S02_ATTACHMENT 2_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10F26R0083
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template used to evaluate contractor performance on federal contracts. The form is completed jointly by the contractor and the client/government representative to assess past performance across multiple dimensions.
The questionnaire is divided into two sections: contractor information (Blocks 1-4) and client information (Blocks 5-8). Contractors provide contract details including firm name, CAGE code, contract number, contract type (Firm Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, or other), award and completion dates, original and final contract prices, project description, and complexity level. Clients rate contractor performance using a five-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) across seven major evaluation categories: Quality (technical data preparation, quality standards, problem resolution, quality assurance); Schedule/Timeliness (delivery compliance, resource utilization); Customer Satisfaction (end-user satisfaction, cooperation, communication); Management/Personnel/Labor (on-site management, workforce qualification, small business utilization, change management); Cost/Financial Management (price compliance, cost innovations, invoicing accuracy, accounting systems, contract terminations, financial stability); Safety/Security (safety maintenance, security compliance); and General (emergency response, contractual compliance, likelihood of rehire). The form requires narrative responses addressing contractor strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and overall performance risk. Clients are encouraged to submit completed questionnaires directly to the offeror, though submission directly to the contracting officer is permitted. The government reserves the right to verify all information provided on the form.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M-402 PreBid Response_B13.pdf | ||
| SF-30 36C10F26R0083 0003.pdf | ||
| 36C10F26R0083_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| M-001 PreBid Response_B13.pdf | ||
| RFI B13 Warehouse Retrofit and Renovation 36C10F26R0083.pdf | ||
| Site Visit Sign-In Sheet B13.pdf | ||
| 36C10F26R0083 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10F26R0083 0001_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| P01 - Roseburg VAMC Building 13 Seismic Upgrade GeoReport - signed.pdf | ||
| P01 - 653-104-Roseburg B13_-Seismic Retrofit IFC Submittal-wAHEC Mod-Drawings.pdf | ||
| P01 - Roseburg B13_-Seismic Retrofit IFC Submittal-Vol 2-Specs.pdf | ||
| S02_ATTACHMENT 3_Proposal Data Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02_ATTACHMENT 1_Key Personnel Resume Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10F26R0083_1.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: CFM REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO CFM WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON CFM SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO CFM. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR CFM POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ATTACHMENT 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) (cont.)
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) |
| E VG S M U N |
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
| E VG S M U N |
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Overall customer satisfaction |
| E VG S M U N |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Government Property Control |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| E VG S M U N |
| e) Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| E VG S M U N |
| f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines |
| E VG S M U N |
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
| h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) |
| E VG S M U N |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. |
| Yes No |
| e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below. |
| Yes No |
| f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. |
| Yes No |
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
| a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. |
| E VG S M U N |
7. GENERAL
| a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM, Engineer-in-Charge, or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) |
| Yes No |
| d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| E VG S M U N |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .