Response_Evaluation_and_Scoring_for_POS_Bid_71835_May_2024.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BD-22-1071-AO-CON01-71835
- Issued by
- Massachusetts
About this file
The document provided is a Response Evaluation and Scoring document for Bid Solicitation #71835, which details the criteria and scoring methodology for evaluating responses to a state and local contract opportunity. The contract opportunity is for Adaptive Housing Services 22 - MRC HOUSING ADAP 22, issued by the Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission (MRC). The procurement is seeking accessibility modifications to the principal residences of eligible individuals with severe disabilities who require such modifications to live independently or obtain/maintain employment. The evaluation criteria include the completeness of the Supplier Diversity Program (SDP) Plan, partnership with at least one certified Supplier Diversity Office (SDO), and the previous fiscal year and committed current fiscal year spending amounts with certified SDO vendors.
The scoring breakdown shows that the SDP Plan is worth up to 40 points out of a total of 160 possible points. Vendors can receive full points for completing the SDP Form, having a partnership with at least one certified SDO, and demonstrating substantial previous fiscal year and committed current fiscal year spending with certified SDO vendors. This scoring methodology reflects the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' commitment to supplier diversity and inclusion in its state and local contract opportunities.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Response Evaluation for Bid Solicitation # 71835
| Review Criteria |
| Potential Points |
Supplier Diversity Program (SDP) Plan:
· The SDP Form must be completed in its entirety.
· Partnership must be with at least one (1) certified SDO or third-party certification body.
· Previous fiscal year spending amount (UFR reporting).
· Committed amount for current fiscal year (UFR reporting).
| Total |
| 40 (out of 160 possible points) |
Breakdown of potential points above:
The SDP Form completed in its entirety – Range: 0 – 3 0 = Information is incomplete 1 = Some information provided (e.g. Business Name, Contact Name, Contact Email and Phone) 2 = N/A 3 = All required fields are complete on SDP Form and vendor is utilizing latest SDP form required
Partnership must be with at least one (1) certified SDO of third-party certification body – Range: 0 -3
0 = No partnership identified, or partner is not listed on MA SDO’s Certification Listing 1 = N/A 2 = N/A 3 = At least one (1) MA SDO certified vendor provided, along with certification type (e.g. WBE, MBE etc.)
Previous fiscal year spending amount (total) – Range: 0 – 16 *
0 = No amount provided or $0 provided 6 = $1,000 - $5,000 range 12 = $5,000.01 - $10,000 range 16 = $10,000.01 and above
Committed amount for current fiscal year spend (total) – Range: 0 – 18*
0 = No amount provided or $0 provided 6 = $10 - $500 range 12 = $500.01 - $1,000 range 18 = $1,000.01 and above
The SDO Criteria above (Criteria 9 on RFR document) will no longer be based on weights and/or multiplied by any single number. For the Supplier Diversity Plan (SDP) Form Category above, the vendor will have the opportunity to score total points based on the new criteria described.
*spend must be with an MA SDO certified business; declared spend not with an MA SDO certified business will not count towards previous FY spend nor commitment for new FY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .