High Axle Vehicles Scores.pdf
PDF 98 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Five (5) High Axle Vehicles
- Solicitation number
- S-25800-00011770
- Issued by
- Polk County, Oregon
About this file
This is an evaluation scoring sheet from the Oregon Department of Emergency Management for Contract #2024008 (S-258000-11770) for Five High Axle Vehicles. Three evaluators assessed three bidders - Acela Inc., Foray Concepts LLC, and Hughes Fire Equipment - across four criteria: Proposed Product, Estimated Delivery Schedule, On-Site Training Plan, and Budget.
Acela Inc. emerged as the top-ranked bidder with a total calculated score of 248.35 points, receiving consistently high ratings across all three evaluators (75.3, 83.0, and 90.1 points respectively). Hughes Fire Equipment ranked second with 225.95 total points, while Foray Concepts LLC placed third with 145.45 points, notably receiving 0% scores from two evaluators on delivery schedule and training plan criteria. The normalized scoring system indicated that lower scores were considered better, with Acela Inc. receiving a normalized score of 4, Hughes Fire Equipment an 8, and Foray Concepts LLC a 9.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQAttB.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQAttC.docx | DOCX document | |
| Coffee~3.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQAttA.pdf | ||
| RFQAttD.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQAttE.docx | DOCX document | |
| S-25800-0011770 High Axle Vehicles.pdf | ||
| RFQAttC~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQAttB~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQAttF.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Agency Contract #: 2024008 Title: S‐258000‐
Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 Evaluator 3
Proposer / Bidder Criteria Rating % of total points per scale
Rating % of total points per scale
Rating % of total points per scale
Total Calculated Points
Scoring Rank Normalized Score (lower is better)
Proposed Product 75% 85% 85% Estimated Delivery Schedule 85% 85% 95% On Site Training Plan 60% 75% 99% Budget 65% 80% 80%
CALCULATED POINTS 75.3 83.0 90.1
EVALUATOR RANK 1 1 1
Proposed Product 55% 80% 85% Estimated Delivery Schedule 0% 70% 0% On Site Training Plan 0% 75% 0% Budget 40% 90% 87%
CALCULATED POINTS 26.0 76.8 42.7
EVALUATOR RANK 3 2 3
Proposed Product 70% 85% 90% Estimated Delivery Schedule 60% 65% 87% On Site Training Plan 35% 70% 90% Budget 75% 80% 90%
CALCULATED POINTS 61.8 75.3 89.0
EVALUATOR RANK 2 3 2
Hughes Fire Equipment
225.95 2 8
Acela Inc. 248.35 1 4
11770High Axle Vehicles
Foray Concepts LLC 145.45 3 9
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .