QASP.pdf

PDF 118 KB Posted

Attached to
Region One Realty Specialist Services
Solicitation number
12034320Q0141
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan and Quality Assurance Surveillance Summary for a federal contract. The Plan describes methods for monitoring contractor performance, including government inspections and potential payment deductions for substandard performance. Key performance objectives include incorporating new land and rights-of-way case information into the Land Status Record System, completing basic information sheets, entering and validating data, and responding to information requests. The associated federal contract opportunity is a combined synopsis/solicitation seeking realty specialist services for the Northern Region of the Forest Service. Services include updating and maintaining Regional Land Status Record Systems and supporting the Automated Lands Program and electronic Land Status Record System. The base period of performance is June 1, 2020 through May 31, 2021 with four optional one-year extensions. The solicitation is set aside 100% for small businesses with a NAICS code of 531390 and $8 million size standard.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SCHEDULE OF ITEMS v2 20200519.pdf PDF
amendment 002 SF30-16c 1.pdf PDF
RO Realt Specialist Services PWS 2.pdf PDF
amendment 001 SF30-16c.pdf 1.pdf PDF
RO Realty Specialist Services PWS.pdf PDF
SCHEDULE OF ITEMS.pdf PDF
Experience Questionaire.docx DOCX document
SCA Wage Determination.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

Land Status

1. Purpose: This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) describes methods that will be used to monitor the Contractor’s performance. The QASP is not part of the Contract. It is provided to the Contractor solely for informational purposes and is subject to change by the

Government during the life of the contract. The Government reserves the right to perform assessments more or less often than outlined in this QASP.

2. Introduction: The QASP establishes methods to assess or evaluate performance of the

Contractor under the contract. It is designed to provide an effective method of monitoring

Contractor Performance for each objective on the Performance Requirements Summary

(PRS) in the contract. The Government is concerned with the quality of the services provided, and not with the method that the Contractor uses to provide the services.

3. Responsibility for Quality Control: The Contractor is responsible for quality control and management actions to meet the performance requirements and terms of the Contract. The

Government performs quality assurance to assess the quality of services rendered, and to verify the services meet the contract requirements, and contract standards are achieved.

Quality Control for Commercial Items is in accordance with accepted industry practices.

4. Surveillance Methods: The Government will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this contract. Examples of Government surveillance may include:

a. Government Inspections.

5. Deduction Methods: The Government will record performance noting any substandard performance. For substandard performance, the Government’s preferred course of action will be discussions with the Contractor to make the Contractor aware of the problem, and to effectively prevent any recurrence of substandard performance. The Government may also take the following actions:

a. Presentation of a Contract Discrepancy Report requiring a written explanation for substandard performance.

b. Payment deductions in accordance with the PRS;

c. Payment deductions in accordance with the applicable FAR clause(s).

d. Require correction or re-performance of the service.

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE SUMMARY

Performance Objective Maximum

Allowable

Defect Rate

Surveillance Method AQL/Deductions

Incorporates all new land adjustment and road rights-of-way case information into the

LSRS

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Completion of Basic

Information Sheets for both Land Status and

Road Rights-of-Way cases.

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Completes Use

Restriction Sheets.

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Enters data into the electronic LSRS or other automated program.

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Enters both tabular and spatial information into current or future automated portions of the LSRS.

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Incorporates new survey information including updated Amended

Protraction Diagrams

(APDs) into the LSRS

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Provides data for road rights-of-way to the

LSRS Spatial Collection team.

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Reviews and validates data previously entered into the automated portion of the LSRS.

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Upon request, assists the

National ALP team in the areas of data entry, validation and program delivery.

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Responds to routine request for information concerning data within the electronic LSRS.

2 defects per month

Government Inspections by COR appointed

Inspector

2% deduction from established rate.

Deduction Threshold. If the number of defects, or instances of unacceptable performance, observed during a month-long period is equal to or less than the maximum allowable defect rate

(MADR), then there will be no deduction in payments to the Contractor for that task. However, if the number of defects observed during a month-long period is greater than the MADR, then there will be a deduction in payments to the Contractor for that task.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .