Exhibit_D_Appendix_D-15_PRPP_for_Chaquehui_and_South_Ancho.pdf

Page 1 [3/4/2019 7:08:53 AM]

19P-0032, **N3B PROJECT** CHAQUEHUI SWMU

INVESTIGATIONS

Created By: CRAIG DOUGLASS Current Phase: PP Date Posted: 02/12/2019

Status: OPEN Project Type: None

Date Review Due: 02/28/2019

TONY BISHOP ‐ WASTE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME REVIEW STATUS: COMPLETE PROJECT TEAM COMPLETION STATUS: NOT APPLICABLE

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/26/2019 BY TONY BISHOP, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Manage any wastes from this project in compliance with federal and state regulations, DOE requirements, and the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit.

JOCELYN BUCKLEY ‐ POTENTIAL RELEASE SITE (PRS) REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME REVIEW STATUS: COMPLETE PROJECT TEAM COMPLETION STATUS: NOT APPLICABLE

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/21/2019 BY JOCELYN BUCKLEY, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

I have reviewed this PRID and have no comments or concerns.

KARI GARCIA ‐ CULTURAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/27/2019 BY KARI GARCIA, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Area #1 Label: AOC 33‐011(b): There are no cultural resource issues within this area as depicted on the PRID map, however there are two archaeological sites within 200 feet to the northeast of the northeastern boundary of this area.

Area #2 Label: SWMU 33‐017 Drainage Area 3: There are no cultural resource issues within this area as depicted on the PRID map.

Area #3 Label: SWMU 33‐017 Drainage Area 1: There is one archaeological site located adjacent to the southeast corner of this area as depicted on the PRID map.

Area #4 Label: SWMU 33‐017 Drainage Area 2: There are two archaeological sites located within this area as depicted on the PRID map.

Area #5 Label: SWMU AOC 33‐044(m): There are no cultural resource issues within this area as depicted on the PRID map, however there is one archaeological site located approximately 140 feet to the north of the northeastern boundary of this area.

Area #6 Label: SWMU 33‐001, 004 & 006 Area: There are three archaeological sites located within this area as depicted on the PRID map and there are two additional archaeological sites located within 25 feet to the east of the southern portion of the eastern boundary. Additionally, there are three historic buildings located within this area as depicted.

RFP-0000297

19P‐0032, **N3B Project** Chaquehui SWMU Investigations

Page 2 of 5 [3/4/2019 7:08:53 AM]

Area #7 Label: SWMU 33‐016: There is one archaeological site located partially within this area at the northwest corner of the area as depicted on the PRID map. Additionally, there is a second archaeological site located approximately 25feet to the west of the southwestern boundary of this area as depicted.

Area #8 Label: SWMU 33‐007, 009: There are no cultural resource issues within this area as depicted on the PRID map.

Area #9 Label: AOC 33‐003: There are no cultural resource issues within this area as depicted on the PRID map.

CHARLES HATHCOCK ‐ BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/12/2019 BY BRENT THOMPSON FOR CHARLES HATHCOCK, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Migratory Bird Protections The federal law, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, prohibits killing migratory birds, including nestlings and eggs. Migratory birds breed across LANL property.

JOSEPH LLOYD ‐ EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/12/2019 BY CHRISTOPHER JOHANSEN FOR JOSEPH LLOYD, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

There is a low probability of encountering explosive debris as this was a former firing site in these areas, however, it is remains a possibility. Therefore the work is approved with the following conditions

OSH‐ISH Group Actions:

Provide guidance and assistance as required or requested as it relates to explosive hazards.

Project Team Actions:

1. In the event that an item is located that is suspected to be a explosive or can not be immediately confirmed as not normal debris for the area in question(cans, trash, debris, etc), LANL Emergency Operations Center (EOC) must be contacted at 7‐6211.

2.All personnel conducting the work must complete or be under the direct supervision of an individual who as taken, the LANL Unexploded Ordnance recognition course prior to the start of work

JEFFREY MCCALE ‐ PHYSICAL SECURITY REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/27/2019 BY DEBORAH MILLER FOR JEFFREY MCCALE, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

N3B project...no comments from LANL physical security

KAREN MCHUGH ‐ SAFETY BASIS REVIEW (UI), PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

Page 3 of 5 [3/4/2019 7:08:53 AM]

2/12/2019 BY KAREN MCHUGH, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

JAMES MORK ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING: SITE PLANNING, PHASE PP

SME REVIEW STATUS: ACTION REQUIRED PROJECT TEAM COMPLETION STATUS: NOT APPLICABLE

Project not reviewed ‐ no comments received.

GERALD MURRELL ‐ RADIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/20/2019 BY LUCAS HETRICK FOR GERALD MURRELL, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

JERI NARANJO‐MARTINEZ ‐ FIRE PROTECTION REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/12/2019 BY JERI NARANJO‐MARTINEZ, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Fire Protection: Fire Danger Rating

Issues/Comments:

Requirements for Fire Danger Matrix will be required to be evaluated.

http:www.lanl.gov/resources/emergency/fire‐danger‐matrix.php

FP‐DO Actions:

None.

Project Leader Actions:

Review Fire Danger Matrix for proposed activities/operations prior to commencing work.

MARWIN SHENDO ‐ WATER QUALITY REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/28/2019 BY BRIAN IACONA FOR MARWIN SHENDO, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

If this project is greater than 1 acre in size or part of a larger common plan of development coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit may be required.

In accordance with EISA 438 requirements, all development or redevelopment projects with a footprint that exceeds 5,000 square feet must maintain or restore, to the maximum extent technically feasible, the predevelopment hydrology of the property with regard to the temperature, rate, volume, and duration of flow.

The work within the watercourse may require 401/404 Dredge and Fill permit coverage.

DOE Order 10 CFR Section 1022 prohibits impacts to floodplains. A floodplain assessment may be required for this work.

JAMES STANTON ‐ WASTE REGULATORY REVIEW, PHASE PP

Page 4 of 5 [3/4/2019 7:08:53 AM]

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/21/2019 BY JAMES STANTON, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

1. Manage any wastes from this project in compliance with federal and state regulations, DOE requirements, and the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit.

2. Waste from this project should be managed in areas that are within an N3B OCA or are otherwise under N3B control.

MARJORIE STOCKTON ‐ AIR QUALITY REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/13/2019 BY VINCENT CARRETTI FOR MARJORIE STOCKTON, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Based on the current project description, there does not appear to be any air quality issues.

These operations are not likely to result in a 0.1 mrem potential off‐site dose. No monitoring or EPA notification is required for this work.

ANTHONY VILLA ‐ UTILITIES REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/13/2019 BY ANTHONY VILLA, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

Caution with overhead and underground utilities within project sites.

JEFFREY WALTERSCHEID ‐ NPDES STORM WATER INDIVIDUAL PERMIT (IP), PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/13/2019 BY JEFFREY WALTERSCHEID, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Project is located within or near Site Monitoring Area (SMA) CHQ‐SMA‐0.5, CHQ‐SMA‐1.01, CHQ‐SMA‐1.02, CHQ‐SMA‐1.03, CHQ‐SMA‐2, CHQ‐SMA‐3.05, CHQ‐SMA‐4.1, CHQ‐SMA‐4.5, CHQ‐SMA‐5.05, CHQ‐SMA‐6, and CHQ‐SMA‐7.1 as listed in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. NM0030759, also referred to as the Individual Permit, Permit or IP.

Based on a review to identify concerns or possible impacts to the IP, it was noted that IP controls are located within or near the outlined project areas. Attached to this PRID are the NPDES Individual Permit maps (CHQ‐SMA‐0.5, CHQ‐SMA‐1.01, CHQ‐SMA‐1.02, CHQ‐SMA‐1.03, CHQ‐SMA‐2, CHQ‐SMA‐3.05, CHQ‐SMA‐4.1, CHQ‐SMA‐4.5, CHQ‐SMA‐5.05, CHQ‐SMA‐6, and CHQ‐SMA‐7.1) for identifying the permitted control locations.

Note that the IP is administered by EM‐DOE and N3B.

ATTACHMENTS:

1) Q001‐13‐0006‐42‐CHQ05‐R7_LA‐UR‐17‐23717.pdf

2) Q002‐13‐0006‐57‐CHQ1.01‐R8_LA‐UR‐17‐23718.pdf

3) Q002A‐13‐0006‐22‐CHQ1.02‐R10_LA‐UR‐17‐24238.pdf

4) Q002B‐13‐0006‐23‐CHQ1.03‐R11_LA‐UR‐17‐24239.pdf

5) Q003‐13‐0006‐43‐CHQ2‐R11_LA‐UR‐17‐24240.pdf

6) Q004‐13‐0006‐44‐CHQ3.05‐R7_LA‐UR‐17‐24032.pdf

Page 5 of 5 [3/4/2019 7:08:53 AM]

7) Q006‐13‐0006‐58‐CHQ4.1‐R8_LA‐UR‐17‐23719.pdf

8) Q007‐13‐0006‐38‐CHQ4.5‐R9_LA‐UR‐17‐24033.pdf

9) Q008‐13‐0006‐300‐CHQ5.05‐R3_LA‐UR‐17‐24243.pdf

10) Q009‐13‐0006‐46‐CHQ6‐R15_LA‐UR‐17‐24034.pdf

11) Q010‐13‐0006‐47‐CHQ7.1‐R8_LA‐UR‐17‐24035.pdf

JEFFREY WHICKER ‐ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PHYSICS REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME REVIEW STATUS: COMPLETE PROJECT TEAM COMPLETION STATUS: NOT APPLICABLE

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/20/2019 BY CHRISTINE BULLOCK FOR JEFFREY WHICKER, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

MARJORIE WRIGHT ‐ NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) REVIEW, PHASE

PP

SME REVIEW STATUS: COMPLETE PROJECT TEAM COMPLETION STATUS: NOT APPLICABLE

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/27/2019 BY JAMES JACKSON FOR MARJORIE WRIGHT, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

PRID 19P0032 has been reviewed with no additional comments.

Page 1 [2/25/2019 7:00:22 AM]

19P-0027, **N3B PROJECT** SOUTH ANCHO SITE

INVESTIGATION

Created By: CRAIG DOUGLASS Current Phase: PP Date Posted: 02/06/2019

Status: OPEN

Project Type: None Date Review Due: 02/22/2019

TONY BISHOP ‐ WASTE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/20/2019 BY TONY BISHOP, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Manage any wastes from this project in compliance with federal and state regulations, DOE requirements, and the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit.

JOCELYN BUCKLEY ‐ POTENTIAL RELEASE SITE (PRS) REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/21/2019 BY JOCELYN BUCKLEY, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

KARI GARCIA ‐ CULTURAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/22/2019 BY KARI GARCIA, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Archaeological Sites: There are no archaeological sites within the proposed boundaries identified as Phase 1 Area, Phase 2 Area A, and Phase 2 Area B. However, there is one archaeological sites located approximately 130’ feet to the northwest of the western boundary of Phase 2 Area A as depicted on the PRID map.

Historic Buildings: There are three historic buildings located within the proposed boundaries identified as Phase 1 Area, Phase 2 Area A, and Phase 2 Area B.

LAWRENCE GARCIA ‐ SAFETY BASIS REVIEW (WFO), PHASE PP

CHARLES HATHCOCK ‐ BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/6/2019 BY CHARLES HATHCOCK, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

During vegetation removal operations, active nests with eggs or nestlings may get destroyed.

The best management practice to protect these nests is to schedule tree and shrub removal outside of the peak bird nesting season, May 15 – July 31.

JOSEPH LLOYD ‐ EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, PHASE PP

19P‐0027, **N3B Project** South Ancho Site Investigation

Page 2 of 4 [2/25/2019 7:00:22 AM]

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/8/2019 BY CHRISTOPHER JOHANSEN FOR JOSEPH LLOYD, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

There is a low probability of encountering explosive debris as this was a former firing site in these areas, however, it is remains a possibility. Therefore the work is approved with the following conditions

OSH‐ISH Group Actions:

Provide guidance and assistance as required or requested as it relates to explosive hazards.

Project Team Actions:

1. In the event that an item is located that is suspected to be a explosive or can not be immediately confirmed as not normal debris for the area in question(cans, trash, debris, etc), LANL Emergency Operations Center (EOC) must be contacted at 7‐6211.

2.All personnel conducting the work must complete or be under the direct supervision of an individual who as taken, the LANL Unexploded Ordnance recognition course prior to the start of work

JEFFREY MCCALE ‐ PHYSICAL SECURITY REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/20/2019 BY DEBORAH MILLER FOR JEFFREY MCCALE, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

This is an M3B project. No input from LANL security

JAMES MORK ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING: SITE PLANNING, PHASE PP

GERALD MURRELL ‐ RADIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/11/2019 BY LUCAS HETRICK FOR GERALD MURRELL, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

JERI NARANJO‐MARTINEZ ‐ FIRE PROTECTION REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/8/2019 BY JERI NARANJO‐MARTINEZ, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Issues/Comments:

Requirements for Fire Danger Matrix will be required to be evaluated.

http:www.lanl.gov/resources/emergency/fire‐danger‐matrix.php

FP‐DO Actions:

None.

Page 3 of 4 [2/25/2019 7:00:22 AM]

Project Leader Actions:

Review Fire Danger Matrix for proposed activities/operations prior to commencing work.

MARWIN SHENDO ‐ WATER QUALITY REVIEW, PHASE PP

JAMES STANTON ‐ WASTE REGULATORY REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/20/2019 BY JAMES STANTON, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

1. Manage any wastes from this project in compliance with federal and state regulations, DOE requirements, and the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit.

2. Waste from this project should be managed in areas that are within an N3B OCA or are otherwise under N3B control.

MARJORIE STOCKTON ‐ AIR QUALITY REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/13/2019 BY VINCENT CARRETTI FOR MARJORIE STOCKTON, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Based on the current project description, there does not appear to be any air quality issues.

These operations are not likely to result in a 0.1 mrem potential off‐site dose. No monitoring or EPA notification is required for this work.

ANTHONY VILLA ‐ UTILITIES REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/6/2019 BY ANTHONY VILLA, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

Utility locates recommended in and around 33‐0087.

JEFFREY WALTERSCHEID ‐ NPDES STORM WATER INDIVIDUAL PERMIT (IP), PHASE PP

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/6/2019 BY JEFFREY WALTERSCHEID, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

Project is located within or near Site Monitoring Area (SMA) A‐SMA‐4 and A‐SMA‐6 as listed in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. NM0030759, also referred to as the Individual Permit, Permit or IP.

Based on a review to identify concerns or possible impacts to the IP, it was noted that IP controls are located within or near the outlined project area. Attached to this PRID are the NPDES Individual Permit maps for A‐SMA‐4 and A‐SMA‐6 showing the permitted control locations.

Note that the IP is administered by EM‐DOE and N3B.

ATTACHMENTS:

Page 4 of 4 [2/25/2019 7:00:22 AM]

1) A008‐13‐0006‐35‐A4‐R9_LA‐UR‐17‐LA‐UR‐17‐30792.pdf

2) A009‐13‐0006‐34‐A6‐R8_LA‐UR‐17‐30793.pdf

JEFFREY WHICKER ‐ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PHYSICS REVIEW, PHASE PP

SME REVIEW STATUS: COMPLETE PROJECT TEAM COMPLETION STATUS: NOT APPLICABLE

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/12/2019 BY CHRISTINE BULLOCK FOR JEFFREY WHICKER, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

MARJORIE WRIGHT ‐ NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) REVIEW, PHASE

PP

SME REVIEW STATUS: COMPLETE PROJECT TEAM COMPLETION STATUS: NOT APPLICABLE

SME/POC COMMENTS:

2/21/2019 BY DAVID HOLTKAMP FOR MARJORIE WRIGHT, SME STATUS: COMPLETE

ISSUES/COMMENTS

This project will be located next to several other projects within the project area and may need to be evaluated for cumulative impacts.

18P‐0148 33‐87 Reopening of Firing Point 18P‐0274 Remote ISOTOPES 19P‐0032 **N3B Project** Chaquehui SWMU Investigations