RFP S-63500-00013989 Attachment G - Responsibility Inquiry.pdf
PDF 129 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Bobcat GPS Collars
- Solicitation number
- S-63500-00013989
- Issued by
- Jackson County, Cheshire CDP, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Responsibility Inquiry form for OregonBuys Request for Proposal (RFP) S-63500-00013989 for Bobcat GPS Collars, issued by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services (DAS) Procurement Services. The form is designed to assess the qualifications and reliability of potential offerors for a contract involving GPS collar procurement for bobcats, with the document last updated on December 3, 2021.
The responsibility inquiry requires detailed information from potential vendors, including their financial capabilities, contract performance history, legal standing, and operational readiness. Key areas of inquiry include the offeror's financial resources, past contract performance, potential legal issues or contract terminations, outstanding judgments, bankruptcy history, licensing and insurance status, and compliance with pay equity requirements. The form serves as a comprehensive vetting mechanism to ensure that the selected vendor has the capacity, stability, and integrity to successfully execute the GPS collar contract for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OregonBuys RFP S-63500-00013989: Bobcat GPS Collars Attachment G
DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – December 9, 2016 (ODFW Update 12/3/21)
ATTACHMENT G
RESPONSIBILITY INQUIRY
Agency will determine responsibility of an Offeror prior to award and execution of a Contract. In addition to this form, Agency may notify Offeror of other documentation required, which may include but is not limited to recent profit-and-loss history, current balance statements and cash flow information, assets-to-liabilities ratio, including number and amount of secured versus unsecured creditor claims, availability of short and long-term financing, bonding capacity, insurability, credit information, materials and equipment, facility capabilities, personnel information, record of performance under previous contracts, etc. Failure to promptly provide requested information or clearly demonstrate responsibility may result in an Agency finding of non-responsibility and rejection.
1. Does Offeror have available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of Offeror to meet all contractual responsibilities? YES / NO .
2. Within the last five years, how many contracts of a similar nature has Offeror completed that, to the extent that the costs associated with and time available to perform the contract remained within Offeror′s control, Offeror stayed within the time and budget allotted, and there were no contract claims by any party? Number: ____
How many contracts did not meet those standards? Number: ____ If any, please explain.
Response:
3. Within the last three years has Offeror (incl. a partner or shareholder owning 10% or more of Offeror’s firm) or a major subcontractor (receiving 10% or more of a total contract amount) been criminally or civilly charged, indicted or convicted in connection with:
• obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract,
• violation of federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of bids or Offerors, or
• embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property? YES / NO .
If "YES," indicate the jurisdiction, date of indictment, charge or judgment, and names and summary of charges in the response field below.
Response:
4. Within the last three years, has Offeror had:
• any contracts terminated for default by any government agency, or
• any lawsuits filed against it by creditors or involving contract disputes? YES / NO .
If "YES," please explain. (With regard to judgments, include jurisdiction and date of final judgment or dismissal.)
Response:
5. Does Offeror have any outstanding or pending judgments against it? YES / NO .
Is Offeror experiencing financial distress or having difficulty securing financing? YES / NO .
Does Offeror have sufficient cash flow to fund day-to-day operations throughout the proposed contract period? YES / NO
If "YES” on the first question or second question, or “NO” on the third question, please provide additional details.
Response:
6. Within the last three years, has Offeror filed a bankruptcy action, filed for reorganization, made a general assignment of assets for the benefit of creditors, or had an action for insolvency instituted against it? YES / NO .
If "YES," indicate the filing dates, jurisdictions, type of action, ultimate resolution, and dates of judgment or dismissal, if applicable.
Response:
7. Does Offeror have all required licenses, insurance and/or registrations, if any, and is Offeror legally authorized to do business in the State of Oregon? YES /NO .
If "NO," please explain.
Response:
8. Pay Equity Certificate. This certificate is required if Offeror employs 50 or more full-time workers and the prospective contract price is estimated to exceed $500,000. [This requirement does not apply to architectural, engineering, photogrammetric mapping, transportation planning or land surveying and related services contracts.] Does a current authorized representative of Offeror possess an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Department of Administrative Services? YES / NO / N/A
. [If the certificate was provided with the Bid or Proposal submitted for a solicitation related to the prospective contract, then it is not necessary to resubmit it. Just indicate “see Bid” or “see Proposal” in the response field. Otherwise, if applicable, submit a copy of the certificate with this form.]
Response:
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
By signature below, the undersigned Authorized Representative on behalf of Offeror certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that the responses provided on this form are complete, accurate, and not misleading.
Offeror Name: RFP:
Project Name:
Authorized Signature Date
Print Name Title
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .