QA 35138 220321 .docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Intermediate RFP - Development of a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Advisory Committee
- Solicitation number
- S-73000-00002277
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Question and Answer (Q&A) from a state and local Request for Proposals (RFP) solicitation. The RFP is seeking proposals for unspecified services, with respondents required to submit technical and price proposals. Proposal Section A is limited to 13 pages and includes the Proposer Information and Certification Sheet (Attachment C) and the Technical Proposal. Proposal Section B, which is not evaluated, includes Reference Check forms (Attachment D), the Price Proposal (Attachment E), and optional Disclosure Exemption Certification (Attachment B). Respondents are allowed to submit prior projects from proposed staff as part of the three project samples required under Evaluation Item 3 - Project Samples.
The document does not provide details on the specific products or services being procured, the response due date, award date, contract term, or pricing and funding information. There are also no details on any set-asides, incumbent contractors, or the current environment.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Intent to Award RFP S_DASOBO-00002278.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP 35138_AttB Disclosure Exemption Certification.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP 35138_AttA Sample Contract.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP 35138_Addendum 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP 35138~1.pdf | ||
| RFP 35138_AttE Price Proposal Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP 35138_AttC Proposer Information and Certification Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP 35138_AttD References Form.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Question #1
| Q #1 |
| 3.2.2.1 Proposal Section A |
| Is the Proposer Information and Certification Sheet (Attachment C) included in the 13 page count for Proposal Section A? |
Answer #1 yes- Section 3.3.3.1 states:
Proposal Section A Section A documents listed below are provided to the evaluation committee. Section A is limited to a total of 13 pages. Any pages exceeding this limit will not be provided to the evaluation committee or considered in the evaluation.
· Proposer Information and Certification Sheet (Attachment C); refer to RFP section 3.4.1
· Technical Proposal; refer to RFP section 3.4.4
| Q #2 |
| 3.2.2.1 Proposal Section A |
| Should the materials in Proposal Section A and Proposal Section B, with the exception of the price proposal being submitted separately, be submitted as one document? |
Answer #2 Separately
3.2.2.1 Proposal Section A
Section A documents listed below are provided to the evaluation committee. Section A is limited to a total of 13 pages. Any pages exceeding this limit will not be provided to the evaluation committee or considered in the evaluation.
· Proposer Information and Certification Sheet (Attachment C); refer to RFP section 3.4.1
· Technical Proposal; refer to RFP section 3.4.4 3.2.2.2Proposal Section B Section B documents listed below are not provided to the evaluation committee. However, they are required to be submitted for this RFP, except as noted below. There is no page limit for Section B.
· Reference Check forms (Attachment D); refer to RFP section 3.4.2
· Price Proposal (Attachment E); refer to RFP section 3.4.3. Proposer shall submit Attachment E as a separate file uploaded via the Attachments tab for this RFP in OregonBuys.
· Disclosure Exemption Certification (Attachment B) and fully redacted version of Proposal, not required unless applicable; refer to RFP section 3.4.5
| Q #3 |
| 3.5.2.3 Evaluation Item 3 - Project Samples |
| Are firms allowed to submit prior projects from proposed staff as part of the three project samples? |
Answer #3 Yes “3.5.2.3” Evaluation Item 3 – Project Samples Provide a list of up to 3 sample projects within the last 3 years, which demonstrate Proposer’s ability to effectively manage projects comparable in size and scope to the Services described in this RFP and attachments.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .