S02 RFQ Attachment - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 44 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24826Q0393
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor qualifications for federal contracting opportunities. The document serves as an appendix or evaluation instrument rather than specifying required products or services. It functions as a standardized form for solicitations to collect information about bidders' relevant prior experience and performance history on similar projects.
The questionnaire is intended to be completed by contractors responding to the solicitation and will be used by the Government evaluation team to assess past performance capability. As a template document, it does not contain specific deadline dates, pricing information, or contract award details. Contractors completing this form would need to reference the specific solicitation number (36C24826Q0393) and associated opportunity documents for submission requirements, evaluation criteria weightings, and any other solicitation-specific instructions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0001 Attachment - RFI Log - Questions and Answers - 36C24826Q0393.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 Attachment - Site Layout.jpg | JPG image | |
| Amendment 0001 Attachment - Site Visit Sign in.pdf | ||
| 36C24826Q0393_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 RFQ Attachment - Project Price Breakdown.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 RFQ Attachment - VAAR 852.219-75 VA NOTICE OF LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 RFQ Attachment - WD FL20260220 dated 01-02-2026.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24826Q0393.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR OFFICAL USE ONLY
INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit no later than the solicitation date/time according to the instructions, below.
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow). Once completed, please send the form directly to the Contracting Officer via email at Melissa.Everett@va.gov.
GENERAL INFORMATION [Completed by Contractor]
Contractor Company Name
Street Address
Contractor Point of Contact Name
City
Point of Contact Phone Number
State
Reference Project Title
Zip Code
Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):
Contract Number
Contract Dollar Value
Description of Work
| Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box) |
| ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel |
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [Completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name
Street Address
POC Name
City
Phone Number
State
Fax Number
Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
| The Contractor … |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| ☐ |
YES
NO
| 23 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.” |
| ☐ |
YES
NO
| 24 |
| To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| ☐ |
YES
NO
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
Name of Person Completing Form Signature
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .