Qualifications.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 240180
- Issued by
- Pima County, Tucson City, Arizona
About this file
The document is a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for an On-Call Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Services contract with the City of Arizona, seeking professional engineering consultants to perform comprehensive utility mapping, coordination, and management services. The project aims to provide in-house design efforts with critical underground utility location data management, with the ultimate goals of reducing construction costs, improving construction schedules, minimizing utility service disruptions, and reducing contractor claims related to underground utility work.
The SOQ evaluation will be based on three primary criteria: Qualifications & Experience of Team (45 points), Qualifications & Experience of Firm (35 points), and Available Resources & Other Considerations (20 points). Submissions must include detailed information about key team members, their professional credentials, project experience, firm capabilities, local resource availability, and organizational structure. Past performance will be assessed through references from city departments, project managers, and outside agencies, with scores assigned based on the information obtained from these sources.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| On-Call_Subsurface_Utility_Engineering_(SUE)_Services.pdf | ||
| DBE_Program_Provisions.pdf | ||
| OFFER_AND_ACCEPTANCE_RFQ.pdf | ||
| Scope_of_work.docx | DOCX document | |
| SBE_Program_Provisions_.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ONE-STEP - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (SOQ)
A. COVER LETTER
Expressing interest in the project and identifying a single individual as point of contact for any future correspondence. (Suggested 2 Pages maximum)
B. EVALUATION CRITERIA
Firms will be screened based on evaluation of the following criteria, which are listed in relative order of importance:
• Qualifications & Experience of Team (45 points)
• Qualifications & Experience of Firm (35 points)
• Available Resources & Other Considerations (20 points) Firms will be screened based on evaluation of the Uniform Questionnaire using the following criteria, which are listed in relative order of importance.
1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF TEAM (45 points) Provide experience and qualifications of key team members including any licenses, registrations or certifications applicable to the proposed work. Identify team experience on similar projects and the extent of team involvement including time commitment. Please include the following:
• Register Professional Civil Engineer/ Land Surveyor
• SUE Field Supervisor/Technologist
• Principals Involvement
• Technical Support
• Key Sub-consultants
KEY TEAM MEMBER EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR PROJECTS
• Provide the experience of the proposed key team members on similar projects.
• Identify type, size, and location of similar work for key team members
• Show how the experience relates to the categories outlined.
2. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF FIRM (35 points) Submit qualifications of the firm and explain why your firm is especially well qualified to perform the required services. Please identify the internal policies and procedures that will be used to assure a quality product and completion of the required services on schedule and within budget.
FIRM EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR PROJECTS
• Provide the experience of the proposed firm on similar projects.
• Identify type and location of similar work to illustrate the work quality.
• List specific references that may be contacted.
• Show how the experience relates to the categories outlined.
3. AVAILABLE RESOURCES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (20 points) Describe the analytical tools, resources or methodologies commonly used by your firm that may be applicable to the project categories. Indicate the availability of the local resources. Submit a typical Organizational Chart of personnel to be assigned to a project together with the specific aspects of the project to which the designated individual will be involved. The chart should show the estimated time commitments of project manager and core project staff as a percentage of the unit total time for a typical project. The chart should clearly show if team members are from local or other offices or from associated firms. Describe internal measures that will be used to ensure timely completion.
OTHER CONSIDERATION
• Special or Unique Knowledge, Investigation & Data Management Approach Pertinent to Work (List), Local Office
PAST PERFORMANCE
• Scores shall be assigned based upon information obtained from City Departments, Project Managers, outside agencies, and references provided by the consultant.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .