SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_NeedsBookSample.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Highway Needs and Analysis Report Tool
- Solicitation number
- 25RFP12707
- Issued by
- Harding County, South Dakota
About this file
This is a 2020 Highway Needs and Project Analysis Report from the South Dakota Department of Transportation's Division of Planning/Engineering, prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. The report, in its fourteenth year using an enhanced pavement management system and seventeenth year utilizing ESRI's geographical information systems software, provides detailed analysis of state-administered highways including surface conditions, maintenance costs, traffic data, and proposed improvements. The document includes comprehensive definitions, highway segment analysis by route number, and specialized maps showing highway systems, truck traffic, pavement types, and surface conditions.
The report operates on an optimization principle where improvement projects are selected based on maximum benefit-to-cost ratio within available funding. It uses visual pavement surface surveys collected yearly to assess various types of distress including transverse cracking, fatigue cracking, patching deterioration, block cracking, and other factors. The data represents budget estimates and STIP projects as of April 23, 2020. The system includes life cycles based on specific pavement types and applied treatments, with results showing surface condition indices on a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). Major mainline improvements are included, while minor improvements like fence repair, roadway lighting, and signing are excluded. The document was printed in 130 copies at a cost of $37.63 per document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP Document.pdf | ||
| Response to Offeror Questions document.pdf | ||
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_NeedsBookSample.pdf | ||
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_Requirements.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_Costs.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_Vendor_Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_Data_specifications.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP Document.pdf | ||
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_Costs.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_Data_specifications.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_Vendor_Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| SDDOT_HNAR_25RFP12707_Requirements.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HIGHWAY NEEDS AND
PROJECT ANALYSIS REPORT
FOR
STATE ADMINISTERED HIGHWAYS
Prepared By the
South Dakota Department of Transportation Division of Planning/Engineering
In Cooperation With The
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
Table of Contents
Introduction ...������������� Introduction 1 - 2
Definitions ������������� Definitions 1 � 5
Highway Segments
Route Number Page 10 �������������������� 1 - 10
11 �������������������� 11 - 22 12 �������������������� 23 - 62 13 �������������������� 63 - 64 14 �������������������� 65 - 104 14B �������������������� 105 - 112 14L �������������������� 113 - 114 14A �������������������� 115 - 123 15 �������������������� 124 - 128 16 �������������������� 129 - 143
16B �������������������� 144 - 148 16A �������������������� 149 - 161 17 �������������������� 162 - 162 18 �������������������� 163 - 206 18B �������������������� 207 - 207 18P �������������������� 208 - 209
19 �������������������� 210 - 218 19A �������������������� 219 - 219 20 �������������������� 220 - 236 20P �������������������� 237 - 237 21 �������������������� 238 - 239 22 �������������������� 240 - 241 25 �������������������� 242 - 255 26 �������������������� 256 - 257 27 �������������������� 258 - 259 28 �������������������� 260 - 266
29 �������������������� 267 - 300 29L �������������������� 301 - 301 29P �������������������� 302 - 302 30 �������������������� 303 - 303 32 �������������������� 304 - 304 34 �������������������� 305 - 337 36 �������������������� 338 - 338
37 �������������������� 339 - 359 37P �������������������� 360 - 362 38 �������������������� 363 - 370 38P �������������������� 371 - 372 40 �������������������� 373 - 375 42 �������������������� 376 - 381 43 �������������������� 382 - 382 44 �������������������� 383 - 413 45 �������������������� 414 - 421 46 �������������������� 422 - 429 47 �������������������� 430 - 441 48 �������������������� 442 - 442 49 �������������������� 443 - 443 50 �������������������� 444 - 465 50L �������������������� 466 - 469 52 �������������������� 470 - 471 53 �������������������� 472 - 474 63 �������������������� 475 - 483
65 �������������������� 484 - 485 71 �������������������� 486 - 488 73 �������������������� 489 - 497 75 �������������������� 498 - 498 79 �������������������� 499 - 514
79P �������������������� 515 - 516 81 �������������������� 517 - 531 83 �������������������� 532 - 549 85 �������������������� 550 - 561
87 �������������������� 562 - 565
89 �������������������� 566 - 567 90 �������������������� 568 - 625 90L �������������������� 626 - 629 90P �������������������� 630 - 630 101 �������������������� 631 - 631 106 �������������������� 632 - 632 109 �������������������� 633 - 633
115 �������������������� 634 - 639 123 �������������������� 640 - 641 127 �������������������� 642 - 643 130 �������������������� 644 - 644 144 �������������������� 645 - 645 153 �������������������� 646 � 646 158 �������������������� 647 - 647 168 �������������������� 648 - 648
1804 �������������������� 649 - 657 1806 �������������������� 658 - 663
1806P �������������������. 664 - 664 183 �������������������� 665 - 666 190 �������������������� 667 � 668 203 �������������������� 669 - 669 204 �������������������� 670 - 670 212 �������������������� 671 - 697
224 �������������������� 698 - 698 229 �������������������� 699 - 704
231 �������������������� 705 - 710 239 �������������������� 711 - 711
240 �������������������� 712 - 715 244 �������������������� 716 - 717 247 �������������������� 718 - 720 248 �������������������� 721 - 726 248P �������������������� 727 - 727 249 �������������������� 728 � 728 251 �������������������� 729 - 730 253 �������������������� 731 � 731
258 �������������������� 732 - 732 262 �������������������� 733 - 737 271 �������������������� 738 - 739 273 �������������������� 740 - 740 281 �������������������� 741 - 753 314 �������������������� 754 - 755 324 �������������������� 756 - 756
377 �������������������� 757 - 757 385 �������������������� 758 - 765 391 �������������������� 766 - 766 407 �������������������� 767 - 767 445 �������������������� 768 - 769 471 �������������������� 770 - 772 473 �������������������� 773 - 773
State Highway System Weighted Crash Rates
State Highway Systems Map
Number of Trucks Per Day on South Dakota Highways Map
Asphalt Pavement Types Map
Concrete Pavement Types Map
Surface Condition Index Map
Appendix ������������������ A1 - A16
INTRODUCTION
The 2020 edition of the Highway Needs and Project Analysis Report reflects our fourteenth year using the enhanced pavement management system and the use of automated mapping to produce this report. This is the seventeenth edition to utilize the ESRI’s geographical information systems (GIS) software. The ESRI software allows for more detailed maps to help identify segment locations.
The enhanced pavement management system operates under a system based on the optimization principle. Simply put, the system selects improvement projects that provide the maximum benefit to cost ratio until available funds are expended. Therefore, highway improvements could take place any time it is most cost effective, even though the pavement may not be in the worst condition. A minor improvement could significantly increase the life expectancy of a pavement.
The enhanced pavement management system provides greater accuracy in predicting life cycles.
The system has life cycles based on specific pavement types and applied treatments. The system allows these life cycles to be refined based on past performance. As a result, greater accuracy is achieved in predicting pavement performance and needs.
A majority of the distress data for this system is collected through a yearly visual pavement surface survey. Visual distresses surveyed include: transverse cracking, fatigue cracking, patching/patch deterioration, block cracking, D-cracking/ASR, joint spalling, corner cracking, joint seal damage, and punchouts. The “Surface Condition Index” is then calculated using these indices combined with faulting and roughness data for concrete surfaces or rutting and roughness data for asphalt surfaces. The surface condition index provides an indication of the overall health of the pavement.
Segment analysis lengths are determined by many factors. The following factors will cause a pavement analysis segment to be created:
Highway terminal breaks (primarily highway offsets);
Changes in pavement type (excludes AC type changes less than 1/2 mile.);
STIP project limits (programmed projects);
Changes in Funding Category;
Changes in SDDOT Region designation;
Change in State Significance designation;
Change in Improvement type (reconstruction vs. resurfacing);
Change in Roadway Width greater than 10 feet;
Change in Year Graded. (Year Resurfaced)
Distress data is gathered by pavement management personnel, maintenance costs are extracted from maintenance cost file, and bridge data is extracted from the bridge management system. The remaining data is collected by Transportation Inventory Management and loaded into the pavement management system via the Roadway Information System (RIS). The pavement condition data shown in this report reflects the condition of the pavement at the time of rating. Structural data represent the predominate values for that segment.
As a result, the data may not always reflect the actual field conditions at a given location.
Please refer to the "State Highway Log" for point specific geometric data.
This report will only include major mainline improvements. Minor improvement types (such as fence repair, roadway lighting, signing, etc.) will not be included in this report. Data represents budget estimates and STIP projects as of April 23, 2020. Please refer to the current Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for a detailed listing of programmed highway projects.
For easy report reference, the routes are assembled in numerical order by highway number and MRM�s. Shown along the upper edge of each sheet is the highway number and the MRM's for segments listed on the page.
A condensed set of �Definitions� for the report is on the following pages. A number of maps illustrating highway data have been added to the rear of the report. These provide quick reference to numerous pavement-related topics. Appendix A follows the maps and provides comprehensive definitions of the data fields.
The Highway Needs and Project Analysis Report is also available on the web. You can access the interactive application at the following link: http:/apps.sd.gov/hr53needsbook/
We encourage constructive comments and criticisms. Notification of incorrect data should be reported to:
Phil Clements, Dani Doorn or Larry Dean S.D. Department of Transportation Division of Planning/Engineering 700 Broadway Avenue East Pierre, S.D. 57501-2586 Telephone (605) 773-3268
The South Dakota Department of Transportation provides services without regard to race, color, gender, religion, national origin, age or disability, according to the provisions contained in SDCL 20-13, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 1994.
To request additional information on the SDDOT�s Title VI/Nondiscrimination policy or file a discrimination complaint, please contact the Department�s Civil Rights Office at 605-773-3540.
130 copies of this document were printed at a cost of $37.63 per document
Definitions - 1
DEFINITIONS TO HIGHWAY NEEDS & PROJECT ANALYSIS REPORT
(More Complete Definitions are in APPENDIX A)
IDENTIFICATION:
FEDERAL-AID SYSTEM - The Federal-aid designation of the segment.
FUNDING CATEGORY - The Department of Transportation’s funding category for the segment.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION - The functional classification of the segment.
DIRECTION - The direction of travel for divided routes.
BEGINNING MRM - The beginning mileage reference point of the highway segment.
MRM DISPLACEMENT - The distance, in thousandths of a mile, from the MRM alongside the roadway to the beginning of the segment.
SEGMENT LENGTH - The length of the highway segment shown to the nearest one-thousandth of a mile.
YEAR BUILT - The year the existing grade was constructed.
YEAR LAST IMPROVED - The year the existing asphalt surface was placed or the year the existing PCCP surface was last rehabilitated.
YEAR LAST SEALED - The year the last surface treatment was applied to an asphalt surface. This includes chip seals and sand seals. Crack sealing is not included. This only applies to asphalt surfaces.
ROADWAY CONDITIONS:
SURFACE CONDITION INDEX - A combined index based upon the individual indices (excluding roughness for urban segments) that give an overall pavement condition. The Surface Condition Index (SCI) provides an indication of the overall health of the highway pavement. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best).
The data that is used to compute this index is gathered on a yearly basis.
NOTE: For segments with Surface Type equal to “BRDG”, this value refers to the FHWA Bridge rating divided by 20. To get the actual FHWA Bridge Rating value, multiply this number by 20, i.e. 3.55 x 20 = FHWA Bridge Rating of 71.
ROUGHNESS INDEX - An index of the rideability of the road section. The data used to compute this index is collected from 75 percent of the highway system on a yearly basis. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available. Roughness data for urban segments should be viewed critically as the data collection process does not lend itself well in these areas.
Definitions - 2
ASPHALT INDEX VALUES:
TRANSVERSE CRACKING - An index of the cracks that are perpendicular to the pavement centerline. A numeric rating of 0 to 5.00 with 5.00 being a perfect rating is calculated using visual distress survey data. This rating is determined by subtracting the deduct value from 5.00. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
FATIGUE CRACKING - An index of the interconnecting cracks that resemble alligator skin or chicken wire. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). he second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
PATCHING/PATCH DETERIORATION - An index of the area where a portion of the pavement surface has been overlaid or replaced. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best).
The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
BLOCK CRACKING - An index of cracks that divide the surface into approximately rectangular pieces. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
RUT INDEX - An index of surface depressions that occur in the wheel path. The data used to compute this index is collected from 75 percent of the highway system on a yearly basis. The first number is the index value.
The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available. This data in the parenthesis also applies to the RUT DEPTH (INCHES) AVG/MAX data which follows next.
RUT DEPTH (INCHES) AVG/MAX – The average rut depth in inches for the segment. This value is back calculated from the Rut Index. Since the Rut Depth Index only considers rut depths up to 0.6”, the actual average rut depth may be greater but will be reported as 0.6”. Rut Depth Max is the maximum rut depth measured within this section.
CONCRETE INDEX VALUES:
D-CRACKING/ASR - An index of cracking that appears as a series of closely spaced hairline cracks that often cause dark coloring of the surface in the surrounding area. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected.
A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
JOINT SPALLING - An index of cracking, breaking, chipping, or fraying of the slab edges beginning at a joint or crack. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). he second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
CORNER CRACKING - An index of cracking that extends vertically through the entire slab which intersects the joints at a distance less than six feet from the corner of the slab. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
FAULTING - An index of the difference in elevation across a joint or a crack. The data used to compute this index is collected from 75 percent of the highway system on a yearly basis. The first number is the index value.
The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
Definitions - 3
CRCP BLOCK CRACKING - An index of cracking that appears as hairline transverse and longitudinal cracks that form a block pattern in CRCP pavement. A numeric rating of 0 to 5.0 with 5.0 being a perfect rating is calculated using visual distress survey data. This rating is determined by subtracting the deduct value from 5.0
JOINT SEAL DAMAGE - An index of joint seal damage. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
PUNCHOUTS - An index of an area enclosed by two closely spaced (usually less than two feet) transverse cracks, a short longitudinal crack, and the edge of the pavement or a longitudinal joint. Will normally occur on continuously reinforced concrete only. The first number is the index value. The index uses a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best). The second number in parenthesis is the year the data was collected. A value of ** indicates that the value was manually adjusted while “--” indicates no date data is available.
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION:
SURFACE TYPE - The surface type of the driving lanes. New sections were created for each change in type except for thin on strong / thin on weak (TONS/TONW) changes that occurred in lengths less than 1/2 mile.
SHOULDR TYPE – PRIMARY/SECONDARY - The prevailing surface type of the shoulder. The first abbreviation refers to predominant shoulder type closest to the driving lane. The second abbreviation refers to predominant shoulder type on the outer edge of the road. The shoulder starts at the white line on the right side of the road and extends toward the ditch. A secondary shoulder does not exist if none is shown on the form.
SURFACE WIDTH – PREDOMIN (MIN) - The prevailing width of the surfaced driving lanes. The first number is the predominant surface width within the segment. The second number in parenthesis is the minimum width within the segment.
LEFT SHOULDER WIDTH-PRIM/SECNDRY - Facing the highway in ascending MRM direction, the prevailing width of the primary and secondary left shoulder to the nearest foot. The numbers in parenthesis are the minimum widths.
RIGHT SHOULDER WIDTH-PRIM/SECNDRY - Facing the highway in ascending MRM direction, the prevailing width of the primary and secondary right shoulder to the nearest foot. The numbers in parenthesis are the minimum widths.
WIDTHS-RDWY/ROW-PREDOM/MIN – The widths of various portions of the highway. The first number indicates the prevailing roadway width to the nearest foot. The second number indicates the prevailing right-of-way width to the nearest foot. The third number (which is in parenthesis) is the minimum right of way width within the segment.
ROADBED LAYERS - The first grouping shows the year the layer was built or improved. The second grouping shows the layer type. The last grouping shows the thickness of the layer. See this section in the appendix for a detailed description of the roadbed layer codes.
NUMBER OF STRUCTURES - The number of bridges greater than 20 feet in length within the highway segment.
This excludes box culverts.
NUMBER OF BOX CULVERTS - The number of box culverts within the highway segment.
Definitions - 4
3 YR AVG. MAINTENANCE COSTS:
The following costs reflect the yearly average per mile cost associated with each segment. They are computed from actual segment maintenance costs from the previous three years that are then averaged to compute a yearly cost. This cost is then divided by the segment length to compute the average maintenance cost per mile.
MAINLINE - The average per mile costs associated with driving surface maintenance over the last three years.
SHOULDERS - The average per mile costs associated with shoulder maintenance over the last three years.
STRUCTURE - The average per mile cost associated with structure maintenance over the last three years.
OTHER - The average per mile cost of all other maintenance costs not included above for the segment over the last three years. This includes costs associated with drainage and erosion control, ditch cleaning, mowing, snow control, fence repair, and other miscellaneous costs that are not directly related to shoulder or structure maintenance.
TOTAL - The total average maintenance cost per mile for the segment for the past three years. This is the sum of the Mainline, Shoulders, Structure, and Other costs.
TOT 3YR MAINT. CONTRACT AMT - The three-year AVERAGE amount expended only on maintenance contracts.
These costs can fall into any of the categories listed above and are included in those averages.
TRAFFIC:
CURRENT ADT - Current Average Daily Traffic.
PROJECTED 20 YR ADT � Average Daily Traffic Forecasted 20 years into the future on this segment of highway using the current ADT.
NUMBER OF TRUCKS - Current Average Daily Truck Traffic.
WEIGHTED CRASH RATE - The crash rate for the last five years.
NUMBER OF FATAL - The number of fatal crashes for the last five years. Injury and/or property damage crashes including fatalities are categorized here.
NUMBER OF INJURY - The number of injury crashes for the last five years. Property damage crashes including injuries are categorized here.
NUMBER OF PROPERTY DAMAGE - The number of property damage only crashes for the last five years.
Definitions - 5
MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS: (Data represents budget estimates and STIP projects as of the date listed in the Introduction).
PROJECT PROGRAMMED - If the segment is programmed for improvements, a “YES” will appear in this column.
The programmed project can be identified by the presence of a PCN listed in the project data.
PCN - Project Control number, used for identification and cross-reference purposes. This number only appears if the improvement is a programmed project.
IMPROVEMENT TYPE - The type of improvement for which the cost is computed. Improvements listed are for mainline projects only. Things such as fencing projects, roadway lighting, rest area improvements, shoulder only improvements, erosion control, and similar projects are not included. Please refer to the current “STIP” for detailed programming information.
NO DATA No data AC OVERLAY Asphalt concrete overlay AC OVER PCCP Asphalt overlay over concrete (No crack and seat) BLOTTER Blotter surfacing or reapplication BONDED OVLY Bonded overlay COLD IP RCYL Cold in place recycle CHIP SEAL Chip seal CRACK_LEVEL Crack leveling CRK SEAT ACO Crack and seat/rubblize with AC overlay DO NOTHING Do nothing (bridge, etc) GRINDING Grinding only GRAVEL SURF Gravel surfacing or resurfacing MICROSURFACE Microsurfacing MILL AC OVLY Mill and AC overlay MILL PC OVLY Mill and PCC overlay MILL S OVLY Mill and Class S Asphalt Overlay MISC IMPROV Miscellaneous major improvements NOT OPTIMZED Not Optimized within analysis period
FULL DEP REC Full depth reclamation PAV REPAIR Pavement repair PAV RESTORE1 Pavement restoration 1 (<40% full depth joint repair PAV RESTORE2 Pavement restoration 2 (>40% full depth joint repair) ROUTE/SEAL Rout and seal cracks RECON AC Reconstruct to flexible (TONS) pavement
- (THK for interstate surfacing) RECON BLOT Reconstruct to blotter (BLOT) pavement RECON PCCP Reconstruct to rigid (TKSJD) pavement RECON CRC Reconstruct to CRC Pavement RECON GRVL Reconstruct to gravel PCCP RESURF Remove and replace PCC or CRC SEAL JNTS Saw and seal joints SHLD WIDNING Shoulder Widening UB CRC OVLY Unbonded CRC overlay UNDRSL/DBR Undersealing/dowel bar retrofit
ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST - The estimated cost of the proposed improvement. Costs are expressed in thousands of dollars and present day values. Costs are for mainline improvements only and will exclude costs for rest area improvements and major bridge and interchange improvements.
IMPROVEMENT YEAR - The optimized year that the improvement should take place within the 20-year analysis period based upon a forecasted budget, or the year the improvement is programmed if a PCN is present.
This Page Intentionally Blank
HIGHWAY 010 E
Beginning MRM = 182.37 Ending MRM = 224.24
HIGHWAY 010 E
Beginning MRM = 182.37 Ending MRM = 224.24
RURAL
IDENTIFICATION
Federal Aid System STP STP STP STP STP STP STP
Funding Category SEC SEC SEC MINA MINA MUNI MUNI Functional Classification R-MA C R-MA C R-MA C R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A
Direction E E Beginning MRM 182.37 182.52 182.63 203.22 212.00 224.24 224.24
MRM Displacement 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.291 0.000 0.005 Segment Length 0.131 0.111 10.724 9.080 11.941 0.005 0.996
Year Built 1956 1962 1962 1953 1955 1955 2013 Year Last Improved 2002 2002 2002 2013 2013 2013 2013
Year Last Sealed 2013 2013 2013 2016 2016 2016 2016
ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Surface Condition Index 2.60 3.10 3.10 4.52 4.54 4.48 4.68
Roughness Index 3.55 (19) 3.85 (19) 4.19 (19) 4.76 (19) 4.70 (19) 3.50 (19) 3.50 (19)
ASPHALT INDEX VALUES
Transverse Cracking 3.50 (19) 3.50 (19) 2.64 (19) 4.63 (19) 4.76 (19) 5.00 (19) 4.83 (19)
Fatigue Cracking 2.70 (19) 3.10 (19) 4.28 (19) 4.80 (19) 4.87 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) Patching/Patch Deterioration 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 4.62 (19) 4.97 (19) 4.99 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19)
Block Cracking 2.60 (19) 3.50 (19) 3.81 (19) 4.51 (19) 4.52 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) Rut Index 4.67 (19) 4.61 (19) 4.57 (19) 4.64 (19) 4.65 (19) 4.32 (19) 4.63 (19)
Rut Depth(Inches) AVG/MAX 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.40 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.20 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20
CONCRETE INDEX VALUES
D-Cracking/ASR
Joint Spalling Corner Cracking
Faulting / CRCP Block Cracking Joint Seal Damage
Punchouts
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
Surface Type TONW TONS TONS TONS TONS TONS TONS
Shoulder Type - Primary/Secondary C & G/N/D C & G/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D C & G/N/D Surface Width 68 (068) 68 (068) 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024) 40 (040)
Left Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 6 (06) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) Right Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 6 (06) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0)
Widths-RDWY/ROW-Predom/Min 072/75/075 072/75/075 036/200/150 030/150/150 030/150/150 030/66/066 044/66/066
Roadbed Layer 1 2013/TS3/0.4 2013/TS3/0.4 2013/TS3/0.4 2016/TS3/0.4 2016/TS3/0.4 2016/TS3/0.4 2016/TS3/0.4 Roadbed Layer 2 2004/TC/0.0 2004/TC/0.0 2006/TS3/0.4 2013/AW3/2.0 2013/AW3/2.0 2013/AW3/2.0 2013/AE3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 3 2002/AL3/2.0 2002/AL3/2.0 2004/TC/0.0 1997/TS3/0.4 1997/TS3/0.4 1997/TS3/0.4 2013/AE3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 4 1993/TS3/0.4 1993/TS3/0.4 2002/AL3/2.0 1990/TS1/0.5 1990/TS1/0.5 1990/TS1/0.5 2013/BS4/12.0 Roadbed Layer 5 1992/TC/0.0 1992/TC/0.0 1993/TS3/0.4 1983/TS3/0.5 1983/TS3/0.5 1983/TS3/0.5 Roadbed Layer 6 1987/TS3/0.5 1987/TS3/0.5 1992/TC/0.0 1976/AE2/1.3 1978/AD3/1.3 1978/AD3/1.3 Roadbed Layer 7 1983/AD3/2.0 1983/AD3/2.0 1987/TS3/0.5 1954/AF4/1.5 1956/AF7/1.5 1957/TS4/0.5 Roadbed Layer 8 1956/BU4/3.0 1968/TS3/0.5 1983/AD3/2.0 1954/BU5/5.0 1956/BU5/5.0 1956/AF3/1.5 Roadbed Layer 9 1968/TG3/0.7 1968/TS3/0.5 1953/BU6/3.0 1955/BU8/4.0 1956/BU5/5.0
Roadbed Layer 10 1962/BU5/5.0 1968/TG6/0.7 1955/BU8/4.0 Roadbed Layer 11 1962/BU5/6.0 1962/BU5/5.0 Roadbed Layer 12 1962/BU5/6.0
Number Of Structures 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Number Of Box Culverts 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
3 YR AVG MAINTENANCE COSTS
Mainline $0 $0 $1751 $541 $541 $600 $541
Shoulders $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Structure $0 $0 $1 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $1672 $4991 $2447 $3994 $3994 $4000 $3994 Total $1672 $4991 $4199 $4534 $4534 $4600 $4534
Total 3 Year Main Contract Amount $328 $973 $229 $1717 $1717 $1800 $1717
TRAFFIC
Current ADT 205 205 456 402 506 1147 1147
Projected 20 Year ADT 294 294 655 577 726 1508 1508 Number Of Trucks 49 49 80 80 83 89 89
CRASHES
Weighted Crash Rate 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.90 2.09 0.00 2.39
Number of Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number Of Injury 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Number Of Property Damage 0 0 9 6 11 0 5
MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Programmed YES YES YES
PCN 06D6 06D6 06D6
Improvement Type MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL
Estimated Improvement Cost $37 $32 $3069 $264 $348 $1 $37 Improvement Year 2022 2022 2022 2023 2023 2023 2023
PCN
Improvement Type ROUTE/SEAL ROUTE/SEAL ROUTE/SEAL FULL DEP REC FULL DEP REC RECON AC MILL AC OVLY
Estimated Improvement Cost $37 $32 $3069 $4304 $5660 $28 $710 Improvement Year 2024 2024 2024 2031 2030 2034 2036
HIGHWAY 010 W
Beginning MRM = 182.37 Ending MRM = 182.52
HIGHWAY 010 W
Beginning MRM = 182.37 Ending MRM = 182.52
RURAL
IDENTIFICATION
Federal Aid System STP STP
Funding Category SEC SEC Functional Classification R-MA C R-MA C
Direction W W Beginning MRM 182.37 182.52
MRM Displacement 0.000 0.003 Segment Length 0.131 0.111
Year Built 1956 1962 Year Last Improved 2002 2002
Year Last Sealed 2013 2013
ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Surface Condition Index 2.63 3.40
Roughness Index 2.36 (19) 3.50 (**)
ASPHALT INDEX VALUES
Transverse Cracking 3.50 (19) 3.50 (19)
Fatigue Cracking 3.40 (19) 3.80 (19) Patching/Patch Deterioration 4.20 (19) 5.00 (19)
Block Cracking 3.40 (19) 3.40 (19) Rut Index 4.48 (19) 4.65 (**)
Rut Depth(Inches) AVG/MAX 0.10 / 0.40 0.10 / 0.30
CONCRETE INDEX VALUES
D-Cracking/ASR
Joint Spalling Corner Cracking
Faulting / CRCP Block Cracking Joint Seal Damage
Punchouts
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
Surface Type TONW TONS
Shoulder Type - Primary/Secondary C & G/N/D C & G/N/D Surface Width 68 (068) 68 (068)
Left Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) Right Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0)
Widths-RDWY/ROW-Predom/Min 072/75/075 072/75/075
Roadbed Layer 1 2013/TS3/0.4 2013/TS3/0.4 Roadbed Layer 2 2004/TC/0.0 2004/TC/0.0 Roadbed Layer 3 2002/AL3/2.0 2002/AL3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 4 1993/TS3/0.4 1993/TS3/0.4 Roadbed Layer 5 1992/TC/0.0 1992/TC/0.0 Roadbed Layer 6 1987/TS3/0.5 1987/TS3/0.5 Roadbed Layer 7 1983/AD3/2.0 1983/AD3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 8 1956/BU4/3.0 1968/TS3/0.5 Roadbed Layer 9 1968/TG3/0.7
Roadbed Layer 10 1962/BU5/5.0 Roadbed Layer 11 1962/BU5/6.0 Roadbed Layer 12
Number Of Structures 0 0 Number Of Box Culverts 0 0
3 YR AVG MAINTENANCE COSTS
Mainline $0 $0
Shoulders $0 $0 Structure $0 $0
Other $1672 $4991 Total $1672 $4991
Total 3 Year Main Contract Amount $328 $973
TRAFFIC
Current ADT 205 205
Projected 20 Year ADT 294 294 Number Of Trucks 49 49
CRASHES
Weighted Crash Rate 0.00 0.00
Number of Fatal 0 0 Number Of Injury 0 0
Number Of Property Damage 0 0
MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Programmed YES YES
PCN 06D6 06D6
Improvement Type MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY
Estimated Improvement Cost $37 $32 Improvement Year 2022 2022
PCN
Improvement Type ROUTE/SEAL ROUTE/SEAL
Estimated Improvement Cost $37 $32 Improvement Year 2024 2024
HIGHWAY 010
Beginning MRM = 225.24 Ending MRM = 244.00
HIGHWAY 010
Beginning MRM = 225.24 Ending MRM = 244.00
RURAL
IDENTIFICATION
Federal Aid System STP STP STP STP STP STP STP
Funding Category MINA MINA MINA MINA MINA MINA MINA Functional Classification R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A
Direction Beginning MRM 225.24 225.24 229.00 230.00 242.00 244.00 244.00
MRM Displacement 0.000 0.046 0.646 0.417 0.178 0.445 0.873 Segment Length 0.046 4.399 0.772 11.757 2.264 0.428 6.347
Year Built 2013 1949 2001 1952 1952 1996 1952 Year Last Improved 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014
Year Last Sealed 2016 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017
ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Surface Condition Index 3.12 4.59 4.68 4.57 4.38 4.36 4.38
Roughness Index 2.30 (19) 4.85 (19) 4.86 (19) 4.89 (19) 4.86 (19) 4.92 (19) 4.83 (19)
ASPHALT INDEX VALUES
Transverse Cracking 4.80 (19) 4.56 (19) 4.85 (19) 4.64 (19) 4.53 (19) 4.50 (19) 4.50 (19)
Fatigue Cracking 5.00 (19) 4.91 (19) 4.86 (19) 4.87 (19) 4.86 (19) 5.00 (19) 4.83 (19) Patching/Patch Deterioration 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19)
Block Cracking 5.00 (19) 4.74 (19) 5.00 (19) 4.57 (19) 4.30 (19) 4.30 (19) 4.33 (19) Rut Index 4.62 (19) 4.68 (19) 4.60 (19) 4.64 (19) 4.67 (19) 4.64 (19) 4.66 (19)
Rut Depth(Inches) AVG/MAX 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20
CONCRETE INDEX VALUES
D-Cracking/ASR
Joint Spalling Corner Cracking
Faulting / CRCP Block Cracking Joint Seal Damage
Punchouts
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
Surface Type TONS THK THK THK THK THK THK
Shoulder Type - Primary/Secondary C & G/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D Surface Width 40 (040) 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024)
Left Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 2 (02) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 6 (06) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) Right Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 2 (02) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 6 (06) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0)
Widths-RDWY/ROW-Predom/Min 044/100/100 030/100/100 036/100/100 030/150/150 032/150/150 032/150/150 032/122/122
Roadbed Layer 1 2016/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 Roadbed Layer 2 2013/AE3/2.0 2017/TC/0.0 2017/TC/0.0 2017/TC/0.0 2017/TC/0.0 2017/TC/0.0 2017/TC/0.0 Roadbed Layer 3 2013/AE3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 4 2013/BS4/12.0 1991/AE3/1.0 2001/AE3/0.5 1998/AL3/0.5 1991/AE3/1.0 1997/AE3/0.5 1991/AE3/1.0 Roadbed Layer 5 1967/TS3/0.5 2001/AE3/1.5 1998/AL3/1.3 1987/TS3/0.5 1997/AE3/2.0 1987/TS3/0.5 Roadbed Layer 6 1960/AF3/3.5 2001/AE3/1.5 0/AA1/1.0 1968/TS3/0.5 1997/AE3/1.0 1968/TS3/0.5 Roadbed Layer 7 1949/BU5/6.0 2001/BS3/12.0 1981/TS1/0.5 1963/AF3/4.0 1996/BU4/12.0 1963/AF3/4.0 Roadbed Layer 8 1972/AE3/1.5 1952/BU5/6.0 1952/BU5/6.0 Roadbed Layer 9 1952/AF3/1.3 1952/BU8/9.0 1952/BU8/9.0
Roadbed Layer 10 1952/BU5/6.0 Roadbed Layer 11 Roadbed Layer 12
Number Of Structures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number Of Box Culverts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 YR AVG MAINTENANCE COSTS
Mainline $543 $33 $32 $48 $188 $187 $187
Shoulders $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Structure $0 $0 $0 $0 $50 $51 $51
Other $4000 $4924 $4925 $4951 $4914 $4914 $4914 Total $4543 $4957 $4957 $4999 $5152 $5152 $5152
Total 3 Year Main Contract Amount $1717 $1098 $1097 $1145 $1248 $1248 $1248
TRAFFIC
Current ADT 608 608 608 577 535 535 660
Projected 20 Year ADT 800 800 800 759 704 704 868 Number Of Trucks 88 88 88 102 122 122 127
CRASHES
Weighted Crash Rate 0.00 2.25 0.90 1.37 0.91 0.00 3.79
Number of Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Number Of Injury 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
Number Of Property Damage 0 11 1 11 2 0 5
MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Programmed
PCN
Improvement Type MILL AC OVLY CHIP SEAL COLD IP RCYL CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL
Estimated Improvement Cost $11 $128 $359 $342 $66 $12 $185 Improvement Year 2024 2024 2029 2024 2024 2024 2024
PCN
Improvement Type ROUTE/SEAL MILL AC OVLY NOT OPTIMZED MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY FULL DEP REC MILL AC OVLY
Estimated Improvement Cost $1 $1227 $0 $3281 $631 $253 $1771 Improvement Year 2026 2031 0 2032 2031 2031 2030
Beginning MRM = 251.00 Ending MRM = 267.25
HIGHWAY 010
Beginning MRM = 251.00 Ending MRM = 267.25
RURAL
IDENTIFICATION
Federal Aid System STP STP STP STP STP STP STP
Funding Category MINA MUNI MUNI MUNI MUNI MINA MINA Functional Classification R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A
Direction Beginning MRM 251.00 258.32 258.75 258.90 259.32 259.44 267.25
MRM Displacement 0.241 0.000 0.069 0.068 0.000 0.000 0.014 Segment Length 7.030 0.499 0.150 0.362 0.140 7.803 11.997
Year Built 1949 1962 1962 1962 1957 1957 1960 Year Last Improved 2014 2014 2014 2014 2012 2012 2012
Year Last Sealed 2017 2017 2017 2017 2015 2015 2015
ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Surface Condition Index 4.43 4.44 4.11 4.30 4.37 4.38 4.42
Roughness Index 4.83 (19) 4.20 (19) 3.82 (19) 3.78 (19) 4.79 (19) 4.84 (19) 4.68 (19)
ASPHALT INDEX VALUES
Transverse Cracking 4.51 (19) 4.85 (19) 4.80 (19) 4.79 (19) 4.80 (19) 4.66 (19) 4.42 (19)
Fatigue Cracking 4.83 (19) 4.60 (19) 4.60 (19) 4.60 (19) 5.00 (19) 4.78 (19) 4.83 (19) Patching/Patch Deterioration 4.99 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 4.99 (19)
Block Cracking 4.43 (19) 4.65 (19) 4.30 (19) 4.30 (19) 4.30 (19) 4.29 (19) 4.50 (19) Rut Index 4.63 (19) 4.44 (19) 4.11 (19) 4.48 (19) 4.59 (19) 4.54 (19) 4.50 (19)
Rut Depth(Inches) AVG/MAX 0.10 / 0.20 0.20 / 0.60 0.20 / 0.60 0.10 / 0.60 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.30
CONCRETE INDEX VALUES
D-Cracking/ASR
Joint Spalling Corner Cracking
Faulting / CRCP Block Cracking Joint Seal Damage
Punchouts
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
Surface Type THK THK THK THK THK THK TONS
Shoulder Type - Primary/Secondary AC/N/D C & G/N/D C & G/N/D C & G/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D Surface Width 24 (024) 40 (040) 56 (056) 40 (040) 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024)
Left Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 3 (03) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) Right Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 3 (03) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0)
Widths-RDWY/ROW-Predom/Min 030/122/122 044/80/080 060/80/080 044/80/080 032/200/200 032/200/200 032/200/200
Roadbed Layer 1 2017/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 2017/TS3/0.4 2015/TS3/0.4 2015/TS3/0.4 2015/TS3/0.4 Roadbed Layer 2 2017/TC/0.0 2017/TC/0.0 2017/TC/0.0 2017/TC/0.0 2014/TC/0.0 2014/TC/0.0 2014/TC/0.0 Roadbed Layer 3 2014/AJ3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 2014/AJ3/2.0 2012/AW3/2.0 2012/AW3/2.0 2012/AW3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 4 1989/AE3/1.0 1967/TS3/0.5 1967/TS3/0.5 1967/TS3/0.5 1991/AE3/1.5 1991/AE3/1.5 1978/AD2/0.8 Roadbed Layer 5 1967/TS3/0.5 1962/AF3/3.0 1962/AF3/3.0 1962/AF3/3.0 1965/TS3/0.5 1965/TS3/0.5 1960/AF3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 6 1960/AF3/3.5 1962/BU5/5.0 1962/BU5/5.0 1962/BU5/5.0 1958/AF3/2.0 1958/AF3/2.0 1960/BU5/5.0 Roadbed Layer 7 1949/BU5/6.0 1958/BU5/5.0 1958/BU5/5.0 1960/BU8/8.0 Roadbed Layer 8 1957/BU8/8.0 1957/BU8/8.0 Roadbed Layer 9
Roadbed Layer 10 Roadbed Layer 11 Roadbed Layer 12
Number Of Structures 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Number Of Box Culverts 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
3 YR AVG MAINTENANCE COSTS
Mainline $187 $188 $187 $188 $186 $187 $123
Shoulders $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Structure $50 $50 $53 $50 $50 $50 $329
Other $4914 $4914 $4913 $4914 $4914 $4914 $5216 Total $5152 $5152 $5153 $5152 $5150 $5152 $5668
Total 3 Year Main Contract Amount $1248 $1248 $1247 $1249 $1250 $1248 $1495
TRAFFIC
Current ADT 675 675 675 675 684 684 661
Projected 20 Year ADT 888 888 888 888 899 899 864 Number Of Trucks 128 128 128 128 137 137 145
CRASHES
Weighted Crash Rate 2.43 0.00 0.00 0.81 2.40 2.16 2.83
Number of Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number Of Injury 2 0 0 0 1 2 5
Number Of Property Damage 15 0 0 1 0 15 26
MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Programmed
PCN
Improvement Type CHIP SEAL MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL CHIP SEAL AC OVERLAY
Estimated Improvement Cost $204 $355 $129 $13 $3 $227 $2433 Improvement Year 2024 2031 2030 2024 2022 2022 2027
PCN
Improvement Type MILL AC OVLY ROUTE/SEAL ROUTE/SEAL MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY ROUTE/SEAL
Estimated Improvement Cost $1962 $5 $2 $258 $84 $2257 $64 Improvement Year 2030 2033 2032 2031 2031 2030 2029
Beginning MRM = 282.30 Ending MRM = 304.16
HIGHWAY 010
Beginning MRM = 282.30 Ending MRM = 304.16
RURAL
IDENTIFICATION
Federal Aid System STP STP STP STP STP STP STP
Funding Category MINA MINA MINA MINA MINA MINA MINA Functional Classification R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A
Direction Beginning MRM 282.30 286.00 287.28 296.00 296.00 297.13 304.16
MRM Displacement 0.000 0.667 0.008 0.268 0.835 0.162 0.000 Segment Length 4.369 0.625 9.014 0.567 0.419 6.838 0.163
Year Built 1956 2010 1956 1955 1955 1955 1955 Year Last Improved 2002 2010 2002 2006 2006 2006 2010
Year Last Sealed 2012 2012 2012 2018 2018 2018 2013
ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Surface Condition Index 4.16 4.34 4.03 3.84 3.72 3.95 3.92
Roughness Index 4.41 (19) 4.48 (19) 4.29 (19) 4.54 (19) 4.34 (19) 4.31 (19) 4.74 (19)
ASPHALT INDEX VALUES
Transverse Cracking 4.55 (19) 4.90 (19) 4.56 (19) 4.00 (19) 4.40 (19) 3.81 (19) 4.40 (19)
Fatigue Cracking 4.60 (19) 4.82 (19) 4.60 (19) 3.89 (19) 4.60 (19) 4.43 (19) 4.20 (19) Patching/Patch Deterioration 4.25 (19) 5.00 (19) 4.23 (19) 4.51 (19) 4.34 (19) 4.40 (19) 5.00 (19)
Block Cracking 4.10 (19) 4.30 (19) 3.92 (19) 3.84 (19) 3.40 (19) 4.17 (19) 3.80 (19) Rut Index 4.64 (19) 4.57 (19) 4.61 (19) 4.54 (19) 4.62 (19) 4.56 (19) 4.53 (19)
Rut Depth(Inches) AVG/MAX 0.10 / 0.30 0.10 / 0.40 0.10 / 0.40 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.20 0.10 / 0.40 0.10 / 0.20
CONCRETE INDEX VALUES
D-Cracking/ASR
Joint Spalling Corner Cracking
Faulting / CRCP Block Cracking Joint Seal Damage
Punchouts
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
Surface Type THK TONS THK THK THK THK TONS
Shoulder Type - Primary/Secondary AC/N/D AC/NONE AC/N/D AC/N/D C & G/N/D AC/N/D AC/N/D Surface Width 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024) 44 (044) 24 (024) 36 (036)
Left Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 4 (02) / 0 (0) 7 (07) / 0 (0) Right Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 4 (04) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 4 (02) / 0 (0) 7 (07) / 0 (0)
Widths-RDWY/ROW-Predom/Min 030/200/200 030/200/200 030/200/200 032/200/200 048/200/200 032/200/200 050/200/200
Roadbed Layer 1 2017/TL/0.0 2017/TL/0.0 2017/TL/0.0 2018/TS3/0.4 2018/TS3/0.4 2018/TS3/0.4 2013/TS3/0.4 Roadbed Layer 2 2012/TS3/0.4 2012/TS3/0.4 2012/TS3/0.4 2009/TS3/0.4 2009/TS3/0.4 2009/TS3/0.4 2012/TC/0.0 Roadbed Layer 3 2005/TS3/0.4 2010/AE3/2.0 2005/TS3/0.4 2008/TC/0.0 2008/TC/0.0 2008/TC/0.0 2010/AW3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 4 2004/TC/0.0 2010/AE3/2.0 2004/TC/0.0 2006/AM3/2.0 2006/AM3/2.0 2006/AM3/2.0 1982/AD3/1.0 Roadbed Layer 5 2002/AL3/1.5 2010/BU4/12.0 2002/AL3/1.5 1989/AG3/1.9 1989/AG3/1.9 1989/AG3/1.9 1970/TS3/0.5 Roadbed Layer 6 2002/AL3/1.5 2002/AL3/1.5 1970/TS3/0.5 1970/TS3/0.5 1970/TS3/0.5 1956/AF3/1.5 Roadbed Layer 7 1981/AD3/0.5 1981/AD3/0.5 1956/AF3/1.5 1956/AF3/1.5 1956/AF3/1.5 1956/BU5/6.0 Roadbed Layer 8 1963/TS3/0.5 1963/TS3/0.5 1956/BU5/6.0 1956/BU5/6.0 1956/BU5/6.0 1955/BU6/4.5 Roadbed Layer 9 1957/AF3/2.0 1957/AF3/2.0 1955/BU6/4.5 1955/BU6/4.5 1955/BU6/4.5
Roadbed Layer 10 1957/BU5/5.0 1957/BU5/5.0 Roadbed Layer 11 1956/BU8/5.0 1956/BU8/5.0 Roadbed Layer 12
Number Of Structures 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Number Of Box Culverts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 YR AVG MAINTENANCE COSTS
Mainline $1534 $1534 $1534 $1115 $1115 $1115 $2196
Shoulders $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Structure $22 $22 $22 $0 $0 $0 $18
Other $4674 $4674 $4674 $5460 $5461 $5461 $4442 Total $6230 $6230 $6230 $6577 $6575 $6576 $6656
Total 3 Year Main Contract Amount $1667 $1667 $1667 $2004 $2005 $2004 $1540
TRAFFIC
Current ADT 346 346 403 475 475 575 906
Projected 20 Year ADT 451 451 526 619 619 749 1181 Number Of Trucks 110 110 110 110 110 116 140
CRASHES
Weighted Crash Rate 5.44 7.92 2.72 0.00 0.00 1.81 0.61
Number of Fatal 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number Of Injury 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Number Of Property Damage 3 5 12 0 0 7 1
MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Programmed YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
PCN 05UM 05UM 05UM 05F4 05F4 05F4 05F4
Improvement Type MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY SHLD WIDNING SHLD WIDNING SHLD WIDNING SHLD WIDNING
Estimated Improvement Cost $1163 $166 $2400 $392 $290 $4731 $113 Improvement Year 2021 2021 2021 2023 2023 2023 2023
PCN 06Q9 06Q9 06Q9 06Q9
Improvement Type ROUTE/SEAL ROUTE/SEAL ROUTE/SEAL MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY
Estimated Improvement Cost $1163 $166 $2400 $392 $290 $4731 $113 Improvement Year 2023 2023 2023 2025 2025 2025 2025
Beginning MRM = 304.16 Ending MRM = 321.35
HIGHWAY 010
Beginning MRM = 304.16 Ending MRM = 321.35
RURAL
IDENTIFICATION
Federal Aid System STP STP STP STP STP STP STP
Funding Category MINA MINA MINA MINA MUNI MUNI MUNI Functional Classification R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A R-MI A
Direction Beginning MRM 304.16 308.06 319.00 320.00 320.72 320.97 321.35
MRM Displacement 0.163 0.099 0.971 0.051 0.000 0.052 0.000 Segment Length 3.944 11.853 0.083 0.507 0.337 0.308 0.276
Year Built 1955 1949 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 Year Last Improved 2010 2010 2010 2013 2013 2013 2013
Year Last Sealed 2013 2013 2013
ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Surface Condition Index 4.29 4.37 4.12 3.89 4.00 3.61 3.20
Roughness Index 4.52 (19) 4.37 (19) 3.89 (19) 3.84 (19) 4.11 (19) 3.68 (19) 4.00 (19)
ASPHALT INDEX VALUES
Transverse Cracking 4.63 (19) 4.66 (19) 4.86 (19)
Fatigue Cracking 4.66 (19) 4.58 (19) 4.60 (19) Patching/Patch Deterioration 4.86 (19) 4.86 (19) 5.00 (19)
Block Cracking 4.20 (19) 4.40 (19) 5.00 (19) Rut Index 4.50 (19) 4.59 (19) 4.54 (19)
Rut Depth(Inches) AVG/MAX 0.10 / 0.30 0.10 / 0.80 0.10 / 0.20
CONCRETE INDEX VALUES
D-Cracking/ASR 4.66 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19)
Joint Spalling 4.11 (19) 4.00 (19) 3.61 (19) 3.20 (19) Corner Cracking 4.60 (19) 4.80 (19) 4.71 (19) 4.60 (19)
Faulting / CRCP Block Cracking 4.79 (19) 4.78 (19) 4.34 (19) 4.71 (19) Joint Seal Damage 4.11 (19) 4.00 (19) 3.61 (19) 3.20 (19)
Punchouts 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19) 5.00 (19)
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
Surface Type TONS TONS THK TKSJD TKSJD TKSJD TKSJD
Shoulder Type - Primary/Secondary AC/N/D AC/N/D AC/NONE C & G/N/D C & G/N/D C & G/N/D C & G/N/D Surface Width 24 (024) 24 (024) 24 (024) 44 (044) 44 (044) 56 (056) 44 (044)
Left Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 9 (09) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) Right Shoulder Width-Prim/Sec 3 (03) / 0 (0) 3 (03) / 0 (0) 9 (09) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0) 2 (02) / 0 (0)
Widths-RDWY/ROW-Predom/Min 030/200/200 030/100/100 042/100/100 048/100/100 048/100/100 060/100/100 048/100/100
Roadbed Layer 1 2013/TS3/0.4 2013/TS3/0.4 2013/TS3/0.4 2013/CJ5/0.0 2013/CJ5/0.0 2013/CJ5/0.0 2013/CJ5/0.0 Roadbed Layer 2 2012/TC/0.0 2012/TC/0.0 2012/TC/0.0 2004/CD1/8.0 2004/CD1/8.0 2004/CD1/8.0 2004/CD1/8.0 Roadbed Layer 3 2010/AW3/2.0 2010/AW3/2.0 2010/AW3/2.0 2004/BU4/9.0 2004/BU4/9.0 2004/BU4/9.0 2004/BU4/9.0 Roadbed Layer 4 1982/AD3/1.0 1982/AD3/1.0 2004/AE3/2.0 2004/BS4/2.0 2004/BS4/2.0 2004/BS4/2.0 2004/BS4/2.0 Roadbed Layer 5 1970/TS3/0.5 1970/TS3/0.5 2004/AE3/2.0 Roadbed Layer 6 1956/AF3/1.5 1949/TG4/0.8 2004/BU4/14.0 Roadbed Layer 7 1956/BU5/6.0 1949/BU5/5.0 Roadbed Layer 8 1955/BU6/4.5 1949/BU6/5.0 Roadbed Layer 9
Roadbed Layer 10 Roadbed Layer 11 Roadbed Layer 12
Number Of Structures 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Number Of Box Culverts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 YR AVG MAINTENANCE COSTS
Mainline $2194 $2194 $12566 $1327 $1326 $1328 $1326
Shoulders $0 $0 $0 $2 $0 $0 $0 Structure $20 $19 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $4440 $4441 $60795 $6252 $6252 $6253 $6254 Total $6654 $6654 $73361 $7582 $7582 $7581 $7583
Total 3 Year Main Contract Amount $1541 $1540 $20482 $2085 $2086 $2084 $2087
TRAFFIC
Current ADT 906 965 1006 1006 1789 1678 1550
Projected 20 Year ADT 1181 1144 1119 1119 1989 1866 1724 Number Of Trucks 140 141 141 141 166 175 186
CRASHES
Weighted Crash Rate 0.92 1.92 0.00 0.00 1.84 2.29 1.06
Number of Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number Of Injury 0 4 0 0 2 1 1
Number Of Property Damage 6 28 0 0 0 4 0
MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Programmed YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
PCN 05F4 05F4 05F4 07KX 07KX 07KX 07KX
Improvement Type SHLD WIDNING SHLD WIDNING SHLD WIDNING PAV RESTORE1 PAV RESTORE1 PAV RESTORE1 PAV RESTORE1
Estimated Improvement Cost $2729 $8201 $57 $24 $16 $15 $13 Improvement Year 2023 2023 2023 2021 2021 2021 2021
PCN 06Q9 06Q9 06Q9
Improvement Type MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY MILL AC OVLY CRK SEAT ACO PAV RESTORE2 PAV RESTORE2 PAV RESTORE2
Estimated Improvement Cost $2729 $8201 $57 $24 $185 $210 $152 Improvement Year 2025 2025 2025 2036 2039 2037 2038
This Page Intentionally Blank
STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM
WEIGHTED CRASH RATES
Weighted Rate
RURAL INTERSTATE: .90
RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL and EXPRESSWAY: 1.46
RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL: 1.73
RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR: 2.42
URBAN INTERSTATE: 1.03
URBAN EXPRESSWAYS 1.55
URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL: 1.92
URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL: 1.96
URBAN COLLECTOR: Not calculated due to so few accidents and Miles of roadway.
These rates are calculated using the formula listed on page A15 of the Appendix.
The number of accidents was determined using calendar year 2015 through preliminary 2019 data. The 2019 VMTs were used to calculate the rates to be consistent with the VMTs rates published in this Needs Book.
SOURCE: Data provided by the Office of Accident Records and Transportation Inventory Management.
Page - A1
APPENDIX
DETAILED DEFINITIONS TO HIGHWAY NEEDS ANALYSIS REPORT DATA
IDENTIFICATION
FEDERAL-AID SYSTEM - The federal-aid designation of the segment:
NHS-IN - National Highway System-Interstate NHS-NI - National Highway System-Non-Interstate STP - Surface Transportation Program NON-FA - Non-Federal-aid
FUNDING CATEGORY - The Department of Transportation’s designated funding category for the segment.
INT - Interstate MAJA - Major Arterial MINA - Minor Arterial SEC - State Secondary NFA - Non-Federal-Aid URB - Urban MUNI - Municipal
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION - The functional classification of the segment
R-INT - Rural Interstate U-INT - Urban Interstate R-F&E - Rural Expressways U-F&E - Urban Expressways R-P A - Rural Principal Arterial U-P A - Urban Principal Arterial R-MI A - Rural Minor Arterial U-MI A - Urban Minor Arterial R-MA C - Rural Major Collector U-COLL - Urban Collector R-MI C - Rural Minor Collector R-LO R - Rural Local Road U-LO S - Urban Local Street
DIRECTION - The direction of travel for divided routes:
N - North Bound Lanes S - South Bound Lanes E - East Bound Lanes W - West Bound Lanes
BEGINNING MRM (Mileage Reference Marker) - The markers used to reference the location of any occurrence along the highway. The beginning MRM as used in this report is the reference point of the beginning of the segment being analyzed. The actual beginning of the segment may be displaced slightly from the mileage marker.
MRM DISPLACEMENT - The distance, in thousandths of miles, from the MRM in place alongside the roadway to the beginning of the segment.
Page - A2
SEGMENT LENGTH - The length of the highway segment shown to the nearest one-thousandth of a mile.
YEAR BUILT - The year the existing grade was constructed.
YEAR LAST IMPROVED - The year the existing asphalt surface was last placed or the year the existing PCCP surface was last rehabilitated.
YEAR LAST SEALED - The year the last surface treatment was applied to the surface. This includes chip seals and sand seals. Crack sealing is not included. This only applies to asphalt surfaces.
ROADWAY CONDITIONS
SURFACE CONDITION INDEX - A calculated index of the individual indices (excluding…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .