Solicitation W912EF21R0010.pdf
PDF 787 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912EF21R0010
About this file
This document provides details of a forthcoming federal construction solicitation from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District. The solicitation will be for a project titled Lower Monumental Transformer T2 Oil Leak and Bushing Repair, to take place at Lower Monumental Dam in Franklin County, Washington. The work will include necessary transformer maintenance including disconnecting and cutting ducts and conductors, draining and purging oil, removing and replacing bushings and radiators, cleaning, testing, filling with oil, and commissioning the transformer. The solicitation will be issued as a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable request for proposals and result in a single firm fixed-price construction contract, set aside for small businesses with a size standard of $39.5 million. The estimated value is between $500,000 and $1,000,000. The NAICS code is 237130. The solicitation is expected to be posted to beta.sam.gov in June 2021 with proposals due approximately 30 days after. The point of contact is provided.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROJECT TITLE: Low er Monumental Transformer T2 Oil Leak and Bushing Repair
LOCATION: Low er Monumental Lock and Dam, Kahlotus, Washington
DAVID C. BOONE 509-527-7205
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS
NEGOTIATED
11-Jun-2021
(RFP)
(IFB)
X
CALL:
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
See Item 7
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID
3. DATE ISSUED
9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME
SOLICITATION
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________Sect. 00 70 00
12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
X YES NO
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and __________ copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________12 Jul 2021 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.
shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.
B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.
C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO.
7. ISSUED BY CODE
USAED, WALLA WALLA - CONTRACTING DIV.
DAVID C BOONE 201 N. THIRD AVENUE
WALLA WALLA WA 99362-1876
W912EF
PAGE OF PAGES
1 OF
CODE
(Title, identifying no., date):
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
03:00 PM (hour) Sealed envelopes containing offers
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)
509-527-7802FAX:TEL: 509-527-7205 TEL: FAX:
W912EF21R0010 65
20B. SIGNATURE
(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK
TO SIGN
NSN 7540-01-155-3212
SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)
AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
OFFER (Type or print)
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
CODE
(Insert any number equal to or greater than
20C. OFFER DATE
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)
CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY
(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
See Item 14
(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
30B. SIGNATURE
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .
gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30C. DATE
(Type or print)
TEL: EMAIL:
31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE
BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER
W912EF21R0010
Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation
Section 00 10 00, Solicitation Contract Form Section 00 21 00, Instructions Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certifications Section 00 70 00, Conditions of the Contract Section 00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions Technical Specifications Drawings
Section 00 21 00 - Instructions
BID SCHEDULE
Walla Walla District Corps of Engineers Lower Monumental Transformer T2 Leak & Bushing Repair
The magnitude of construction is estimated to be between $500,000 and $1,000,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY U/M U/P AMOUNT
Base Items 0001 Repair Transformer Bank T2 1 JOB XXXXX $_______
0002 Acquire new high & low voltage bushings 1 JOB XXXXX $_______
Optional Items
0003 Add Oxidation Inhibitor to Oil 1 JOB XXXXX $_______
SCHEDULE TOTAL $__________
IMPORTANT: See Section 01 22 00.00 28; MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT; Paragraph; Retainage of Payment, for withholding of payment for final deliverables.
U/M* = Unit of Measure U/P* = Unit Price
EVALUATION FACTORS
A. BASIS FOR AWARD
The Government will award a contract to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation with the lowest price proposal that is determined to be technically acceptable with appropriate consideration given to the three (3) evaluation factors: Experience; Past Performance; and Price. For a proposal to be considered technically acceptable, an Offeror shall submit a proposal that clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation and receive a rating of acceptable for all non-cost factors. Contract award will be made as a whole to one offeror.
The following paragraphs B through E cover the Factors to be evaluated, the evaluation approach for each Factor to include factor rating tables, proposal submission requirements and final discussion guidance.
B. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED
The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal provides the Government the best value on the basis of the lowest evaluated price (Factor 3) of proposals that meet or exceed the acceptability for the non-price evaluation factors (Factor 1 and Factor 2).
FACTOR 1 – EXPERIENCE
FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE
FACTOR 3 – PRICE
C. EVALUATION APPROACH
All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). The following sections define the information to be provided and describe how the information for each factor will be evaluated and rated. Proposals shall conform to the solicitation requirements, to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required of this solicitation.
1. FACTOR 1- EXPERIENCE
Proposals will be evaluated to determine experience with oil draining, disassembling, refurbishing, working within a transformer tank, assembling, vacuum oil filling, oil processing, testing and commissioning an oil-filled Generator Step-Up (GSU) Transformers. Offeror shall provide sufficient information to clearly demonstrate the breadth and depth of the Offeror’s experience.
Demonstrated experience shall be indicated by providing at least three (3) and up to six (6) projects completed within the past ten (10) years in which the Offeror and/or subcontractors can collectively demonstrate oil draining, disassembling, refurbishing, working within a transformer tank, assembling, vacuum oil filling, oil processing, testing and commissioning an oil-filled Generator Step-Up (GSU) Transformers. The submitted projects must also include the following:
• At least one (1) of the projects included a shell formed core.
• At least one (1) of the projects included working on a single-phase transformer.
Submit all information relating to this Factor on the attached Offeror Experience Form (Attachment B). If the prime contractor proposes self-performing the experience, ensure the proposal is clear that the Offeror will be performing this function. If the prime contractor proposes to use a subcontractor for experience, the offeror shall submit a signed Letter of Commitment from the subcontractor with the proposal in order for the experience to be evaluated.
Evaluation Standard
Adjectival Rating Description
Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation
2. FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE
There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: Recency, Relevancy (including context of data) and Quality (including general trends in the contractor performance and source of information).
The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the scope of work.
a. The Government will focus its inquiries on the offeror’s (and major subcontractor’s) record of performance as it relates to all solicitation requirements, including price, schedule, performance and management of sub-contractors. Major subcontractors are defined as members of an offeror’s overall team who are expected to perform ten (10) percent or more of the proposed effort. A significant achievement, problem, or lack of relevant data in any element of the work can become an important consideration in the evaluation process.
Therefore, offerors are reminded to include the most recent and relevant efforts (within the past ten (10) years) in their proposal. Absent any recent and relevant past performance history or when the performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will be assigned an “unknown confidence rating” and its proposal will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. The Government may use data provided by the offeror in its proposal and data obtained from other sources, including data in Government files or data obtained through interviews with personnel familiar with the contractor and their current and past performance under Federal, State, or Local government or commercial contracts for same or similar services as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 237130 Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction. Data submitted by the offeror or gathered from other sources by the government in conducting performance risk assessments shall not extend past ten years prior to the issue date of the request for proposal, but may include performance data generated during the past six years without regard to the contract award date.
b. Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contract numbers and descriptions for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past ten years, from the issue date of this request for proposal, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. The Government may consider a wide array of information from a variety of sources but is not compelled to rely on all of the information available.
c. The past performance factor considers each offeror’s demonstrated current and relevant past record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract requirements.
d. RECENCY: The Government will evaluate recency by examining the offerors’ record of past performance and to assess the time period during which the offeror’s past performance is considered relevant.
e. RELEVANCY: The Government will conduct a performance assessment based on the relevancy of the Offeror's current and past performance, as well as that of its major subcontractors, as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the required effort. These efforts include all aspects of schedule, performance and customer support, and the Offeror’s record of: 1) Conforming to specifications and standards of good workmanship; 2) Maintaining program execution within price; 3) Adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; 4) Ability to resolve technical and manufacturing problems quickly and effectively; 5) Businesslike concern for the interest of its customers and 6) Establishing and maintaining adequate management of subcontractors.
f. QUALITY: The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance. The quality past performance evaluations conducted gathers information from offeror’s customers to determine how well the offeror performed those past contracts.
Evaluation Standard
Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Offerors are reminded that the Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any source available. At no time during this process, during the debriefing, or after award, will the names of the individuals providing reference information about an Offeror’s past performance be revealed to the Offerors or to any other party.
Note: In accordance with FAR Part 15.305(a)(2)(iv), in the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable”.
A PPQ is included in this solicitation at Attachment A. Submit one Attachment A for each project narrative submitted under Factor 2. When completing the PPQ, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. However, if the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal due date, the Offeror shall, at a minimum, submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ with blocks 1 through 5 completed. This will allow the Government an opportunity to contact the client directly. Please contact the client to notify them of the Government’s intent to contact them regarding Past Performance on the project listed. Additionally, if the client requests, PPQs may be submitted directly from the client to the Government’s point of contact listed in Block 7 of Standard Form 1442.
Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal any PPQs previously submitted for other Solicitations/Requests for Proposals. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.
All documentation for this factor shall be contained in Volume 1 “Technical Proposal.”
FACTOR 3 - PRICE
Offerors must submit completed Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINS) with unit price, quantity, and extended price.
All extensions of the unit prices shown will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the extended price, the unit price will govern. For the purpose of evaluating proposals, the following will be used to resolve arithmetic discrepancies found on the face of the pricing schedule as submitted by the offeror:
a. Obviously misplaced decimal points will be corrected;
b. In a discrepancy between unit price and extended rice, the unit price will govern;
c. Calculation errors in extension of unit prices will be corrected;
d. Calculation errors in the addition of lump-sum and extended prices will be corrected.
An evaluation will be performed on the proposed prices. The evaluation will not be assigned an adjectival rating.
However, it will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.305 and FAR 15.404.
D. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
1. Introduction The offeror’s proposal shall be submitted electronically, as set forth below. The solicitation shall provide the Government address and receipt date for proposal submission. Files shall not contain classified data.
The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.
The offerors’ proposal shall consist of two (2) volumes. The Volumes are:
Volume I – Experience (Factor 1) Past Performance (Factor 2)
Volume II – Price (Factor 3)
Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations.
Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.
Any costs related to proposal preparation and submission will not be reimbursed by the Government.
2. Proposal Submission Requirements
a. Each volume shall be submitted as a separate PDF or ZIP file. Any pages that are changed (as a result of negotiations or proposal revisions) should be of a different color and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page. The revised pages shall be dated.
b. Printing should be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape.
c. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:
VOLUME TITLE PRINTED COPIES ELECTRONIC COPIES
Volume I Printed copies not required. 1 Volume II Printed copies not required. 1
d. Proposals may be rejected for failure to adhere to the proposal preparation requirements.
e. Proposals shall conform to the solicitation requirements to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required of this solicitation.
f. To submit proposals electronically via DoD SAFE, email Contract Specialist, David Boone at david.c.boone@usace.army.mil and Contracting Officer, Jani Long at jani.c.long@usace.army.mil for a unique code with valid email address and point of contact for your company. Mr. Boone will provide you with your unique code, then you will need to go to the following website: https://safe.apps.mil/
At the DoD SAFE website select “Drop-Off,” then enter your unique code, and submit your proposal(s).
When your proposal is submitted via the DoD SAFE website, the website will provide notification of the submittal to the recipients. For this solicitation, the recipient will be: David Boone, david.c.boone@usace.army.mil mailto:david.c.boone@usace.army.mil mailto:jani.c.long@usace.army.mil https://safe.apps.mil/ mailto:david.c.boone@usace.army.mil
• When your files have been “picked-up,” you will receive an email notification. If you have not received a notification, and it has been more than one business day since your “drop-off”
– please contact David Boone at david.c.boone@usace.army.mil.
For the purposes of determining whether the proposal was received “late” in accordance with FAR 15.208, the date and time the file(s) are uploaded into the DoD SAFE website as identified in the DoD Safe e-mail sent to the Contract Specialist(s)/Contracting Officer will be the time and date the Government received the proposal. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal.
NOTE: ONLY in the unusual case that the DoD SAFE website is “down” (not operational);
the Offeror should email their proposal to the following individuals prior to the proposal due date and time: David Boone whose email address is david.c.boone@usace.army.mil.
SUBMISSION DEADLINE - Proposals shall be received by the USACE Contracting Activity no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442. Official time will be established by the clock located in the area where proposals are received. Late proposals may not be accepted.
3. Proposal Files
a. Format The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and RFP number in the header and/or footer. Scans must be in color and at least 600 dpi. All files created in MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:
Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11”
NOTE: 11X17 folded pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations.
The following additional restrictions apply:
b. File Packaging. All of the proposal files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled proposal zip using WinZip version 6.2 or later, or as separate uploads in their native format, i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc., and submitted electronically via DoD SAFE. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files.
All price breakdown information to aid in the Price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format. **Please note – Self extracting exe files are not acceptable.
c. Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.
d. Subcontractor Identification. Offerors should clearly identify the firm(s) that will be utilized during performance of the contract or work that will be self-performed. Ensure the proposal is clear as to which function the Offeror or subcontractor will be performing. If the prime contractor proposes to use a subcontractor, the offeror shall submit a signed Letter of Commitment from the subcontractor with the proposal.
1. If a subcontractor is proposed, the proposal will be considered more favorable if the proposal contains evidence of the prime and subcontractor working successfully together previously on relevant projects.
2. If a joint venture is proposed, the proposal will be considered more favorable if the proposal contains evidence of the joint venture entity working successfully together previously on relevant projects.
e. VOLUME I, TAB1 – Experience. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:
(1) Section 1 – Project 1
(2) Section 2 – Project 2
(3) Section 3 – Project 3, etc.
Use attached “Offeror Experience Form” to describe the projects in which the Offeror has relevant experience as defined in Factor 1, Experience. Project experience shall include adequate detail to demonstrate the relevancy of the scope of work for comparison to that required in this solicitation.
f. VOLUME I, TAB 2 – Past Performance. This tab shall contain current and past performance information regarding similar contracts. Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor currently in performance or awarded during the past ten (10) years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort required by the RFP. Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, signed letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered. This tab shall be organized into the following sections:
(1) Section 1 – Contract Descriptions. This section shall include the following information in the following format. Ensure all information is current and accurate.
(a) Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and DUNS Number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).
(b) Government contracting activity, (or private firm) and current address, Procuring Contracting Officer’s name, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.
(c) Technical representative/COR and current email address, telephone and fax numbers.
(d) Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officer’s name, current e-mail address, telephone and fax number.
(e) Government contract administration activity’s Pre-Award point of contact name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.
(f) Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery Order Numbers.
(g) Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of Indefinite Delivery contracts, indicate specific type
(Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc.).
(h) Awarded price.
(i) Final or projected final price.
(j) Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion or work.
(k) Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.
(2) Section 2 – Performance. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract listed in Section 1 - Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP.
(a) For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor. The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.
(3) Section 3 – Subcontracts. Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government technical specification. This includes all subcontractors who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than 10% of the total proposed Price.
(4) Section 4 – New Corporate Entities. New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its officers and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited to demonstrate the relevancy of experience and past performance with this solicitation. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above. Signed Letters of Commitment shall be included in the proposal for these employees in order to be considered. Letters of Commitment must be signed both by the company official and the employee.
(5) Section 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire. For all contracts identified in Section 1 - Contract Descriptions, complete a Past Performance Questionnaire for any project that has not received a formal Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation.
The offeror shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail the questionnaire to the technical representative responsible for the current and past contract. The Points of Contact (POCs) shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Office no later than the proposal due date, to david.c.boone@usace.army.mil. The offeror shall submit, with its proposal, a list of all the POCs who were sent questionnaires. The POC list shall be submitted to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number;
Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC (month/day).
(6) Section 6-Submissions. Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors’ facility, i.e., in case an offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement.
Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency points of contact (POC) in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations as described above.
DO NOT SUBMIT PRICING INFORMATION IN VOLUME I.
g. VOLUME II, TAB 1 – Price. This tab shall consist of all information, required to support proposed prices. Certified pricing data is not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. There are no page limitations for this volume.
The offeror shall ensure that the information submitted in this volume is consistent with and fully supports the amounts set forth in the SF1442 and continuation sheets.
h. VOLUME II, TAB 2 – SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND AWARD DOCUMENTS AND
CERTIFICATIONS/REPRESENTATIONS
Certifications and Representations – Each offeror shall complete (fill-in and signatures) the solicitation sections indicated below using the file (without modification to the file) provided with the RFP. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the SF 1442 and all certifications requiring original signature. An Acrobat PDF file shall be created to capture the signatures for submission.
Section 00 21 00 – Standard Form 1442 Solicitation, Offer and Award Section 00 45 00 – Representations, Certification and Other Statements of Offerors
Solicitations, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations shall not be submitted separately from that submitted in VOLUME II – SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND
AWARD DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS /REPRESENTATIONS.
E. DISCUSSIONS
1. GENERAL INFORMATION. In accordance with FAR provision 52.215-1, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.
ATTENTION TO OFFERORS
ATTENTION TO OFFERORS
Offerors(s) may be asked to provide the following information for the Government’s use in the determination of offerors(s) responsibility, pursuant to FAR Part 9.
QUALIFICATIONS
1. Current Balance Sheet and latest Profit and Loss Statement prepared from the most recent fiscal year and certified by an officer of the company.
2. The name of your banking firm, telephone number and the name of the individual to contact for a line-of-credit reference.
Banking Institution ______________________________________________
Telephone Number ______________________________________________
Person to Contact ______________________________________________
Email Address ______________________________________________
3. Tax ID Number ___________________________________
4. Years of experience (in the field of the proposed work). _______________________ Indicate similarity of work currently under way to work required for this project.
5. List of present work to include agency or firm name, address, telephone number and email address of primary point of contact responsible for inspection and acceptance of the work. (Attach list)
6. List of previous work to include agency or firm name, address, telephone number and email address of primary point of contact responsible for inspection and acceptance of the work. (Attach list)
7. Percentage of work under this contract to be subcontracted _______________ %
Return completed form with all attachments to:
Email: david.c.boone@usace.army.mil
Offerors shall price all line items of the bid schedule.
AWARD will be made, as a whole, to one offeror.
BONDS: If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its offer by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed payments bonds or alternate payment protection within 10 Calendar days after receipt of the contract award forms by the offeror, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.
ARTHMETIC DISCREPANCIES:
(a) For the purposes of evaluating proposals, the following will be used to resolve arithmetic discrepancies found on the face of the Bid Schedule as submitted by the offeror:
a. Obviously misplaced decimal points will be corrected.
b. In a discrepancy between unit price and extended price, the unit price will govern;
c. Calculation errors in extension of unit prices will be corrected;
d. Calculation errors in the addition of lump-sum and extended prices will be corrected.
(b) For the purpose of proposal evaluation, the government will proceed on the assumption that the offeror intends his proposal to be evaluated on the basis of unit prices, the totals arrived at by resolution of arithmetic discrepancies as provided above the proposal will be so reflected on the abstract of offers.
(c) These correction procedures shall not be used to resolve any ambiguity in the proposal
OFFER QUANTITIES: Proposals for less than the specified quantities of each item in the bid schedule will not be considered.
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY, PREAWARD SURVEY
In order to determine a contractor’s responsibility for purposes of contract award the contractor is required to provide a statement regarding previous experience and past performance in performing comparable work, information related to the business organization, financial resources, and/or plant to be used in performing the work.
(See the Attention to Bidders form included in this solicitation.) In accordance with FAR 9.104-1, to be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must –
(a) Have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them;
(b) Be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;
(c) Have a satisfactory performance record. (A prospective contractor shall not be determined responsible or nonresponsible solely on the basis of a lack of relevant performance history except as provided in FAR 9.104-2);
(d) Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics;
(e) Have the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them;
(f) Have the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them;
and
(g) Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.
BIDDER INQUIRY
All inquiries regarding this solicitation are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry. Telephone and email inquiries will not be accepted. Bidder Inquiry is a web-site that allows bidders to post questions regarding the solicitation and view all questions by other bidders and responses by USACE. Bidder Inquiry can be accessed through ProjNet at (https://www.projnet.org)
To submit and review inquiry items, prospective vendors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below the key for access. A prospective vendor who submits a comment /question will receive an acknowledgement of their comment/question via email. Another email to the same address will notify the prospective vendor once the reply is available for viewing.
https://www.projnet.org/
TIMING OF BIDDER INQUIRIES: Bidders are encouraged to submit their bidder inquiries promptly. The Government will make every effort to answer all bidder inquiries; however, the closer to the bid or proposal due date an inquiry is received, the less likely it is that a timely response can be provided.
The Bidder Inquiry Key is: G58XYX-QI25DF
Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:
1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.
2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.
3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.
4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.
5. Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.
6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.
7. Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.
Instructions for Entering Questions:
1. After you are logged in click on the "post new inquiry", it is on the left side of the window under the Word "Submit" a.) This is the window where you will enter your questions b.) Comment Classification: Click on the down arrow to the right of the words “Please select from below”, select “Public” c.) Discipline: This is where you select who this question should be directed to. Example; if the question is about an electrical drawing or specification select: “Electrical” from the pull down list.
d.) Sheet. Enter the sheet number of the drawing you are asking about.
e.) Detail. Enter the detail name of the detail shown on the drawing that you are asking about.
f.) Specification. Enter the Specification number and paragraph number.
g.) File. Use this if you are going to attach a pdf file.
h.) Question. Enter your question here.
Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:
1. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be provided any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.
2. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.
3. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.
4. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.
5. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.
6. Click Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.
7. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.
For questions about the ProjNet Bidder Inquiry, please contact the Call Center help desk toll free at 1-800-428- HELP, which operates from 8AM to 5PM (Central US time zone). Bidder inquiry help questions can also be emailed to the helpdesk at staff@projnet.info mailto:staff@projnet.info
EXPERIENCE FORM
OFFEROR EXPERIENCE FORM
Technical Factor: Factor 1 Factor Title: Experience
Name of Offeror: ______________________________
Project Title: _________________________________________________________________
Contract/Project Number: _________________________
Project Location: _________________________________
Total Contract Value: $_______________ (Final value if completed, current value if not completed)
If Offeror performed as Subcontractor, Value of Subcontract: $_______________
Construction Phase Start Date: ___________________________________
Construction Phase Completion Date: ______________________________ (Actual date if project has been completed, anticipated date if project is not complete)
Name of Customer/Client: ______________________________________________________
Telephone Number of Customer/Client: __________________________________________
Email Address of Customer/Client: ______________________________________________
Description of Project’s Scope:
Offeror’s role and responsibility during construction of the project:
(Indicate whether your firm performed as a prime or subcontractor.)
Describe the relevancy of the reference project with the scope required in this solicitation:
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?
(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .