.

Page | 8

The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user.

APPENDIX A

SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING AND PHOTOLOG

Camp Grayling

Photograph Log Building 536Q Grayling, Michigan 49738

188BS26106

Photograph #1

Homogenous Material Description

HA-1: Concrete walkways

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

1965 SF

Additional Notes

Photograph #2

HA-2: Brick mortar – CMU block walls

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

13845 SF

Photograph #3

HA-3: Expansion joint – grey, in CMU block walls

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

80 LF

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #4

HA-4: Grey caulk – perimeter of aluminum window frames, and steel door frames

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

530 LF

Photograph #5

HA-5: Window glaze

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

704 LF

Photograph #6

HA-6: Black door frame caulk

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

20 LF

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #7

HA-7: Grey caulk, on natural gas penetration

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

1 LF

Additional Notes

Very little left after sampling

Photograph #8

HA-8: White caulk, steel window frame

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

Yes: .25% Chrysotile

Total Quantity Present

10 LF

Photograph #9

HA-9: Window glaze – steel window

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

Yes: .25% Chrysotile

Total Quantity Present

12 LF

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #10

HA-10: Window glaze – white, on entry door

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

12 LF

Photograph #11

HA-11: Asphalt roofing materials

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

8625 SF

Photograph #12

HA-12: Grey caulk on exhaust penetration

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

1 SF

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #13

HA-13: Concrete slab foundation

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

7730 SF

Photograph #14

HA-14: Black fibrous expansion joint

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

580 LF

Photograph #15

HA-15: Grey, soft expansion joint

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

290 LF

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #16

HA-16: Grey caulk, on door/window frames

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

1115 LF

Photograph #17

HA-17: Grey caulk on power penetration

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

1 LF

Photograph #18

HA-18: White canvas vibration dampener

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

Yes: 40% Chrysotile

Total Quantity Present

40 SF

4 dampeners

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #19

HA-19: Expansion joint, grey, hard, in wall

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

Photograph #20

HA-20: Grey caulk, hard, door frame

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

Photograph #21

HA-21: White caulk in shower

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

10 LF

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #22

HA-22: Window glaze on shower room doors

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

Yes: .25% Chrysotile

Total Quantity Present

50 LF (2 doors)

Photograph #23

HA-23: Wallboard system

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

1040 SF

Photograph #24

HA-24: Glaze block mortar

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

525 SF

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #25

HA-25: White caulk on ceiling trim

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

155 LF

Photograph #26

HA-26: White caulk, seams of doorways

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

30 LF

Photograph #27

HA-27: Chimney brick mortar

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

60 SF

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Photograph #28

HA-28: Terracotta chimney liner

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

20 SF

Photograph #29

HA-29: Stack cement

Asbestos Present (Yes/No/Assumed)

No

Total Quantity Present

5 SF

Asbestos / Lead-Based Paint

Sampling Location Map

Building Exterior

PROJECT NUMBER: 188BS26106

DRAWN BY: AHD REVIEWED BY Atlas

FIGURE:

DATE: 2/25/2026

4 6 5 5 5 H u m b o l d t D r i v e , S u i t e 1 0 0

N o v i , M i c h i g a n 4 8 3 7 7

P h : ( 2 4 8 ) 6 6 9 - 5 1 4 0 ~ F a x : ( 2 4 8 ) 6 6 9 - 5 1 4 7

= Asbestos Sample Number

= Lead-Based Paint Sample Location

Camp Grayling

Building # 536Q

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Map Key

EA-1

EA-2

EA-3

EA-4

EA-5

1-LBP-Beige

2-LBP-White

11-RM-A

11-RM-B

11-RM-C

12-EC-A,B,C

1-CC-A

1-CC-B

1-CC-C

2-BM-A 2-BM-B

2-BM-C

3-EJ-A

3-EJ-B

3-EJ-C

4-EC-A

4-EC-B

4-EC-C

5-WG-A

5-WG-B

5-WG-C

6-EC-A,B,C

9-WG-A,B,C

10-WG-A,B,C

17-EC-A,B,C

Asbestos / Lead-Based Paint

Sampling Location Map

Building Interior

PROJECT NUMBER: 188BS26106

DRAWN BY: AHD REVIEWED BY Atlas

FIGURE:

DATE: 2/25/2026

4 6 5 5 5 H u m b o l d t D r i v e , S u i t e 1 0 0

N o v i , M i c h i g a n 4 8 3 7 7

P h : ( 2 4 8 ) 6 6 9 - 5 1 4 0 ~ F a x : ( 2 4 8 ) 6 6 9 - 5 1 4 7

= Asbestos Sample Number

= Lead-Based Paint Sample Location

Camp Grayling

Building # 536Q

Grayling, Michigan 49738

Map Key

13-CC-A

13-CC-B

13-CC-C

14-EJ-A

14-EJ-B

14-EJ-C

15-EJ-A

15-EJ-B

15-EJ-C

16-IC-A

16-IC-B

16-IC-C

18-VD-C

19-EJ-A

19-EJ-B,C

20-IC-A 20-IC-B,C

21-IC-A,B,C

22-WG-A,B 22-WG-C

-W

B S

-A

23-WBS-B

23-WBS-C

24-BM-A,B,C

25-IC-A,B,C

26-IC-A

26-IC-B

26-IC-C

27-BM-A,B,C

28-TC-A,B,C

29-SC-A,B,C

3-LBP-Grey

FS-1

F S

-2

FS-3

FS-4

FS-5

FS-6

F S

-7

FS-8

FS-9

18-VD-A,B

4-LBP-White

APPENDIX B

ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORT

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To:

Attention:

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Novi, Michigan 48377

Project Location:

Camp Grayling

536Q

Client Project: 188BS26106

288778ETL Job:

Jennifer Fashbaugh

Report Issued: 03/10/2026

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type CompletedSampled Analyst

1867545 Asbestos1-CC-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867546 Asbestos1-CC-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867547 Asbestos1-CC-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867548 Asbestos2-BM-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867549 Asbestos2-BM-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867550 Asbestos2-BM-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867551 Asbestos3-EJ-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867552 Asbestos3-EJ-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867553 Asbestos3-EJ-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867554 Asbestos4-EC-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867555 Asbestos4-EC-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867556 Asbestos4-EC-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867557 Asbestos5-WG-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867558 Asbestos5-WG-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867559 Asbestos5-WG-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867560 Asbestos6-EC-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type CompletedSampled Analyst

1867561 Asbestos6-EC-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867562 Asbestos6-EC-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867563 Asbestos7-EC-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867564 Asbestos7-EC-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867565 Asbestos7-EC-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867566 Asbestos8-EC-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867567 Asbestos8-EC-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867568 Asbestos8-EC-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867569 Asbestos9-WG-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867570 Asbestos9-WG-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867571 Asbestos9-WG-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867572 Asbestos10-WG-A 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867573 Asbestos10-WG-B 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867574 Asbestos10-WG-C 03/10/2026 OJ Ivey02/25/2026

1867575 Asbestos11-RM-A 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867576 Asbestos11-RM-B 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867577 Asbestos11-RM-C 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867578 Asbestos12-EC-A 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867579 Asbestos12-EC-B 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867580 Asbestos12-EC-C 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867581 Asbestos13-CC-A 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867582 Asbestos13-CC-B 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867583 Asbestos13-CC-C 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867584 Asbestos14-EJ-A 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867585 Asbestos14-EJ-B 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867586 Asbestos14-EJ-C 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

1867587 Asbestos15-EJ-A 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867588 Asbestos15-EJ-B 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867589 Asbestos15-EJ-C 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867590 Asbestos16-IC-A 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867591 Asbestos16-IC-B 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867592 Asbestos16-IC-C 03/10/2026 Erica Marcos02/25/2026

1867593 Asbestos17-EC-A 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867594 Asbestos17-EC-B 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867595 Asbestos17-EC-C 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867596 Asbestos18-VD-A 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867597 Asbestos18-VD-B 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867598 Asbestos18-VD-C 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867599 Asbestos19-EJ-A 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867600 Asbestos19-EJ-B 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867601 Asbestos19-EJ-C 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867602 Asbestos20-IC-A 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867603 Asbestos20-IC-B 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867604 Asbestos20-IC-C 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867605 Asbestos21-IC-A 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867606 Asbestos21-IC-B 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867607 Asbestos21-IC-C 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867608 Asbestos22-WG-A 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867609 Asbestos22-WG-B 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867610 Asbestos22-WG-C 03/10/2026 Asha Davidson02/25/2026

1867611 Asbestos23-WBS-A 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

1867612 Asbestos23-WBS-B 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

1867613 Asbestos23-WBS-C 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

1867614 Asbestos24-BM-A 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

1867615 Asbestos24-BM-B 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

1867616 Asbestos24-BM-C 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

1867617 Asbestos25-IC-A 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

1867618 Asbestos25-IC-B 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

1867619 Asbestos25-IC-C 03/10/2026 Teagan Murphy02/25/2026

1867620 Asbestos26-IC-A 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867621 Asbestos26-IC-B 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867622 Asbestos26-IC-C 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867623 Asbestos27-BM-A 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867624 Asbestos27-BM-B 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867625 Asbestos27-BM-C 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867626 Asbestos28-TC-A 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867627 Asbestos28-TC-B 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867628 Asbestos28-TC-C 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867629 Asbestos29-SC-A 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867630 Asbestos29-SC-B 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

1867631 Asbestos29-SC-C 03/10/2026 Ben Jones02/25/2026

Reviewed by:

Summary

Sample Layer MasticMethod

PLM 95

Point Count 9

Dawson Bradley

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Camp Grayling

536Q

ETL Job :

Client Project :

288778

188BS26106

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

02/25/2026

03/05/2026

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1867545

1-CC-A

PLM 95% OtherPLM 5% CelluloseGreyExterior Concrete

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867545

1-CC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867546

1-CC-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGreyExterior Concrete

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867546

1-CC-B

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseWhiteGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867547

1-CC-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGreyExterior Concrete

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867547

1-CC-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseWhiteGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Camp Grayling

536Q

ETL Job :

Client Project :

288778

188BS26106

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

02/25/2026

03/05/2026

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1867548

2-BM-A

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGreyBrick

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867548

2-BM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseLight GreyMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867549

2-BM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGreyBrick

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867549

2-BM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseLight GreyMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867550

2-BM-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGreyBrick

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867550

2-BM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseLight GreyMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Camp Grayling

536Q

ETL Job :

Client Project :

288778

188BS26106

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

02/25/2026

03/05/2026

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1867551

3-EJ-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGreyExpansion Joint

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867552

3-EJ-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGreyExpansion Joint

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867553

3-EJ-C

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGreyExpansion Joint

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867554

4-EC-A

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867555

4-EC-B

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867556

4-EC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Camp Grayling

536Q

ETL Job :

Client Project :

288778

188BS26106

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

02/25/2026

03/05/2026

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1867557

5-WG-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867558

5-WG-B

PLM 95% OtherPLM 5% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867559

5-WG-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867560

6-EC-A

PLM 94% OtherPLM 6% CelluloseBlackExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Non-Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

With Adhesive

PLM None Detected 1867561

6-EC-B

PLM 95% OtherPLM 5% CelluloseBlackExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Non-Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

With Adhesive

PLM None Detected 1867562

6-EC-C

PLM 94% OtherPLM 6% CelluloseBlackExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Non-Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

With Adhesive

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Camp Grayling

536Q

ETL Job :

Client Project :

288778

188BS26106

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

02/25/2026

03/05/2026

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1867563

7-EC-A

PLM 95% OtherPLM 5% CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867564

7-EC-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867565

7-EC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PC 0.25% Chrysotile1867566

8-EC-A

PC 97% OtherPC 2.75% CelluloseWhiteExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PC Trace Chrysotile1867567

8-EC-B

PC 98.75% OtherPC 1.25% CelluloseWhiteExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PC Trace Chrysotile1867568

8-EC-C

PC 99% OtherPC 1% CelluloseWhiteExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Camp Grayling

536Q

ETL Job :

Client Project :

288778

188BS26106

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

02/25/2026

03/05/2026

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PC Trace Chrysotile1867569

9-WG-A

PC 99.5% OtherPC 0.5% CelluloseLight GreyWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PC 0.25% Chrysotile1867570

9-WG-B

PC 99.5% OtherPC 0.25% CelluloseLight GreyWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PC 0.25% Chrysotile1867571

9-WG-C

PC 98.75% OtherPC 1% CelluloseLight GreyWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867572

10-WG-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867573

10-WG-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867574

10-WG-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Camp Grayling

536Q

ETL Job :

Client Project :

288778

188BS26106

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

02/25/2026

03/05/2026

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1867575

11-RM-A

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace Cellulose

PLM Trace Fiberglass

Brownish RedRoofing Materials

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867576

11-RM-B

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace Cellulose

PLM Trace Fiberglass

Brownish RedRoofing Materials

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867577

11-RM-C

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace Cellulose

PLM Trace Fiberglass

Brownish RedRoofing Materials

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867578

12-EC-A

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867579

12-EC-B

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867580

12-EC-C

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace CelluloseGreyExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Camp Grayling

536Q

ETL Job :

Client Project :

288778

188BS26106

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

02/25/2026

03/05/2026

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1867581

13-CC-A

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace CelluloseGreyConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867582

13-CC-B

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace CelluloseGreyConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867583

13-CC-C

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace CelluloseGreyConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867583

13-CC-C

PLM 100% OtherPLM Trace CelluloseWhiteCementitious Material

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867584

14-EJ-A

PLM 3% OtherPLM 97% CelluloseBlackExpansion Joint

Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

PLM None Detected 1867585

14-EJ-B

PLM 3% OtherPLM 97% CelluloseBlackExpansion Joint

Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Erica Marcos

Date Analyzed : 03/10/2026

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e.