Attachment_12.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Diplomatic Platform Support Services (DiPSS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA16R0106
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey and details of a federal contract opportunity for diplomatic platform support services. The United States Department of State is conducting a competitive procurement for logistical services, life and mission support, and operations and maintenance at various government installations worldwide. Services may include food service, facilities maintenance, camp operations, plumbing, property leasing and refurbishment, laboratories, dining facilities, and travel insurance. The solicitation will result in multiple indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts awarded in the third quarter of fiscal year 2017, with task orders issued as any contract type. The basic contract period is 12 months with nine 12-month options, for a maximum 10-year period of performance. The estimated maximum value for all contracts is $10 billion, which may be divided among awardees. The minimum guarantee per contract is $10,000. Questions are due by January 27, 2017.
Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Survey
| PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY | ||
| Introduction: The United States Department of State (DOS) is currently conducting a competitive procurement for its Diplomatic Platform Support Services (DiPSS) supporting U.S. Embassies and U.S. Agencies world-wide for which the prospective offeror [XXXXX] has been requested to identify customers with whom it is currently or has been recently under contract, to serve as potential references on its past performance record. You are being asked to complete the attached Contractor Past Performance Survey. You may also be contacted by a DOS procurement official to arrange a telephone interview, using the survey as the focal point of the interview. To ensure frank and open evaluations and expressions of opinions by evaluators, all parties are advised that the identity of respondents completing the survey will be held in confidence and will not be released or disclosed to the prospective offeror or outside the Government. | ||
| Instructions: Please complete all areas of this form indicated in light yellow. | ||
| PART I - CONTRACT INFORMATION | ||
| a. Contractor: | XXXXX | |
| b. Customer Name (Federal Agency or Other): | ||
| c. Technical Point of Contact Information | ||
| i. Name: | ||
| ii. Telephone Number: | ||
| iii. Facsimile Number: | ||
| iv. E-mail Address: | ||
| v. Mailing Address: | ||
| vi. Position Title/Grade: | ||
| d. Contract Number: | ||
| e. Type of Contract | (Select responses from drop down menu) | |
| i. Negotiated or Sealed Bidding: | Negotiated | |
| ii. Competitive or Non-Competitive: | Competitive | |
| iii. Firm-Fixed-Price, Cost-Plus, Time-and-Materials/Labor Hour, Hybrid, or Other: | Firm-Fixed-Price | |
| iv. Indefinite Quantity, Requirements, or neither: | Indefinite Quantity | |
| f. Contract Period of Performance: |
| h. Initial Contract Value: $ |
| i. Current (or Completed) Contract Value: $ |
| j. Brief Description of the Contract Requirement: |
(Include a summary of the scope and complexity of the services provided.)
| PART II - GOVERNMENT PAST PERFORMANCE/CUSTOMER SATISFACTION EVALUATION |
| EVALUATION RATINGS |
| EXCELLENT: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation clearly and consistently exceed contractual requirements. |
| SATISFACTORY: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation met the contractual requirements. |
| MARGINAL: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation experienced minor problems for which solutions were satisfactory. |
| UNACCEPTABLE: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation experienced serious problems. The Contractor is/was in danger of being unable to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery is not likely or did not occur. |
| EVALUATION AREA 1: QUALITY OF SERVICES | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Overall ability to proactively and aggressively perform contract requirements: | |
| Overall ability to resolve performance issues: | |
| Demonstration of reasonable and cooperative behavior in dealing with clients | |
| Effectiveness and reliability of contractor's key personnel: | |
| EVALUATION AREA 2: COMPLIANCE WITH SCHEDULES | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring: | |
| Completion of major milestones on schedule: | |
| Timely completion of efforts within period of performance: | |
| EVALUATION AREA 3: PRICE/COST CONTROL | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Quality, completeness, and accuracy of price/cost proposals/invoices: | |
| Accuracy and timeliness of cost reports: | |
| Ability to perform within negotiated costs/prices: | |
| Ability to provide innovative solutions that resulted in cost savings: | |
| EVALUATION AREA 4: MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Effictiveness in managing and directing contract resources: | |
| Ability to work in collaboration with other contractors towards a common goal: | |
| Ability to choose and manage quality subcontractors: | |
| EVALUATION AREA 5: SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Demonstrated support for small businesses through subcontracting opportunities: | |
| Adherence to small business subcontracting goals | |
| Demonstrated support for developing small business capabilities through mentoring campaigns | |
| EVALUATION AREA 7: COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Adherence with regulatory requirements of contract | |
| Proactive engagement to identify regulatory requirements | |
| Proactive engagement to identify regulatory requirement risks | |
| Proactive engagement to mitigate regulatory requirement risks | |
| COMMENTS (Please include any additional comments concerning the past performance of the contractor): |
| Thank You for completing this past performance evaluation. Please email the completed survey to the following address: |
| U. S. Department of State |
| Office of Acquisition Management |
| ATTN: |
David Ziemba
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
ziembade@state.gov
SAQMMA-16-R-0106
Attachment 12 - Past Performance Survey
&P
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .