RFP Attachment J.5. Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cross-Cutting Program Support (CCPS) Solomon Islands Threshold Program Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 95332422R0001
- Issued by
- Millennium Challenge Corporation
About this file
This document includes a solicitation for cross-cutting program support services for the Millennium Challenge Corporation's Solomon Islands Threshold Program. The solicitation seeks a contractor to provide facilitated governance reform support, program monitoring, meeting and administrative support, and communications support, with options to provide disbursement of blended finance funding and program closure support. The program aims to address constraints to economic growth in Solomon Islands through two projects: the Accessing Land for Tourism Investment Facilitation Project and the Forest Value Enhancement Project. The solicitation includes details on offer submission deadlines, evaluation criteria, and points of contact.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 95332422R0001 Amendment 0002_Signed.pdf | ||
| CCPS Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 95332422R0001 Amendment 0001_Signed.pdf | ||
| RFP A1 - CCPS Conference Registration.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP A1 - SI THP CCPS Pre-Proposal Conference Presentation (12 Apr 2022).pdf | ||
| RFP 95332422R0001 CCPS.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment J.1 Implementation Model.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment J.3. Travel Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Attachment J.2. M&E Program Logics and Diagrams.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment J.4. Contractor-Acquired MCC Property Inventory and Transfer Agreement.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP #95332422R0001
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
| Solicitation #: | 95332422R0001 |
| Offeror Name: |
| Name of Reference: | |
| Title/Role: | |
| Email: | Phone: |
| Agency/Company: |
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
| Contract #: |
| Total Contract Value ($): |
| Period of Performance: |
| Was the Offeror Prime or Sub? |
Description of product/service provided:
RATING CATEGORIES:
| RATING |
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| Exceptional |
| E |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| VG |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| S |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| M |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unacceptable |
| U |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable |
| NA |
| Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed. |
ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:
Using the rating categories on page 1, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.
(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).
|_| E |_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?
|_| E |_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(3) Performance – Rate the contractor’s ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.
|_| E |_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?
|_| E |_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems? Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.
|_| E |_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.
|_| E |_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
|_| E |_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.
(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.
(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?
CERTIFICATION:
I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
| ______________________________________ | ________________ | |
| [Enter Name of Reference] | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .