J-08_PastPerformanceQuestionnaire.doc
DOC document 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation RRB11R001 - RRB Specialty MAC
- Solicitation number
- RRB11R001
- Issued by
-
Railroad Retirement Board
About this file
Solicitation RRB11R001 Attachment J08 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RRB RFP - RRB-11-R-001
Attachment J-08 Past Performance Questionnaire
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Sample Cover Letter
[COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Prime or subcontractor)]
Reference Name and Address
Date
SUBJECT: RFP- RRB-11-R-001– Specialty MAC Contractor Dear _________________:
We are currently responding to the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) Request for Proposal number RFP-RRB-11-R-001 (as a subcontractor to______ (If applicable)). The purpose of this contract is to perform claims process activities in accordance with the Part B Specialty Medicare Administrative Contract (SMAC) requirements.
There is an increased emphasis on past performance in the federal source selection process. The RRB is requesting that customers and clients of offerors provide the information as described within the attached questionnaire and return it to them for evaluation. We have identified you as one of our references and respectfully request that you complete and sign the attached questionnaire and then return it to RRB.
Questionnaires are due to RRB no later than ____________ (to be filled in by offeror); however, we would appreciate an earlier response if at all possible.
We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, Contracting Officer
U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Division of Acquisition Management 844 N Rush St.
Chicago, IL 60611-2092 Division of Acquisition Management
SUBJECT:
Solicitation RFP- RRB-11-R-001– Specialty MAC Contractor, Past Performance Questionnaire To Whom It May Concern:
The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) very much appreciates your time and thoughtfulness in completing the attached questionnaire. The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past performance of Offerors/Contractors who wish to be awarded a contract with RRB. Please be advised that neither your name, nor position or organization, nor this survey, will be divulged before, during or after this survey has been completed.
The questionnaire is arranged by the following agency goals: Customer Service, Financial Management, Operational Excellence, and Innovations and Technology. Each area consists of a few basic questions relating to these aspects of performance with regard to the Offeror/Contractor with which you worked. Please complete the questionnaire as indicated on the form.
Finally, please sign your name and identify your position during your association with the referenced Offeror/Contractor. Once completed, please submit the questionnaire in one of the following manners:
Email PDF (Preferred):
Karen.Haskins-Brewer@rrb.gov E-mail is the preferred method.
Fax Original:
(312) 751-4923, ATTN: Karen Haskins-Brewer, (312) 751-4615 (Please advise by phone or e-mail if questionnaire will be faxed) Mail Original:
U.S Railroad Retirement Board
Division of Acquisition Management
ATTN: Karen Haskins-Brewer
(312) 751-4615 Contract Administrator
844 N Rush Street
Chicago, IL 60611-2092 Thank you for taking the time to complete the questionnaire.
Sincerely, Paul T Ahern
Contracting Officer
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
RRB Solicitation No. RFP- RRB-11-R-001- Specialty MAC Contractor Company Being Evaluated (Offeror) Offeror/Contractor:
Address:
Please complete the following questionnaire about the Offeror/Contractor and indicate your responses in the blocks or columns, as appropriate. Numerical ratings are as indicated in the Rating Scale below. Other Ratings are as indicated in each block. Note: Use of the term “Agency” can be interpreted as also Government/non-Government agencies or customers.
Rating Scale:
| N/A |
| Not Applicable: Question does not apply to the contract discussed in this report |
| 0 |
| Unsatisfactory: Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements. |
| 1 |
| Poor: Overall compliance requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| Fair: Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
| 3 |
| Good: There are no, or very minimal, quality problems, and the Contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| 4 |
| Excellent: There are no quality issues, and the Contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the Government. |
| 5 |
| Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example for others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
We request that you justify each of your ratings with a comment. Please be as specific in your comment as possible, especially in situations that warrant very high or very low ratings. Use extra pages as necessary or expand the form electronically as needed.
CUSTOMER SERVICE
How did the contractor work collaboratively with the “customers” of the contract?
“Customers” may include, but are not limited to, other stakeholders (such as Medical Providers in a health insurance contract) critical to the success of the contract in question and those members of your staff responsible for the administration of the contract.
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Is/was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction and would you hire this contractor again?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
Comments:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Was the contractor timely and accurate in processing payments if the contractor administered funds and/or payments for services?
If the contractor administered funds and/or payments on this contract, was the contractor timely and accurate in submitting accounting reports?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE
How was the contractor’s quality of products/services? How well did the contractor meet the standards and requirements of the contract’s Statement of Work? Was the contractor timely in meeting its contract schedule and/or requirements?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
How well was did the contractor utilize internal controls to effectively manage its staff and systems?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
INNOVATIONS
How well did the contractor develop and continually refine its internal business processes to improve the quality of the work delivered on the contract?
If the contractor did incorporate internal business processes changes, what was the impact of those changes on the daily operations?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Yes/No: |
Agency/Company COMPLETING Questionnaire
Agency/Company Name:
Address:
Signature of Individual Completing the Questionnaire:
Date
Name:
Telephone No.:
Title:
Email Address:
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Page | 5
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .