The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
36C25625R0043 Amendment 0001
5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)
CODE
7. ADMINISTERED BY
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER
CODE
6. ISSUED BY
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED
PAGE OF PAGES
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED
BPA NO.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
FACILITY CODE
CODE
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
E. IMPORTANT:
is extended,
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
(REV. 11/2016)
is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.
is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
15C. DATE SIGNED
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER
Contractor
16C. DATE SIGNED
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
STANDARD FORM 30
PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE
Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)
(If required)
(SEE ITEM 11)
(SEE ITEM 13)
(X)
CHECK
ONE
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
07-11-2025
580-25-3-5912-0007
580-22-201 Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 16 Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center 2002 Holcombe BLVD Houston TX 77056-5643
Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 16 5075 Westheimer Road, Suite 750
Houston TX 77056-5643 To all Offerors/Bidders
36C25625R0043 06-12-2025
X
X
July 29, 2025 @ 11:00 am Central
One (01) RE: Replace and Upgrade BAS
A. Clarifications are on pages 2-26. Additional clarifications are forthcoming.
B. Proposal due date is extended until Tuesday, July 29, 2025, at 11:00 am.
C. List of site visit attendees is attached.
Tabitha Contreras Contracting Officer
| # |
| CONTRACTOR QUESTION |
| VA RESPONSE |
| 1 |
| Page 23-24 of the Solicitation incorporates by reference FAR 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee. However, the amount of the bond is not indicated. Please provide the amount of the bid guarantee required. |
| 52.228-1 is referenced in the solicitation and hereby changed to full text. Paragraph c provides the answer to this question: |
52.228-1Bid Guarantee.
Bid Guarantee (Sept 1996) (a)Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.
(b)The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier’s check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States. The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds- (1)To unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids; and (2)To the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.
(c)The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20 percent of the bid price or $3,000,000 whichever is less.
(d)If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.
(e)In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.
(End of clause)
| 2 |
| Page 57 of the Solicitation includes VAAR 852.211-72 Technical Industry Standards, but the requirements are not completed. Please provide the missing information regarding what standards and/or proof are required under this contract. |
| VAAR 852.211-72 is hereby removed from the solicitation. |
| 3 |
| Construction Phase Schedule on Drawing GI0004 shows a total of 390-day project duration, even though the period of performance is 730 days. Please clarify the period of performance and whether the contractor is required to conform to the Suggested BAS Room Construction Phase Schedule phases 1-5 duration |
| The phasing plan is a suggested timeframe for the performance of the actual work. It does not account for mobilization, the submittal process and review time, material delivery, transition times, etc. The government anticipates this project to take 730 days from NTP to closeout. |
| 4 |
| Will the VA provide the Contractor with space for an office trailer and storage container(s) for materials? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 5 |
| Please provide pictures of the space above the ceiling where the VAV’s are being replaced. This was not made available for viewing at the site visit. |
| VAV picture from the main VA campus bldg. 100 is attached. See Photos RFI 5. |
| 6 |
| Please provide duct drawings with sizes for the first & second floors of building 109. |
Contractor is to field-verify duct dimensions to support the purchase and installation of necessary equipment and devices.
| 7 |
| Are there areas in any of the buildings where we can expect delays to access? What are those areas and how much of a delay is to be expected? |
Coordination is key. Contractor shall provide a detailed project schedule that will aid the COR in scheduling the work with the building staff. VA COR does not anticipate any access issues.
| 8 |
| Please provide a copy of the sign-in sheet from the site visit. |
| See attached. |
| 9 |
| Section 25 10 10. Advanced Utility Metering System. Is this item required? I do not find it shown on the plans. If required is this to be provided & installed by the DDC Controls contractor? |
| Contractor shall install metering on load side of existing ATSs as indicated on E-100 and E-601 and integrate into new BAS system. |
| 10 |
| The Bid Solicitation allows 730 days to complete the project. The Suggested BAS Room Construction Phase Schedule shown on GI004 reflects a 390 project. Can this Schedule be corrected to match the 730-day completion. |
The phasing plan is a suggested timeframe for the performance of the actual work. It does not account for mobilization, the submittal process and review time, material delivery, transition times, etc. The government anticipates this project to take 730 days from NTP to closeout.
| 11 |
| AD110 Note 2. Can you provide some clarification? What material type is the soffit? How large? The ceiling is not marked to be replaced where the soffit is shown. Will |
ceiling work be required? Will wall patching and painting be required? Please define this scope of work more clearly.
The material type of the soffits appears to be gyp. bd. with a plaster finish. Note 2 calls out ceiling areas that are gyp. bd. That will need to be replaced once the unit has been upgraded. Contractor shall replace ceiling from side of room to side of room, and as much length as needed to access the unit. This way, only one joint is needed to be patched back into the existing ceiling.
| 12 |
| What type of sprinkler work is required? Just temporary relocation of heads to facilitate the temp controls installation? There is no spec section for Fire Protection but there is information and details shown on M-002. Is the Contractor responsible for fire protection design? |
| The scope of work for this project does not include any new fire protection work. The scope of work for this project may, however, require the temporary relocation of sprinkler heads for the FCU work in B109. |
| 13 |
| MH100, MH101, MH102, MH103, MH104, MH105 and MH106 note 5. What size and type is the chilled water piping for each FCU that requires a new control valve? |
For bidding purposes assume the valves are 1” diameter. The Contractor shall field-verify existing pipe sizes prior to submitting the submittals for the purchase and installation of necessary new devices. Match pipe size and type to the existing piping system.
| 14 |
| MH100, MH101, MH102, MH103, MH10n4, MH105 and MH106 note 5. Is this just for the pneumatic tubing? What is the size and type of that pipe? How many feet of piping requires demolition? |
The statement to “DEMOLISH ASSOCIATED PIPING” in Note 5 on these drawings is in reference to the pneumatic air tubing to the existing pneumatic controls. The Contractor is to remove pneumatic controls tubing back to the source. Coordinate the sequence of removal so that no operating equipment is left without control air. For bidding purposes assume that tubing and valves are 3/8” diameter.
| 15 |
| MH100, MH101, MH102, MH103, MH104, MH105 and MH106 note 5. M-501 detail 4 Four Pipe Fan Coil Unit Controls. Do these fan coil units require a new DDC control valve on the hot water piping also? What size and type are the heating hot water piping for each FCU that requires a new control valve? |
In accordance with drawing key notes, Contractor shall replace all pneumatic controls devices for the existing FCU’s. This shall include heating hot water control valves where the existing FCU includes reheat coils and HHW piping. Contractor is to field verify. For bidding purposes assume that all FCU’s are 4-pipe units and that tubing and valves are 1” diameter.
| 16 |
| MH100 note 7. Is this steam energy meter in-line or insertion type? What is the size and type of piping in which the meter is installed? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 17 |
| MH100 note 8. Is the new steam energy meter in-line or insertion type? What is the size and type of piping in which the meter is to be installed? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 18 |
| MH100 note 9. Is the new steam flow and quality meter in-line or insertion type? What is the size and type of piping in which the meter is to be installed? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 19 |
| MH100 note 10. Are piping connections required for this monitor? What is the size and type of the piping connection? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 20 |
| MH100 note 11. Is this water flow meter in-line or insertion type? What is the size and type of piping in which the meter is installed? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 21 |
| MH108 note 4. Is this just for the pneumatic tubing? How many feet of piping requires demolition? What is the size and type of that pipe? |
The statement to “DEMOLISH ASSOCIATED PIPING” in Note 4 on these drawings is in reference to the pneumatic air tubing to the existing pneumatic controls. The Contractor is to remove pneumatic controls tubing back to the source. Coordinate the sequence of removal so that no operating equipment is left without control air.
| 22 |
| MH108 note 6. Is this flow meter in-line or insertion type? What is the size and type of piping in which the meter is to be installed? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 23 |
| MH109 note 3. Is this chilled water energy meter in-line or insertion type? What is the size and type of piping in which the meter is installed? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 24 |
| MH112 note 3. Is this chilled water energy meter in-line or insertion type? What is the size and type of piping in which the meter is installed? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 25 |
| MH112 note 5. Is there piping other than the pneumatic tubing that requires demo? How many feet of piping requires demolition? What is the size and type of that pipe? |
| Note 5 refers to the pneumatics system, including associated pneumatic pipe and tubing. For bidding purposes assume that the pneumatic tubing is copper that ranges in size from 3/8” to ½” in diameter. |
| 26 |
| MH112 note 6. Are piping connections required for this monitor? What is the size and type of the piping connection? |
| Coordinate device connection requirements with the existing water treatment and quality monitoring system. For the purposes of bidding, assume that all required piping connections already exist and that the BAS needs to be connected from the local alarm monitoring points to the new area BAS control panel. |
| 27 |
| MH112 note 9. What is the extent of the piping requiring demolition? How many feet, what size and what type of pipe? |
Note 9 on MH112 refers, in general, to the pneumatic piping in the general vicinity of the booster pump. At the completion of the DDC conversion, however, the Contractor shall be responsible for removal of the entire pneumatic system within the area of work.
| 28 |
| MH114 note 3. Is this chilled water energy meter in-line or insertion type? What is the size and type of piping in which the meter is installed? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 29 |
| MH114 note 5. What is the extent of the piping requiring demolition? How many feet, what size and what type of pipe? |
Note 9 on MH112 refers, in general, to the pneumatic piping in the general vicinity of the booster pump. At the completion of the DDC conversion, however, the Contractor shall be responsible for removal of the entire pneumatic system within the area of work.
| 30 |
| MH117 note 4. What is the extent of the piping requiring demolition? How many feet, what size and what type of pipe? |
Note 4 on MH117 refers, in general, to the pneumatic piping in the general vicinity of the booster pump. At the completion of the DDC conversion, however, the Contractor shall be responsible for removal of the entire pneumatic system within the area of work.
| 31 |
| MH121 note 3. Are piping connections required for this monitor? What is the size and type of the piping connection? |
Coordinate device connection requirements with the existing water quality monitoring system. For the purposes of bidding, assume that all required piping connections already exist and that the BAS needs to be connected from the local alarm monitoring points to the new area BAS control panel.
| 32 |
| Please confirm that and all Basis of Design items and materials that the VA has satisfied all Buy American Waivers, if applicable, and sole source requirements as needed. Please provide us any Buy American Act Waivers that would be provided under this contract. This is not currently in the plans, documents, or specifications. |
| See clause 52.225-11. |
| 33 |
| Will the VA pay for the engineering and design submittals, as well as all applicable deposits required by various manufacturers to put equipment into design and/or production? |
| Awardee will be required to submit a schedule of values for approval after award. Advanced payments are not permitted. |
| 34 |
| Tax Exemption: Is this project sales tax-exempt? If so, can the government provide a tax exemption certificate for materials purchased? |
See FAR 52.229-3 in the solicitation. Please note: in accordance with V.T.C.A., Tax Code §151.311, the purchase of tangible personal property for use in the performance of a contract for an organization exempted under Section 151.309 or 151.310 of this code is exempt if the tangible personal property is incorporated into realty in the performance of the contract. Additionally, the purchase of tangible personal property, other than machinery or equipment and its accessories and repair and replacement parts, for use in the performance of a contract for an improvement to realty for an organization exempted under Section 151.309 or 151.310 of the code is exempt if the tangible personal property is necessary and essential for the performance of the contract and completely consumed on the job. The VA is an exempt organization.
Therefore, the contractor’s purchase of such building and construction materials within the State of Texas to be incorporated into the real property belonging to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) or completely used in the performance of the contract is subject to exemption from Texas Sales and Use taxes under the code. To take advantage of the tax exemption, the successful offeror under this solicitation must complete a Texas Sales and Use Tax Exemption Certificate when it purchases construction materials for this contract.
All bids received in response to this solicitation are presumed to reflect this tax exemption and therefore should not include Texas’ Sales or Use Taxes on sales of materials for incorporation into VA real estate under this contract or used in the performance of this contract.
| 35 |
| Notice to Proceed (NTP): How soon after a contract award is the NTP expected to be issued? |
| NTP will be issued 30 days after the contract is awarded. |
| 36 |
| Submittal Platform: Will the VA accept the use of Procore software or equivalent as the primary submittal platform? |
Procore software or equivalent is acceptable. VA does have restrictions to some sites. Procore, Submittal Exchange, ProjectSight/Trimble, are a few that we are able to access.
| 37 |
| Payment for Stored Materials: Will payment applications for materials stored on-site or in a bonded warehouse be approved? |
Yes. A list of requirements will be provided after award that the contractor shall meet in order for the VA to pay for materials not installed.
| 38 |
| Bid Hold Period: Will the government consider reducing the bid hold period to 90 days due to current inflation risks? |
| Bid guarantee period is 90 days. Please refer to Page 1, Block 13d of the solicitation. |
| 39 |
| Economic Price Adjustment Clause: Will the government include an Economic Price Adjustment Clause in the contract to address price fluctuations in materials? |
| No. |
| 40 |
| Scheduling Consultant: Is an external scheduling consultant required, or can scheduling duties be handled in-house by a qualified team member? |
| An external scheduling consultant is not required. Schedules must include information as required by FAR 52.236-15 and VAAR 852.232-71. |
| 41 |
| Temporary Facilities: Are contractors required to provide a temporary site office or trailer, or will space be allocated within the existing facility? |
| See response to RFI #4. |
| 42 |
| Parking and Staging: Will there be designated parking and staging area for contractor personnel? |
| See response to RFI #42. |
| 43 |
| How many parking spaces will be provided if there is on-site parking? |
Contractors can park in any non-gated areas on VA Houston Campus with the exception of Parking Lot W.
| 44 |
| Site Access and Badging: Will the government provide a detailed badging and access protocol for contractor personnel? |
| Yes, this information will be shared during the preconstruction meeting post award. |
| 45 |
| Fire Watch: If impairments to fire alarm systems exceed four hours, will the VA provide support for fire watch personnel, or is the contractor solely responsible? |
| Per specification 01 35 26 Section 1.14 K, the contractor shall be responsible for providing fire watch for impairments that exceed 4 hours. |
| 46 |
| Environmental Protection Plan: Are there specific templates or guidelines required for the Environmental Protection Plan, or is a contractor-developed plan sufficient? |
| Contractor developed plan will be sufficient. |
| 47 |
| Infection Control: Please confirm modular walls (such as STARC) are allowed for ICRA. |
Yes. STARC modular walls may be used as long as they meet the ICRA classification requirements listed in the ICRA Schedule for the intended space.
| 48 |
| As-Built Drawings: Are as-built drawings available for existing conditions, or will the contractor need to verify all dimensions on-site? |
| As-built drawings will be available post award. Contractor will still need to verify conditions on-site. |
| 49 |
| The KTR would like to request a full points list out of the existing Johnson Controls Metasys BAS System, please advise? A full points list out of the existing system will ensure that all of the existing devices are covered. |
| VA Houston does not have a list of the current number of points on MetaSys. The contractor (awardee) must verify the points in field. |
| 50 |
| The KTR is a SDVOSB and can perform 15% of the construction work, provide bid bond, payment bond, and performance bonds for 15% of the project. Can my subcontractor provide bid bond, payment bond, and performance bonds for the other 85% of the project? |
All bonds have to be provided by the prime. Your firm would be required to submit 100% of the bonds under your company, not a subcontractor
| 51 |
| Will we be able to include our subcontractors past performance for you to assess the relative risks associated with an Offeror’s likelihood to success in fulfilling the solicitation’s requirements? |
| The past performance evaluation factor requires the prime contractor (offeror) to submit past projects where they were the prime contractor; see page 10 of the solicitation. |
| 52 |
| In specification 23 09 23-7, G that Control System Integrator has already been preselected. Who is the Controls Service Company that will be performing this scope? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 53 |
| Will the Controls Integrator also be allowed to perform the Controls Contractor scope of work as well? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 54 |
| Page MH109 keynote 2 states field controls from NAE-55-108 is the intent to reuse the existing Johnson Control N2 Protocol field controllers. Specification states: 1. Remove existing direct-digital control system ECC, communications network and controllers. Replace with new BACnet ECC, network and controllers compliant with this Section of the technical specifications. Is it the intent to re-use the existing JCI controllers or upgrade the controllers? Using the existing JCI controllers will limit the open market upgrade options, please clarify. |
| The final BAS product must be a complete working system that utilizes a single interface. If a system other than JCI is used, it must be compatible with JCI equipment or replace non-compatible components of the system for the system to work seamlessly. |
| 55 |
| BAS Network Infrastructure. There is conflicting statement about the BAS network: Scope of Work Document Paragraph 2.5: The current MEDVAMC Building Automation System will not be on or connected to the VA Network. Therefore, no Enterprise Risk Analysis is not required as of March 10, 2025. Notes on drawings: Reconnect to dedicated BAS network in the existing DDC Panel with within mechanical room. Coordinate with VA COR and Obtain IP addresses for infrastructure programming required to operate on the BAS ethernet. Is it the design intent to install a new dedicated fiber backbone network to accommodate the new BAS upgrade network as part of the BAS upgrade? |
| The intent of this project is not to run a new fiber optic network. The design intent is to utilize the existing BAS fiber network located in each mechanical bay. |
| 56 |
| There is reference to existing JCI controllers however there isn’t reference to Johnson Controls as an expansion of upgrade to the existing Johnson Controls system. Is it the intent of the RFP to upgrade the existing JCI system or upgrade the site BAS system in its entirety and open to other BAS manufacturers? |
| The final BAS product must be a complete working system that utilizes a single interface. If a system other than JCI is used, it must be compatible with JCI equipment or replace non-compatible components of the system for the system to work seamlessly. |
| 57 |
| Is this contract to replace the existing BAS system and or upgrade it? The existing BAS is Johnson Controls, does the existing system have the capability of utilizing existing equipment for an advantage of the upgrade or is the RFP to upgrade all equipment on the BAS system? |
| The final BAS product must be a complete working system that utilizes a single interface. If a system other than JCI is used, it must be compatible with JCI equipment or replace non-compatible components of the system for the system to work seamlessly. |
| 58 |
| Does the system require a new fiber back bone network that is dedicated to the BAS network? Does this include layer 3 managed network switches / racks / UPS Power and wire management as well? |
| The intent is to utilize the existing fiberoptic network. |
| 59 |
| We understand that the project will start with the outside buildings, and we will work our way in. Do you want the potential offeror to structure their quote as CLINS for each building? |
| No. Offerors shall submit pricing on the price sheet in the solicitation starting on page 3. |
| 60 |
| When accessing the mechanical rooms, are we able to apply and utilize PIV cards? Or will we need an escort when accessing these locations? |
| Awardee will be provided with a means of access to mech rooms. Escorts will be provided on a case-by-case basis. |
| 61 |
| We understand the outer buildings do not have as much foot traffic, but when it comes to the primary building with patients. Will we be working after hours and or weekends? |
| If planned work causes disruption to patient care or facility operations, work shall be conducted after hours at no additional cost to the VA. |
| 62 |
| In building 109, there was a lot of damage to the insulation, would you like this to be replaced with different material? |
Contractor is only responsible for the insulation impacted by the scope of this project. Work and repairs in areas outside the scope is not to be addressed.
| 63 |
| In building 110, there was a lot of water damage and rusted pipes. Does the VA plan to repair the water damage? If not, will that be included in the SOW? |
| Water damage and rusty pipe replacement are not a part of this project’s scope. |
| 64 |
| We have heard a lot from various entities throughout the VA about the cabling being cut. Is there a specific color cabling which you would like to utilize? Our plan is to tag the cabling and provide as builts. A specific color may help eliminate future confusion and issues with other trades performing work. |
| VA Houston recommends the “tan” color for the BAS controls project. Also, we can work with the awardee post award on the specifics. |
| 65 |
| Will there be new conduit required in the mechanical bays? |
Contractor may reutilize conduit where extant. Contractor shall clean conduit prior to reuse per spec section 26 05 33 - 3.2(F).
| 66 |
| Building 109 and 110: Will all the dampers / valves / actuators need to be replaced? Will all BAS associated electronic and mechanical equipment and devices need to be replaced? We noticed some of the mechanical devices such as dampers / valves were old and some not functioning? Please clarify Building 109 and 110 mechanical equipment replacement. |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 67 |
| General - Will there be a bid extension date? |
| Please see the offer extension date included in the solicitation amendment. |
| 68 |
| General -Will there need to be after hours calculated for lab and sensitive pressure control rooms? |
| See response to #61. |
| 69 |
| General -What are the requirements needed for containment required in all hospital/lab spaces? |
| Refer to the ICRA table and ICRA Schedule for requirements. |
| 70 |
| General -What are the training requirements for the project? |
Each division in the specifications has a separate training section. Please reference project specifications for training requirements.
| 71 |
| General- Is the warranty period a standard 1-year warranty or is there an extended warranty requirement? |
The warranty period of 1 year starts once “ALL” equipment and components have been installed in “ALL” buildings and the government makes final acceptance.
| 72 |
| General- Will contractor parking be available, and material drop off in designated areas? |
| See response to RFI #42. |
| 73 |
| SOW Alternates - Will a Smoke Damper Size Schedule be provided for actuator sizing? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 74 |
| SOW Alternates – Does smoke damper actuator report to an existing fireman override? Do smoke actuator position switches need to report to BAS as a hardwired input? |
| Smoke damper actuator shall indicate position to BAS as a hardwired input. |
| 75 |
| SOW Alternates - Are Liebert Units connected to a Liebert Site Link or do they have I-COM cards per unit? |
Liebert units are currently unmonitored. Provide necessary interface to allow compatibility for monitoring via new BAS system.
| 76 |
| SOW Alternates - What are the protocols and locations for the Lighting Controls in Building 109? (Modbus, LON, BACnet). |
| Contractor shall provide appropriate translator as required for lighting control panel interface. |
| 77 |
| SOW Alternates - What is the number of lighting control panels at Building 109? Are they only located in basement as noted or do other floors have them? |
| The lights being affected are controlled from the panel indicated on E-111. |
| 78 |
| MH107 - Does not note network controller is present, however in note 4 states reconnecting device to IP level of BAS network. Please clarify if a network level controller needs to be present in building. |
| Assume for bidding purposes that the contractor is required to provide and install a network controller for the building. |
| 79 |
| MH108 – Please provide valve schedule for retrofit of actuators. |
The Contractor is to field-verify the size of all valves being replaced or having actuators replaced. For the purpose of bidding, assume that FCU valves are 1” diameter.
| 80 |
| MH112 – MH113 – Please provide Mechanical Duct Drawings for takeoff of transitions of replacing the dual duct VAVs to single duct VAVs. |
Refer to plan note 4 on drawings MH112 and MH113 for the quantity and location of dual duct VAV boxes to be replaced. The Air Terminal Unit schedule on M-601 provides unit sizes.
| 81 |
| MH112 – MH113 – Existing AHU and Exhaust Controllers are N2. Is the goal to change controllers to BACnet capable controllers? |
The final BAS product must be a complete working system that utilizes a single interface. If a system other than JCI is used, it must be compatible with JCI equipment or replace non-compatible components of the system for the system to work seamlessly.
| 82 |
| MH112 – MH113 – Can box replacement occur during normal business hours? (7AM-5PM). |
The box replacement effort shall be coordinated with the COR. If the box replacement effort will not hinder VA operations, then the work can happen during core hours 7AM-5PM. Otherwise, if patient care or operations are impacted, the box replacement effort must take place after hours at no additional cost to VA.
| 83 |
| MH115 – Controllers are N2. Is the intention to replace the whole VAV controllers with a BACnet capable controller or just replace stats as is. |
The final BAS product must be a complete working system that utilizes a single interface. If a system other than JCI is used, it must be compatible with JCI equipment or replace non-compatible components of the system for the system to work seamlessly.
| 84 |
| M-501 - Are FCU’s in Building 100 Cooling Only? Schematic Label says 4 pipe configurations, but points/schematic shows 2 pipe configurations. |
For bidding purposes, assume that all FCU’s in building 100 are cooling only. Verify actual unit configuration in the field prior to submittal process and purchase of equipment and notify the Government promptly of any deviations.
| 85 |
| What are the protocols for the Energy Meters? (Modbus, LON, BACnet) |
The contractor is to coordinate meter data output protocol with the BAS input requirements.
| 86 |
| M-601 – Basis of airflow valve VAV design is Price Model RDV, are you accepting equivalent air valve substitutes with approval? Is an air valve required or is the intention to use a traditional damper VAV box? |
Refer to specification section 23 3600 for detailed Air Terminal Unit requirements. While the terminal units for building 109 are not an exhaust application, Price model RDV were used as a basis based on the need for single duct terminal units that do not have reheat coils.
| 87 |
| M-601 – NAE-02-EP is listed as unknown location, do we know what building or points this controller monitors? |
The location of the NAE-02-EP controllers is unknown. The Contractor is to carry an allowance for a quantity of three (3) of these controllers serving a total of 131 points.
| 88 |
| E-601 - What are the protocols for the Automated Transfer Switches? (Modbus, LON, BACnet) |
The Contractor-furnished energy meters scheduled on M-601 are to be provided with an output protocol to consistent with the protocol(s) supported by the new BAS system.
| 89 |
| SOW Alternates - What are the protocols and locations for the KW Meters? (Modbus, LON, BACnet) |
The Contractor-furnished energy meters scheduled on M-601 are to be provided with an output protocol to consistent with the protocol(s) supported by the new BAS system.
| 90 |
| Will an additional site visit be available? |
| Another organized site visit will not be scheduled. |
| 91 |
| Will office space be provided for a construction office, or is an office trailer required? |
| See response to RFI #4. |
| 92 |
| Will a site mobilization trailer be needed for contractor office space? |
| See response to RFI #4. |
| 93 |
| Will contractor parking and designated material drop-off areas be available? |
| See response to RFI #42. |
| 94 |
| Will site restrooms be available, or must the contractor provide portable restrooms? |
| Reference Spec 01 00 00 section 1.19 |
| 95 |
| Will a general safety coordinator be required on-site daily? |
| Follow all requirements per spec 01 35 26. |
| 96 |
| Is an OSHA 10 or OSHA 30 General Industry certification acceptable for the competent person or other workers? |
| Per spec 01 35 26, competent persons must have completed the OSHA 30-hour construction safety course. |
| 97 |
| Will there be a bid extension date? |
| Yes. |
| 98 |
| Is after-hours work required for labs and sensitive pressure control rooms? If so, please provide details. |
| See response to RFI #61. |
| 99 |
| What are the requirements for hospital and lab spaces? |
| See ICRA Table and ICRA Schedule for proper requirements. |
| 100 |
| What are the training requirements for the project? |
| See Response to RFI #70. |
| 101 |
| Is the warranty period a standard 1-year warranty, or is an extended warranty required? |
| See response to RFI #71. |
| 102 |
| Please provide CFR documentation, including: |
· 40 CFR 261: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
· 40 CFR 262: Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste
· 40 CFR 263: Standards Applicable to Transporters of Hazardous Waste
· 49 CFR 173: Subparts A, B, and J (General Requirements, Preparation, and Other Regulated Material Definitions for Shipments and Packaging) Follow project specifications for hazardous waste. Code of Federal Regulations may be found here: https://www.ecfr.gov/
| 103 |
| Building 100 For Room 1C-392A (First Floor, GI003), no notes are provided. What is the scope for this mechanical room? |
| The Scope shall be the same as the other mechanical rooms listed on the schedule. |
| 104 |
| Please provide the smoke damper schedule for Building 100, including sizes and ratings. |
| The Contractor is to field verify size and configuration of the Smoke Dampers. |
| 105 |
| Can a network controller be added to split the overloaded MSTP BACnet communication trunks in Building 100? |
| Yes. |
| 106 |
| Do the smoke dampers in mechanical rooms on the AHUs need replacement, and should all pneumatics be removed? |
| Response if forthcoming. |
| 107 |
| For Pods A, B, C, and D on the 1st Floor, where controls have been updated, do smoke damper controls need to be reintegrated into the AHU programming? |
| Assume for bidding purposes, that Yes, the smoke dampers are to be reintegrated into AHU controls. Field verify with the existing control sequences. |
| 108 |
| Are FCUs in Building 100 cooling-only? M-501 indicates a 4-pipe configuration, but points/schematic show a 2-pipe configuration. |
For bidding purposes, assume that all FCU’s in building 100 are cooling only. Verify actual unit configuration in the field prior to submittal process and purchase of equipment and notify the Government promptly of any deviations.
| 109 |
| Please provide the missing mechanical drawing for Building 108 (BM-DR). |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 110 |
| Will mechanical drawings for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floors of Building 109 be provided? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 111 |
| What are the protocols (Modbus, LON, BACnet) and locations for the lighting controls in Building 109? |
Contractor shall provide appropriate translator as required for lighting control panel interface.
| 112 |
| How many lighting control panels are in Building 109? Are they only in the basement, or are there panels on other floors? |
| Lights to be controlled are fed from the indicated panels. |
| 113 |
| Please confirm the network controller count for the project. |
| Bid based on drawings and specs; a separate summary will not be provided. |
| 114 |
| For MH107, note 4 mentions reconnecting devices to the IP level of the BAS network, but no network controller is noted. Is a network controller required? |
| See response to RFI #78 |
| 115 |
| Please provide the valve schedule for actuator retrofits in MH108. |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 116 |
| For MH112 and MH113, please provide mechanical duct drawings for the transition from dual duct VAVs to single duct VAVs. |
Refer to MH112 and MH113 for the location of dual duct VAVs to single duct VAV conversions. Refer to the general detail 2 on drawing MH113 for duct connections and refer to the Air Terminal Unit schedule on M-601 for sizes.
| 117 |
| For MH112 and MH113, please provide mechanical duct drawings for the transition from dual duct VAVs to single duct VAVs. |
Refer to MH112 and MH113 for the location of dual duct VAVs to single duct VAV conversions. Refer to the general detail 2 on drawing MH113 for duct connections, and refer to the Air Terminal Unit schedule on M-601 for sizes.
| 118 |
| For MH112 and MH113, can VAV box replacement occur during normal business hours (7 AM–5 PM)? |
| See response to RFI #82 |
| 119 |
| For MH115, controllers are N2. Should the entire VAV controllers be replaced with BACnet-capable controllers, or only the stats? |
| VAV’s in this building are being replaced. New VAV’s are to be provided with new controllers to match the new BAS. |
| 120 |
| For M-601, the basis of airflow valve VAV design is Price Model RDV. Are equivalent air valve substitutes acceptable with approval? Is an air valve required, or should a traditional damper VAV box be used? |
| See response to RFI #86 |
| 121 |
| For M-601, NAE-02-EP is listed with an unknown location. What building or points does this controller monitor? |
| See response to RFI #87 |
| 122 |
| What are the protocols (Modbus, LON, BACnet) for the energy meters (M-501) and automated transfer switches (E-601)? |
The Contractor-furnished energy meters scheduled on M-601 are to be provided with an output protocol to consistent with the protocol(s) supported by the new BAS system.
| 123 |
| Are Liebert units connected to a Liebert Site Link, or do they have I-COM cards per unit? |
| See response to RFI #75 |
| 124 |
| Will a smoke damper size schedule be provided for actuator sizing? |
| See response to RFI #73 |
| 125 |
| Do smoke damper actuators report to an existing fireman override? Must actuator position switches report to the BAS as hardwired inputs? |
| See response to RFI #74 |
| 126 |
| What are the protocols (Modbus, LON, BACnet) and locations for the KW meters? |
| Meters shall be provided with an output protocol consistent with the protocols supported by the new BAS system. |
| 127 |
| Will the VA provide CAD drawings of the most up-to-date floorplans of the VA campus, including room numbers, for the development of graphics? Or is the controls contractor responsible for developing these? |
| VA will provide all floor plans that are available in PDF format post award. |
| 128 |
| There is a substantial amount of mechanical equipment at the VA that is non-functional or otherwise in need of repair. Confirm that the controls contractor must make note of all these deficiencies prior to executing the project. |
| Yes. Contractor shall document deficiencies prior to starting construction. |
| 129 |
| Confirm that repairing existing non-functional controls or equipment is not included to be repaired in this scope. |
Confirmed. Contractor is not required to repair existing non-functional controls and/or equipment. Contractor shall document deficiencies prior to starting construction.
| 130 |
| What is the firm that the VA will contract with for the VA provided commissioning agent? |
| COR will provide commissioning agent’s information post award. |
| 131 |
| The statement of work document mentions monitoring of the solar panel system via the BAS, but this is not shown in the plans or specs. Is this required? Please provide plans and specs for this scope if required. |
| Monitoring of solar panel system is not within the scope of this project. |
| 132 |
| Spec Section 019100.1.7: The list of Systems to be Commissioned outlines that the entire DDC system and all HVAC and HVAC-related hydronic systems are to be commissioned. Please clarify whether controls on all of these systems are to be commissioned even if these controls are existing to remain. |
Only systems modified either by replacement of associated controllers or DDC control components need to be verified to be working properly at the end of the project. If an existing device stays on an existing controller, the individual device will not need to be verified. However, all controllers existing and new will need to be checked to ensure they are working as a complete system.
| 133 |
| Spec Section 019100.3.5.C: Can we use the existing VAMC WiFi network in all buildings to fulfill the requirement or is it the intent that the contractor install a completely new and separate Wi-Fi network throughout all buildings for this purpose? |
| VA wifi can be used but does not cover all areas of all buildings. Cellular hotspots or similar to be provided by the contractor when other coverage is not available. |
| 134 |
| Spec Section 019100.3.5.E: This implies that we must provide all point to point checkout data on every sensor on every system in all buildings. Clarify if all existing DDC controls to remain in-service on all existing systems must be checked out and commissioned even if we’re not replacing the controls. |
Systems must be verified down to the component level replaced. If a sensor or actuator is replaced the control point must be validated. If a controller is replaced visibility and response of all devices connected must be validated. Components not replaced only need to be validated so that they are visible throughout the control system and respond to the system control.
| 135 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.1.A.4: Please clarify that each “mechanical system” shown on the contract drawings are the “systems” that are to be getting new controls and all other “systems” not shown on the contract drawings that already have existing DDC controls are not to get new controls. |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 136 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.1.A.6: The controls specification requires the BAS to be Enterprise Risk Analysis compliant, but the Statement of Work document says that Enterprise Risk Analysis is not required as the BAS is not on the VA Network. Please clarify. |
| Please refer to section 2.5 SOW. The BAS network shall be a stand-alone system, not integrated into our main VA network. Therefore, an Enterprise Risk assessment is not required. |
| 137 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.1.A.6: Is there a pre-approved list of controls systems by the Enterprise Risk Analysis Specialized Device Cybersecurity Department? If so, please provide the list. If there is not a pre-approved list, how will this approval process be administered and when? Before contract award? After contract award? |
| See RFI #136 |
| 138 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.1.A.7: Provide a list of FedRAMP compliant controls systems. |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 139 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.1.A.8: Provide a list of DIACP compliant controls systems. |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 140 |
| Spec Section 230923 1.1.G: Confirm that the Controls System Integrator and the Controls Contractor should be one combined contractor. Otherwise, please disclose who the preselected Control System Integrator is as referenced by this spec section? |
| See response to RFIs # 52 & 53 |
| 141 |
| Spec Section 230923 1.1.G.4: In the responsibility table, does the “ECC expansion” provided by the CSI include the ECC hardware and BMS software? If so, what BMS software will the CSI be providing? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 142 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.4.A.1: The first sentence in this paragraph is confusing - Clarify who is responsible for providing the ECC hardware and software – it is recommended that the DDC contractor should provide it to assure source and manufacturer compatibility between the ECC and the new network controllers. In the second sentence, is the “integration subcontractor” the same as the CSI? If so, this sentence specifies that the CSI is responsible for “the complete design, installation, integration and commissioning of the system” but previous specifications for the CSI only have them responsible for the ECC and integration of new controls, database and graphics on the new ECC. Isn’t the DDC contractor to be responsible for “the complete design, installation, integration and commissioning of the system”? |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 143 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.4.A.3: Clarify to whom the list of similar projects shall be submitted to and provide a deadline for submission. Will these projects be evaluated for a short-list of pre-approved DDC contractors? If so, will the pre-approved list be published in an addendum? |
| This shall be submitted as a submittal for subcontractor’s qualifications post award. |
| 144 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.4.A.5: Clarify to whom the list of personnel resumés shall be submitted to and provide a deadline for submission. Will these resumés be evaluated for a short-list of pre-approved DDC contractors? If so, will the pre-approved list be published in an addendum? |
| This shall be submitted as a submittal for subcontractor’s qualifications post award. |
| 145 |
| Spec Section 230923.1.6: Clarify the warranty responsibilities and requirements for the CSI as it relates to the ECC. |
The warranty period of 1 year starts once “ALL” equipment and components have been installed in “ALL” buildings and the government makes final acceptance.
| 146 |
| Spec Section 230923.2.5.B: the POT is specified to be used as a browser access to the BMS or as a service/programming tool to access controllers and the network. Consider deleting the requirement for the (4) POTs to be BTL listed as B-AWSs. This would require any manufacturer to provide (4) copies of B-AWS server software which is not necessary to accomplish the specified functionality of the POT |
| Response is forthcoming. |
| 147 |
| Page MH101 note 3 and Page E101 note 3: Clarify that replacement of fire smoke damper pneumatic actuators is to be performed by division 26 and not by division 23. |
| Replacement of the damper actuators is the responsibility of the Contractor. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to determine which sub-trade will perform that work. |
| 148 |
| Page MH112 and Spec Section 230923.1.1.E: BMS specs responsibility matrix in 23 09 23 says that all power to all VAV boxes shall be provided by Div 26 but note 4 on mechanical plan MH112 says to provide 24VAC to terminal units. Clarify that all power to all terminal units shall be provided by Div 26. |
Source power from panels indicated on electrical drawings to a controls transformer to be provided and installed by Div. 26. Low voltage power downstream of controls transformers to be provided and installed by Div. 23 contractor. Coordinate location of transformers to ensure voltage drop does not affect device operation.
| 149 |
| MH100 Note 13: Is the “operator terminal” the same thing as the POT specified in spec section 230923? |
The “OPERATOR'S TERMINAL FOR THE BAS” noted on MH100 is the Engineering Control Center (“ECC”) in section 23 0932 paragraph 2.5. This is different from the “Portable Operator Terminal” specified in section 23 0923 paragraph 2.5.
| 150 |
| Page E-100, notes 1, 4-14: Clarify what type of meter is to be installed on the ATSs shown on this page. |
| Provide meters with capabilities per spec section 25 10 10 Advanced Utility Metering. |
| 151 |
| I see in the specification 23 09 23-7, G that Control System Integrator has already been preselected. Could you let me know who the Controls Service Company is, that will be performing this scope? |
| See response to RFI #52 |
| 152 |
| Will the Controls Integrator also be allowed to perform the Controls Contractor scope of work as well? |
| See response to RFI #53 |
| 153 |
| The Bid is currently scheduled for July 14,2025. This time frame does not allow us to put together our estimate and proposal, for a project of this size. Could you please extend the bid date by 30 days. |
| See response to RFI #67. |
| 154 |
| Will we be provided an opportunity to evaluate the existing system function prior to conversion to ensure we have agreement on what will be specific responsibility of the new project versus existing site conditions? |
| Yes. Contractor and COR will coordinate this effort post award. |
| 155 |
| Is a secure, on-premises Building Automation System (BAS) that aligns with NIST 800-53 and FIPS 140-2 acceptable, given that no BAS platforms currently hold Fed RAMP certification? |
| NIST 800-53 and FIPS 140-2 is acceptable. |
| 156 |
| Does Government have a list of all systems being controlled and approx. point counts for panel replacements? |
| See response to RFI #49 |
| 157 |
| Does the Government have an approx. list of number of graphics required for this project to match existing functionality? |
| MEDVAMC does not have a graphics list; VA Houston’s energy control center will work with awardee post award. |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.