S000000268 Response Packet~1.docx

DOCX document 46 KB Posted

Attached to
Video Tape Archive Digitization Project
Solicitation number
S000000268
Issued by
Clark County, Arkansas

About this file

This document is a Technical Proposal Packet for a state and local contract opportunity in Arkansas. The contract opportunity is for a Video Tape Archive Digitization Project involving the jurisdictions of Pulaski County and the City of Little Rock. The proposal packet outlines the response requirements, including a Proposal Signature Page, Recommended Options Form, Proposed Subcontractors Form, and templates for providing information on the prospective contractor's experience, proposed solution, and risk mitigation. The proposal is due on an unspecified date, and the contract term and any renewal options are not provided.

The pricing terms, set-asides, incumbent information, funding details, and other salient commercial terms are not included in the proposal packet. The packet focuses on the technical response requirements, including the need to provide a redacted copy of the submission documents, comply with certifications regarding the employment of illegal immigrants and the boycott of Israel, and submit various required forms and templates as part of the proposal.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL PACKET

S000000268

PROPOSAL SIGNATURE PAGE

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR’S INFORMATION

Company:

Address:

City:

State:

Zip Code:

Minority or Women-Owned Designation*
☐ Not Applicable
AR Certification #: ________________

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR CONTACT INFORMATION

Provide contact information to be used for Solicitation related matters.

Contact Person:

Title:

Phone:

Alternate Phone:

Email:

CONFIRMATION OF REDACTED COPY

☐ YES, a redacted copy of submission documents is enclosed.

☐ NO, a redacted copy of submission documents is not enclosed. I understand a full copy of non-redacted submission documents will be released if requested.**

REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS

By signing and submitting a response to this Solicitation, Prospective Contractor agrees and certifies that they:

· Do not employ or contract with illegal immigrants and shall not employ or contract with illegal immigrants during the term of a contract awarded as a result of this Solicitation, and

· Do not boycott Israel and shall not boycott Israel during the term of a contract awarded as a result of this Solicitation

*See the Minority and Women-Owned Business section of the Solicitation.

**If a redacted copy of the submission documents is not provided with Prospective Contractor’s response packet, and neither box is checked, a copy of the non-redacted documents, except for financial data (other than pricing), will be released in response to any request made under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). See the Proprietary Information section of the Solicitation.

An official authorized to bind the Prospective Contractor to a resultant contract shall sign below. The signature below signifies agreement that any exception that conflicts with a Requirement of this Solicitation may cause the Prospective Contractor’s proposal to be rejected.

Authorized Signature: Title:

Printed/Typed Name: Date:

submission requirements checklist The following items must be submitted with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal:

· Proposal Signature Page

· Proposed Subcontractors Form

· Recommended Options Form

· Information for Evaluation

· Experience (2 pages or less)

· Solution (2 pages or less)

· Risk (2 pages or less)

· Copy of Prospective Contractor’s Equal Opportunity Policy

· Completed Pricing Response

The following items, which must be submitted prior to a contract award to the Prospective Contractor, may also be included with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal:

· EO 98-04: Contract and Grant Disclosure Form

· Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT), if applicable (itic.org, use the VPAT 2.4 Rev 508 version)

RECOMMENDED OPTIONS FORM

Prospective Contractors should identify optional recommended services available to the State, along with the schedule impact and cost details of each item. If the Prospective Contractor does not intend to use subcontractor(s), Prospective Contractor should indicate so by checking the appropriate box. Responses to this form will not be scored for evaluation purposes.

Costs associated with the optional recommended services must be included on this form and must not be included in the completed Pricing Response.

Prospective Contractor proposes the following optional recommended services under a resulting contract:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

☐ Prospective Contractor does not offer optional recommended services.

PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS FORM

Prospective Contractors shall complete the form for all subcontractors the Prospective Contractor proposes to use under a resulting contract (Services Contract (SRV-1) Fillable Form, section 14). If the Prospective Contractor does not intend to use subcontractor(s), Prospective Contractor should indicate so by checking the appropriate box.

Prospective Contractors should not include additional information relating to subcontractors on this form or as an attachment to this form.

Prospective Contractor proposes to use the following subcontractor(s) under a resulting contract:

SUBCONTRACTOR’S COMPANY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY, STATE, ZIP

☐ Prospective Contractor does not propose to use subcontractors under a resulting contract.

INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – EXPERIENCE

Using this template, Prospective Contractors should provide the Prospective Contractor’s experience and capabilities to meet the Solicitation requirements. The information provided should be prioritized beginning with the most important and/or relevant experience listed first.

Prospective Contractors may expand the space in each table, add a table, or delete a table as needed, but Prospective Contractors shall not exceed the two-page limit for this subsection. See RFP Section 3.5 for more information about this subsection.

Prospective Contractors shall not include the Prospective Contractor’s name or any other identifiers, including without limitation names of staff members, projects, products, and addresses on the Information for Evaluation – Experience document.

Prospective Contractors may delete the instructions above and example shown below.

Example:

Claim of Expertise:
We have a significant amount of experience in providing P-Card and T-Card services to State governments, and consistently delivery high performance.
Documented Performance:
We currently have 10 similar services, with an average rebate to the client of 5% and the average customer satisfaction rating on these services is currently a 9.8 out of 10.

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – SOLUTION

Using this template, Prospective Contractors should include a narrative to address and provide a high-level overview of the solution and/or approach proposed using the requirements outlined in the Solicitation.

Prospective Contractors shall not exceed the two-page limit for this subsection. See RFP Section 3.5 for more information about this subsection.

Prospective Contractors shall not include the Prospective Contractor’s name or any other identifiers, including without limitation names of staff members, projects, products, and addresses on the Information for Evaluation - Solution document.

Prospective Contractors may delete the instructions above.

INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – RISK

Using this template, Prospective Contractors should identify and prioritize major risks that they reasonably foresee could potentially prevent or impair the Prospective Contractor’s delivery of the solution as offered in the proposal or to otherwise fail to meet the State’s desired outcome, specifications, and performance standards, and how they will mitigate, manage, and/or minimize each risk listed.

Prospective Contractors may expand the space in each table, add a table, or delete a table as needed, but Prospective Contractors shall not exceed the two-page limit for this subsection. See RFP Section 3.5 for more information about this subsection.

Prospective Contractors shall not include the Prospective Contractor’s name or any other identifiers, including without limitation names of staff members, projects, products, and addresses on the Information for Evaluation – Risk document.

Prospective Contractors may delete the instructions above and the example shown below.

Example:

Risk Description:
Participating Entity does not understand how to use the Commercial Card Program.
Solution:
A full-time training group will hold education meetings at all Participating Entity locations twice a year throughout the length of the contract.
Documented Performance:
This risk mitigation has been used on the last 4 clients and has received a 10/10 satisfaction rating. These four clients have reported 0 complaints from their constituents regarding the usage of their commercial card program.

Risk Description:

Solution:

Documented Performance:

Risk Description:

Solution:

Documented Performance:

Risk Description:

Solution:

Documented Performance:

Risk Description:

Solution:

Documented Performance:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .