SE_11404_Attachment_4_-_MQ_Response_Template.docx
DOCX document 45 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SFGOV-0000011404
- Issued by
- San Francisco County, San Francisco City, California
About this file
Summary of SE_11404_Attachment_4_-_MQ_Response_Template.docx
This document is a Minority Quotation (MQ) Response Template provided by the City and County of San Francisco Office of Contract Administration for the Technology Marketplace 3.0 Micro LBE Set-Aside solicitation (TC99421). The template is designed to facilitate responses from proposers seeking to provide Information Technology commodities and services to City Departments on an as-needed basis through the City's Technology Marketplace program. The template standardizes the format and structure for minority-owned businesses to submit their qualifications and pricing proposals in response to this procurement opportunity, which targets Micro Local Business Enterprises (Micro LBEs) as part of the set-aside process.
The MQ Response Template establishes uniform requirements for proposers to demonstrate their eligibility, capabilities, and pricing for IT commodities and services. By providing a standardized response format, the template ensures consistency in proposal evaluation and administration while supporting the City's commitment to fostering economic participation by minority and locally-based businesses. This set-aside designation is explicitly selected as part of the Technology Marketplace 3.0 initiative, which reserves contracting opportunities for qualified Micro LBE vendors as defined by San Francisco's local business enterprise program.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sourcing Event 0000011404 Attachment 4 Minimum Qualification Response Template
Proposer Name
Instructions to Proposers Proposer shall use this template to provide their Written Proposal responses. Proposers are only required to fill out blue fields. Responses will be evaluated based on the quality and sufficiency of each response and, where applicable, the quality of the supplemental documents required as part of the response.
All documents submitted in response to this Solicitation are subject to public disclosure. Therefore, please exclude or otherwise identify confidential or proprietary information, as appropriate.
The Written Proposal Template consists of three Aggregates, one for each CMD LBE category. Proposers must pass and be certified for EACH Aggregate for which they are submitting a Proposal. A Proposer may seek to be qualified for one, multiple, or all Aggregates.
Scoring Criteria
Aggregate 1 EQ108–Computer Hardware/Software/Peripheral Equipment
Pass/Fail
Aggregate 2 GS027-Data Information Network Services
Pass/Fail
Aggregate 3 GS109–Computer Systems Services
Pass/Fail
| P-690 (3-24): Attachment 4 | 2 | Sourcing Event 0000011404 | |
| MQ Response Template | October 22, 2026 |
Aggregate 1 (Pass/Fail)
Who must complete this Section: Micro-LBE’s Certified in EQ108–Computer Hardware/Software/Peripheral Equipment
Proposer must pass both questions A and B in order to pass this Aggregate.
A. Proposer must be certified as a Micro-LBE by the San Francisco Contract Monitoring Division in this category by the proposal submission deadline. Proposer must provide evidence of this certification. In the space below, state:
If you are a certified LBE in this category; and The evidence of such certification you are providing with your proposal.
Proposer Question A Response
B. Using the table below, identify three projects/transactions in the last five years, each with a value greater than $5,000, that demonstrate your experience in the sale of EQ108–Computer Hardware/Software/ Peripheral Equipment to a governmental or institutional entity. For each of the three projects, identify the client served, items sold, approximate dollar value of the transaction, and approximate date of the transaction. Include a contact person name, email, and phone number so that City may verify each transaction.
YOU MUST IDENTIFY THREE VERIFIABLE PROJECTS THAT MEET THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS TO PASS THIS QUESTION.
| Project Name |
| Approximate Transaction Date |
| Client Served |
Including name, email and phone number of the client’s contact.
| Summary of Items Sold |
| Approximate Dollar Value |
Aggregate 2 (Pass/Fail)
Who must complete this Section: Micro-LBE’s Certified in GS027–Data Information Network Services
Proposer must pass both questions A and B in order to pass this Aggregate.
A. Proposer must be certified as a Micro-LBE by the San Francisco Contract Monitoring Division in this category by the proposal submission deadline. Proposer must provide evidence of this certification. In the space below state:
1. If you are a certified LBE in this category; and
2. The evidence of such certification you are providing with your proposal.
Proposer Question A Response
B. Using the table below, identify three projects/transactions in the last five years, each with a value greater than $5,000, that demonstrate your experience in the performance of GS027–Data Information Network Services to a governmental or institutional entity. For each of the three projects, identify the client served, services performed, approximate dollar value of the transaction, and approximate date(s) of the transaction. Include a contact person name, email, and phone number so that City may verify each transaction.
| Project Name |
| Approximate Transaction Date(s) |
| Client Served |
Including name, email and phone number of the client’s contact.
| Description of Services Performed |
| Approximate Dollar Value |
Aggregate 3 (Pass/Fail)
Who must complete this Section: Micro-LBE’s Certified in GS109–Computer Systems Services
Proposer must pass both questions A and B in order to pass this Aggregate.
A. Proposer must be certified as a Micro-LBE by the San Francisco Contract Monitoring Division in this category by the proposal submission deadline. Proposer must provide evidence of this certification. In the space below, state:
1. If you are a certified LBE in this category; and
2. The evidence of such certification you are providing with your proposal.
Proposer Question A Response
B. Using the table below, identify three projects/transactions in the last five years, each with a value greater than $5,000, that demonstrate your experience in the performance of GS109–Computer Systems Services to a governmental or institutional entity. For each of the three projects, identify the client served, services performed, approximate dollar value of the transaction, and approximate date(s) of the transaction. Include a contact person name, email, and phone number so that City may verify each transaction.
| Project Name |
| Approximate Transaction Date(s) |
| Client Served |
Including name, email and phone number of the client’s contact.
| Description of Services Performed |
| Approximate Dollar value |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .