Attachment F - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
HHCC Clinical Staffing Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
RFQ-26-PHX-035
Issued by
Department of Health and Human Services Indian Health Service

About this file

This is a Contractor Past Performance Questionnaire template used by the Phoenix Area Indian Health Service (PAIHS) to evaluate contractor performance on completed federal contracts.

The questionnaire is divided into two sections: contractor-completed blocks and client-completed blocks. Contractors must provide basic company information (firm name, UEI, address, contact details), specify their role (prime contractor, subcontractor, or joint venture), and document contract details including contract number, type (Firm Fixed-Price, Cost Reimbursement, or Other), title, location, award date, and completion date. Contractors also describe project complexity (High, Medium, or Routine) and relevance to the current solicitation. The client section captures the evaluator's contact information, their role in the project, and the completion date. The evaluation criteria use a standardized six-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unacceptable, or Neutral) applied across seven performance categories: Quality (technical performance, quality standards, problem resolution, quality control); Schedule/Timeliness (delivery compliance, resource utilization); Customer Satisfaction (end-user satisfaction, contractor cooperation, responsiveness, overall satisfaction); Management/Personnel/Labor (on-site management, workforce capability, government property control, personnel expertise, small business utilization, concurrent project management, change management, overall management effectiveness); Cost Control/Financial Management (contract price compliance, cost-saving innovations, invoice accuracy, accounting system adequacy, termination history, financial stability); Safety/Security (safety plan adherence, security compliance); and General (emergency response capability, contractual compliance, overall rating, rehire likelihood). The questionnaire requires narrative responses addressing contractor strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and other performance risk factors to inform future evaluation decisions.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to HHCC Clinical Staffing Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFQ-26-PHX-035_Vendor_QA_Numbered.pdf PDF
RFQ-26-PHX-035_Amendment_0001_QA_Supplement.pdf PDF
Attachment E - HHS326 IEE Representation.pdf PDF
Attachment A - Rate Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Combined Synopsis.pdf PDF
Attachment C- Tax Exemption.pdf PDF
Attachment H - Applicable Contract Clauses.pdf PDF
Attachment D - PWS - QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment G - Ordering Procedures and Contract Administration.pdf PDF
Attachment B - BAA.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Contractor Past Performance Questionnaire

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: ________________________________________________ UEI:________________

Address: __________________________________________________

Phone Number: ____________________________________________

Email Address: _____________________________________________

Point of Contact: ___________________________________________ Phone Number: ____________

2. Work Performed as Prime Contractor Subcontractor Joint Venture

Percent of project work performed: _______________________________________________________

If subcontractor, who was the Prime (Name/Phone#): ________________________________________

3. Contract Information

Contract Number: ______________________________________________________________________

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable): _________________________________________________

Contract Type: Firm Fixed-Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please Specify) _____________

Contract Title: _________________________________________________________________________

Contract Location: _____________________________________________________________________

Award Date: _________________________ Contract Completion Date _______________________

Actual Completion Date (If Different from Contract Completion Date): ____________________________

Explain:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Medium Routine

How is this project relevant to project submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information:

Name: _______________________________________________________________________________

Title: ________________________________________________________________________________

Phone Number: ________________________________________________________________________

Email Address: ________________________________________________________________________

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was Completed:

8. Client’s Signature: ___________________________________

NOTE: Phoenix Area Indian Health Service (PAIHS) requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits directly back to the offeror. The offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to IHS with their quote/proposal/bid and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on PAIHS solicitations. Please contact the offeror for PAIHS POC information. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE

CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many for the government/owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some of them to the government’s/owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the government/owner. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the elements or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(M) Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal rating is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/owner.

(U) Unacceptable

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recover is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious a problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear to be or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the government/owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Neutral No information or did not apply to your contract.

NA rating will neither be positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE SELECT THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE

CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical performance E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedule, including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) End user satisfaction with the project E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with government staff (Including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, and appropriate communication)

E VG S M U N

c) Contractor’s level of concern and responsiveness to customer concerns

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGERMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort.

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel

E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business Concerns (sub-contracting)

E VG S M U N

f) Ability to manage concurrent projects with multiple disciplines.

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST CONTROL/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexpected variances (under/overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking costs? (If no, please explain below)

Yes No

e) IF this is/was a government contract, has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations? (Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action below)

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems?

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) Contractor’s ability to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues (Includes: following the users

E VG S M U N

rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc)

b) Contractor compliance with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues)

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/clauses (If M/U, please specify below)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again?

Yes No

d) Overall rating for work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

Firm Name:
UEI:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Phone Number_2:
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor who was the Prime NamePhone:
Contract Number:
DeliveryTask Order Number if applicable:
Other Please Specify:
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Name:
Title:
Phone Number_3:
Email Address_2:
please attach additional pages if necessary:
Group1: Off
Group2: Off
Date2_af_date:
Date3_af_date:
Date4_af_date:
Text5:
Text6:
Group3: Off
Date7_af_date:
Text8:
Text9:
Group4: Off
Group5: Off
Group6: Off
Group7: Off
Group8: Off
Group9: Off
Group10: Off
Group11: Off
Group12: Off
Group13: Off
Group14: Off
Group15: Off
Group16: Off
Group17: Off
Group18: Off
Group19: Off
Group20: Off
Group21: Off
Group22: Off
Group23: Off
Group24: Off
Group25: Off
Group26: Off
Group27: Off
Group28: Off
Group29: Off
Group30: Off
Group31: Off
Group32: Off
Group33: Off

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .