RFQAttC.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Five (5) High Axle Vehicles
Solicitation number
S-25800-00011770
Issued by
Polk County, Oregon

About this file

This is a Reference Check Form template (Attachment F) associated with RFP S-25800-0011770 for Three High Axle Vehicles. The form is designed to gather information from previous clients of proposers bidding on this opportunity.

The form consists of ten questions focused on evaluating vendor performance, including the type of services provided, customer service quality, business relationship satisfaction, problem resolution methods, likelihood of repeat business, areas of highest and lowest satisfaction, timeline adherence, and cost management. The form requires basic contact information from the reference, including entity name, contact name, telephone number, and email address.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQAttA.pdf PDF
RFQAttD.docx DOCX document
RFQAttE.docx DOCX document
S-25800-0011770 High Axle Vehicles.pdf PDF
RFQAttC~1.docx DOCX document
RFQAttB.docx DOCX document
High Axle Vehicles Scores.pdf PDF
Coffee~3.docx DOCX document
RFQAttB~1.docx DOCX document
RFQAttF.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

RFP S-25800-0011770 – Three (3) High Axle Vehicles Att D

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Proposer Name:__________________________________________
Reference Entity:__________________________________________
Reference Contact Name:__________________________________________
Contact Telephone Number:__________________________________________
Contact Email Address:__________________________________________

Please respond to the following questions:

1. For what type of services did you engage Proposer?

Describe the services listed in response to question 1.

Describe Proposer’s customer service.

Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Proposer.

Describe Proposer’s methods for problem resolution.

How likely would you be to use Proposer’s services again?

With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s services are you the most satisfied?

With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s services are you the least satisfied?

How well did Proposer stay within the proposed timeline?

How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?

Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 Page 1 of 2

DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016 Page 1 of 2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .