RFP 27-017AG Vendor Performance.pdf
PDF 277 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 146965
- Issued by
- Riverside County, California
About this file
This is a Vendor Performance Evaluation Form issued by the City of Corona, California as part of RFP No. 27-017AG for an Electric Utility Battery Energy Storage System Feasibility Study. The form serves as the framework for periodic assessments of contractor performance metrics throughout the contract term. The evaluation period can be conducted on a weekly, monthly, quarterly, annual, or other specified interval basis. All prospective consultants are required to complete this form in its entirety and submit it electronically through the PlanetBids system along with their proposal documentation.
The Vendor Performance Evaluation Form assesses nine specific criteria, each scored on a scale of 1 to 5 (with 1 being unsatisfactory and 5 being excellent): Quality of Goods and Services, Quality of Work Performed, Timeliness of Delivery of Goods, Compliance with Law and Regulations, Safety and Protection, Appropriateness of Tools/Technology, Customer Service, Overall Timeliness of Invoices, and Overall Accuracy of Invoices. The form applies to vendors across four categories: General and Maintenance Services, Professional Services, Products, and Software. The overall evaluation score is calculated as an average of all nine criteria scores, with ratings ranging from Unsatisfactory (1.00-1.80) to Excellent (4.50-5.00). Vendors must acknowledge their understanding of this evaluation form and its use as the basis for contract performance assessment by signing the acknowledgment section prior to proposal submission.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
12/2025
RFP No. 27-017AG Section V. “Proposal Content and Forms”
CITY OF CORONA ELECTRIC UTILITY BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY
Vendor Performance Evaluation Form
Department: Division:
Prepared By: Title:
Vendor Name: P. O. #:
Contract Amount: $ Change Order Amount: $
Project Name:
Description of Project:
Date Prepared:
Performance Evaluation Period: (select one)
Weekly Monthly Quarterly Annually Other
Vendor Category: (select one)
General and Maintenance Services - Commercial services provided on a frequent basis such as catering, lawn service, general maintenance, or cleaning.
Professional Service - unique, technical, and/or infrequent functions performed by an independent consultant/vendor qualified by education, experience, and/or technical ability to provide services.
Products - a supplier of a tangible object that is manufactured or refined for sale.
Software - a supplier of technology infrastructure or any license/maintenance based, or cloud based software, requiring access to the City’s information technology system.
Evaluation Score Range and Criteria Factors
EXCELLENT
ABOVE
AVERAGE AVERAGE
BELOW
AVERAGE UNSATISFACTORY
5 (4.50-5.00) 4 (3.20-4.49) 3 (2.60-3.19) 2 (1.81-2.59) 1 (1.00-1.80)
1. Quality of Goods and Services: A measure to determine if the goods/ service received met the quality desired.
2. Quality of Work Performed: A measure to determine if the actual performed met the quality desired.
3. Timeliness of Delivery of Goods: A measure to determine if the goods delivered met (at minimum) the date specified to the vendor.
4. Compliance with Law and Regulations: A measure to determine if the supplier adhered to compliance law and regulations related to the nature of work or product delivered.
5. Safety and Protection: A measure to determine if the supplier followed all safety precautions and wore the appropriate protection gear to perform the service.
6. Appropriate of Tools/Technology: A measure to determine if the vendor provided tools/technology that aligned with requirements.
CITY OF CORONA ELECTRIC UTILITY BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY
7. Customer Service: How knowledgeable was the vendor regarding the product or service, was the vendor proactive in addressing City staff problems or concerns regarding the product or service.
8. Overall Timeliness of Invoices: Invoices for payment were submitted on a timely basis reflective to the contract.
9. Overall accuracy of Invoices: Invoices for payment were accurate and complete, covering the Work completed as of the date of the Application, inclusive of all required attachments and backup data
For each category identified below, enter the score (1 – 5) with 1 being unsatisfactory and 5 being excellent
Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Score
1. Quality of Goods and Services 5 4 3 2 1
2. Quality of Work Performed 5 4 3 2 1
3. Timeliness of Delivery of Goods 5 4 3 2 1
4. Compliance with Law and Regulations 5 4 3 2 1
5. Safety and Protection 5 4 3 2 1
6. Appropriate of Tools/Technology 5 4 3 2 1
7. Customer Service 5 4 3 2 1
8. Overall Timeliness of Invoices 5 4 3 2 1
9. Overall accuracy of Invoices 5 4 3 2 1
EXAMPLE:
OVERALL EVALUATION SCORE 4.89
OVERALL EVALUATION RATING EXCELLENT
CITY OF CORONA ELECTRIC UTILITY BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
This is to acknowledge that we have read the City of Corona Vendor Performance Evaluation Form and understand a version of this type of form will be used to provide the basis for periodic assessments by the City to establish contract performance metrics.
(Firm name)
(Print name and title of person signing for firm)
(Signature/date)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .