RFP 2025-66 Renaissance Court Final.pdf
PDF 317 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP 2025-66 SUPPORTIVE HOUSING CASE MANAGEMENT AND PEER SUPPORT SERVICES, RENAISSANCE COURT
- Solicitation number
- S-C01010-00014554
- Issued by
- Clackamas County, Oregon
About this file
This is a Request for Proposals (RFP #2025-66) issued by Clackamas County, Oregon, through its Housing & Community Development Division for supportive housing case management and peer support services at Renaissance Court Apartments located at 11520 SW Zurich St. Wilsonville, OR 97070. The RFP seeks to procure site-based supportive housing case management and peer support services for nineteen (19) residential units serving households with severe and persistent mental illness who are at or below 50% of Area Median Income. Key dates include RFP issuance on August 5, 2025, a non-mandatory pre-proposal meeting on August 18, 2025, clarifying questions deadline of August 21, 2025, and proposal submission deadline of September 4, 2025, at 2:00 PM Pacific Time via Bid Locker electronic submission. The contract term runs from the effective date through June 30, 2026, with options for three additional one-year renewals subject to mutual agreement.
The County has allocated an estimated project total of $365,000 annually for program costs, excluding one-time expenses for capacity building, program ramp-up, furnishings, fixtures, or equipment. Proposals are evaluated on four criteria: Program Implementation (30 points), Population Experience (25 points), Ability to Initiate Services (20 points), and Budget and Staffing Plan (25 points), with a maximum 5-page proposal limit. Services must be restricted to within the Metro jurisdictional boundary and funded through Metro Supportive Housing Services Measure restrictions. Required insurance includes Commercial General Liability ($1M per occurrence), Professional Liability ($1M per occurrence), Automobile Liability ($1M per occurrence), Abuse & Molestation coverage ($1M per occurrence), and Cyber Liability ($1M per occurrence). The program combines affordable housing with flexible, tenant-driven, voluntary case management services focused on housing stability and lease compliance.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 7018 Heather St ITB_Advertisement_final.pdf | ||
| RFP 2025-66 Clarifying Questions.pdf | ||
| RFP 2025-66- Addendum 1.pdf | ||
| 2025-66 Notice of Intent to Award.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS #2025-66
FOR
SUPPORTIVE HOUSING CASE MANAGEMENT AND PEER SUPPORT SERVICES,
RENAISSANCE COURT
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CRAIG ROBERTS, Chair
PAUL SAVAS, Commissioner MARTHA SCHRADER, Commissioner
BEN WEST, Commissioner DIANA HELM, Commissioner
Gary Schmidt
County Administrator
Micheline D’Angelis
Contract Analyst
PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE, TIME AND LOCATION
DATE: September 4, 2025
TIME: 2:00 PM, Pacific Time
PLACE: https://bidlocker.us/a/clackamascounty/BidLocker https://bidlocker.us/a/clackamascounty/BidLocker
RFP #2025-66
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page ii
SCHEDULE
Request for Proposals Issued……............................... August 5, 2025
Protest of Specifications Deadline.............................. August 14, 2025, 5:00 PM, Pacific Time
Non-Mandatory Pre-Proposal Meeting...................... August 18, 2025, 12:00 PM, Pacific Time
Deadline to Submit Clarifying Questions.................. August 21, 2025, 5:00 PM, Pacific Time
Request for Proposals Closing Date and Time……...September 4, 2025, 2:00 PM, Pacific Time
Deadline to Submit Protest of Award...................Seven (7) days from the Intent to Award
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 – Notice of Request for Proposals
Section 2 – Instructions to Proposers
Section 3 – Scope of Work
Section 4 – Evaluation and Selection Criteria
Section 5 – Proposal Content (Including Proposal Certification)
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 3
SECTION 1
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Notice is hereby given that Clackamas County, through the Housing & Community Development Division of its Health, Housing, and Human Services Department, will receive sealed Proposals per specifications until 2:00 PM, September 4, 2025 (“Closing”), to provide Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court. No Proposals will be received or considered after that time.
Location of RFP documents: OregonBuys RFP Documents can be downloaded from the state of Oregon procurement website (“OregonBuys”) at the following address https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/view/login/login.xhtml, Document No. S-C01010-00014554.
Prospective Proposers will need to sign in to download the information and that information will be accumulated for a Plan Holder's List. Prospective Proposers are responsible for obtaining any Addenda, clarifying questions, and Notices of Award from OregonBuys.
Submitting Proposals: Bid Locker Proposals will only be accepted electronically thru a secure online bid submission service, Bid Locker. Email submissions to Clackamas County email addresses will no longer be accepted.
A. Completed proposal documents must arrive electronically via Bid Locker located at https://bidlocker.us/a/clackamascounty/BidLocker.
B. Bid Locker will electronically document the date and time of all submissions. Completed documents must arrive by the deadline indicated in Section 1 or as modified by Addendum. LATE PROPOSALS
WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
C. Proposers must register and create a profile for their business with Bid Locker in order to submit for this project. It is free to register for Bid Locker.
D. Proposers with further questions concerning Bid Locker may review the Vendor’s Guide located at https://www.clackamas.us/how-to-bid-on-county-projects .
Contact Information Procurement Process and Technical Questions: Micheline D’Angelis, mdangelis@clackamas.us
The Board of County Commissioners reserves the right to reject any and all Proposals not in compliance with all prescribed public bidding procedures and requirements, and may reject for good cause any and all Proposals upon the finding that it is in the public interest to do so and to waive any and all informalities in the public interest. In the award of the contract, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the element of time, will accept the Proposal or Proposals which in their estimation will best serve the interests of Clackamas County and will reserve the right to award the contract to the contractor whose Proposal shall be best for the public good.
Clackamas County encourages proposals from Minority, Women, Veteran and Emerging Small Businesses.
Non-Mandatory Pre-Proposal Meeting:
A non-mandatory pre-proposal meeting will be conducted on August 18, 2025, at 12:00 PM PST. Join Zoom Meeting https://clackamascounty.zoom.us/j/83962204091?pwd=ZlQXr1kYTBaE6epkY4KlF8jvafFnZO.1 https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/view/login/login.xhtml https://www.clackamas.us/how-to-bid-on-county-projects mailto:mdangelis@clackamas.us https://clackamascounty.zoom.us/j/83962204091?pwd=ZlQXr1kYTBaE6epkY4KlF8jvafFnZO.1
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 4
SECTION 2
INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
Clackamas County (“County”) reserves the right to reject any and all Proposals received as a result of this RFP.
County Local Contract Review Board Rules (“LCRB”) govern the procurement process for the County.
2.1 Modification or Withdrawal of Proposal: Any Proposal may be modified or withdrawn at any time prior to the Closing deadline, provided that a written request is received by the County Procurement Division Director, prior to the Closing. The withdrawal of a Proposal will not prejudice the right of a Proposer to submit a new Proposal.
2.2 Requests for Clarification and Requests for Change: Proposers may submit questions regarding the specifications of the RFP. Questions must be received in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. (Pacific Time), on the date indicated in the Schedule, at the Procurement Division address as listed in Section 1 of this RFP. Requests for changes must include the reason for the change and any proposed changes to the requirements. The purpose of this requirement is to permit County to correct, prior to the opening of Proposals, RFP terms or technical requirements that may be unlawful, improvident or which unjustifiably restrict competition. County will consider all requested changes and, if appropriate, amend the RFP. No oral or written instructions or information concerning this RFP from County managers, employees or agents to prospective Proposers shall bind County unless included in an Addendum to the RFP.
2.3 Protests of the RFP/Specifications: Protests must be in accordance with LCRB C-047-0730. Protests of Specifications must be received in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. (Pacific Time), on the date indicated in the Schedule, or within three (3) business days of issuance of any addendum, at the Procurement Division address listed in Section 1 of this RFP. Protests may not be faxed. Protests of the RFP specifications must include the reason for the protest and any proposed changes to the requirements.
2.4 Addenda: If any part of this RFP is changed, an addendum will be provided to Proposers that have provided an address to the Procurement Division for this procurement. It shall be Proposers responsibility to regularly check OregonBuys for any notices, published addenda, or response to clarifying questions.
2.5 Submission of Proposals: Proposals must be submitted in accordance with Section 5. All Proposals shall be legibly written in ink or typed and comply in all regards with the requirements of this RFP. Proposals that include orders or qualifications may be rejected as irregular. All Proposals must include a signature that affirms the Proposer’s intent to be bound by the Proposal (may be on cover letter, on the Proposal, or the Proposal Certification Form) shall be signed. If a Proposal is submitted by a firm or partnership, the name and address of the firm or partnership shall be shown, together with the names and addresses of the members. If the Proposal is submitted by a corporation, it shall be signed in the name of such corporation by an official who is authorized to bind the contractor. The Proposals will be considered by the County to be submitted in confidence and are not subject to public disclosure until the notice of intent to award has been issued.
No late Proposals will be accepted. Proposals submitted after the Closing will be considered late and will be returned unopened. Proposals may not be submitted by telephone or fax.
2.6 Post-Selection Review and Protest of Award: County will name the apparent successful Proposer in a Notice of Intent to Award published on OregonBuys. Identification of the apparent successful Proposer is procedural only and creates no right of the named Proposer to award of the contract. Competing Proposers shall be given seven (7) calendar days from the date on the Notice of Intent to Award to review the file at the Procurement Division office and file a written protest of award, pursuant to LCRB C-047-0740. Any award protest must be in writing and must be delivered by email, hand-delivery or mail to the address for the Procurement Division as listed in Section 1 of this RFP.
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 5
Only actual Proposers may protest if they believe they have been adversely affected because the Proposer would be eligible to be awarded the contract in the event the protest is successful. The basis of the written protest must be in accordance with ORS 279B.410 and shall specify the grounds upon which the protest is based. In order to be an adversely affected Proposer with a right to submit a written protest, a Proposer must be next in line for award, i.e. the protester must claim that all higher rated Proposers are ineligible for award because they are non-responsive or non-responsible.
County will consider any protests received and:
a. reject all protests and proceed with final evaluation of, and any allowed contract language negotiation with, the apparent successful Proposer and, pending the satisfactory outcome of this final evaluation and negotiation, enter into a contract with the named Proposer; OR
b. sustain a meritorious protest(s) and reject the apparent successful Proposer as nonresponsive, if such Proposer is unable to demonstrate that its Proposal complied with all material requirements of the solicitation and Oregon public procurement law; thereafter, County may name a new apparent successful Proposer; OR
c. reject all Proposals and cancel the procurement.
2.7 Acceptance of Contractual Requirements: Failure of the selected Proposer to execute a contract and deliver required insurance certificates within ten (10) calendar days after notification of an award may result in cancellation of the award. This time period may be extended at the option of County.
2.8 Public Records: Proposals are deemed confidential until the “Notice of Intent to Award” letter is issued.
This RFP and one copy of each original Proposal received in response to it, together with copies of all documents pertaining to the award of a contract, will be kept and made a part of a file or record which will be open to public inspection. If a Proposal contains any information that is considered a TRADE SECRET under ORS 192.345(2), SUCH INFORMATION MUST BE LISTED ON A SEPARATE SHEET CAPABLE OF SEPARATION
FROM THE REMAINING PROPOSAL AND MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH THE FOLLOWING
LEGEND:
“This information constitutes a trade secret under ORS 192.345(2), and shall not be disclosed except in accordance with the Oregon Public Records Law, ORS Chapter 192.”
The Oregon Public Records Law exempts from disclosure only bona fide trade secrets, and the exemption from disclosure applies only “unless the public interest requires disclosure in the particular instance” (ORS 192.345).
Therefore, non-disclosure of documents, or any portion of a document submitted as part of a Proposal, may depend upon official or judicial determinations made pursuant to the Public Records Law.
2.9 Investigation of References: County reserves the right to investigate all references in addition to those supplied references and investigate past performance of any Proposer with respect to its successful performance of similar services, its compliance with specifications and contractual obligations, its completion or delivery of a project on schedule, its lawful payment of subcontractors and workers, and any other factor relevant to this RFP.
County may postpone the award or the execution of the contract after the announcement of the apparent successful Proposer in order to complete its investigation.
2.10 RFP Proposal Preparation Costs and Other Costs: Proposer costs of developing the Proposal, cost of attendance at an interview (if requested by County), or any other costs are entirely the responsibility of the Proposer, and will not be reimbursed in any manner by County.
2.11 Clarification and Clarity: County reserves the right to seek clarification of each Proposal, or to make an award without further discussion of Proposals received. Therefore, it is important that each Proposal be submitted initially in the most complete, clear, and favorable manner possible.
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 6
2.12 Right to Reject Proposals: County reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals or to withdraw any item from the award, if such rejection or withdrawal would be in the public interest, as determined by County.
2.13 Cancellation: County reserves the right to cancel or postpone this RFP at any time or to award no contract.
2.14 Proposal Terms: All Proposals, including any price quotations, will be valid and firm through a period of one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days following the Closing date. County may require an extension of this firm offer period. Proposers will be required to agree to the longer time frame in order to be further considered in the procurement process.
2.15 Oral Presentations: At County’s sole option, Proposers may be required to give an oral presentation of their Proposals to County, a process which would provide an opportunity for the Proposer to clarify or elaborate on the Proposal but will in no material way change Proposer’s original Proposal. If the evaluating committee requests presentations, the Procurement Division will schedule the time and location for said presentation. Any costs of participating in such presentations will be borne solely by Proposer and will not be reimbursed by County.
Note: Oral presentations are at the discretion of the evaluating committee and may not be conducted; therefore, written Proposals should be complete.
2.16 Usage: It is the intention of County to utilize the services of the successful Proposer(s) to provide services as outlined in the below Scope of Work.
2.17 Review for Responsiveness: Upon receipt of all Proposals, the Procurement Division or designee will determine the responsiveness of all Proposals before submitting them to the evaluation committee. If a Proposal is incomplete or non-responsive in significant part or in whole, it will be rejected and will not be submitted to the evaluation committee. County reserves the right to determine if an inadvertent error is solely clerical or is a minor informality which may be waived, and then to determine if an error is grounds for disqualifying a Proposal.
The Proposer’s contact person identified on the Proposal will be notified, identifying the reason(s) the Proposal is non-responsive. One copy of the Proposal will be archived and all others discarded.
2.18 RFP Incorporated into Contract: This RFP will become part of the Contract between County and the selected contractor(s). The contractor(s) will be bound to perform according to the terms of this RFP, their Proposal(s), and the terms of the Sample Contract.
2.19 Communication Blackout Period: Except as called for in this RFP, Proposers may not communicate with members of the Evaluation Committee or other County employees or representatives about the RFP during the procurement process until the apparent successful Proposer is selected, and all protests, if any, have been resolved. Communication in violation of this restriction may result in rejection of a Proposer.
2.20 Prohibition on Commissions and Subcontractors: County will contract directly with persons/entities capable of performing the requirements of this RFP. Contractors must be represented directly. Participation by brokers or commissioned agents will not be allowed during the Proposal process. Contractor shall not use subcontractors to perform the Work unless specifically pre-authorized in writing to do so by the County.
Contractor represents that any employees assigned to perform the Work, and any authorized subcontractors performing the Work, are fully qualified to perform the tasks assigned to them, and shall perform the Work in a competent and professional manner. Contractor shall not be permitted to add on any fee or charge for subcontractor Work. Contractor shall provide, if requested, any documents relating to subcontractor’s qualifications to perform required Work.
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 7
2.21 Ownership of Proposals: All Proposals in response to this RFP are the sole property of County, and subject to the provisions of ORS 192.410-192.505 (Public Records Act).
2.22 Clerical Errors in Awards: County reserves the right to correct inaccurate awards resulting from its clerical errors.
2.23 Rejection of Qualified Proposals: Proposals may be rejected in whole or in part if they attempt to limit or modify any of the terms, conditions, or specifications of the RFP or the Sample Contract.
2.24 Collusion: By responding, the Proposer states that the Proposal is not made in connection with any competing Proposer submitting a separate response to the RFP, and is in all aspects fair and without collusion or fraud. Proposer also certifies that no officer, agent, elected official, or employee of County has a pecuniary interest in this Proposal.
2.25 Evaluation Committee: Proposals will be evaluated by a committee consisting of representatives from County and potentially external representatives. County reserves the right to modify the Evaluation Committee make-up in its sole discretion.
2.26 Commencement of Work: The contractor shall commence no work until all insurance requirements have been met, the Protest of Awards deadline has been passed, any protest have been decided, a contract has been fully executed, and a Notice to Proceed has been issued by County.
2.27 Nondiscrimination: The successful Proposer agrees that, in performing the work called for by this RFP and in securing and supplying materials, contractor will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, veteran status, physical or mental handicap, national origin or ancestry, or any other class protected by applicable law.
2.28 Intergovernmental Cooperative Procurement Statement: Pursuant to ORS 279A and LCRB, other public agencies shall have the ability to purchase the awarded goods and services from the awarded contractor(s) under terms and conditions of the resultant contract. Any such purchases shall be between the contractor and the participating public agency and shall not impact the contactor’s obligation to the County. Any estimated purchase volumes listed herein do not include other public agencies and County makes no guarantee as to their participation. Any Proposer, by written notification included with their Proposal, may decline to extend the prices and terms of this solicitation to any and/or all other public agencies. County grants to any and all public serving governmental agencies, authorization to purchase equivalent services or products described herein at the same submitted unit bid price, but only with the consent of the contractor awarded the contract by the County.
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 8
SECTION 3
SCOPE OF WORK
3.1. INTRODUCTION
Clackamas County, on behalf of the Housing, and Community Development Division (“HCDD”) of the Health, Housing & Human Services Department is seeking Proposals to provide site-based Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Apartments, 11520 SW Zurich St. Wilsonville, OR 97070.
The intent of this RFP is to award a contract or contracts for programmatic needs. The County reserves the right to award one, multiple, or no contracts as a result of this solicitation.
Please direct all Technical/Specifications or Procurement Process Questions to the indicated representative referenced in the Notice of Request for Proposals and note the communication restriction outlined in Section 2.19.
3.2 BACKGROUND
The mission of the Housing and Community Development Division of the Health, Housing & Human Services Department is to provide and develop affordable housing with supportive services for individuals and families on their path to improved health, wellness, prosperity and inclusion. To sustain these services, we prioritize equitable service delivery, financial sustainability, and thriving partnerships to ensure our long-term viability.
This request for proposals seeks to procure the services needed to provide site-based Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Apartments, 11520 SW Zurich St. Wilsonville, OR 97070. Further information on the requirements of these programs is provided below (Scope of Services).
In the event HCDD’s funding sources for this program restrict use of funds, any contract resulting from this RFP will be subject to such restrictions. For example, if HCDD uses funds provided under the Metro Supportive Housing Services Measure, selected contracts will be obligated to perform the services requested under this RFP solely within the Metro jurisdictional boundary or as otherwise permitted by the applicable funding source.
3.3. SCOPE OF WORK
3.3.1. Scope:
This RFP is to procure site-based supportive housing case management and peer support services for Renaissance Court Apartments, 11520 SW Zurich St. Wilsonville, OR 97070. The program resulting from this RFP will provide supportive housing case management and peer support services to residents in nineteen (19) residential units of affordable housing at Renaissance Court Apartments that serve households with a severe and persistent mental illness who are at or below 50% of Area Median Income (“AMI”).
The primary aim of this initiative is to provide assistance to households that have secured permanent housing and express a need for, or desire to receive, supportive services to enhance housing stability. If households are already receiving housing support through alternative programs, they may be referred to this specific program for continuous case management services. It's important to note that this program covers the expenses associated with case management and other supportive services, and providers delivering these services may not be tasked with administering or providing rent subsidies for the participating households. The case management services offered are committed to ensuring participants sustain permanent housing over the long term, either through
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 9 ongoing housing subsidy and support or by successfully transitioning away from rental subsidy and/or intensive case management support (referred to as "graduating"). Budgets for this program should comprehensively encompass all related expenses, including staffing costs and adequate flexible funds to meet the outlined program outcomes. Supportive housing, as conceptualized in this program, combines affordable housing with adaptable, tenant-driven, non-time-limited, and voluntary case management services. The overarching goal is to assist households experiencing homelessness in achieving housing stability.
For households receiving rental subsidies managed by HCDD, the responsibility of paying the monthly rental subsidy directly to the landlord lies with HCDD. It's essential to clarify that while other sources of rental subsidy may include federal or state-funded programs, applicants in this program will be responsible for delivering supportive housing case management and not managing rental subsidies.
Contractor shall also establish a peer supportive services program for residents of Renaissance Court Apartments. The program's overarching intent is to develop a sense of community, a feeling of connectedness and to provide support for the community's residents. The primary path will be through community connection opportunities on-site, which will also function as a drop-in resource center for residents seeking to access peer support or address other needs. Peer support will offer residents an opportunity to connect without having to schedule an appointment. The program will also create opportunities for residents to interact with one another and peer support through community activities and facilitated discussion groups. Services shall be provided to the residents of the nineteen (19) residential units at Renaissance Court. Services shall be restricted to within the Metro jurisdictional boundary.
Specific components of supportive housing case management include, but are not limited to:
• Intensive, relationship based, and trauma informed one-on-one case management focused on housing stabilization and lease compliance offered at least monthly (and in many cases, weekly). The need for support may be more intensive once people are housed and for the first six months after. Case management may be more intensive to support people with adjusting to housing and connecting with all needed benefits and resources. Case management must be highly flexible and tailored to meet the needs of each individual. These services must include, but are not limited to:
o Identify and leverage existing individual/family strengths, expertise, and assets through a strength-based assessment o Work with participant to identify, develop, and maintain safe meaningful connections to their community/support network o Create a housing stability action plan and housing goals for each household, including wraparound services, which are collaborative between case manager and participant and focused on housing success.
o Evaluate progress related to housing action plan, as defined through collaborative process with case manager and participant, and adjust plan as needed o Ensure each participant has a monthly plan to pay their portion of the rent/utilities; Refer to Utility Payment Program and/or Social Security Representative Payee services if needed and eligible o Assistance responding to voucher/rental subsidy requirements including inspections and paperwork completion o Create strong relationships with Landlords. Act as a landlord liaison and assist in landlord relationship development; assist participants with responding to notices from landlord o Provide early intervention and support to address issues that could jeopardize housing stability
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 10 o Education on tenant and landlord rights and responsibilities; connect participants with Housing Rights and Resources and/or Housing Mediation services as needed o Encourage regular communication with the tenant and property management o Provide problem solving and crisis management o Provide connection to independent living supports and/or provision of life skills training, as needed o Provide connections to education and employment opportunities o Assist (or connect to assistance) with applying for SSI/SSDI using the SOAR model, and other mainstream benefits, when appropriate; refer to ASSIST program for SSI/SSDI application support o Make appropriate use of flexible client services funding to support housing stability and wellness goals o Assist with house cleaning and unit maintenance as needed to ensure lease compliance through approved use of flex funding o Coordination and connections with other supportive services as needed o Complete annual review. Discuss readiness to "graduate" from housing case management services, as appropriate using "Graduation" protocol.
o If participant loses their housing voucher, case manager will look at housing first and diversion options to find other opportunities for participants whenever possible.
o Dedicated, publicly posted onsite staff hours o An activities calendar for residents o Clear supervision expectations (on site or easily accessible) to support case manager/peer support.
All proposals submitted by applicants shall incorporate and adhere to all applicable guiding principles and expectations set forth in Section 3.3, above. The execution of any contract, or contract amendment, resulting from this RFP is expressly contingent upon the availability of sufficient funds, as determined by Clackamas County in its sole discretion.
In the event Clackamas County’s funding sources for this program restrict use of funds, any contract resulting from this RFP will be subject to such restrictions. For example, if Clackamas County uses funds provided under the Metro supportive housing services measure, selected contracts will be obligated to perform the services requested under this RFP solely within the Metro jurisdictional boundary or as otherwise permitted by the applicable funding source.
3.3.2. Budget:
The County has an estimated project total of $365,000.00 for annual program costs. This does not include one-time costs for such things as capacity building, program ramp-up, furnishings, fixtures, or equipment. These and other one-time costs will be paid in addition to the annualized program budget. However, firms shall provide competitive rates with an estimated not-to-exceed total. The proposed not-to-exceed price will be a factor in provider selection
3.3.3. Term of Contract:
The term of the contract shall be from the effective date through June 30, 2026, with the option for three (3) additional one (1) year renewals thereafter subject to the mutual agreement of the parties.
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 11
3.3.4 Sample Contract: Submission of a Proposal in response to this RFP indicates Proposer’s willingness to enter into a contract containing substantially the same terms (including insurance requirements) of the sample contract identified below. No action or response to the sample contract is required under this RFP. Any objections to the sample contract terms should be raised in accordance with Paragraphs 2.2 or 2.3 of this RFP, pertaining to requests for clarification or change or protest of the RFP/specifications, and as otherwise provided for in this RFP. This RFP and all supplemental information in response to this RFP will be a binding part of the final contract.
The applicable Sample Personal Services Contract for this RFP can be found at https://www.clackamas.us/finance/terms.html.
Personal Services Contract (unless checked, item does not apply)
The following paragraphs of the Professional Services Contract will be applicable:
Article I, Paragraph 5 – Travel and Other Expense is Authorized Article II, Paragraph 28 – Confidentiality Article II, Paragraph 29 – Criminal Background Check Requirements Article II, Paragraph 30 – Key Persons Article II, Paragraph 31 – Cooperative Contracting Article II, Paragraph 32 – Federal Contracting Requirements Exhibit A – On-Call Provision
The following insurance requirements will be applicable:
Commercial General Liability: combined single limit, or the equivalent, of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, with an annual aggregate limit of $2,000,000 for Bodily Injury and Property Damage.
Professional Liability: combined single limit, or the equivalent, of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, with an annual aggregate limit of $2,000,000 for damages caused by error, omission or negligent acts.
Automobile Liability: combined single limit, or the equivalent, of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage.
Abuse & Molestation endorsement with limits not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence if not included in the Commercial General Liability policy.
Cyber Liability: combined single limit, or the equivalent, of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for network security (including data breach), privacy, interruption of business, media liability, and errors and omissions https://www.clackamas.us/finance/terms.html
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 12
SECTION 4
EVALUATION PROCEDURE
4.1 An evaluation committee will review all Proposals that are initially deemed responsive, and they shall rank the Proposals in accordance with the below criteria. The evaluation committee may recommend an award based solely on the written responses or may request Proposal interviews/presentations.
Interviews/presentations, if deemed beneficial by the evaluation committee, will consist of the highest scoring Proposers. The invited Proposers will be notified of the time, place, and format of the interview/presentation. Based on the interview/presentation, the evaluation committee may revise their scoring.
Written Proposals must be complete and no additions, deletions, or substitutions will be permitted during the interview/presentation (if any). The evaluation committee will recommend award of a contract to the final County decision maker based on the highest scoring Proposal. The County decision maker reserves the right to accept the recommendation, award to a different Proposer, or reject all Proposals and cancel the RFP.
Proposers are not permitted to directly communicate with any member of the evaluation committee during the evaluation process. All communication will be facilitated through the Procurement representative.
4.2 Evaluation Criteria
Area Ideal Response Max Score Score Program Implementation Clearly demonstrates the ability and capacity for program implementation and success. Accurately describes housing first, connection to mainstream services is clear, and graduation and step up policies are discussed.
Population Experience Clearly demonstrates significant experience providing service to the population outlined in this Request for Proposals
Ability to Initiate Services Clearly demonstrates the ability to implement the capacity/staffing necessary to successfully initiate and fully implement services
Budget and Staffing Plan Budget is clearly stated, covering all associated program costs. Budget does not exceed maximum expenditures as outlined in this Request for Proposals
Total 100
4.3 Once a selection has been made, the County will enter into contract negotiations. During negotiation, the County may require any additional information it deems necessary to clarify the approach and understanding of the requested services. Any changes agreed upon during contract negotiations will become part of the final contract. The negotiations will identify a level of work and associated fee that best represents the efforts required. If the County is unable to come to terms with the highest scoring Proposer, discussions shall be terminated, and negotiations will begin with the next highest scoring Proposer. If the resulting contract contemplates multiple phases and the County deems it is in its interest to not authorize any particular phase, it reserves the right to return to this solicitation and commence negotiations with the next highest ranked Proposer to complete the remaining phases.
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 13
SECTION 5
PROPOSAL CONTENTS
5.1. Vendors must observe submission instructions and be advised as follows:
5.1.1. Proposals will only be accepted electronically thru Equity Hub’s Bid Locker. Email submissions to Clackamas County email addresses will no longer be accepted.
5.1.2. Completed proposal documents must arrive electronically via Equity Hub’s Bid Locker located at https://bidlocker.us/a/clackamascounty/BidLocker.
5.1.3. County reserves the right to solicit additional information or Proposal clarification from the vendors, or any one vendor, should the County deem such information necessary.
5.1.4. Proposal may not exceed a total of 5 pages (single-sided), inclusive of all exhibits, attachments, title pages, pages separations, table of contents, or other information. The Proposal Certification Page will NOT count towards the final page count.
Provide the following information in the order in which it appears below:
5.2. Scope of Work:
5.2.1 General
Program Implementation (30 points): Please describe your plan to provide the programming described in the Scope of Services, including the proposed staffing model. Include a program implementation timeline and a projected success rate. Describe essential services necessary to serve the demographic described to be served under this contract if awarded.
Population Experience (25 points): Please describe how your organization centers racial equity and incorporates culturally responsive practices into its service delivery model. How will equity lead your work if awarded this contract? Describe significant experience providing service to the population outlined in this
RFP.
Ability to Initiate Services (20 points): Please demonstrate your agency’s ability to implement the capacity/staffing necessary to successfully initiate and fully implement services. Please describe your agency’s capacity to implement the described program for the population outlined in this document. Describe best practices established within your agency related to the services you are applying to provide.
Budget and Staffing Plan (25 points)
Provide a detailed budget, budget narrative, and staffing plan. Budgets should include administration, staffing, all program expenses, necessary capacity building, and flexible funding required to perform the work described in your proposal. Please use the budget template provided in Attachment A.
5.3. References
Upon request proposers shall provide at least three (3) references from clients your firm has served similar to the County in the past three (3) years, including one client that has newly engaged the firm in the past thirty-six (36) months and one (1) long-term client. Provide the name, address, email, and phone number of the references.
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 14
Please note the required three references may not be from County staff, but additional references may be supplied. Points awarded for this criteria are based on both the providing of references as well as information gleaned from the provided contacts. Evaluation Committee members may contact references at their sole discretion.
5.4. Completed Proposal Certification (see the below form)
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 15
PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION
Submitted by:
(Must be entity’s full legal name, and State of Formation)
Each Proposer must read, complete and submit a copy of this Proposal Certification with their Proposal. Failure to do so may result in rejection of the Proposal. By signature on this Proposal Certification, the undersigned certifies that they are authorized to act on behalf of the Proposer and that under penalty of perjury, the undersigned will comply with the following:
SECTION I. OREGON TAX LAWS: As required in ORS 279B.110(2)(e), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, the Proposer is not in violation of any Oregon Tax Laws. For purposes of this certification, “Oregon Tax Laws” means the tax laws of the state or a political subdivision of the state, including ORS
305.620 and ORS chapters 316, 317 and 318. If a contract is executed, this information will be reported to the Internal Revenue Service. Information not matching IRS records could subject Proposer to 24% backup withholding.
SECTION II. NON-DISCRIMINATION: That the Proposer has not and will not discriminate in its employment practices with regard to race, creed, age, religious affiliation, sex, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, or any other protected class. Nor has Proposer or will Proposer discriminate against a subcontractor in the awarding of a subcontract because the subcontractor is a disadvantaged business enterprise, a minority-owned business, a woman-owned business, a business that a service-disabled veteran owns or an emerging small business that is certified under ORS 200.055.
SECTION III. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The undersigned hereby certifies that no elected official, officer, agent or employee of Clackamas County is personally interested, directly or indirectly, in any resulting contract from this RFP, or the compensation to be paid under such contract, and that no representation, statements (oral or in writing), of the County, its elected officials, officers, agents, or employees had induced Proposer to submit this Proposal. In addition, the undersigned hereby certifies that this proposal is made without connection with any person, firm, or corporation submitting a proposal for the same material, and is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud.
SECTION IV. COMPLIANCE WITH SOLICITATION: The undersigned further agrees and certifies that they:
1. Have read, understand and agree to be bound by and comply with all requirements, instructions, specifications, terms and conditions of the RFP (including any attachments); and
2. Are an authorized representative of the Proposer, that the information provided is true and accurate, and that providing incorrect or incomplete information may be cause for rejection of the Proposal or contract termination;
and
3. Will furnish the designated item(s) and/or service(s) in accordance with the RFP and Proposal; and
4. Will use recyclable products to the maximum extend economically feasible in the performance of the contract work set forth in this RFP.
Name:_______________________________________ Date:______________________________________
Signature:____________________________________ Title:______________________________________
Email:_______________________________________ Telephone:_________________________________
Oregon Business Registry Number:________________ OR CCB # (if applicable):________________________
Business Designation (check one):
Corporation Partnership Sole Proprietorship Non-Profit Limited Liability Company
Resident Quoter, as defined in ORS 279A.120 Non-Resident Quote. Resident State:__________________________
Supportive Housing Case Management and Peer Support Services at Renaissance Court Page 16
ATTACHMENT A
Budget Line Item Category
Narrative/Description Please provide a detailed description of each line item Funds Requested
Safety off the Streets Personnel
Personnel Subtotal: $ - Program Operations - Materials and Services
Program Operations Subtotal: $ - Client Services
Client Services Subtotal: $ - Indirect Administration
Indirect Administration Subtotal: $ -
Safety off the Streets Subtotal: $ - Permanent Supportive Housing Navigation/Placement
Personnel
Personnel Subtotal: $ - Program Operations - Materials and Services
Program Operations Subtotal: $ - Client Services
Client Services Subtotal: $ - Indirect Administration
Indirect Administration Subtotal: $ -
Permanent Supportive Housing Navigation/Placement Subtotal: $ - Total Funds Requested: $ -
| PAUL SAVAS, Commissioner |
| MARTHA SCHRADER, Commissioner |
| BEN WEST, Commissioner |
| DIANA HELM, Commissioner |
| PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE, TIME AND LOCATION |
| TIME: 2:00 PM, Pacific Time |
| PLACE: https://bidlocker.us/a/clackamascounty/BidLocker |
| Non-Mandatory Pre-Proposal Meeting...................... August 18, 2025, 12:00 PM, Pacific Time |
| Deadline to Submit Clarifying Questions.................. August 21, 2025, 5:00 PM, Pacific Time |
| Request for Proposals Closing Date and Time……...September 4, 2025, 2:00 PM, Pacific Time |
| Deadline to Submit Protest of Award...................Seven (7) days from the Intent to Award |
| Please direct all Technical/Specifications or Procurement Process Questions to the indicated representative referenced in the Notice of Request for Proposals and note the communication restriction outlined in Section 2.19. |
| ATTACHMENT A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .