Section L- Attchment B- Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 69 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mobile Aircraft Arresting System- DRAFT RFP
- Solicitation number
- FA8534-21-R-0009
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| USAF Approved Test Matrix for All AAS at NAVAIR.pdf | ||
| USG- Ktr QA_2- Responses.pdf | ||
| AFMC Form 260_FAT.pdf | ||
| SOW_09-Jul-2021.pdf | ||
| 7545764 Rev B.pdf | ||
| 515053 Rev J.pdf | ||
| 66D1751 Rev K.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 04 - Downselect Cost Model.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AFMC Form 260_FAT.pdf | ||
| AFMC Form 158- Packaging.pdf | ||
| MIL-STD-3035.pdf | ||
| DD Form 1653-Transportation.pdf | ||
| Section L - Downselect_5.4_FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Attachment 03 - Initial Cost Model.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Section M - Downselect_5.4- FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Attachment 01- SOW.pdf | ||
| Section M - Initial_6.4 FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| CDRLS Portfolio.pdf | ||
| Section L - Initial_6.4- FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Attachment 02 - Cross Reference Matrix.doc | DOC document | |
| DRAFT- FA8534-21-R-0009.pdf | ||
| MIL-STD-3036.pdf |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ATTACHMENT B
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR
MOBILE AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEM (MAAS)
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:
Name/Signature and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Agency or Business: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Telephone No: _______________________________
FAX No: ____________________________________
Email: _______________________________________
Return your completed questionnaire either by mail to AFLCMC/WNKAC 235 Byron St., STE. 19A, BLDG 300CML, Robins AFB, GA 31098, Attention: Kristen Campbell and Kelsey Wade, or electronically to kristen.campbell.2@us.af.mil and kelsey.wade.1@us.af.mil. Please clearly identify the email as a “Past Perormance Questionnaire for Mobile Aircraft Arresting System RFP FA8534-21-R-0009”, no later than the date and time specified in Block 8 on the face page of the RFP.
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
Part I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.
Contractor/Business: __________________________________________ Contractor CAGE Code: __________
Program Title and Brief Description: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Role in the Program/Work Performed As:
_____Prime _____Subcontractor _____Vendor/Supplier
Contract Number: ________________________________ Number of Years?: Basic:________ Option: _________
Contract Type(s): List all applicable contract types, i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc._________________________
Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.
Period of Performance:
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable) ___________________________________________________________________________________
Contract Dollar Value:
1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ________________________________________________________________
2. Current MAX $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ________________________________________________________________
3. Primary Causes of Changes for differences between initial contract cost and final contract cost:
NOTE: In Part III., should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 4 of 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.
PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.
Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions:
N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory V=Very Good E=Exceptional
| N/A |
| U |
| M |
| S |
| V |
| E |
1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the technical/performance requirements of the specification:
2. Configuration Management (first product delivered same as last):
3. Quality of Completed Product:
4. Overall management of subcontracting efforts:
5. Quality of Technical Manuals or Commercial Manuals:
6. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions:
7. Adequate Number of Dedicated Resources For Your Program:
8. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program:
9. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight?
10. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones:
11. Completed Work on Time:
12. Extent to which small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses and other socio-economic business sectors were utilized in the performance of the contract:
13. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default (partially or completely)? If yes, explain. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.
15. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
16. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
17. Additional Remarks.
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.
RFP NUMBER
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM
E EXCEPTIONAL: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL: During the contract period, performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY: During the contract period, performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
NOTICE TO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENTS: Please do not include this page when returning the completed questionnaire.
(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .