J.1.2_Revised_PAST_PERFORMANCE_evaluation_11-22-2017.doc
DOC document 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Power Systems Engineering
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA17R0344
About this file
Revised Past Performance Survey in word format -SAQMMA17R0344
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SAQMMA17R0344_Amendment_A003.pdf | ||
| RFP_POWER_SYSTEMS___SAQMMA17R0344__Revised_11-22-2017_docx.pdf | ||
| 11-29-2017_SAQMMA17R0344_Questions_with_answers.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SAQMMA17R0344_Amendment_A002.pdf | ||
| SAQMMA17R0344_Amendment_A001.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Evaluation
Power Systems Engineering
SAQMMA17R0344
CONTRACT INFORMATION
Please provide the following information to assist us in tracking responses received and resolving any conflicts in the evaluation process if necessary.
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Name of Evaluator:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Mailing Address:
Length of involvement with contract:
Degree or extent of involvement with contract:
Period of Performance:
____________________ to
Initial Contract Value:
Current or Completed Contract Value:
Brief Description of Requirement:
Complexity of effort
( ) Difficult ( ) Routine
Thank you in advance for completing this survey. THIS INFORMATION WILL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 15.1004 (e).
SCORING CRITERIA
EXCEPTIONAL - Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation clearly and consistently exceeds contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE - Indicates no problem in area of evaluation or has only minor problems for which solutions were satisfactory.
UNACCEPTABLE - Indicates serious problems in the evaluation area. The Contractor is/was in danger of being unable to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery is not likely or did not occur.
Comments below the ratings are not required.
I. CONFORMANCE TO SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF GOOD WORKMANSHIP
1a. Overall ability to pro-actively and aggressively perform contract requirements.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
Unacceptable
Acceptable Exceptional
1b. Effectiveness and reliability of contractor's Key Personnel.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
II. ADHERANCE TO CONTRACT SCHEDULE
2a. Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
2b. Completion of major milestones on schedule.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
2c. Timely completion within period of performance.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
III. GENERAL BUSINESS CONDUCT AND BUSINESS LIKE CONCERN FOR THE CUSTOMER
3a Responsiveness and flexibility in responding to changes.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
3b. Responsiveness/capability to respond to surge/short term requirements.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
3c. Accuracy and completeness of vouchers/invoices.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT
4a. Quality, completeness, and accuracy of price proposals.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
4b. Accuracy and timeliness of required reports.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
4c. Ability to perform within negotiated prices.
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check ( if N/A.
Please place in Volume 1 Tab D of your proposal.
Comments below the ratings are not necessary.
Page 1-Revised 11-22-2017
File details come from the government source that posted it.