RFQQ 4891_ETS Attach D UWM Responses.pdf
PDF 428 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Endomechanical, Trocar and Suture (ETS)
- Solicitation number
- RFQQ 4891
- Issued by
- Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington
About this file
This is a Question and Answer document for UW Medicine's RFQQ 4891 for Endomechanical, Trocar and Suture (ETS) products. Bidder questions were due January 10, 2025 by 12:00 PM Pacific Time, with UW Medicine's responses due January 13, 2025 by 12:00 PM Pacific Time. The document contains three questions and responses from potential bidders covering technical specifications, general information, and proposal preparation instructions.
Key clarifications provided include: UW Medicine will only accept pricing at the "Eaches" level as the standard unit of measure, rejecting a suggestion to include strand-level pricing for sutures; no bidder presentations will be permitted as part of the RFQQ process; and there is no Vizient Master cross reference being used for the analysis, with each bidder instead being required to provide their own updated cross references as part of their bid package.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQQ 4891 ETS AMEND 2_12.30.24.pdf | ||
| RFQQ 4891 ETS Attachment C_Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQQ 4891 ETS AMEND 1_12.20.24.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQQ 4891 ETS AMEND 3_1.8.2025.pdf | ||
| RFQQ 4891_ETS Attach D Questions Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQQ 4891 ETS AMEND 5_1.14.2025.pdf | ||
| RFQQ 4891 ETS_AMEND 4_1.13.2025.pdf | ||
| RFQQ 4891 Endomechanic Tocar Suture_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQQ 4891 ETS Attach C_v2 12202024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQQ 4891 ETS UWM Responses.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
UW Medicine
RFQQ 4891 ENDOMECHANICAL, TROCAR AND SUTURE (ETS)
Bidder's questions due Friday, January 10, 2025 by 12:00 PM Pacific Time UWM provide answers to Bidder's questions due Monday, January 13, 2025 by 12:00 PM Pacific Time Instructions: Provide the section # in column B (Section). Type in your Question within column C. Submit this template as an Excel document.
No. SECTION QUESTION UWM Response
1 Section 4. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Suture Usage: We’ve noticed that UWM current suture usage is recorded in eaches. Since multipack codes contain varying numbers of strands per each, it would be more accurate to break down the pricing at the strand level for a clearer understanding of pricing and value.
Would UWM be comfortable with Bidder including three columns in the suture cross and bid:
Box Price, Each Price, and Strand Price?
The unit of measure (UOM) of Eaches is the accepted standard across the industry and country. Accordingly, UW Medicine’s standard is the Eaches level. If a column is added for Strand pricing, it will not be used in the review.
Section 2. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR
BIDDERS
Will there be an opportunity to present our bid proposals to the bid committee and the executive committee?
No. Per Section 5, bids submissions will be reviewed by the Evaluation Committee. Bidder presentations are not part of this RFQQ.
Section 3. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING
PROPOSALS
Regarding cross-referencing: How will UWM handle situations where a company defers on their cross-reference. Particularly in terms of Exact Cross vs Close Cross? Would UWM able to share the Vizient Master cross reference that UWM will be using to run the analysis?
There is not a Vizient Master cross reference. Each Bidder has been asked to provide updated cross references in the bid process. UW Medicine looks forward to seeing Bidder's cross reference and bid package.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .