S02 SOL-Att-05 - Past Performance Client Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Z1DA--Madison MATOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25221R0070
About this file
This document provides information for a Multiple Award Task Order Contract solicitation for construction services. The Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 12 will award multiple Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite- Quantity contracts for maintenance, repair, alteration, and new construction services for the Wm S. Middleton VA Hospital in Madison, Wisconsin. Task orders will range from $2,000 to $7,000,000 with a maximum of $40 million per contractor. The period of performance is a five year ordering period from award. Work may include various construction disciplines such as facilities, renovations, HVAC, plumbing, electrical, site work and other related services. The solicitation will be issued on June 1, 2021 as a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. The North American Industry Classification System code is 236220 with a size standard of $36.5 million. Contractors must have a minimum $2,000,000 bonding capacity for the life of the contract.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) 36C25221R0070 Solicitation Attachment 5 Past Performance Client Questionnaire
(SAMPLE TRANSMITALL LETTER TO BE SENT FROM CONTRACTOR)
<Your Company Letterhead>
Date: ___________________
To:
We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm will be submitting a proposal under a solicitation advertised by Department of Veterans Affairs, Network Contracting Office 12 (NCO 12), located at 2500 Overlook Terrace, Madison WI 53705-2254.
In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance; your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible.
Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306 (e) (4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.
Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address. Do NOT return them directly to our company.
via email to: john.meyers2@va.gov or via postal to: Department of Veterans Affairs Wm S. Middleton VA Hospital Attn: John Meyers (90C) 2500 Overlook Terrace Madison WI 53705-2254
If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, please contact John Meyers at john.meyers2@va.gov .
Please be advised that “E-Mail” is the preferred method of receiving the requested information.
Thank you for your assistance.
<Signature and Title of Offeror’s Principal>
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
| Solicitation Number |
| 36C25221R0070 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Madison Construction MATOC |
| Customer/Agency |
| Department of the Veteran Affairs, NCO 12, Madison, WI 53705 |
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s______________________________________
| Name and Address: | ______________________________________ | |
| ______________________________________ | ||
| ______________________________________ |
2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________
3. Phone number (with area code): ___________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award number: _________________________________________
5. Description of Services provided under contract: ________________________________________________________________________
6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial Final
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 12 Network Contracting Activity, Madison, WI.
(Signature)
| _____________________________________________ | __________________________ | |
| (Name and Title of Authorizing Official) | (Date) |
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).
RATING SCALE Definitions
| Exceptional (E) |
| The Offeror exceeded the majority of our expectations or requirements and met all other expectations or requirements. |
| Good (G) |
| The Offeror exceeded some of our expectations or requirements and met all other expectations or requirements. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| The Offeror met all of our expectations or requirements. |
| Marginal (M) |
| The Offeror failed to meet some of our expectations or requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| The Offeror failed to meet most of our expectations or requirements. |
| Neutral / Not Applicable or Unknown (N) |
| No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation. |
The questions in the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
1. QUALITY:
| Attention to detail and quality of initial performance. (Was work done right the first time?) |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Provided qualified personnel and quality execution for specialized trade work |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Followed approved quality control plan |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality control plan (without adverse effect on performance) |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| Met established project schedules. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Developed realistic progress schedules |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| Overall project satisfaction |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, business-like and communication) |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Professionalism of contractor |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| Provided reasonable cost and time proposals for contract changes. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
| Contractor’s ability to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Contractor compliance with all security requirements. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
7. GENERAL
| Ability to successfully respond to emergency situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes
No
| In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Please provide straightforward responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (attach additional pages if necessary):
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
________________________________________ _______________________________ (Signature) (Date)
| _______________________________________________________________________ | (Typed Name/Title) | ||
| ________________________________________ | _______________________________ | ||
| (Phone Number) | (Organization) | ||
| SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE | Page 1 of 5 | 36C25221R0070 Attachment 5 |
FAR 2.101 and 3.104.-4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .