Attachment_L-3__Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 93 KB Posted

Attached to
SECHQ1-14-R-0021- AWARD NOTIFICATION - WC2
Solicitation number
SECHQ1-14-R-0021
Issued by

About this file

Attachment L-3

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Award_Notification_WC-2.pdf PDF
Award_Notification.pdf PDF
SECHQ1-14-R-0021-_Amendment_000003.pdf PDF
CLS_-_Sections_B_through_M_-_Amendment_000003.pdf PDF
L-1_Pricing_Templates_-_Amendment_000003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CLS_RFP_Cover_Letter_-_Amendment_000003.pdf PDF
L-5_Work_Category_1_-_Amendment_000003.pdf PDF
CLS_-_Questions_and_Responses-_Amendment_000003.pdf PDF
Amendment_000002.pdf PDF
Attachment_-_Fact_Sheet.pdf PDF
Amendment_000001_-_SECHQ1-14-R-0021.pdf PDF
Attachment_H-4_Declaration_for_Federal_Employment.pdf PDF
Attachment_H-1_NDA-Contractor_Entity.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-6_Work_Category_2.pdf PDF
SECHQ1-14-R-0021.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-7_Work_Category_3.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-5_Work_Category_1.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-2_Descriptions_of_Personnel_Labor_Category_by_Work_Category.pdf PDF
L-1_Pricing_Templates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_I-1_DOL_Area_Wage_Determinations.pdf PDF
Attachment_H-5_Authorization_for_Release_of_Credit_Information.pdf PDF
Attachment_H-2_NDA-Contract_Personnel.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-4_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan_Format.docx DOCX document
SECHQ114R0021_-_RFP_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_H-3_Contractor_Data_Form.pdf PDF
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment L-3

Past Performance Questionnaire

SECHQ1-14-R-0021

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Office of Acquisitions, intends to obtain a qualified firm under RFP No. SECHQ1-14-R-0021 to provide non-personal professional legal support services and products to support the mission requirements of the SEC. In order to accurately evaluate the Offeror’s past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying the past performance history of this Offeror.

Two forms are provided to complete the evaluation: 1) Performance Rating Form; and 2) Supplemental Comment Form. Upon completion of this form, please submit it as an e-mailed attachment Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted to OA-CLS@sec.gov NO LATER THAN 2:00 P.M. Eastern Time on July 22, 2014. Please make the subject line of the e-mail read “SECHQ1-14-R-0021 - Past Performance Questionnaire – Insert Evaluated Company’s Name.”

The following standards shall be used in arriving at the rating.

Outstanding
The Quoter’s record of past performance, as applicable, specifically relates to and suggests that SEC can expect superior performance and customer satisfaction for this effort with very low risk.
Very Good
The Quoter’s record of past performance, as applicable, specifically relates to and suggests that SEC may expect highly satisfactory performance and customer satisfaction for this effort with minimal risk.
Acceptable
The Quoter’s record of past performance, as applicable, specifically relates to and suggests that the SEC may expect satisfactory performance and customer satisfaction for this effort.
Marginal
The Quoter’s record of past performance, as applicable, suggests that the Government may expect less than satisfactory performance and customer satisfaction for this effort. The Quoter’s performance record presents a high degree of risk.

Unacceptable

The Quoter’s record of past performance, as applicable, suggests that the Government may expect unsatisfactory performance and customer satisfaction for this effort. The Quoter’s performance record, as applicable, suggests a high degree of risk.

Neutral

A "Neutral" rating indicates a quoter without a record of past performance or for whom information on relevant past performance is not available.

Performance Rating Form

NAME OF COMPANY EVALUATED:

ADDRESS OF COMPANY EVALUATED:

CONTRACT NUMBER

CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

CONTRACT VALUE
CONTRACT TYPE

CONTRACTING OFFICER NAME,

ADDRESS, FAX AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND EMAIL ADDRESS

TYPE OF SERVICES PERFORMED (ACTIVITY):

NAME OF EVALUATOR, COMPANY/AGENCY, ADDRESS, FAX AND TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS
DATE EVALUATION PROVIDED

Additional Comment Form

Please provide any additional comments regarding your performance element ratings in the space below. Please add additional pages as necessary.

Performance Element

Outstanding

Very Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptab le

Neutral

1. QUALITY OF TECHNICAL APPROACH

(For example:

Were the services comprehensive, complete, and feasible?

(Met needs, performed successfully, accommodated changing requirements.)

2. UNDERSTANDING OF REQUIREMENTS

(For example:

Did contractor show an understanding of scope requirements an appreciation complexity requirements?

And did contractor effectively identify flaws, inconsistencies other inaccuracies in your technical direction?)

3. EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT USE OF

RESOURCES

(For example: Was the contractor able to obtain in a timely manner the amount and type of personnel resources required to support the project, effectively train personnel to perform the work required for the project, and maintain the required workforce throughout the term of the contract?)

4. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

(For example: Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)

5. QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE/CUSTOMER

SATISFACTION

(For example: Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?)

6. BUSINESS BEHAVIOR

(For example: Was the contractor reasonable and cooperative at the corporate and program levels in response to changes in technical direction, correcting errors, poor performance, criticism/rejection of contract deliverables and other quality issues?)

7. COMMUNICATION

(For example: Did the contractor work and communicate well with contracting officers, contracting officer’s technical representatives, end users, other contractors, subcontractors, and in-house staff?)

8. COST CONTROL

(For example: Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic costs, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost effective manner?)

NO

9.

Given the choice, would you do business with this contractor again?

YES

FOR #9, PLEASE ANSWER “Yes” or “No”, as appropriate

Cost Control

Timeliness of Performance

Quality / Customer Satisfaction

Technical Performance (Quality of Product or Service)

PAGE

4 SECHQ1-14-R-0021 Attachment L-3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .