SolicitationNSP7149 Z1QuestionsAnswers Addendum 5.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NSP7149 Z1
- Issued by
- Blaine County, Nebraska
About this file
This document is Addendum 5 to the Request for Proposal (RFP) Number NSP7149 Z1 issued by the Nebraska State Patrol (NSP) for a Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data System. The addendum provides questions and answers related to the project, including clarification on the number of full-time employees within NSP, the interoperability between NSP's communication centers, the integration requirements for various systems such as AVL, MACH, TRACS, and RTCC, and the expected maximum number of concurrent mobile users. The RFP is seeking a qualified contractor to provide the requested system, and the resulting contract may not be exclusive.
The document also provides additional details on the hardware specifications, which will be provided as an option, and indicates that the number of cameras and video feeds is currently unknown. The addendum will be incorporated into the solicitation, and bidders are expected to provide fixed cost estimates for the interfaces, with the understanding that more information may be needed at a later date.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM 5 NSP7149 Z1, QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Date: July 1, 2024
To: All Bidders
| From: | Jason Dean |
| Nebraska State Patrol |
RE: Addendum for NSP7149 Z1 to be opened July 22, 2024 at 2 p.m. CST p.m. CST
ADDENDUM:QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
SPB Form GS-8 Rev. 5-1-2024 State Purchasing Bureau Questions and Answers
Following are the questions submitted and answers provided for the above-mentioned solicitation. The questions and answers are to be considered as part of the solicitation. It is the responsibility of bidders to check the State Purchasing Bureau website for all addenda or amendments.
| Question Number |
| RFP/ITB |
Section Reference
RFP/ITB
Page Number
| Question |
| State Response |
| 1. |
| Section V, Part B: |
| In addition to the detail provided in “Project Environment” section, please provide the number of full time employees within Nebraska State Patrol. |
| Answer: 482 sworn and approximately 240 civilian staff. |
| 2. |
| Section V Part A – list in Item 3: |
| In the “Project Overall System Goals and Objectives” section, please provide further clarification on item #3, Interoperability between the two NSP Communications Centers and Capital Security”. Is Capital Security a backup dispatch location? |
| Answer: NSP’s preference is to have one instance of CAD that serves all three Communication Centers. The server farm will be in Lincoln with North Platte and CapSec connected by fiber and/or high speed internet connectivity. North Platte will be the back up for Lincoln (and vice versa) and Lincoln is a back up for CapSec. NSP will be configured in the CAD to be a single jurisdiction managing two different geographic locations. CapSec will have a unique CAD configuration to manage their unique requirements. All three Communications Centers will have the ability to view and manage the other Center’s calls and units. |
| 3. |
| Matrix – Interfaces Tab, Item 21 and Section V, Part H, list item 4r: |
| Please define what type of interface is envisioned for “AirWing (microwave downlink)” and AirWing/drone feed.” Please define the third party providing the solution, the anticipated data elements being exchanged, and the CAD use case. |
| Answer: NSP has provided information concerning interfaces in the “Interface List” as an amendment to the RFP. This information represents an overview of the interface as it relates to CAD and MDS. NSP asks that the bidders provide a fixed cost in the RFP to estimate the costs associated with the bidder’s solution. It is acceptable to add caveats to the fixed cost estimates that more information may be needed at a later date. |
| 4. |
| Matrix – Interfaces tab, Item 8 and Section V, Part H, list item 4a: |
Please define the specific integration required in:
8. Motorola APX Next (for AVL integration to the CAD/Mobile map and bi-directional Push to Talk – PTT information in CAD).
Answer: NSP has provided information concerning interfaces in the “Interface List” as an amendment to the RFP. This information represents an overview of the interface as it relates to CAD and MDS. NSP asks that the bidders provide a fixed cost in the RFP to estimate the costs associated with the bidder’s solution. It is acceptable to add caveats to the fixed cost estimates that more information may be needed at a later date.
| 5. |
| Matrix – Interfaces tab, Item 10 and Section V, Part H, list item 4n: |
Please define what type of interface is envisioned for “MACH AVL”. Will MACH only be used to supply vehicle location to the new CAD solution?
Please specify the exact use case and the anticipated data elements being sent inbound to the new CAD solution.
Also please specify the MACH method of integration, API, SOAP, REST, TAIP, NMEA, etc.
Answer: NSP has provided information concerning interfaces in the “Interface List” as an amendment to the RFP. This information represents an overview of the interface as it relates to CAD and MDS. NSP asks that the bidders provide a fixed cost in the RFP to estimate the costs associated with the bidder’s solution. It is acceptable to add caveats to the fixed cost estimates that more information may be needed at a later date.
| 6. |
| Section II, Part D, list in item 3: |
| In the “Security and Administrative” section, please provide further clarification the NITC security requirements (Refer to Section III. L. Nebraska Technology Access Standards). An internet search did not readily provide the referenced section of the document. |
| Answer: NSP has provided information concerning interfaces in the “Interface List” as an amendment to the RFP. This information represents an overview of the interface as it relates to CAD and MDS. NSP asks that the bidders provide a fixed cost in the RFP to estimate the costs associated with the bidder’s solution. It is acceptable to add caveats to the fixed cost estimates that more information may be needed at a later date. |
| 7. |
| Cost Proposal Sheet, Cost Tab, Interface Software section and Matrix, Interfaces Tab: |
| Please confirm the use cases for “Crash Reporting – TRACS” and “e-Citation – TRACS” interfaces. Are these integrated with the existing records system? Our solution will provide incident data from the CAD system into the Niche Records system. If additional functionality is envisioned, please describe the desired workflow from CAD to these systems. |
| Answer: NSP has provided information concerning interfaces in the “Interface List” as an amendment to the RFP. This information represents an overview of the interface as it relates to CAD and MDS. NSP asks that the bidders provide a fixed cost in the RFP to estimate the costs associated with the bidder’s solution. It is acceptable to add caveats to the fixed cost estimates that more information may be needed at a later date. |
| 8. |
| Cost Proposal Sheet, Cost Tab, Interface Software section: |
| Please provide the use case for a “State/NCIC Interface from RMS” interface. Is this describing an interface between the existing Records system and NCIC? |
| Answer: NSP has provided information concerning interfaces in the “Interface List” as an amendment to the RFP. This information represents an overview of the interface as it relates to CAD and MDS. NSP asks that the bidders provide a fixed cost in the RFP to estimate the costs associated with the bidder’s solution. It is acceptable to add caveats to the fixed cost estimates that more information may be needed at a later date. |
| 9. |
| Cost Proposal Sheet, Cost Tab, Interface Software section: |
| Please provide the use case for a “Real Time Crime Center: interface. Does NSP already have RTCC software? |
| Answer: No, NSP does not currently have a RTCC, but they may need to integrate by sending CAD call data to an external RTCC solution. The bidder can propose a standard CAD to external Web Service interface. |
| 10. |
| Cost Proposal Sheet, Cost Tab, Interface Software section and Matrix, Interfaces tab: |
| Please provide the use case for a “Schedule Anywhere” interface. Please provide the direction of dataflow, the anticipated data elements being exchanged, and the CAD use case or cases. |
| Answer: NSP has provided information concerning interfaces in the “Interface List” as an amendment to the RFP. This information represents an overview of the interface as it relates to CAD and MDS. NSP asks that the bidders provide a fixed cost in the RFP to estimate the costs associated with the bidder’s solution. It is acceptable to add caveats to the fixed cost estimates that more information may be needed at a later date. |
| 11. |
| Section V, Part B and Exhibit A Matrix, Agency Info Tab: |
| Section V, Part B states that NSP has a total of 482 mobile users. The Exhibit A, Agency Info Tab, states a grand total of 350 mobile users. Please clarify which document should take precedence and the expected maximum number of concurrent mobile users. |
| Answer: The number of mobile users is 350. |
| 12. |
| General |
| N/A |
| Please clarify if system server hardware should be included in the base offering or only as an option. |
| Answer: The hardware specifications, including all servers, network components, and connectivity will be an option. There is a line item in the Cost Proposal worksheet for any fees associated with configuring and implementing the hardware. |
| 13. |
| General |
| N/A |
| What is the total number of video feeds (cameras) that NSP would like to have access to? |
| Answer: The number of cameras and video fees is unknown at this time. |
This addendum will be incorporated into the solicitation.
Revised 07/31/08
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .