RFQQ 24-00024 amd 1.docx
DOCX document 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WDFW Aircraft Charter Services
- Solicitation number
- 24-00024
- Issued by
- Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington
About this file
The document is a Request for Qualifications and Quotations (RFQQ) issued by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for Air Charter Services. The RFQQ is intended to be awarded to multiple qualified bidders who can provide suitable fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft, as well as qualified pilots, to WDFW for a variety of services. The RFQQ aims to meet the diverse needs of WDFW biologists, and individual projects will be assigned to the most suitable contractor. The RFQQ was issued on November 8, 2024, and bidders do not need to be on the Department of Enterprise Services' master contract to apply.
The RFQQ specifies that WDFW currently contracts out all net gunning projects and does not expect bidders to be qualified for that type of work. However, WDFW is open to building relationships with contractors to potentially take on that work in the future, with WDFW staff present. The RFQQ does not specify any set-asides or incumbents, and the funding source and requirements are not provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| rfqq 24-00024 aircraft services.docx | DOCX document | |
| WDFW policy and procedure 2006.pdf | ||
| WDFW policy and procedure 2006.pdf.crdownload | CRDOWNLOAD file | |
| RFQ 24-00024 amd 2.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Request for Qualifications and Quotations Amendment
| RFQQ No.: |
| 24-00024 |
| Title: |
| WDFW Air Charter Services |
| Date issued: |
| November 8, 2024 |
| Amendment No: |
| 1 |
1. The purpose of this amendment is to provide answers to bidder questions provided to WDFW in accordance with Section 4.4, Pre-bid Conference and Bidder Questions.
a. Question 1: Does a bidder currently need to be on the Department of Enterprise Services’ master contract for this?
Answer: No, a vendor does not need to be on the current DES contract to apply to this contract.
b. Question 2: This appears to be a contract like a master service agreement and then the individual biologist will call when they have a project. If we get chosen, you'll have a bunch of awarded contractors?
Answer: This RFQQ is intended to be awarded to multiple bidders who meet the required qualifications for air charter services. The needs of WDFW biologists are diverse and this RFQQ aims to meet those needs through different contractors. As individual projects emerge, biologists will reach out to contractors who they think are the best fit for the project and WDFW will issue a work order under those contracts for service.
c. Question 3: One of the waterfowl biologists are requesting bubble windows on all the passenger doors of our helicopter. Is that the case for all your biologists?
Answer: No. Bubble windows are not important for other surveys.
1) Question 4: What about net gunning?
Answer: Currently, WDFW contracts out all net gunning projects and activities related to net gunning ungulates and does not expect bidders of this RFQQ to be qualified for that type of work. WDFW staff must be present for work with wolves, so there is the possibility of building a relationship between staff and contractors to take on that work in the future.
All other terms, conditions, and specifications remain unchanged.
Attachments: N/A image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .