RFP S-63500-00013989 Attachment D - Reference Check Form.pdf

PDF 87 KB Posted

Attached to
Bobcat GPS Collars
Solicitation number
S-63500-00013989
Issued by
Jackson County, Cheshire CDP, Oregon

About this file

The document is a Reference Check Form (Attachment D) for Oregon's Department of Administrative Services (DAS) Procurement Services, associated with RFP S-63500-00013989 for Bobcat GPS Collars. The form is designed for potential vendors to provide two professional references who will be evaluated on a 0-10 scale across multiple performance criteria, including service quality, timeline adherence, customer responsiveness, and technical performance of GPS collars.

The reference evaluation specifically focuses on technical performance metrics for GPS collars, including percentages of collars that stopped transmitting due to battery failure, firmware/software issues, and incorrect mortality identification. The Agency will make three attempts to contact each reference, and if unsuccessful, the vendor will receive a zero score for that reference. The form requires detailed contact information for each reference and is part of the overall vendor qualification process for the GPS collar procurement.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OregonBuys RFP S-63500-00013989: Bobcat GPS Collars Attachment D

DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 August 16, 2021 Page 1 of 1

ATTACHMENT D

REFERENCE CHECK FORM

As required in Section 3.4.3 of the RFP, Offeror must submit completed Reference Check Form from two (2) References.

Proposer must submit one (1) Attachment D for each Reference.

Offeror Name: __________________________________________

Reference Entity: __________________________________________

Reference Contact Name: __________________________________________

Contact Telephone Number: __________________________________________

Contact Email Address: __________________________________________

Agency will make three (3) attempts to contact each of the references provided by the Offeror. If these attempts are unsuccessful, the Offeror will receive a score of zero for that reference.

When Agency contacts each Reference, the following questions will be rated on a scale of 0-10:

0 = Poor - 10 = Excellent

How would you rate the Offeror’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Offeror?

How well did the Offeror stay within the proposed timeline?

How would you rate the Offeror’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?

Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Offeror.

How likely would you be to use Offeror’s services again?

What percent of collars stopped transmitting due to battery failure prior to the minimum estimated battery life of the collars?

What percent of collars stopped transmitting as a result of firmware or software issues associated with the transmitters?

What percent of the collars incorrectly identified mortality of the individual?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .