RFP-Learning Center Remodel Design-Build Addendum 1.pdf
PDF 928 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-X06100-00012574
- Issued by
- Coos County, Condon City, Oregon
About this file
This is Addendum #1 to a Learning Center Remodel Design-Build RFP issued by the Coquille Indian Tribe in Coos Bay, Oregon. The addendum provides clarifications from a mandatory pre-proposal meeting regarding the renovation of an existing learning center building. Key details include that the building is slab on grade with no crawl space, and archived drawings have been located but require verification. The facility currently has 6-7 teachers serving 25 students on average (up to 60 during summer) plus community use of gym spaces. The renovation aims to expand from one classroom to three classrooms with flex spaces and separate teacher offices. A 3D scan with CAD and Revit drawings is being contracted to document existing conditions.
The project's design-build delivery method was selected due to funding structure and timeline constraints. Initial funding has been received for design work to support application for a subsequent construction grant, requiring immediate transition to construction without additional bidding periods. The addendum clarifies that using a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) approach is not possible due to timeline and funding source requirements. TERO requirements are not applicable for this project. The mandatory pre-proposal meeting sign-in sheets show attendance by nine firms including general contractors, architects, and subcontractors.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Learning Center Remodel Design-Build
Addendum #1
January 31, 2025
This Addendum is hereby issued to inform you of the following revisions and or clarifications to the above-referenced RFP and/or the Contract Documents for the Project, to the extent they have been modified herein. Any conflict or inconsistency between this Addendum and the Solicitation
Document or any previous addenda will be resolved in favor of this Addendum. Proposals shall conform to this Addendum. Unless specifically changed by this Addendum, all other requirements, terms and conditions of the Solicitation Document and or Contract Documents, and any previous addenda, remain unchanged and can be modified only in writing by CIT. The following changes are hereby made:
• Mandatory Pre-Proposal Meeting Resulting Clarifications o There is no crawl space under the building. The building is slab on grade.
o We have located some of the archived drawings for this building. Without thorough review, we cannot guarantee their accuracy as as-built drawings. We are currently contracting for a 3D scan, associated CAD and Revit drawings. The results of this and the historical information will be made available for use during the project.
o Please assume part of the building will continue to be utilized in some manner during construction. Please consider this during design.
o TERO is not required.
o There is not a specific number of teachers and students that we have planned for space utilization at this time. Programs are currently limited by building capacity.
Currently we have 6-7 teachers, 25 kids on average and up to 60 kids during the summer, as well as the community utilizing the larger gym spaces.
o There is currently one classroom, not including Headstart. Ideally, we would like three classrooms with flex spaces for kids, and o<ices for teachers outside of the classrooms.
o Mandatory Pre-Proposal Sign-in Sheet attached.
• Additional Questions Received o What was the reason behind design-build delivery method compared to design-bid-build, or design with CM/GC delivery method? The architect can include cost es�ma�ng services. Given that it appears to be a remodel, the complexity and constraints of exis�ng condi�ons really dictates the design. We see Design-Build typically used for new standalone projects. Just curious on the ra�onale.
We have received funding to complete design work to apply for a subsequent grant. This grant �ming would require us to roll straight into construc�on without �me for addi�onal bidding and uncertainty.
o Hiring a Construc�on Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) during the design phase would accomplish the same results and keep the architect and contractor as standalone team members. Is that a possibility?
Not for this project due to the �meline and the funding sources.
END OF ADDENDUM #1
| RFP - Learning Center Remodel Design Build - Addendum #1 |
| Pre-Bid Sign In Documents |
| Slide 1 |
| Slide 2 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .