Residential_Energy_Audit.pdf
PDF 478 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Residential Energy Audit
- Solicitation number
- NSD-RFQu-26-006
- Issued by
- Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona
About this file
This is a Request for Qualifications (RFQu) issued by the City of Phoenix, Neighborhood Services Department, for residential energy audit consulting services. The City seeks qualified contractors to provide comprehensive energy audits for low and moderate-income residential properties, including Standard (Initial) Audits, Emergency Audits, Final Audits, and specialized diagnostic services such as Manual J HVAC sizing calculations, Manual S HVAC efficiency assessments, Manual D ductwork efficiency mapping, ASHRAE ventilation requirement calculations, appliance metering, and quality control inspections. Contractors must respond to audit requests within specified timeframes: Standard Audits within two weeks of request with reports due within two business days of completion; Emergency Audits within three business days of request with reports due within one business day; and Final Audits within one week of request with reports due within three business days. The pre-offer conference is scheduled for October 16, 2026, at 11:00 AM via WebEx; written inquiries are due by October 23, 2026, at 12:00 PM; and offers must be submitted by November 6, 2026, at 12:00 PM through the City's Procurement Portal. The contract term is five years beginning December 1, 2026, with no renewal options.
Evaluation criteria include Statement of Qualifications (25 percent), Staff Capacity and Qualifications (25 percent), Contractor Licensing (25 percent), and Pricing Proposal (25 percent), all evaluated on a pass/fail basis. Offerors must demonstrate a minimum of one year of relevant experience in Manual J, Manual D, Manual S, appliance audits, and CO2 audits; possess appropriate Arizona Registrar of Contractors licensing; and provide resumes and certifications for key staff. All prices shall be firm and fixed for the initial one-year period, with annual price increase requests thereafter requiring 60 days' written notice and supporting documentation, subject to City approval. The City reserves the right to add additional contractors at its discretion and to award multiple contracts. Contractors must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including equal employment opportunity requirements, legal worker verification, and background screening requirements for all contract workers at the contractor's expense. Contract workers require City badging and background screening; failure to comply constitutes material breach with liquidated damages of $1,000 per breach.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
NSD-RFQu-26-006
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY AUDIT
CITY OF PHOENIX
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
200 WEST WASHINGTON STREET
PHOENIX, AZ
85003
RELEASE DATE: October 9, 2026
DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS: October 23, 2026
RESPONSE DEADLINE: November 6, 2026, 12:00 pm
City of Phoenix
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
NSD-RFQu-26-006
Residential Energy Audit
1. INTRODUCTION
2. INSTRUCTIONS
3. SCOPE OF WORK
4. EVALUATION PROCESS
5. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
7. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION
8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
9. SUBMITTALS
10. PRICING PROPOSAL
Attachments:
A - Acceptance of Offer Form 2026
Request For Qualifications #NSD-RFQu-26-006 Title: Residential Energy Audit
1. Introduction
The City of Phoenix, Neighborhood Services Department, invites sealed offers from individuals or organizations to provide residential energy audit consulting services.
The Effective Date of this Agreement will be December 1, 2026, or upon final signature and recording by the City Clerk’s department, whichever is later.
The term of this Agreement will be for 5 years, beginning on the Effective Date, with no options to extend.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement will terminate upon the earliest occurrence: by reaching the end of the term including any extensions exercised, or termination pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
This solicitation is available through the City’s Procurement Portal. For technical support issues related to the City's Procurement Portal, Offeror may use the support bubble on the bottom right, or email procurement-support@opengov.com for any assistance. For other issues related to this solicitation please contact the procurement officer listed under Contact Information.
1.1. Contact Information
Kimberly Butts
Neighborhood Services
Email: nsd.procurement@phoenix.gov
Phone: (602) 495-5409
1.2. Schedule of Events
The City reserves the right to change dates, times, and locations, as necessary. The City does not always hold a Pre-Offer Conference or Site Visit. All times in the Schedule of Events are
Local Phoenix, AZ Time.
To request a reasonable accommodation or alternative format for any public meeting, please contact the Procurement Officer (Kimberly Butts) at (602) 495-5409/Voice or 711/TTY, or nsd.procurement@phoenix.gov, no later than five (5) business days prior to the meeting.
Solicitation Issue Date: October 9, 2026 mailto:procurement-support@opengov.com
Pre-Offer Conference (Non-Mandatory): October 16, 2026, 11:00am
Join from the meeting link https://cityofphoenix.webex.com/cityofphoen ix/j.php?MTID=m1bdb12bdd489304ffb3b78
7a5b541c16
Join by meeting number
Meeting number (access code): 2331 320
Meeting password: aaVQMRs92j4
Join by phone
+1-415-655-0001 US Toll
Join from a video system or application
Dial
23313209294@cityofphoenix.webex.com
You can also dial 173.243.2.68 and enter your meeting number.
Written Inquiries Due Date: October 23, 2026, 12:00pm
Offer Due Date: November 6, 2026, 12:00pm https://cityofphoenix.webex.com/cityofphoenix/j.php?MTID=m1bdb12bdd489304ffb3b787a5b541c16 https://cityofphoenix.webex.com/cityofphoenix/j.php?MTID=m1bdb12bdd489304ffb3b787a5b541c16 https://cityofphoenix.webex.com/cityofphoenix/j.php?MTID=m1bdb12bdd489304ffb3b787a5b541c16 mailto:23313209294@cityofphoenix.webex.com http://173.243.2.68/
2. Instructions
2.1. Preparation of Offer
All forms provided must be completed and submitted with the Offer. The signed and completed
Conflict of Interest and Transparency form must be included or your Offer may be deemed non-responsive.
It is permissible to copy Submittal forms if necessary. Erasures, interlineations, or other modifications of the Offer must be initialed in original ink by the authorized person signing the
Offer. No offer will be altered, amended or withdrawn after the specified offer due date and time.
The City is not responsible for Offeror’s errors or omissions.
All time periods stated as a number of days will be calendar days.
It is the responsibility of all Offerors to examine the entire solicitation and seek clarification of any requirement that may not be clear and to check all responses for accuracy before submitting an offer. Negligence in preparing an offer confers no right of withdrawal after due date and time. Offerors are strongly encouraged to:
A. Consider applicable laws and/or economic conditions that may affect cost, progress, performance, or furnishing of the products or services.
B. Study and carefully correlate Offeror’s knowledge and observations with the solicitation and other related data.
C. Promptly notify the City of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Offeror has discovered in or between the solicitation and other related documents.
D. The City does not reimburse the cost of developing, presenting or providing any response to this solicitation. Offers submitted for consideration should be prepared simply and economically, providing adequate information in a straightforward and concise manner. The Offeror is responsible for all costs incurred in responding to this solicitation. All materials and documents submitted in response to this solicitation become the property of the City and will not be returned.
E. Offerors are reminded that the specifications stated in the solicitation are the minimum level required and that offers submitted must be for products or services that meet or exceed the minimum level of all features specifically listed in this solicitation. Offers offering less than any minimum specifications or criteria specified are not responsive and should not be submitted.
F. Offer responses submitted for products considered by the seller to be acceptable alternates to the brand names or manufacturer’s catalog references specified herein must be submitted with technical literature and/or detailed product brochures for the
City’s use to evaluate the products offered. Offers submitted without this product information may be considered as non-responsive and rejected. The City will be the sole judge as to the acceptability of alternate products offered.
G. Prices will be submitted on a per unit basis by line item, when applicable. In the event of a disparity between the unit price and extended price, the unit price will prevail unless obviously in error.
2.2. Fixed Offer Price Period
All offers shall be firm and fixed for a period of 180 calendar days from the solicitation opening date.
2.3. Obtaining a Copy of the Solicitation and Addenda
Interested offerors may download the complete solicitation and addenda from the City’s
Procurement Portal: https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/280259. Any interested Offerors without internet access may obtain this solicitation by calling the
Procurement Officer or picking up a copy during regular business hours at the City of Phoenix, Neighborhood Services Department, Administrative Services Division, 200 W. Washington
Street, 4th Floor, Phoenix, AZ. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to check the City’s Procurement
Portal, read the entire solicitation, and verify all required information is submitted with their
Offer.
2.4. Exceptions
Offeror must not take any exceptions to any terms, conditions or material requirements of this solicitation. Offers submitted with exceptions may be deemed non-responsive and disqualified from further consideration in the City’s sole discretion. Offerors must conform to all the requirements specified in the solicitation. The City encourages Offerors to send inquiries to the
Procurement Officer rather than including exceptions in their Offer.
2.5. Inquiries
All questions that arise relating to this solicitation should be directed via City’s Procurement
Portal and must be received by the due date indicated in the Schedule of Events. The City will not consider questions received after the deadline.
No informal contact initiated by Offerors on the proposed service will be allowed with members of City’s staff from date of distribution of this solicitation until after city council awards the contract. All questions concerning or issues related to this solicitation must be presented in writing.
The Procurement Officer will answer written inquiries in an addendum and publish any addenda on the City’s Procurement Portal.
2.6. Addenda
The City of Phoenix will not be responsible for any oral instructions made by any employees or officers of the City of Phoenix regarding this solicitation. Any changes will be in the form of an addendum. The Offeror must acknowledge receipt of any/all addenda through the City's
Procurement Portal.
Changes to terms and conditions of the Solicitation and resulting Agreement made pursuant to an addendum shall be memorialized in the Solicitation and resulting Agreement document. To https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/280259 that end, a parenthetical will be added to applicable provision(s) referencing the addendum that imposed the change. The language in the final provision will reflect the updated version.
2.7. Licenses
If required by law for the operation of the business or work related to this Offer, Offeror must possess all valid certifications and/or licenses as required by federal, state or local laws at the time of submittal.
2.8. Certifications
By signature in the Offer section of the Offer and Acceptance page(s), Offeror certifies:
• The submission of the Offer did not involve collusion or other anti-competitive practices.
• The Offeror must not discriminate against any employee, or applicant for employment in violation of Federal or State Law.
• The Offeror has not given, offered to give, nor intends to give at any time hereafter, any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant in connection with the submitted Offer.
2.9. Submission of Offer
Offers must be in possession of the Department on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events. Late offers will not be considered. The prevailing clock will be the
City Department’s clock.
Offers should be submitted electronically via the City’s Procurement Portal by clicking on “Draft
Response” via https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/280259. Offerors that are unable to submit electronically should contact the Procurement Officer to discuss the logistics of hard copy submittals. Offerors must be registered with OpenGov by signing up via https://procurement.opengov.com/signup. Vendor training guides can be found at: https://opengov.my.site.com/support/s/article/ca6d1285-1e48-4a21-bb0d-715edb7794ed
Any original documents (such as bonds, guaranties, powers of attorney), if required by the solicitation, must be separately delivered to and received by the City on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events, with a clear indication of the Offer for which it is attributed.
It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the Offer is timely and to confirm that there are no technical reasons that any offer submitted electronically may be delayed. The date and time on the upload as received/stamped by the City’s Procurement Portal will provide proof of submission and verification whether the Offer was received on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events.
For assistance with submittals, vendors are welcome to use the OpenGov support chat (blue chat bubble in the bottom right corner) to connect with a member of OpenGov's support team who will be able to assist you with your submission.
Please DO NOT submit links to Google Docs, Dropbox Paper, or similar services. Your offer may be deemed non-responsive if your offer is supplied utilizing these services.
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/280259 https://procurement.opengov.com/signup https://opengov.my.site.com/support/s/article/ca6d1285-1e48-4a21-bb0d-715edb7794ed
2.10. Withdrawal of Offer
At any time prior to the solicitation due date and time, an Offeror (or designated representative) may withdraw the Offer by clicking “Unsubmit Response” on the Offer submission via the City’s
Procurement Portal.
2.11. Offer Results
Offers will be opened on the offer due date, time and location indicated in the Schedule of
Events, at which time the name of each Offeror, and the prices may be read. Offers and other information received in response to the solicitation will be shown only to authorized City personnel having a legitimate interest in them or persons assisting the City in the evaluation.
Offers are not available for public inspection until after the City has posted the award recommendation on the City's Procurement Portal.
The City will post a preliminary offer tabulation on the City's Procurement
Portal: https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/280259 within five business days of the offer opening. The City will post the information on the preliminary tabulation as it was read during the offer opening. The City makes no guarantee as to the accuracy of any information on the preliminary tabulation. Once the City has evaluated the offers, the City will post an award recommendation on the City's Procurement Portal. By signing and submitting its
Offer, each Offeror agrees that this posting of the award recommendation to the City's
Procurement Portal effectively serves as the Offeror’s receipt of that notice of award recommendation. The City has no obligation to provide any further notification to unsuccessful
Offerors.
2.12. Special Requirements
The Offeror(s) must be a Certified as outlined in the Minimum Qualifications section, and registered with the appropriate regulatory agency.
In order for an RFQu response to be considered, the Offeror shall comply with Phoenix City
Code, 1969, Chapter 18, Article V, as amended, Equal Employment Opportunity Requirements.
Any questions in regard to these requirements shall be directed to the Equal Opportunity
Department, (602) 262-6790.
2.13. Pre-Award Qualifications
Offeror must have been in operation a minimum of one (1) year. The Offeror’s normal business activity during the past one (1) year will have been for providing the goods or services in this solicitation. This information must be provided in Vendor Questionnaire section, under Years in
Business and References form of this solicitation.
Upon notification of a recommended award, the Offeror will have 14 calendar days to submit a complete certificate of insurance in the minimum amounts and the coverages as required in the
Insurance Requirements of this agreement. Insurance requirements are non-negotiable.
2.14. Qualification Criteria
Statement of Qualifications shall relate specifically to the following items, listed in general order of importance, for evaluation and selection purposes: Years of Experience, Staff Capacity, Certifications/Training.
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/280259
2.15. Evaluation and Selection
After evaluating all submissions, the City may ask some or all the firms that submitted a response to participate in interviews. Upon completion of the evaluation process, the City may assign a detailed scope of work to the selected candidate and negotiate fees for services.
RFQu responses should be concise, well-organized per the requested information, and clearly.
The review process places considerable emphasis on the responsiveness of the RFQu response to the requirements outlined above. RFQu responses that are not written specifically in response to this request cannot receive serious consideration.
All RFQu responses will be evaluated based on the criteria listed above in the Qualifications
Section of this RFQu.
The firms under consideration for this RFQu, will be evaluated in accordance with the solicitation by an Evaluation Committee and/or the Procurement Officer. The City reserves the right to request supplemental information that the Evaluation Committee deems necessary to make a selection. The Committee may be supplemented by outside professionals or professionals from other City departments who can provide additional expertise.
2.16. Agreement
The City will require the selected Offeror to participate in negotiations and to submit such cost, technical or other revisions of the submittals as may result from negotiations. The City shall draft all final contracts and documents that result from this RFQu.
The language contained in this RFQu and the Offeror's statement of qualifications will form the basis of any resulting Contract. However, this RFQu does not commit the City to enter a
Contract, to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of a submittal to this request or in subsequent negotiations, or to procure a contract for the project(s).
2.17. Certificates of Insurance
Upon notification of a recommended award, the Offeror will have 14 calendar days to submit a complete certificate of insurance in the minimum amounts and the coverages as required in the
Insurance Requirements of this solicitation. Insurance requirements are non-negotiable.
2.18. Award of Contract
Unless otherwise indicated, award(s) will be made to responsive, responsible Offeror(s) who are regularly established in the service, or providing the goods, contained in this solicitation and who have demonstrated the ability to perform in an acceptable manner.
A. Factors that may be considered by the City include:
1. Technical capability of the Offeror to accomplish the scope of work required in the
Solicitation. This may include performance history on past and current government or industrial contracts; and,
2. Demonstrated availability of the necessary manpower (both supervisory and operational personnel) and necessary equipment to accomplish the scope of work in the Solicitation; and,
3. Safety record; and,
4. Offeror history of complaints and termination for convenience or cause.
B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this solicitation, the City reserves the right to: (1) waive any immaterial defect or informality; or (2) reject any or all offers or portions thereof; or (3) reissue a solicitation.
C. A response to a solicitation is an offer to contract with the City based upon the terms, conditions, and specifications contained in the City’s solicitation. Offers do not become contracts until they are executed by the Chief Procurement Officer or Department
Director. A contract has its inception in the award, eliminating a formal signing of a separate contract. For that reason, all of the terms, conditions and specifications of the procurement contract are contained in the solicitation, and in any addendum or contract amendment.
2.19. Solicitation Transparency Policy
Commencing on the date and time a solicitation is published, potential or actual Offerors or respondents (including their representatives) shall only discuss matters associated with the solicitation with the Mayor, any members of City Council, the City Manager, any Deputy City
Manager, or any department director directly associated with the solicitation (including in each case their assigned staff, except for the designated Procurement Officer) at a public meeting, posted under Arizona Statutes, until the resulting contract(s) are awarded to all offers or responses are rejected and the solicitation is cancelled without any announcement by the
Procurement Officer of the City’s intent to reissue the same or similar solicitation.
As long as the solicitation is not discussed, Offerors may continue to conduct business with the
City and discuss business that is unrelated to the solicitation with the City staff. Offerors may not discuss the solicitation with any City employees or evaluation panel members.
Offerors may discuss their proposal or the solicitation with the Mayor or one or more members of the Phoenix City Council, provided such meetings are scheduled through the Procurement
Officer, and are posted as open meetings with the City Clerk at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meetings. The City Clerk will be responsible for posting the meetings. The posted notice shall identify the participants and the subject matter, as well as invite the public to participate.
With respect to the selection of the successful Offerors, the City Manager and/or City Manager's
Office will continue the past practice of exerting no undue influence on the process. In all solicitations of bids and proposals, any direction on the selection from the City Manager and/or
City Manager's Office and Department Head (or representative) to the proposal review panel or selecting authority must be provided in writing to all prospective Offerors.
This policy is intended to create a level playing field for all Offerors, assure that contracts are awarded in public, and protect the integrity of the selection process. OFFERORS THAT
VIOLATE THIS POLICY SHALL BE DISQUALIFIED. After official Notice is received by the City for disqualification, the Offeror may follow the Protest process, unless the Solicitation is cancelled without notice of intent to re-issue.
“To discuss” means any contact by the Offeror, regardless of whether the City responds to the contact. Offerors that violate this policy will be disqualified until the resulting contract(s) are awarded, or all offers or responses are rejected and the solicitation is cancelled without any announcement by the Procurement Officer of the City’s intent to reissue the same or a similar solicitation. The City interprets the policy as continuing through a cancellation of a solicitation until Council award of the contract, as long as the City cancels with a statement that the City will rebid the solicitation.
2.20. Protest Process
Offeror may protest the contents of a solicitation no later than seven days before the solicitation deadline when the protest is based on an apparent alleged mistake, impropriety or defect in the solicitation. Protests filed regarding the solicitation may be addressed by an amendment to the solicitation or denied by the City. If denied, the opening and award will proceed unless the City determines that it is in the City’s best interests to set new deadlines, amend the solicitation, cancel or re-bid.
Therefore, unless otherwise notified by a formal amendment, the Protester must adhere to all solicitation dates and deadlines, including timely filing of an offer, regardless of filing a protest.
Offeror may protest an adverse determination issued by the City regarding responsibility and responsiveness, within seven days of the date the Offeror was notified of the adverse determination.
Offeror may protest an award recommendation if the Offeror can establish that it had a substantial chance of being awarded the contract and will be harmed by the recommended award. The City will post recommendations on the City’s Procurement Portal to award the contract(s) to an Offeror(s). Offeror must submit award protests within seven days after the posting of the award recommendation, with exceptions only for good cause shown, within the
City’s full and final discretion.
All protests will be in writing, filed with the Procurement Officer identified in the solicitation and include the following:
• Identification of the solicitation number;
• The name, address and telephone number of the protester;
• A detailed statement describing the legal and factual grounds for the protest, including copies of relevant documents;
• The form of relief requested; and
• The signature of the protester or its authorized representative.
The Procurement Officer will render a written decision within a reasonable period after the protest is filed. The City will not request City Council authorization to award the contract until the protest process is complete. All protests and appeals must be submitted in accordance with the
City’s Procurement Code, (Phoenix City Code, Ch. 43) and any protests or appeals not submitted within the time requirements will not be considered. Protests must be filed with the
Procurement Officer.
2.21. Public Record
All Offers submitted in response to this solicitation will become the property of the City and become a matter of public record available for review pursuant to Arizona State law. If an
Offeror believes that a specific section of its Offer response is confidential, the Offeror will isolate the pages marked confidential in a specific and clearly labeled section of its Offer response. An Offeror may request specific information contained within its Offer is treated by the
Procurement Officer as confidential provided the Offeror clearly labels the information
“confidential.” To the extent necessary for the evaluation process, information marked as
“confidential” will not be treated as confidential. Once the procurement file becomes available for public inspection, the Procurement Officer will not make any information identified by the
Offerors as “confidential” available to the public unless necessary to support the evaluation process or if specifically requested in accordance with applicable public records law. When a public records request for such information is received, the Procurement Officer will notify the
Offeror in writing of any request to view any portion of its Offer marked “confidential.” The
Offeror will have the time set forth in the notice to obtain a court order enjoining such disclosure.
If the Offeror does not provide the Procurement Officer with a court order enjoining release of the information during the designated time, the Procurement Officer will make the information requested available for inspection.
2.22. Late Offers
Late Offers must be rejected, except for good cause. If a late Offer is submitted, the Department will document the date and time of the submittal of the late Offer, keep the Offer and notify the
Offeror that its Offer was disqualified for being a late Offer.
2.23. Right to Disqualify
The City reserves the right to disqualify any Offeror who fails to provide information or data requested or who provides materially inaccurate or misleading information or data. The City further reserves the right to disqualify any Offeror on the basis of any real or apparent conflict of interest that is disclosed by the Offer submitted or any other data or information available to the
City. This disqualification is at the sole discretion of the City. By submission of a solicitation response, the Offeror waives any right to object now or at any future time, before any agency or body including, but not limited to, the City Council of the City or any court as to the exercise by the City of such right to disqualify or as to any disqualification by reason of real or apparent conflict of interest determined by the City. The City reserves the right to replace the disqualified
Offeror.
2.24. Contract Award
The City reserves the right to award a contract by individual line items, by group, all or none, or any other combination most advantageous to the City. The City reserves the right to award multiple contracts.
2.25. Determining Responsiveness and Responsibility
Offers will be reviewed for documentation of any required minimum qualifications, and completeness and compliance with the solicitation requirements. The City reserves sole discretion to determine responsiveness and responsibility.
Responsiveness: Nonresponsive Offers will not be considered in the evaluation process. The solicitation states criteria that determine responsiveness, and the solicitation includes terms and conditions that if included or excluded from Offers will render an Offer nonresponsive.
Responsibility: To obtain true economy, the City must conduct solicitations to minimize the possibility of a subsequent default by the Offeror, late deliveries, or other unsatisfactory performance that may result in additional administrative costs. It is important that the Offeror be a responsible Offeror. Responsibility includes the Offeror’s integrity, skill, capacity, experience, and facilities for conducting the work to be performed.
2.26. Evaluation of Competitive Sealed Offers
The City will use its discretion in applying the following processes to this solicitation. Any ties in scoring will be resolved with a best and final price request and the lowest price will prevail.
2.27. Detailed Evaluation of Offers and Determination of Competitive Range
During deliberations, the Evaluation Panel will reach a consensus score for each evaluation criterion except price. The Procurement Officer will score the price, which will be added to the overall consensus score. The overall consensus scores will determine the Offerors’ rankings and which offers are within the Competitive Range, when appropriate.
2.28. Offers Not Within the Competitive Range
The City may notify Offerors of Offers that the City determined are not in the Competitive
Range.
2.29. Discussions with Offerors in the Competitive Range
The City will notify each Offeror whose Offer is in the Competitive Range or made the ‘short list’ and provide in writing any questions or requests for clarification to the Offeror. Each Offeror so notified may be interviewed by the City and asked to discuss answers to written or oral questions or provide clarifications to any facet of its Offer. The Offerors in the competitive range may be required to provide a demonstration of their product.
Demonstrations - Offerors in the competitive range may be invited to construct a hands-on sample or presentation of their solution at the City of Phoenix. In addition, each finalist may prepare and deliver a presentation of their proposed solution based on the script developed by the evaluation panel. The City may also require a hands-on lab demonstration designed specifically for the evaluation panel. The results of the surveys will be tabulated and delivered to the evaluation team for the final review and solution selection session(s).
If an Offer in the Competitive Range contains conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings to or about any Contract or Solicitation Scope requirement, the City may discuss or negotiate the conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings during these meetings. But the City in its sole discretion may reject any and all conditions, exceptions, reservations and understandings, and the City may instruct any Offeror to remove the conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings. If the Offeror fails to do so, the City may determine the Offer is nonresponsive, and the City may revoke its determination that the Offer is in the Competitive Range.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the City will not provide any information, financial or otherwise, to any Offeror about other Offers received in response to this solicitation. During discussions with Offerors in the Competitive Range, the City will not give Offerors specific prices or specific financial requirements that Offerors must meet to qualify for further consideration.
The City may state that proposed prices are too high with respect to the marketplace or otherwise unacceptable. Offerors will not be told of their relative rankings before Contract award.
2.30. Best and Final Offers (BAFO)
A BAFO is an option available for negotiations. Each Offeror in the Competitive Range, which is determined in the City’s sole discretion, may be afforded the opportunity to amend its Offer and make one BAFO.
If an Offeror’s BAFO modifies its initial Offer, the modifications must be identified in the BAFO.
The City will evaluate BAFOs based on the same requirements and criteria applicable to initial
Offers. The City will adjust appropriately the initial scores for criteria that have been affected by offer modifications made by a BAFO. Based on the criteria defined in the solicitation as weighted, the City will then perform final scoring and prepare final rankings.
The Evaluation Panel will recommend the Offer that is the best value and most advantageous to the City based on the evaluation criteria.
The City reserves the right to make an award to an Offeror whose Offer is the highest rated, best value, and most advantageous to the City based on the evaluation criteria, without conducting written or oral discussions with any Offeror, without negotiations, and without soliciting BAFOs.
3. Scope of Work
3.1. Background
Housing repair is an important element in the City's strategy to enhance the quality of homes throughout Phoenix neighborhoods. The Neighborhood Services Department (NSD) uses federal and state funding to administer programs for low and moderate-income residents to improve housing conditions, including energy efficiency.
As part of these services, the City is looking to enter into agreements with vendors who can perform the following Residential Energy Audits:
Service Purpose Includes Standard (Initial) Audit Full baseline energy audit of the home Diagnostics, whole-home assessment
REM or Equivalent Create an energy model using REM or Equivalent
Energy performance simulation
REM or Equivalent Modification
Adjustments to previously completed REM or equivalent
Adjustment to initial REM or equivalent, after project changes
Final Audit Post-work audit Verification that improvements were completed correctly
Manual J HVAC system sizing calculation
Heating and cooling load analysis
Manual J Modification Adjustments to previously completed Manual J
Design or home data changes
Manual S HVAC efficiencies and operating capacities
Heating and cooling energy efficiency and capacity
Manual D HVAC ductwork efficiency mapping
Heating and cooling duct layout and sizing as appropriate
ASHRAE Ventilation requirement calculation
Fresh air-flow requirements
Appliance Metering Measure power consumption of appliances
Appliance consumption analysis
QCI Field Inspection On-site Quality control inspector review
Work verification to program standards
QCI File Inspection Document review only (no site visit)
Paperwork verification
QCI Retest Fee Follow-up diagnostic test required during QCI
Second diagnostic testing
Retest Additional diagnostic test after an issue or failure
Follow-up diagnostic evaluation
Service Call - No Work Completed
Formal determination that home cannot be audited
Documentation as outlined in 3.2.E.
The City of Phoenix reserves the right to add additional contractors, at the City's sole discretion, in cases where the currently listed contractors are of an insufficient number or skillset to satisfy the City's needs or to ensure adequate competition on any project or task work order.
3.2. General Requirements
A. Contractor shall be responsible for communicating with the owner/tenants at each site within 48 hours to arrange access to the property. The Contractor should contact the
NSD Staff if they are unable to arrange access to the property.
B. After completion of construction, Contractor shall be responsible for post-testing verification and reporting of test results using City provided forms.
C. Contractor shall provide a minimum of one-hour training for owner/tenants on the operation and maintenance of all equipment installed.
D. Contractor must be able to respond to requests for the following audit and report types:
1. Standard (Initial) Audit: Perform initial program audit within two (2) weeks of request. Initial report and invoice for services rendered will be due within two (2) business days after completion of audit.
2. Emergency Audit: Schedule audit within 24-hours of receiving request. Audit must be performed within three (3) business days of the request. Report and invoice for services rendered will be due within one (1) business days following an emergency audit completion.
3. Final Audit: Schedule final audit within two (2) business days of request. Audit must be performed within one (1) week of request. The report and invoice for services rendered will be due within three (3) business days following completion of final audit.
E. Contractor must provide a report and photo documentation for any service call, with no work performed. Contractor must state a reasonable basis for no work performed, such as:
1. There is an accessibility issue;
2. Building envelope is not suitable for audit/testing;
3. Verifiable health or safety issues; or
4. Other situations reviewed and agreed upon by both Contractor and the City in writing.
F. Contractor will verify scheduled audits with the Rehabilitation Supervisor or Specialist.
3.3. Energy Audit Report Requirements
A. Contractor must electronically submit a written Audit Report for each site inspected.
B. Audit Reports must include the following:
1. Cover sheet that includes:
a. Photograph of the property,
b. Neighborhood Services Project Identifier, and
c. Resident's last name only.
2. Photo documentation of pre-existing conditions and post-construction repairs.
C. All Audit Report must follow City of Phoenix Confidentiality as outlined in section 6.27, Confidentiality.
D. All Audit Reports will be uploaded through a secure portal provided by the City to protect resident's personal identifiable information (PII) as outlined in Section 6.28, Data
Protection.
4. Minimum Qualifications
In accordance with the Administrative Regulation 3.10, Competitive Sealed Proposal awards shall be made to the responsive and responsible Offeror(s) whose Offer is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the City based upon the evaluation criteria listed below.
The evaluation factors are listed in the relative order of importance and more details are provided in Scope of Work. The Weight (Points) for each Evaluation Criteria are the maximum points that may be assigned for that Criteria. The following evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate all Offers:
No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)
1. Statement of Qualification
Offeror must provide a Statement of Qualification (SOQ) of the company profile. The SOQ must include a narrative response to each item that demonstrates
Offeror's understanding of the
Scope of Work requirements and describes Offeror's experience, qualifications, methodology and approach to providing the services stated in this solicitation.
Responses should be specific to this solicitation.
SOQ must include the following information:
• Describe Offeror's years of experience, outlining a minimum of one (1) year of relevant experience providing the following:
Manual J, Manual D, Manual S, Appliance audits, and CO2 audits.
• A brief narrative of the
Offeror's company profile and quality assurance practices.
• Outline the Offeror's staffing structure. Describe how
Offeror will ensure the scope of services are provided effectively and efficiently.
Pass / Fail 1
(25% of Total)
2. Staff Capacity and Qualifications
Offeror must provide a narrative outlining and including the following:
• Outline staff processes and how home energy audits are conducted to properly evaluate homes.
• Include resumes for key staff who will be performing services under the contract.
• Include documentation for key staff accreditations and certifications applicable to the services listed in the
Scope of Work.
• Outline Offeror's caseload capacity/availability for conducting the services listed in the Scope of Work.
Pass / Fail 1
(25% of Total)
3. Contractor Licensing
Offeror shall comply with all statutes and rules of the State of
Arizona and the Registrar of
Contractors. In accordance with
A.R.S. § 32-1151, and unless otherwise exempted by A.R.S. §
32-1121, Offeror shall have the correct class of license as required by the Registrar of Contractors for the work specified in the Scope of
Work, at the time of offer submission.
Pass / Fail 1
(25% of Total)
4. Pricing Proposal
Offeror has uploaded Pricing
Proposal to Vendor Questionnaire.
Pass / Fail 1
(25% of Total)
5. Standard Terms and Conditions
5.1. Definition of Key Words Used in the Solicitation
Shall, Will, Must: Indicates a mandatory requirement. Failure to meet these mandatory requirements may result in the rejection of Offer as non-responsive.
Should: Indicates something that is recommended but not mandatory. If the Offeror fails to provide recommended information, the City may, at its sole option, ask the Offeror to provide the information or evaluate the Offer without the information.
May: Indicates something that is not mandatory but permissible.
For purposes of this solicitation, the following definitions will apply:
“A.R.S.” Arizona Revised Statute
“Buyer” or “Procurement Officer” City of Phoenix staff person responsible for the solicitation.
The City employee or employees who have specifically been designated to act as a contact person or persons to the Contractor, and responsible for monitoring and overseeing the
Contractor's performance under this contract.
"City" The City of Phoenix
"Contractor" The individual, partnership, or corporation who, as a result of the competitive process, is awarded a contract by the City of Phoenix.
"Contract” or “Agreement" The legal agreement executed between the City of Phoenix, AZ and the Contractor.
“Days” Means calendar days unless otherwise specified.
“Chief Procurement Officer” The contracting authority for the City of Phoenix, AZ, authorized to sign contracts and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Phoenix, AZ.
“Employer” Any individual or type of organization that transacts business in this state, that has a license issued by an agency in this state and employs one or more employees in this state.
Employer includes this state, any political subdivision of this state and self-employed persons. In the case of an independent contractor, employer means the independent contractor and does not mean the person or organization that uses contract labor. (A.R.S. 23-211).
“Offer” Means a response from a Supplier, Contractor, or Service Provider to a solicitation request that, if awarded, binds the Supplier, Contractor, or Service Provider to perform in accordance with the contract. Same as bid, proposal, quotation or tender.
“Offeror” Any Vendor, Seller or Supplier submitting a competitive offer in response to a solicitation from the City. Same as Bidder or Proposer.
“Solicitation” Means an Invitation for Bid (IFB), Request for Proposal (RFP), Request for
Quotations (RFQ), Request for Qualifications (RFQu) and request for sealed Offers, or any other type of formal procurement which the City makes public through advertising, mailings, or some other method of communication. It is the process by which the City seeks information, proposals, Offers, or quotes from suppliers.
“Suppliers” Firms, entities or individuals furnishing goods or services to the City.
“Vendor or Seller” A seller of goods or services.
5.2. City’s Vendor Self-Registration and Notification
Vendors must be registered in the City’s Procurement Portal at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix to respond to solicitations and access procurement information.
Vendors are required to register in the City’s procurePHX Self-Registration System
(https://eprocurement.phoenix.gov/irj/portal) prior to contract execution. Registration is not required at the time of offer submission. However, the City will not execute a contract with any awarded vendor until registration is complete.
5.3. Business in Arizona
The City will not enter contracts with Offerors (or any company(ies)) not granted authority to transact business, or not in good standing, in the state of Arizona by the Arizona Corporation
Commission, unless the Offeror asserts a statutory exception prior to entering a contract with the City.
5.4. Contract Interpretation
A. Applicable Law: This Contract will be governed by the law of the State of Arizona, and suits pertaining to this Contract will be brought only in Federal or State courts in
Maricopa County, State of Arizona.
B. Contract Order of Precedence: In the event of a conflict in the provisions of the
Contract, as accepted by the City and as they may be amended, the following will prevail in the order set forth below:
1. Federal terms and conditions, if any
2. Special terms and conditions
3. Standard terms and conditions
4. Amendments
5. Statement or scope of work
6. Specifications
7. Attachments
8. Exhibits
9. Instructions to Contractors
10. Other documents referenced or included in the Solicitation
C. Organization – Employment Disclaimer: The Agreement resulting hereunder is not intended to constitute, create, give rise to or otherwise recognize a joint venture https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix https://eprocurement.phoenix.gov/irj/portal agreement or relationship, partnership or formal business organization of any kind, and the rights and obligations of the parties will be only those expressly set forth in the agreement. The parties agree that no persons supplied by the Contractor in the performance of Contractor’s obligations under the agreement are considered to be City’s employees and that no rights of City civil service, retirement or personnel rules accrue to such persons. The Contractor will have total responsibility for all salaries, wage bonuses, retirement, withholdings, workmen’s compensation, occupational disease compensation, unemployment compensation, other employee benefits and all taxes and premiums appurtenant thereto concerning such persons, and will save and hold the City harmless with respect thereto.
D. Severability: The provisions of this Contract are severable to the extent that any provision or application held to be invalid will not affect any other provision or application of the contract which may remain in effect without the invalid provision or application.
E. Non-Waiver of Liability: The City of Phoenix as a public entity supported by tax monies, in execution of its public trust, cannot agree to waive any lawful or legitimate right to recover monies lawfully due it. Therefore, any Contractor agrees that it will not insist upon or demand any statement whereby the City agrees to limit in advance or waive any right the City might have to recover actual lawful damages in any court of law under applicable Arizona law.
F. Parol Evidence: This Agreement is intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement and is intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of this agreement. No course of prior dealings between the parties and no usage in the trade will be relevant to supplement or explain any term used in this Contract.
Acceptance or acquiescence in a course of performance rendered under this contract will not be relevant to determine the meaning of this Contract even though the accepting or acquiescing party has knowledge of the nature of the performance and opportunity to object.
5.5. Contract Administration and Operation
A. Records: All books, accounts, reports, files and other records relating to the contract will be subject at all reasonable times to inspection and audit by the City for five years after completion of the contract. Such records will be produced at a City of Phoenix office as designated by the City. Confidentiality will be maintained, and City will not violate any proprietary or other confidentiality agreements Contractor has in place.
B. Discrimination Prohibited: Contractor agrees to abide by the provisions of the Phoenix
City Code Chapter 18, Article V as amended. Any Contractor, in performing under this contract, will not discriminate against any worker, employee or applicant, or any member of the public, because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability nor otherwise commit an unfair employment practice. The supplier and/or lessee will take action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are dealt with during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, age or disability and adhere to a policy to pay equal compensation to men and women who perform jobs that require substantially equal skill, effort and responsibility, and that are performed within the same establishment under similar working conditions. Such action will include but not be limited to the following: Employment, promotion, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training; including apprenticeship. The supplier further agrees that this clause will be incorporated in all subcontracts with all labor organizations furnishing skilled, unskilled and union labor, or who may perform any such labor or services in connection with this contract. Contractor further agrees that this clause will be incorporated in all subcontracts, job-contractor agreements or subleases of this agreement entered into by supplier/lessee.
C. Equal Employment Opportunity and Pay: In order to do business with the City, Contractor must comply with Phoenix City Code, 1969, Chapter 18, Article V, as amended, Equal Employment Opportunity Requirements. Contractor will direct any questions in regard to these requirements to the Equal Opportunity Department, (602)
262-6790.
1. For a Contractor with 35 employees or fewer: Contractor in performing under this
Agreement shall not discriminate against any worker, employee or applicant, or any member of the public, because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability, nor otherwise commit an unfair employment practice. The Contractor will ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are dealt with during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability. Such action shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, promotion, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training;
including apprenticeship. The Contractor further agrees that this clause will be incorporated in all subcontracts related to this Agreement that involve furnishing skilled, unskilled and union labor, or who may perform any such labor or services in connection with this Agreement. Contractor further agrees that this clause will be incorporated in all subcontracts, Contractor agreements or subleases of this agreement entered into by supplier/lessee.
2. For a Contractor with more than 35 employees: Contractor in performing under this Agreement shall not discriminate against any worker, employee or applicant, or any member of the…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .