RSMA Ad Strategy Evaluation Criteria.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
DEP-BAW-RFQ-2027-RRR Marketing Services-PRF86 - CAT5
Solicitation number
BD-27-1045-BAW00-BAW01-132017
Issued by
Suffolk County, Massachusetts

About this file

This is an evaluation criteria document for a statewide contract issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) for advertising, marketing, and event planning services under statewide contract PRF86, Category 5. MassDEP seeks qualifications and proposals from eligible bidders for the development and implementation of a marketing strategy supporting the agency's statewide waste reduction education initiative, Recycle Smart MA. The document does not specify project quantities, response dates, due dates, site visits, bidder conferences, award dates, or contract term details.

The evaluation will assess vendor proposals across six weighted criteria: bidder qualifications and relevant experience (0-20 points), proposed campaign strategy and approach (0-25 points), creative quality and communications effectiveness (0-15 points), project team management and capacity (0-10 points), references and past performance (0-5 points), and cost proposal (0-25 points). The document does not contain information regarding pricing terms, set-asides, incumbent vendors, funding requirements, or budget amounts.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MassDEP Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Outreach and Education Initiative PRF86: Advertising, Marketing and Event Planning Services Category 5: Integrated Marketing Services

The scoring by evaluation criterion is explained below:

Statewide Contract PRF86

Evaluation Components

Vendor 1

Vendor 2

Vendor 3

1. Bidder qualifications and relevant experience. (0-20)

2. Proposed campaign strategy and approach (0-25)

3. Creative quality and communications effectiveness (0-15)

4. Project team management and capacity (0-10)

5. References and past performance (0-5)

6. Cost proposal (0-25)

Total

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .