Section J - Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionaire Form.docx

DOCX document 30 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Transportation Services at the FAA, William J. Hughes Technical Center for Advanced Aerospace, Atlantic City International Airport, New Jersey
Solicitation number
692M15-24-R-00009
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire Form for the Air Transportation Services Solicitation 692M15-24-R-00009 issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Technical Center. The solicitation is for air transportation services from the William J. Hughes Technical Center at the Atlantic City International Airport to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. The scope includes compliance with contract requirements, timeliness of performance, cost control, program management, and customer satisfaction. The questionnaire is to be completed by respondents and returned directly to the Contracting Officer by the due date. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses under NAICS code 481111 for Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation, with an anticipated award to the lowest-priced, technically acceptable responsible offeror. The FAA reserves the right to communicate with offerors and review program eligibility during the solicitation process.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Air Transportation Services

SIR 692M15-24-R-00009

ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE FORM

Please send the completed questionnaire directly via email to Contracting Officer, Colleen McGuire at colleen.mcguire@faa.gov, no later than __________________________.

OFFEROR INFORMATION

Offeror Name:

Offeror Address:

CONTRACT IDENTIFICATIONOFFEROR COMPLETE

Project Title:

Contract Number:

Agency/Customer:

Agency/Customer POC Name:

Agency/Customer POC Email Address

Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT)

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support very high or very low rating should be noted on the last page.

Assign each area a rating of, 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory), and 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines which is provided as Exhibit 1 as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating.

A. IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDENT

Name:

Title:

Telephone Number:

Address:

Email:

B. EVALUATION

QUALITY OF SERVICE:

#
Category
Rating
1
2
3
4
N/A
1
Compliance with contract requirements
2
Accuracy of reports
3
Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel
4
Capability of personnel to perform required services
5
Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services
6
Overall quality of service

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

#
Category
Rating
1
2
3
4
N/A
1
Reliability
2
Responsive to technical direction
3
Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines

COST CONTROL:

#
Category
Rating
1
2
3
4
N/A
1
Current, accurate and complete billings
2
Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals
3
Cost effectiveness

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:

#
Category
Rating
1
2
3
4
N/A
1
Adequate and complete management plan
2
Specific management team dedicated to this project
3
Indications that the provided team had experience in subcontractor management and surveillance
4
Process, or metrics, for the evaluation of their own overall management performance

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP:

#
Category
Rating
1
2
3
4
N/A
1
Effective management, including subcontracts
2
Reasonable/cooperative behavior
3
Responsive to contract requirements
4
Notification of problems
5
Flexibility
6
Proactive vs. reactive

OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

#
Category
Response
Yes
No
1
The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

a. Contractor Manageent Personnel

b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Rating Guidelines Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.

RATING
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
4-Outstanding
Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services
Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete billings
Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/

administrative issues is effective

3-Good
Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified
Contractor is usually effective in managing costs
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective
2-Satisfactory
Some problems have been encountered
Contractor is having some problems in managing costs effectively
Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective
1-Unsatisfactory
Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives
Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .