RFP Attachment 5 - MOSES II Professional Compensation Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MOSES II Request for Proposal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA702224RMOSE
About this file
This document is the Professional Compensation Matrix instructions for Attachment 5 of the MOSES II Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command. The instructions provide guidance for offerors to complete the labor rate information, including entering the prime/subcontractor names, proposed labor categories, number of full-time equivalents, base hourly salary rates, and fringe rates. Offerors are required to provide salary support data from recognized compensation sources such as Salary.com, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or Glassdoor, and map the proposed labor categories to the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics occupation titles and codes. The instructions caution that unrealistically low salaries may be viewed as evidence of failure to comprehend the contract requirements. The RFP solicitation number is FA702224RMOSE and is being issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QnA.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA702224R00060001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - FA702224R00060001.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 1 - MOSES II PWS.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 9 - Section L.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA702224R0006.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A - MOSES II CDRLs.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 4 - MOSES II Direct-Indirect Rates - TEP.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP Attachment 6 - MOSES II Past Performance Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Attachment 10 - Section M.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 8 - MOSES II Task Order 1 PWS_30 Jul 2024.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 2 - MOSES_II_Technical Data Package.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 3 - MOSES II Base - dd254 (23 Jul 2024).pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 7 - MOSES II Subcontractor Consent Letter.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions
Instructions for Completing the Professional Compensation Labor Matrix
Professional Comp Matrix Instructions Offerors shall complete all “Green” shaded cells and shall not alter any formulas in the Professional Comp Matrix.
> Offeror shall enter the Prime/Subcontractor(s) names in Column A.
> In Column C, the offeror shall enter the corresponding Offeror's labor category, as applicable, if they are different from the Government labor categories identified in Column B.
> In Column D, the offeror shall enter the quantity of FTEs being proposed for each labor category.
> Additionally, offerors shall provide the base rate hourly salary in Column E, exclusive of all cost factors (e.g., fringe, indirect labor, G&A, profit, and etc.); do not enter fully burdened labor rates or any other markups.
> Offerors shall also enter the fringe percentage rates (not dollars), Column F.
The prime offeror’s Compensation Plan (Narrative and Professional Comp Matrix) shall be included in the prime contractor’s proposal.
The prime may instruct subcontractors/teaming partners to electronically submit their Compensation Plans (Narrative and Professional Comp Matrix) directly to the Contracting Officer, if applicable.
Offerors shall propose one (1) Compensation Plan Narrative and one (1) Professional Comp Matrix for the entire team.
Offerors shall map proposed labor categories (to include Subcontractors) to the corresponding Government labor category if they deviate from the Government’s labor category, and also map salary support documentation to each proposed labor category in the “Labor Rate Support Data” (Column G).
Offeror shall provide salary support data from recent surveys and/or studies from professional, public, and private organizations (e.g., Salary.com, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Glassdoor, etc.) used to support the proposed compensation. Identify the source of the provided surveys and studies. Data may be in the form of reports, payrolls, table of labor categories with salary ranges, and etc. If not using one of the sources listed above, explain the credibility of the source providing the surveys and studies. Support data shall be included in the Compensation Plan Narrative.
The offeror should also identify the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupation Title and BLS Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code, at the most detailed level possible, from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm.
Unrealistically low professional employee salaries may impair the offeror’s ability to attract and retain competent professional employees and may be viewed as evidence of failure to comprehend the complexity of the contract requirements.
MOSES II RFP Atch 5
| Examples in Blue Text | Attachment 5 - Direct Labor Rates | https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm | |||||
| Hourly Salary Rate Support Data | |||||||
| Prime/Sub-Contractor Company Name | Government Labor Category | Offeror's Labor Category | # of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Proposed By Labor Category | Base Rate | |||
| Hourly Salary ($) | Fringe Rate (%) | ||||||
| Map proposed labor categories to an equivalent national/regional compensation survey or recognized compensation market data source (e.g., Watson & Wyatt, Economic Research Institute, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Salary.com, Glassdoor, etc.) used to support the proposed compensation. Any other type of source must be indicated below and justified in the Narrative as a realistic basis of support. | BLS Occupation Title | BLS SOC Code | |||||
| Program Manager | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Security | |||||||
| Chief Engineer/Scientist | |||||||
| Chemical Engineer (Principal) | |||||||
| Chemical Engineer (Sr) | |||||||
| Chemical Engineer (Mid) | |||||||
| Chemist (Principal) | |||||||
| Chemist (Sr) | |||||||
| Chemist (Mid) | |||||||
| Chemist (Jr) | |||||||
| Nuclear Engineer (Mid) | |||||||
| Meteorologist (Principal) | |||||||
| Meteorologist (Sr) | |||||||
| Meteorologist (Mid) | |||||||
| Meteorologist (Jr) | |||||||
| Systems Engineer (Sr) | |||||||
| Systems Engineer (Mid) | |||||||
| Systems Administrator (Mid) | |||||||
| Scientist (Principal) | |||||||
| Scientist (Sr) | |||||||
| Scientist (Mid) | |||||||
| Scientist (Jr) | |||||||
| Math/Stat (Principal) | |||||||
| Math/Stat (Sr) | |||||||
| Math/Stat (Mid) | |||||||
| Math/Stat (Jr) | |||||||
| SW Development Eng (Principal) | |||||||
| SW Development Engineer (Sr) | |||||||
| SW Development Engineer (Mid) | |||||||
| SW Development Engineer (Jr) | |||||||
| SW Test Engineer (Sr) | |||||||
| SW Test Engineer (Mid) | |||||||
| Data Analyst (Sr) | |||||||
| Data Analyst (Mid) | |||||||
| Data Analyst (Jr) |
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .