PastPerformanceQuestionnaire36C25522R0033Project657-19-127JB.docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25522R0033
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for renovation services. The past performance questionnaire requests evaluation of a contractor's previous work on Contract Number 36C25522R0033, Project 657-19-127JB to renovate space for domiciliary providers at the Jefferson Barracks Division VA Medical Center in St. Louis, Missouri. Details are requested on work performed, contract period, and ratings for quality, timeliness, communication and other performance metrics. The related federal contract opportunity posting provides additional context, with requirements to renovate areas on the second and first floors of Building 2. The project cost range is $2,000,000 to $5,000,000, work must be phased to accommodate occupancy, and award will be made using best value tradeoff. The solicitation will be posted on December 20, 2021 to veterans.va.gov for renovation services by Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses under NAICS 236220.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 657-19-127JB_spec section 27 51 16.pdf | ||
| 36C25522R0033 0007.docx | DOCX document | |
| 657-19-127JB_Electrical plan changes.pdf | ||
| 657-19-127JB-2022.03.17_ADD-2.pdf | ||
| 36C25522R0033 0006.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1801901 Asbestos Mold Survey - Jefferson Building 2 (final).pdf | ||
| JB-2-Report.pdf | ||
| 36C25522R0033 0005.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25522R0033 0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25522R0033 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| UpdatedSpecs_Vol1_revised 20211215.pdf | ||
| UpdatedSpecs_Vol2.pdf | ||
| 36C25522R0033.docx | DOCX document | |
| Bid Docs_Arch.pdf | ||
| Bid Docs_MEP DRAWINGS.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation 36C25522R0033
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE 36C25522R0033, PROJECT #657-19-127JB, FCA-RENOVATE SPACE FOR
DOMICILIARY PROVIDERS, BUILDING 2
1. Contractor Information
Firm Name: Address:
Phone Number:
Point of Contact:
Contact Phone Number:
DUNs Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:
Rating: Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation. DO NOT RATE ON A “+” OR “- “SCALE. If a “+” or “- “is used, the rating without the "+" or "-" will be applied. In addition to the ratings, please provide a short narrative in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
| “O” |
| Outstanding |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual |
performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were highly effective.
| “A” |
| Above Average |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which |
corrective actions taken by the offeror were effective.
| “S” |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which |
corrective actions taken by the offeror were satisfactory.
| “M” |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. Performance indicated that there are some potential risks associated with the quality products, timeliness of service, and contract |
performance.
| “U” |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the offeror has yet |
to identify corrective actions or the offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
NOTE: Any rating of Outstanding or Unacceptable must include sufficient details to support the rating.
Please rate and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:
| 1. The quality of the working relationship with the client (the tenant and/ or owner). |
| O |
| A |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| 2. The professionalism and integrity with which offeror conducted business. |
| O |
| A |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| 3. The responsiveness to the client’s needs and expectations. |
| O |
| A |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| 4. The Offeror’s ability to successfully management and perform the project. |
| O |
| A |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| 5. The offeror’s level of communication. |
| O |
| A |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| 6. The quality control of the project. |
| O |
| A |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| 7. Any Value added to the project as the result of cost savings, favorable financing, positive asset management, etc. | |
| Yes | No |
| 8. Would you award another contact to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain. |
| Yes |
No
| 9. The delivery of the project within the budget and on schedule. |
| O |
| A |
| S |
| M |
| U |
10. Other relevant aspects in the management of a project development for the client.
| 11. Overall rating for this firm: |
| O |
| A |
| S |
| M |
| U |
Signature of Evaluator
Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .