Performance Assessment Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 159 KB Posted

Attached to
Synopsis and Solicitation ProModel Software Technical Consulting Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911SD-23-R-0189
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis

About this file

This document contains a performance assessment questionnaire for federal contractors and a related federal contract opportunity for ProModel software technical consulting services. The performance assessment questionnaire requests feedback on a contractor's past performance in areas such as compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness, cost controls, customer satisfaction and overall performance. Responses are due to Ms. Tara D'Amico at the Army Materiel Command by August 16, 2023. The federal contract opportunity is issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis for ProModel software technical consulting services.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Synopsis and Solicitation ProModel Software Technical Consulting Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
W911SD-23-R-0189 - Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Wage Determinations.pdf PDF
Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
52.212-2 Addendum-ProModel Consulting Services.pdf PDF
Performance Requirements Summary.pdf PDF
W911SD-23-R-0189.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Specialist, Ms. Tara D’Amico, at Tara.M.Damico.civ@army.mil listed below within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Ms. Tara D’Amico at:

Tara.M.Damico.civ@army.mil no later than 16 August 2023.

Thank you for your assistance.

mailto:Tara.M.Damico.civ@army.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .