RFP S-25700-00002528 Evaluation Criteria Spreadsheet- filled.xls
XLS spreadsheet 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HYPERION TO OBIEE ACCOUNTING TRANSITION
- Solicitation number
- S-25700-00002528
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria Spreadsheet related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the State of Oregon, Department of Oregon State Police, to solicit services for transitioning from Hyperion to OBIEE accounting software. The RFP was open to contractors to provide the required services, with proposals evaluated on criteria such as understanding of the scope of work, meeting the required components, ability to meet technical requirements, and cost. The recommended proposal for award is from Cherry Road Tech, with the highest total score of 95.85 out of 100 points.
The pricing information shows the total estimated fee for the three proposals, with Cherry Road Tech having the lowest total price of $48,525.00. The evaluation breakdown provides the scores assigned by each of the three evaluators across the various criteria. The contract opportunity involves the State of Oregon and the local jurisdictions of Marion County and Salem City.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S-25700-00002528 AttD.docx | DOCX document | |
| Aging Report - Current~1.bqy | — | |
| S-25700-00002528 AttF.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| S-25700-00002528 AttB.docx | DOCX document | |
| S-25700-00002528 AttE.docx | DOCX document | |
| Contract Vendor Query.bqy | — | |
| S-25700-00002528 AttA.docx | DOCX document | |
| S-25700-00002528 AttC.docx | DOCX document | |
| S-25700-00002528 IntRFP Template DAS.doc | DOC document | |
| S-25700-00002528 AttG.doc | DOC document | |
| Request_for_Competitive_Quotes.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Prop. Summary
| Important Note: Scores shown are the three evaluations from "Proposals Eval Breakdown" tab averaged, converted to a percentage (for an averaged score of 9, then 9 is used as a 90% multiplier), then use the multiplier times the Maximum points possible for the category. | |||||||||
| See Important Note above | Proposer Company Name | How well does the Offeror demonstrate an understanding of the Scope of Work? (25 Points) | How well does the Offer meet or exceed the Required Components of the Scope of Work in this RFP? (25 Points) | How well does the Offeror demonstrate they can meet or exceed the procurement and evaluation technical requirements of the RFP? (20 Points) | Cost (30 Points) | Total Score (100) | Referance only- Total Price | Test / Sample Estimated Fee Formula | |
| Proposal #1 | Cherry Road Tech | 23.25 | 24.00 | 18.60 | 30 | 95.85 | $48,525.00 | 30.00 | Lowest Total Price on this row |
| Proposal #2 | Rite Software Solutions & Service | 20.00 | 20.00 | 15.40 | 8.56 | 63.96 | $170,100.00 | 8.56 | |
| Proposal #2 | Singareddy Info Tech, Inc | 19.25 | 15.75 | 8.60 | 1.64 | 45.24 | $885,000.00 | 1.64 | |
| TOTAL: | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| Recommended Proposal Award | Cherry Road Tech | 23.25 | 24 | 18.6 | 30 | 95.85 |
Prop. Eval Breakdown Scores are the values (0-10) assigned by each evaluator.
1. Christina.
2. Kyle.
| 3. Tiffany. | Proposer Company Name | How well does the Offeror demonstrate an understanding of the Scope of Work? | How well does the Offer meet or exceed the Required Components of the Scope of Work in this RFP? | How well does the Offeror demonstrate they can meet or exceed the procurement and evaluation technical requirements of the RFP? | Total Points (FYI use only) | COMMENTS: Document your reason for points here. One bullet per a Question Rationale. | |
| Proposal #1- findings by Evaluator #1 | Cherry Road Tech | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30.00 | • |
Proposal #1- findings by Evaluator #2 Cherry Road Tech 8 9 8 25.00 • Proposal #1- findings by Evaluator #3 Cherry Road Tech 10 10 10 30.00 •
| Proposal #1-TOTAL: | Cherry Road Tech | 9.33 | 9.67 | 9.33 | 28.33 | N/A |
| Proposal #1- findings by Evaluator #1 | Rite Software Solutions & Service | 8 | 8 | 8 | 24.00 | • |
Proposal #1- findings by Evaluator #2 Rite Software Solutions & Service 6 7 6 19.00 • Proposal #1- findings by Evaluator #3 Rite Software Solutions & Service 10 9 9 28.00 •
| Proposal #1-TOTAL: | Rite Software Solutions & Service | 8.00 | 8.00 | 7.67 | 23.67 | N/A |
| Proposal #2- findings by Evaluator #1 | Singareddy Info Tech, Inc | 7 | 4 | 3 | 14.00 | • |
Proposal #2- findings by Evaluator #2 Singareddy Info Tech, Inc 8 9 4 21.00 • Proposal #2- findings by Evaluator #3 Singareddy Info Tech, Inc 8 6 6 20.00 • Proposal #2-TOTAL: Singareddy Info Tech, Inc 7.67 6.33 4.33 18.33 N/A
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .