Phase I_P. Past Performance Reference Check.doc

DOC document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
General Services Administration (GSA) seeks to Lease the Following Space: Solicitation No. 8KY2130
Solicitation number
8KY2130
Issued by

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK

General Services Administration

Project 8KY2130 Louisville, KY I.

YOU ARE BEING CONTACTED FOR A REFERENCE REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF

II.

Project Name:

Project Address:

City and State:

Type of Project:

Square Footage:

III.

Name of Company/ Government Agency Employing Reference:

Name and Title of Individual Providing Reference Responses:

Phone Number: 000.000.0000 email address: Current Address:

Was this design/build?

Does the information in II above accurately describe your project, and if not, please explain.

1. What was your role in the project?

2. What was the duration of the project?

Please describe the types of services the firm/person provided:

3. As applicable to the role he or she had on the team, please provide responses to the following questions using a scale of 0 to 10 with zero being the lowest rating and 10 being the highest rating.

9-10 Significantly Exceeded Expectations

7-8 Met and to Some Extent Exceeded Expectations

5-6 Met Expectations

3-4 Did Not Fully Meet Expectations

0-2 Failed to Meet Expectations

III.

QUALITY OF BUILDING AND SERVICES

BUILDING

1.

a. For the building, how satisfied were you with workmanship, quality of materials used and overall appearance? Circle one.

b. What could have improved your score?

2.

a. For the interior spaces, how satisfied were you with the efficiency of the space and flexibility for future space changes?

SERVICES

3.

For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her time commitment to the project?

4.

For the person named above, how satisfied were you with the quality of his or her project management methods (or design if the person named above was an architectural designer) and his or her response to unanticipated problems?

IV.

COST CONTROL

5.

For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her commitment to your budget?

6. How satisfied were you with the handling and pricing of change orders?

V.

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

7.

a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to stay on schedule?

8.

a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to respond to any of your questions and comments in a timely manner?

VI.

BUSINESS RELATIONS

9.

a. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her working relationship between the project team members?

10.

a. How satisfied were you with his or her problem resolution skills?

11. (Complete this if you are providing a reference for the Offeror only and if the referenced project was a Government contract requiring a subcontracting plan.) Did the firm meet subcontractor and Small Disadvantaged Business goals and file the required 294’s and 295’s?

YES

NO

12. Were any claims or mechanics liens filed in connection with this project?

If yes, please explain:

13.

a. Would you contract with them again?

b. What is your overall score for the person named above?

c. What could have improved your score?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .