Q_A - FSG-RFP-2425-1008.pdf
PDF 142 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Bell 412EP Rotary Wing Aircraft
- Solicitation number
- RFP-10942
- Issued by
- Leon County, Florida
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document from the Division of the State Guard in Tallahassee, Florida regarding solicitation FSG-RFP-24/25-1008 for the procurement of two Bell 412EP Rotary Wing Aircraft. The document addresses 10 clarifying questions submitted by potential respondents, covering technical specifications and submission requirements. Key clarifications include allowing electronic signatures, modifying aircraft usage limits to allow up to 10,000 hours of total time while eliminating landing cycle restrictions, and confirming that interior auxiliary fuel tanks are acceptable but not required.
The Q&A provides important technical clarifications about optional equipment, noting that installed hoists are preferred but not required on both helicopters, and that there is no preference for keying systems between the two aircraft. The document also confirms that optional equipment pricing can be listed on separate price sheets for each helicopter using a similar format to what was provided. Two section reference corrections were made, changing references from Section 6.0.3 and 6.0.4 to Sections 5.0.3 and 5.0.4 respectively.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1008_Bell 412EP Rotary Wing Aircraft.pdf | ||
| Addendum No. 3 - 1008.pdf | ||
| Attachment D Price Sheet - Bell 412EP.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Addendum No. 2 - 1008.pdf | ||
| Q_A - FSG-RFP-2425-1008.pdf | ||
| Addendum No. 1 - 1008.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FSG-RFP-24/25-1008
BELL 412EP ROTARY WING AIRCRAFT - Q&A
Division of the State Guard
2601 South Blair Stone Rd Tallahassee, FL 32301
BELL 412EP ROTARY WING AIRCRAFT
SOLICITATION NO.: FSG-RFP-24/25-1008
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Date: November 22, 2024
Note: All written questions are reproduced in the same format as submitted by the Respondent.
NO. RFP
Section
RFP
Page #
Question Answer
1 5.2 16 of
Are Electronic Signatures Acceptable? Yes.
2 ATT A
1A1)
1 of 9 This section allows 10,000 hours total time which conf licts with ATT A 1C (1&2) allowing
6000 hours total time and maximum of 4,000 landings/cycles.
Considering helicopters in general and the
412EP mission prof ile specif ically, total landings will typically exceed total hours f lown.
Based on 10,000 hour maximum limit we would suggest that maximum landings should be no less than 15,000-20,000.
Eleminate the landing cycles for helicopters.
Allow up to 10,000 hours of total time.
3 ATT A
1B10
2 of 9 External fuel tanks not available. However, interior mounted L/H and R/H 82 gallon Aux Fuel Tanks are available and included with (2) helicopter purchase.
Interior tanks are acceptable, but not required.
4 ATT A
D2) j.
3 of 9 Hoist Provisions are installed on both helicopters. Currently only one has a Hoist. Do both helicopters require a hoist?
Installed hoists are preferred, but not required.
5 ATT A
E2
3 of 9 Is each helicopter to be keyed dif ferently or do you prefer all locks being the same on both helicopters?
There is not a preference. Either way is acceptable.
6 ATT A
1F7
3 of 9 Please explain the term Propeller Sling? This option is not applicable.
7 ATT A
1F8
3 of 9 Please explain the term Tail Stand? This requirement is no longer applicable.
8 ATT D
Pricing
TBD Based on format provided, is it acceptable to list “Optional Equipment Pricing” on a separate PRICE SHEET for each helicopter using similar format?
Yes.
9 ATT H
No. 4
2 of 1 Item refers to Section 6.0.3. Should this refer to Section 5.0.3?
Yes.
10 ATT H
No. 5
1 of 1 Item refers to Section 6.0.4. Should this refer to Section 5.0.4?
Yes.
Q_A - FSG-RFP-2425-1008 Response MS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .