2014-07-14_INDUSTRY_QUESTIONS_ _DOS_RESPONSES.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- IT EQUIPMENT: ENTERPRISE CONVERGED PLATFORM Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA14R0308
About this file
DOS responses to additional industry questions received 07/14/14.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INDUSTRY QUESTIONS
07/14/14
Q: Within the LCCM, for both the DDC and Remote Office Tabs for all contract years there is a CLIN for Extended Equipment Warranty – OPTIONAL (SOW Section 8.8). This CLIN is listed as a 'Cost Reimbursable' contract type. However, this CLIN is to proposing the cost of a single year (fixed unit) of extended equipment warranty. Would the government consider revising this Contract Type from 'Cost Reimbursable' to 'Unit Priced.'
A: Yes, CLIN 8.8 Extended Equipment Warranty - OPTIONAL should be proposed as a firm, fixed Unit Priced. See revised LCCM.
Reference LCCM - There seems to be some inconsistencies within the LCCM across the base and option years. For example: a) Remote Site Base Year Tab and Remote Site OY1 Tabs require pricing on Section 7.2 (Conduct [Worldwide] Installation, Maintenance and Systems Administrator Training for Installers) but do not request pricing for Section 8.4 (Conduct On-site [OCONUS] Familiarization Training for Remote Offices – OPTIONAL) of the SOW. b) Remote Site OY2, OY3, and OY4 Tabs require pricing on Section 8.4 but do not request pricing for Section 7.2 of the SOW. Please provide clarification.
A: LCCM is revised to align with the language in the SOW. See revised LCCM.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .