Sol_140P5425R0021_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 190 KB Posted

Attached to
FELLERS HOUSE REHAB
Solicitation number
140P5425R0021
Issued by

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation 140P5425R0021 issued by the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Contracting Operations East, South Contracting Office. The solicitation is for the Rehabilitation of the Feller House Exterior, and the questionnaire is designed to collect performance feedback from a previous or current contract reference.

The questionnaire must be completed and submitted directly to the Contracting Officer, Tony Eusebio, via corporate email by 5:00 P.M. EDT on Monday, August 18, 2025. It requires the reference to evaluate the contractor's performance across several key areas, including overall performance, timeliness, ability to resolve issues, quality of work, and an overall rating. The evaluation uses a rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with space for detailed comments. The document emphasizes that the information is source selection sensitive and contains strict guidelines about how the performance information can be used.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOL 140P5425R0021 ATTACHMENT 0003-

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation# 140P5425R0021 Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to tony_eusebio@nps.gov

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Contracting Operations East, South Contracting Office, Solicitation Number:

140P5425R0021 for the Rehabilitation Feller House Exterior. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference for our performance for this type of construction service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail it to the Contracting Officer, e-mail:

tony_eusebio@nps.gov

Questionnaire is due to Tony Eusebio no later than 5:00 P.M. EDT on Monday, August 18, 2025. The questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate email account.

Notice to Contractor

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

If you will not be available for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contracting officer to contact.

Alternate POC name: ________________________________________

Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________

Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________

Thank you.

NAME OF OFFEROR BEING RATED:

Phone:

E-Mail:

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________

2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________

3. Period of Performance:

mailto:tony_eusebio@nps.gov

4. Brief description of items provided:

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________

Agency/Company:

Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________

E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________

II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions –

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

5BEXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

0BVERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

1BSATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

2BMARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

3BUNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

4BNOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide an assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation

Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory 6BN/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products promptly?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory 7BN/A

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Question 4. Quality of Work

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Shipments

Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of the Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on the contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

MARGINAL
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
N/A
N/A
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .