ratings sheet.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CODING AND BILLING AUDIT SERVICES - OCAO IHS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 246-22-Q-0033
About this file
This document provides details for a federal solicitation requesting coding and billing audit services. The Indian Health Service is seeking these services for the Oklahoma City Area and intends to make a single award. Interested vendors must submit fixed pricing for the services as well as for optional years two through five to meet the agency's needs for at least five years. Responses are due by December 22, 2021. Vendors will also submit past performance references and qualifications of staff. The solicitation requests these services on a 100% small business set-aside and provides evaluation criteria for vendor past performance and staff qualifications.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 246-22-Q-0033 Questions 12142021.docx | DOCX document | |
| 246-22-Q-0033 Questions 12152021.docx | DOCX document | |
| 246-22-Q-0033 Questions 12102021.docx | DOCX document | |
| SOW - OCAO Coding and Billing Audit Services.docx | DOCX document | |
| Pt 12 solicitation clauses OCAO Coding and Billing Audit Services.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT A – RATINGS SHEET
Ratings Methods Ratings Descriptors
Excellent Proposal demonstrates superior understanding of requirements and approach that exceeds performance or capability standards and contains at least one exceptional enhancing feature that benefits the Government. Any weakness is minor. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
Good Proposal demonstrates an exhaustive understanding of the requirements and a thorough approach that meets performance or capability standards. There may be strengths and weaknesses, though they offset one another. Has one or more enhancing features that will benefit the Government. Weakness do not significantly detract from the Quoter’s response. Any weaknesses appear to be correctable and will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk is low.
Satisfactory Proposal demonstrates acceptable understanding of requirements and approach that meets performance or capability standards. Acceptable solutions are identified. No major enhancing features will benefit the Government are identified. There is some risk.
Unsatisfactory Proposal fails to meet performance or capability standards and requirements of the Solicitation. Proposal is not awardable. Requirements can only be met with major changes to the proposal. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Past Performance Ratings
| Rating Method |
| Rating Descriptors |
| Excellent |
| The contractor has performed successfully and greatly exceeded expectations under the contract. |
| Good |
| The contractor has performed successfully under the contract. |
| Neutral |
| No record of performance or performance is inconclusive. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The contractor has performed unsuccessfully under the contract. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .