Past_Performance_Form_FSI__DOS.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Offsite Training and Lodging Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SFSIAQ16Q4002
About this file
Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SFSIAQ16Q4002_A002_Offsite.pdf | ||
| SFSIAQ16Q4002_A001_Offsite.pdf | ||
| SFSIAQ16Q4002_Offsite.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Reference Package
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SHEET COVER SHEET
Name of Company:
Contracting with:
Contract Type:
Length of time your office has been involved with this company:
Description of the Services Provided:
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
Neutral
/ NA
Exceeded Requirement
Met Requirement
Did not meet Requirement
A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship.
(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
B. COST CONTROL:
(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.
C. SCHEDULE:
(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
D. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) was apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.
E. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
(1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the program.
(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC.
(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.
F. PERSONNEL:
(1) The labor turnover in personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.
(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.
3) Were key personnel available? How often did they visit and meet with your office?
G. OTHER:
(1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes ( ) No If “No”, please provide an explanation.____________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .